Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
25
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
25 results for “user engagement”
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects - Raw Data
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding raw data for the analyses described in D3.3 (can be found here), which are the result of our research that culminated into the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. Usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p>The raw data is in the <code>.json</code> format and can be read by most languages/tools. It is recommended to import the data into a MongoDB to work with it.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis for possible further examinations, involving additional (not yet analysed) features such as the content of the comments etc. and also new ways of extracting networks.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains three files:</p> <ul> <li><code>Comments.json</code> <ul> <li>contains the basic data representation with multiple fields (e.g., <code>time_created</code>, <code>user_login</code>). Each data field represents a comment.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Discussions.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all discussions. Each data field is a discussion, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>comments_count</code>, <code>user_login</code>)</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Projects.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all projects. Each data field is a project, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>project_id</code>, <code>description</code>)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>The projects (and thus the corresponding discussions and comments) were collected on the basis of common forum features such as the discussion boards.</p>
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding dataset for the analyses and results achieved in the CS Track project in the research line on participation analyses, which is also reported in the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. The usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis to reproduce the results reported in the associated deliverable, and in the above-mentioned publication. As such, it <strong>does not</strong> represent <strong>raw data</strong>, but rather files that already include certain analysis steps (like calculated degrees or other SNA-related measures), ready for analysis, visualisation and interpretation with R.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>In this Zenodo entry, several files can be found. The structure is as follows (<code>files</code> and <strong>folders </strong>and<strong> </strong><em>descriptions</em>).</p> <ul> <li><code>corresponding_calculations.html</code> <ul> <li><em>Quarto-notebook to view in browser</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code> <ul> <li><em>Quarto-notebook to view in RStudio</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>assets</strong> <ul> <li><strong>data</strong> <ul> <li><strong>annotations</strong> <ul> <li><code>annotations.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>List of annotations made per day for each of the analysed projects</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>comments</strong> <ul> <li><code>comments.csv </code> <ul> <li><em>Total list of comments with several data fields (i.e., comment id, text, reply_user_id)</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>rolechanges</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_rolechanges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>List of roles per user to determine number of role changes </em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_rolechanges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>totalnetworkdata</strong> <ul> <li><strong>Edges</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_edges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>Network data (edge set) for the given projects (without time slices)</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_edges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Nodes</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_nodes.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>Network data (node set) for the given projects (without time slices)</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_nodes.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>trajectories</strong> <ul> <li><em>Network data (edge and node sets) for the given projects and all time slices (Q1 2016 - Q4 2021)</em></li> <li><strong>478</strong> <ul> <li><strong>Edges</strong> <ul> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q1.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Nodes</strong> <ul> <li><code>nodes_4782016_q1.csv</code></li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><strong>1104</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Edges</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><strong>Nodes</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>...</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>scripts</strong> <ul> <li><code>datavizfuncs.R</code> <ul> <li><em>script for the data visualisation functions, automatically executed from within </em><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>import.R</code> <ul> <li><em>script for the import of data, automatically executed from within </em><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>corresponding_calculations_files</strong> <ul> <li>f<em>iles for the html/qmd view in the browser/RStudio</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>The data is grouped according to given criteria (e.g., <code>project_title </code>or <code>time</code>). Accordingly, the respective files can be found in the data structure</p>
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects
<p>Corresponding dataset for the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. Usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p>The structure of the dataset is as follows:</p> <p><strong>Annotations</strong> </p> <p><em>List of annotations made per day for each of the analysed projects.</em></p> <p><code>annotations.csv </code></p> <p><strong>Comments </strong></p> <p><em>Total list of comments with several data fields (i.e., comment id, text, reply_user_id)</em></p> <p><code>comments.csv </code></p> <p><strong>Rolechanges</strong> </p> <p><em>List of roles per user to determine number of role changes </em></p> <p><code>478_rolechanges.csv</code></p> <p><code>1104_rolechanges.csv</code></p> <p><code>...</code></p> <p><strong>Totalnetworkdata</strong> </p> <p><em>Network data (edge and node sets) for the given projects (without time slices).</em></p> <p>Edges </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>478_edges.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>1104_edges.csv</code></p> </li> </ul> <p>Nodes </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>478_nodes.csv</code> </p> </li> <li> <p><code>1104_nodes.csv</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Trajectories</strong> </p> <p><em>Network data (edge and node sets) for the given projects and all time slices (Q1 2016 - Q4 2021)</em></p> <p>478 </p> <ul> <li>Edges <ul> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q1.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>...</p> </li> <li>Nodes <ul> <li><code>nodes_4782016_q1.csv</code></li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>1104 </p> <ul> <li> <p>Edges </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Nodes </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> <p> </p>
Datasets from the paper "Measuring the relationship between the use of typical Manosphere discourse and the engagement of a user with the pick-up artist community"
<p>Datasets from the paper "Measuring the relationship between the use of typical Manosphere discourse and the engagement of a user with the pick-up artist community", presented at the 24th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL).</p> <p>The dataset consists in 2 files:</p> <ul> <li>tweets.csv: This file contains the ids of the tweets and the user that published the tweet.</li> <li>df_users_seeds.csv: This file contains a table were the first field is the user id; the other columns indicate the seed number and if the user follows that seed (1) or not (0)</li> </ul>
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects - Graph Files
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding graph files of the extracted Zooniverse networks described in D3.3 (can be found here), which are the result of our research that culminated into the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. Usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p>The graph files are in <code>.gexf</code> (graph exchange XML format) and <code>.gml</code> (graph modeling language) formats which can be used by common graph/network-analysis and visualisation tools such as Gephi.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis for possible further examinations of the network structure, involving additional (not yet analysed) features such as the content of the comments etc.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains distinct graph files for each of the analysed projects. For each graph file, there are <em>nodes </em>and <em>edges</em> and their associated attributes (i.e., each edge can have an attribute). For the edges, apart from source and target, we have as attributes:</p> <ul> <li><code>weight</code></li> <li><code>project_title</code></li> <li><code>body </code>(i.e., text)</li> <li><code>created_at</code></li> <li><code>userRoles</code></li> <li><code>discussion_title</code></li> <li><code>discussion_id</code></li> <li><code>user_id</code></li> <li><code>board_title</code></li> <li><code>relation</code></li> <li><code>target_role</code></li> </ul> <p>For the nodes, the attributes are:</p> <ul> <li><code>user_id</code></li> <li><code>userRoles</code></li> <li><code>degree_reply </code>(i.e., degree for the reply relation)</li> <li><code>in_degree_reply</code></li> <li><code>out_degree_reply</code></li> <li><code>degree_comment</code></li> <li><code>in_degree_comment</code></li> <li><code>out_degree_comment</code></li> <li><code>degree_total</code></li> <li><code>in_degree_total</code></li> <li><code>out_degree_total</code></li> <li><code>target_role</code></li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>Each graph file represents all the comments for the respective project across its lifespan irrespective of any time slices. Edges represent the comments and users represent the nodes. While the different boards are still contained within the data, all boards occur in the data.</p> <p> </p>
Deaf Weight Wise: Community-engaged Implementation Research to Promote Healthy Lifestyle Change With Deaf ASL Users
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05211596. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
User engagement analysis report
<p>This study looks at classification (transcribed) data from the three citizen research projects in <em>Engaging Crowds</em>, which were set up on the <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/">Zooniverse</a> platform: <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/msalmon/hms-nhs-the-nautical-health-service"><em>HMS NHS: The Nautical Health Service</em></a>, <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/bogden/scarlets-and-blues"><em>Scarlets and Blues</em></a> and <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/emhaston/the-rbge-herbarium-exploring-gesneriaceae-the-african-violet-family"><em>The RBGE Herbarium: Exploring Gesneriaceae, the African violet family</em></a>.</p> <p>Each project presents volunteers with a series of tasks (known as ‘workflows’ in Zooniverse terminology). The projects and their workflows are summarised in Tables 1, 2 and 3 below. From these we can see that <em>HMS NHS</em> is the largest and longest-running of the three projects and so gives us our best sample of volunteer behaviour. We can also see that the workflows in <em>The RBGE Herbarium </em>were completed most quickly by volunteers, possibly aided by the project’s familiarity: it is perhaps most similar to the majority of Zooniverse projects, which deal with observational scientific data in simple workflows with short tasks. Volunteers tended to contribute to just one of the <em>Engaging Crowds </em>projects. Within the data analysed, only 13 volunteers contributed to all three projects.</p>
#Coronavirus on TikTok: User engagement with misinformation as a potential threat to public health behavior
<p><strong>Background:</strong> COVID-related misinformation is prevalent online, including on social media. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with user engagement with COVID-related misinformation on the social media platform, TikTok.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A sample of TikTok videos associated with the hashtag #coronavirus were downloaded on September 20, 2020. Misinformation was evaluated on a scale (low, medium, high) using a codebook developed by experts in infectious diseases. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with number of views and presence of user comments indicating intention to change behavior.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 166 TikTok videos were identified. Moderate misinformation was present in 36 (22%) videos, and high-level misinformation was present in 11 (7%). After controlling for characteristics and content, videos containing moderate misinformation were less likely to generate a user response indicating intended behavior change. By contrast, videos containing high-level misinformation were less likely to be viewed but demonstrated a non-significant trend towards higher engagement among viewers.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> COVID-related misinformation is less frequently viewed on TikTok but more likely to engage viewers. Public health authorities can combat misinformation on social media by posting content of their own. </p>
Efficacy of Gamification in Enhancing User Engagement
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05422339. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
#Coronavirus on TikTok: User engagement with misinformation as a potential threat to public health behavior
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Dataset for the publication: User experience, game satisfaction and engagement with the virtual simulation VR FestLab for alcohol prevention: A quantitative analysis among Danish adolescents
<p>Anonymized dataset for the publication: User experience, game satisfaction and engagement with the virtual simulation VR FestLab for alcohol prevention: A quantitative analysis among Danish adolescents</p>
Hospital Visit as Opportunity for Prevention and Engagement for HIV-Infected Drug Users
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01612169. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
ParentText User Engagement and Effectiveness Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05003518. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 46.
Machine-based Algorithm for Increased Physical Activity and Sustained User Engagement
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06388317. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Evaluating Consumer m-Health Services for User Engagement and Health Promotion: An Organizational Field Experiment
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02206893. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Blue Note Therapeutics Product BNT 103 Usability and User Engagement
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05032404. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Routine Evaluation of the Social Determinants of Health in Oncology: User-centered Resource Coordination and Engagement
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04879927. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Onboarding Positives and PrEP Users to Engage Negatives (OPPEN): Peer-driven Education to Link YMSM of Color to PrEP
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05356910. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Longitudinal Assessment of Functional Connectivity in Treatment Engaged Cocaine Users
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03554928. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Using Machine Learning to Optimize User Engagement and Clinical Response to Digital Mental Health Interventions
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05567640. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.