Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15 results for “workflow management”
LIBER 2019 Workshop. Open Access books in academic libraries – how can we adapt workflows and cost management to an open scholarly communications landscape?
<p>This dataset includes all the results from a workshop held at the LIBER Annual Conference 2019 on June 26, 2019, in Dublin, Ireland. The workshop aimed at collecting and discussing current library practices related to open access books.</p> <p>The dataset includes information from a survey made in preparation for the conference, where 67 European libraries responded to a questionnaire based on activities or workflows in libraries related to open access books. Both the survey questionnaire and the results from the survey are uploaded as separate files.</p> <p>The dataset also includes the presentation made by keynote speaker Eelco Ferwerda from the OAPEN Foundation. He presented results based on the 2017 landscape study report on open access monographs with some new results from more recent studies by Springer Nature and a follow-up report by Knowledge Exchange.</p> <p>Olaf Siegert from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics presented a brief overview of what libraries can do to promote OA books in terms of collection management, publication services and development of staff and organisation. The conclusion is that it is not necessarily big changes that are needed.</p> <p>Sofie Wennström presented results from a survey aimed at European research libraries on behalf of the LIBER Open Access Working Group. The survey reveals that many libraries are already working with processes to promote OA books. This is done by libraries organising publishing services or inhouse publishing, by including OA books in discovery services and repositories and by supporting authors to learn more about open access and open licensing.</p> <p>Finally, the LIBER Open Access Working Group shares a report from the workshop providing some quick takeaways and some good examples brought up during the breakout session with the workshop participants.</p>
Demonstration of Scientific Workflow Reproducibility with Hyperflow Workflow Management System
<p>This package contains the Experiment Digital Object that allows to reproduce the workflow execution experiment.</p> <p>The content of the package:<br> - Information about the experimental workflow (below).<br> - Experiment execution traces in the form of a dataframe (csv file) with description of the format (below).<br> - Visualization of the execution (png file).<br> - Python script for analysis of the execution trace (generates the visualization). <br> - Instructions describing how to reproduce the experiment (below).</p>
IPBES Data Management Tutorials - Session 4.2: Recommendations for workflow establishment and data management
<p>The <em>IPBES data management tutorials</em> are short videos to help experts implement the IPBES data management Policy. They cover topics ranging from data management policy, reports, active research data, tools, and examples.</p> <p>The <em>Data management of active research data </em>chapter provides an introduction for IPBES experts on how to manage data while actively being used, analyzed, and produced to fulfill the criteria of the IPBES data management policy.</p> <p>This session,<em> Recommendations for workflow establishment and data management</em>, provides recommendations for data management including the generation of workflows and data storage. </p>
Research Data Management Workflow
<p>This diagram illustrates essential ideas and useful tools during the RDM cycle.</p>
A formative usability study of workflow management systems in label-free digital pathology - Data and Code
<p>This repository holds the necessary data and code as well as a descriptive Readme file that was used for our publication "A formative usability study of workflow management systems in label-free digital pathology" by Markus Jelonek et al. (2022), submitted to F1000Research.</p> <p> </p> <p>Abstract:</p> <p>We present a formative usability study that investigates the usability of different<br> workflow management systems in the field of biomedical data analysis. Specifically, we study a task in the field of so-called label-free digital pathology and investigate one graphical user interface based workflow and one script-based workflow to solve the task. Our main intention is to gain first insights into the systematic study of usability in the context of biomedical image analysis, and formulate experiences and guidelines for future usability studies dealing with workflow management systems. Embedded in a specific setup dealing with label-free digital pathology, the core question behind our contribution is how usability studies for scientific workflow management can be conducted, and how they can be used systematically to improve such tools. Further, we address specific questions about the resource utilisation and management of usability studies, including the recruitment of participants as well as the design of specific workflows to be investigated.</p>
A formative usability study of workflow management systems in label-free digital pathology - Questionnaires
<p>This repository holds the necessary questionnaires, participant data, interview questions and data, as well as a descriptive Readme file that was used for our publication "A formative usability study of workflow management systems in label-free digital pathology" by Markus Jelonek et al. (2022), submitted to F1000Research.</p> <p> </p> <p>Abstract:</p> <p>We present a formative usability study that investigates the usability of different<br> workflow management systems in the field of biomedical data analysis. Specifically, we study a task in the field of so-called label-free digital pathology and investigate one graphical user interface based workflow and one script-based workflow to solve the task. Our main intention is to gain first insights into the systematic study of usability in the context of biomedical image analysis, and formulate experiences and guidelines for future usability studies dealing with workflow management systems. Embedded in a specific setup dealing with label-free digital pathology, the core question behind our contribution is how usability studies for scientific workflow management can be conducted, and how they can be used systematically to improve such tools. Further, we address specific questions about the resource utilisation and management of usability studies, including the recruitment of participants as well as the design of specific workflows to be investigated.</p>
Demo-Dataset for publication "FAIR workflows in Earth system modelling: a use case with semantic data management"
<p>This demodataset is intended to be used to test the workflow described in the publication by Lennartz & Schlemmer "FAIR workflows in Earth System modelling: a use case with semantic data management". It contains example model output for an arbitrary biogeochemical model tracer (here: dissolved organic carbon, DOC) from an ocean model as a 4-dimensional dataset (latitude, longitude, depth, time), the corresponding grid point locations as well as a textfile specifying parameter inputs for the model. The file structure is adapted for seamless integration into the workflow described in Lennartz & Schlemmer, which builds on the open source semantic research data management system LinkAhead. The dataset contains the following structure: The folder DataAnalysis stores data required for data analysis, such as the grid point locations in the file TMM_grid_v2018a.mat. The folder SimulationData stores model output in the folder 2022_TMM, containing the parameter input file nl_in.txt and the model output TR_monthly.mat. Related instructions can be accessed here: https://gitlab.com/salexan/fairworkflows-demodataset .</p>
Data Management Workflows with CaosDB
<p>A figure illustrating how the open source research data management system CaosDB can be integrated into data management workflows. It is shown that data is typically integrated into the system using a file crawler. Afterwards data can be accessed using e.g. the web frontend or other client interfaces.</p>
Analyzing Scientific Workflow Management Systems
<p>Contains data and scripts to reproduce the test runs that were used in the thesis "Analyzing Scientific Workflow Management Systems", and the complete result data.</p>
CCTBX.XFEL Workflow Manager Demo
<p>A demo showcasing the CCTBX.XFEL Computational Crystallography workflow tool. It is being narrated by Aaron Brewster as he demonstrates the tool running on a High-Performance Computing (HPC) system. The demo shows:</p> <ol> <li>Starting the CCTBX.XFEL tool on a pre-configured HPC system.</li> <li>Configuring CCTBX.XFEL to look for new data</li> <li>Configuring data analysis parameters</li> <li>Automatically submitting jobs to the batch queue</li> <li>Watching the data analysis in real time</li> </ol>
Novel Neuroradiological Workflow for the Assisted DIAgnosis and Management of DEMentia with Artificial Intelligence
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06877182. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 26.
Performance of a Tablet Based Workflow and Decision Support System With Incorporated Software Algorithm Used for Glycaemic Management
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01766752. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Data from: From population genomics to conservation and management: a workflow for targeted analysis of markers identified using genome-wide approaches in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material 1 from: Borisenko A, Young R, Hanner R (2024) A lab-centric, workflow-based data management system for environmental DNA research. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e120483. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e120483
eDNA Laboratory Database Schema Outline
Figure 1 from: Borisenko A, Young R, Hanner R (2024) A lab-centric, workflow-based data management system for environmental DNA research. Research Ideas and Outcomes 10: e120483. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.10.e120483
Figure 1 Schematic representation of key ontological entities of an eDNA data management system.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.