Forced Swim Test Immobility Calculator

Enter immobility, swimming, and climbing times per animal. Get % immobility, time-bin breakdown, behavior proportions, and group comparisons.

% ImmobilityBehavior ProportionsCSV Export

Try it out

Load example FST data to see the full workflow

Add Animal — Summary Times

  • Compute % immobility from manually scored immobility, swimming, and climbing times
  • Generate time-bin immobility curves across the scored session (5-second bins)
  • Calculate behavior proportions (immobility / swimming / climbing) for pharmacological profiling
  • Compare % immobility and behavior profiles across treatment groups with SEM error bars
  • Compute latency to first immobility from time-bin data
  • Export per-animal results and group summaries to CSV

Don't use for

  • Real-time video scoring — use ConductVision or dedicated software (e.g., SMART, ANY-maze) to score behavior first, then enter results here
  • Tail suspension test — use the tail suspension immobility calculator instead (different apparatus, different behavioral definitions)
  • Sucrose preference test — a separate anhedonia assay with different measures

What Is the Forced Swim Test?

The forced swim test (FST), introduced by Porsolt, Le Pichon, and Jalfre (1977), is one of the most widely used preclinical assays for antidepressant-like activity. A mouse or rat is placed in an inescapable cylinder of water (typically 25 +/- 1 degrees Celsius) for a fixed duration. After initial vigorous escape attempts (swimming and climbing), the animal progressively adopts an immobile posture — floating passively with only minor movements to maintain its head above water. This transition to immobility is interpreted as behavioral despair or passive coping, and it is sensitive to antidepressant drugs: acute or subchronic administration of tricyclics, SSRIs, SNRIs, and other antidepressants reliably reduces immobility. The test is valued for its simplicity, high throughput, and pharmacological predictive validity. However, interpretation remains debated — some researchers argue immobility reflects an adaptive energy-conservation strategy rather than despair. Regardless of interpretive framework, the FST remains a standard screening tool in antidepressant drug discovery and a common phenotyping assay for transgenic models of depression.

Scoring Immobility: Methods and Thresholds

Immobility in the FST is defined as the absence of active escape-oriented movements. The animal floats in the water, making only small adjustments necessary to keep its nose above the surface. This is distinct from swimming (active horizontal movement through the water) and climbing (vigorous upward-directed movements with forepaws breaking the water surface against the cylinder wall). Scoring can be performed manually by a trained observer watching recorded video, using either continuous timing (stopwatch for each behavior) or time-sampling (predominant behavior scored in consecutive 5-second bins). Automated scoring systems detect immobility from video using pixel-change, centroid velocity, or pose-estimation algorithms. Manual scoring requires blinding and inter-rater reliability assessment (Cohen kappa > 0.85 is considered acceptable). Whether manual or automated, the same behavioral definitions must be applied consistently. The scored interval is typically the last 4 minutes of a 6-minute session (rats) or the full 6 minutes (mice), though protocols vary by laboratory.

Climbing vs. Swimming vs. Immobility

The modified forced swim test, developed by Detke, Rickels, and Lucki (1995), introduced the three-behavior scoring system that distinguishes immobility, swimming, and climbing. This modification was motivated by the observation that different classes of antidepressants produce distinct behavioral profiles: serotonergic drugs (fluoxetine, sertraline) selectively increase swimming behavior, while noradrenergic drugs (desipramine, reboxetine) selectively increase climbing behavior. Both reduce immobility, but the active behavior that replaces immobility differs. This pharmacological dissociation provides additional information beyond total immobility: if a novel compound reduces immobility by increasing swimming, it likely has serotonergic activity; if by increasing climbing, noradrenergic activity. The three behaviors are mutually exclusive and should sum to the total scored duration. Scoring is typically done in 5-second bins with the predominant behavior recorded for each bin, yielding counts that are converted to time (count times 5 seconds) or percentages. This approach has been validated across multiple laboratories and is now standard in most FST protocols.

Frequently Asked Questions