ToolsConductScience tool
% ImmobilityFree in-browser calculator

Tail Suspension Test Immobility Calculator.

Enter immobility durations per animal. Get % immobility, latency to first immobility, time-bin analysis, and group comparisons with error bars.

PrivateData stays in your browser
LiveNo sign-up required
Validated2026-04-05
CitableMethods and citation included

Calculator

Results update in place

Try it out

Load example Tail Suspension Test data to see the full workflow

Session Settings

Add Animal Data

When to use

  • Score total immobility time and % immobility from manually entered or pre-scored TST data
  • Compute latency to first immobility for each animal
  • Perform time-bin analysis (e.g., 1-minute bins) to reveal temporal immobility patterns
  • Compare % immobility across treatment groups with SEM error bars
  • Analyze multiple groups (Vehicle, Drug, KO, etc.) in one session
  • Generate a methods text paragraph for your manuscript
  • Export per-animal and group summary results to CSV

Do not use for

  • Real-time video scoring — use ConductVision or dedicated tracking software to score immobility first, then enter results here
  • Forced swim test (FST) scoring — use the FST-specific calculator which handles swimming, climbing, and immobility categories
  • Rat tail suspension — the TST is validated primarily for mice; rats climb their tails

Use consistent immobility criteria across all animals

Whether scoring manually or with automated systems, the immobility threshold must be identical for all animals. For manual scoring, establish inter-rater reliability (kappa > 0.80) before experimental sessions. For automated systems, calibrate against manual scoring in a pilot cohort. Report the exact criteria (e.g., "complete cessation of movement for >= 1 s, excluding momentum-driven sway").

Control for tail climbing

Tail climbing is a significant confound, especially in C57BL/6 mice. Animals that climb their tails spend less time both struggling and immobile, distorting the data. Apply tape at least 1 cm from the tail tip and consider using a climbing-prevention device (small plastic tube around the tail). If climbing occurs, note the duration and decide a priori whether to exclude those animals or subtract climbing time from the denominator.

Validate automated scoring against manual observation

Force transducer and video-based automated scoring systems must be calibrated against expert manual scoring for each lab setup. Threshold values that work in one apparatus may not transfer to another. Run a calibration cohort of 8-10 animals, scoring both manually and automatically, and verify r > 0.90 before using automated scores exclusively.

Time-of-day and test order matter

Circadian effects and prior testing experience significantly affect TST immobility. Run all groups at the same time of day, counterbalance test order, and allow at least 1 hour of acclimation to the testing room. If running multiple behavioral tests in the same cohort, schedule the TST last or with adequate inter-test intervals (>48 h) to minimize carryover effects.

Report strain, age, sex, and drug timing

Baseline immobility varies dramatically across strains (BALB/c > C57BL/6 > Swiss Webster), ages, and sexes. Always report strain, age, sex, and — for drug studies — the dose, route, and timing of administration relative to the test. Acute antidepressant effects typically require dosing 30-60 minutes before testing.

1

Method

Percent immobility equals total immobility time divided by session duration, multiplied by 100. Latency to first immobility is the onset time of the first immobility episode. Time-bin analysis divides the session into equal-width bins and computes percent immobility per bin. Group statistics use sample standard deviation (n-1 denominator) for SEM calculation. All computation is client-side — no data leaves your browser.

2

Validated

Last validated 2026-04-05. Calculations are designed for planning and documentation support; verify procurement decisions against manufacturer specifications or institutional SOPs.

3

How to cite

How to Cite

ConductScience Tail Suspension Test Immobility Calculator (v1.0). ConductScience, Inc. 2026. Available at: https://conductscience.com/tools/tail-suspension-test-immobility-calculator

This tool performs mathematical calculations on user-provided data. It does not replace scientific judgment regarding experimental design, exclusion criteria, or statistical analysis.

What Is the Tail Suspension Test?

The tail suspension test (TST) was introduced by Steru, Chermat, Thierry, and Simon in 1985 as a mouse model of behavioral despair. A mouse is suspended by its tail from a horizontal bar, typically using adhesive tape, approximately 50 cm above the surface below. The test is based on the observation that rodents placed in an inescapable stressful situation will, after an initial period of vigorous activity, adopt an immobile posture. This immobility is interpreted as a failure to persist in escape-directed behavior, i.e., behavioral despair. The TST has become one of the two most widely used screening tests for antidepressant activity in mice, alongside the forced swim test (FST). The test is valued for its simplicity, reliability, sensitivity to all major classes of antidepressants (SSRIs, SNRIs, tricyclics, MAOIs, atypicals), and its suitability for high-throughput screening. Unlike the FST, the TST does not involve water exposure, eliminating confounds related to thermoregulation, swimming ability, and post-test drying. Standard parameters include total immobility time, percent immobility, and latency to first immobility episode.

Scoring Immobility in the TST

Immobility can be scored manually by trained observers or automatically using force-transducer systems or video-based tracking. Manual scoring involves continuous or time-sampled observation during the 6-minute session, with the observer pressing a key or timer whenever the mouse is immobile. Inter-rater reliability should be established (Cohen kappa > 0.80) before collecting experimental data. Automated force-transducer systems attach a strain gauge to the suspension bar and record the force fluctuations caused by the animal's movements. When the animal is immobile, force variance drops to near zero; thresholds are calibrated against manual scoring. Video-based systems (e.g., ConductVision) use computer vision to detect movement from video frames, applying pixel-change or pose-estimation algorithms. Regardless of method, a minimum immobility bout duration of 1-2 seconds is applied to filter brief pauses. The key metrics are: total immobility time (seconds), percent immobility (immobility time / session duration x 100), latency to first immobility (seconds from session start), and number of immobility bouts. Time-bin analysis (typically 1-minute bins) reveals the temporal pattern of immobility onset and can detect drug effects not apparent in total scores.

TST vs. FST: Choosing the Right Despair Test

The tail suspension test (TST) and forced swim test (FST) are the two canonical behavioral despair paradigms, and choosing between them depends on species, strain, and experimental goals. The TST is exclusively a mouse test — rats and heavier mice tend to climb their tails, making scoring unreliable. The FST works in both rats and mice. The TST is a dry test with no water immersion, eliminating hypothermia and swimming-ability confounds. The FST requires precise water temperature control (typically 23-25 C) and post-swim warming. In terms of pharmacological sensitivity, the TST is broadly sensitive to antidepressants and has been validated for SSRIs (fluoxetine, paroxetine), SNRIs (venlafaxine), tricyclics (imipramine, desipramine), MAOIs (tranylcypromine), and atypical antidepressants. Some studies suggest the TST may have higher sensitivity to serotonergic compounds, while the FST (particularly the modified Cryan scoring with swimming, climbing, and immobility) provides additional behavioral categorization that can distinguish serotonergic from noradrenergic mechanisms. For comprehensive phenotyping, many labs run both the TST and FST in the same cohort (with appropriate spacing between tests) to provide converging evidence. Strain considerations are critical: C57BL/6J mice show moderate baseline immobility in both tests, while BALB/cJ mice show high baseline immobility, and some strains (e.g., Swiss Webster) may show excessive tail climbing in the TST.

Frequently asked

325
Free tools
1,200+
Institutions
100%
Client-side
0
Uploads required