FIGURE 5. Morphological differences between C. alnifolia, C. chichape, C in Celtis flumeniana (Cannabaceae): a new species from Brazil and reestablishment of Celtis alnifolia
FIGURE 5. Morphological differences between C. alnifolia, C. chichape, C. flumeniana, and C. iguanaea.—A: C. alnifolia, trunk.; B: C. chichape, trunk.; C: C. flumeniana, trunk.; D: C. iguanaea, trunk.; E: C. alnifolia, staminate flower.; F: C. chichape, staminate flower.; G: C. flumeniana, staminate flower.; H: C. iguanaea, staminate flower.; I: C. alnifolia, pistillate flower.; J: C. chichape, pistillate flower.; K: C. flumeniana, pistillate flower.; L: C. iguanaea, pistillate flower.; M: C. alnifolia, mature drupe.; N: C. chichape, mature drupe.; O: C. flumeniana, mature drupe.; P: C. iguanaea, mature drupe.; Q: C. alnifolia, pyrene.; Q1: C. alnifolia, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; R: C. chichape, pyrene.; S: C. flumeniana, pyrene.; S1: C. flumeniana, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.; T: C. iguanaea, pyrene. T1: C. iguanaea, arrow pointing to the apiculum scar.
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0