Figure 18 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716

Figure 18 Contrasting phylogenetic positions for Pterogyne as supported by different analyses A sister to all Caesalpinioideae, except Ceratonieae and Gleditsiae (ca. 1500 nuclear genes; Zhao et al. 2021) B sister to Cassieae (SUSY nuclear gene and combined trnL intron + morphological data; Manzanilla and Brunau 2012, Herendeen et al. 2003a, respectively) C sister to Caesalpinieae (trnL intron and coding plastid genes; Bruneau et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2020) D sister to the remaining Caesalpinioideae (plastid non-coding loci; Zhang et al. 2020).