Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Fig. 6. A in The giant pliosaurid that wasn't-revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland

Fig. 6. A. Approximate position of the identifiable fragments of the thalassochelydian turtle Craspedochelys? sp., MZ VIII Vr-71, within the shell, in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views (schematic reconstruction of Craspedochelys spp. based on Anquetin et al. 2014, 2017, and TS personal observations, modified to fit the observed morphologies). Numbers represent the elements illustrated in the text: 1, Fig. 2; 2, Fig. 3A; 3, Fig. 3B; 4, Fig. 4A; 5, Fig. 4B; 6, Fig. 4D. Fragments likely belonging to the same individual are indicated by the same colour. B–E. Anterior edges of the carapace of Plesiochelys etalloni (Pictet and Humbert, 1857), NMS 8514/NMS 118 (B) and NMS 8727/NMS 116 (C), Craspedochelys jaccardi (Pictet, 1860), NMS 101 (D), and Craspedochelys picteti (Rütimeyer, 1873), NMS 9149/NMS 608 (E); all from the Kimmeridgian of Solothurn, Switzerland. The numbers indicate marginal scutes. Note the anteriorly protruding first marginal of Plesiochelys etalloni (B, C) and straight anterior edge in Craspedochelys spp. (D, E).

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0

Topics