Figure 66 from: Grishin N, Cong Q (2014) A new Hermeuptychia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) is sympatric and synchronic with H. sosybius in southeast US coastal plains, while another new Hermeuptychia species – not hermes – inhabits south Texas and northeast Mexico. ZooKeys 379: 43-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.379.6394

Figure 66 - DNA-derived data. a Analysis of named Hermeuptychia species b relationships between Hermeuptychia specimens from USA in a form of BioNJ (Dereeper et al. 2008) distance tree. a DNA barcode distance matrix is shown on the right and a BioNJ distance tree corresponding to it is on the left. The tree is rooted with Megisto cymela (Cramer, 1777) sequence. A more comprehensive tree that includes several specimens of each species (except those described herein) and their detailed analyses are given in Seraphim et al. (2014) and is not repeated here. Only a single representative sequence for each species is used in a for clarity. The scale bar corresponding to about 1% difference in sequences is placed below the tree. Bootstrap support values are shown by each node in the tree; values below 0.5 indicate possibly incorrect groupings. GenBank accessions (http://genbank.gov/) for sequences are given after species names. NT, PT and HT refer to neotype, paratype and holotype, respectively. Data for specimens are in Table 1. Specimens 4–11 were not examined and their identification follows that of the authors who performed sequencing studies and analyses (Peña et al. 2010, Silva-Brandão et al. 2011, Seraphim et al. 2014). Percent difference and the number of different nucleotides are shown below and above the diagonal in the matrix, respectively, and the length of each sequence segment (bp) used in the analysis is on the diagonal. Most instructive values discussed in the text are shown in bold font b GenBank accession numbers (those that start with letters G or K) for sequences retrieved from GenBank or DNA voucher numbers (those that start from a number or letter N) for sequences obtained in this study and locality data for specimens are given for each sequence. Further details about the specimens are provided in Table 1. Hermeuptychia sosybius specimens with sequences obtained from GenBank were not examined and their identification follows that of the authors who performed sequencing studies (Murray and Prowell 2004, Hebert et al. 2010 & Seraphim et al. 2014). All Hermeuptychia hermybius and Hermeuptychia intricata specimens are paratypes, except the holotype marked with "HT". Scale bar shown below indicates about 0.5% difference.