Skip to main content
ediopen

Sugar Maple Regeneration in New Hampshire, 2019-2023

Overview: These data sets are the culmination of a five-year community science project done in collaboration with the Society for Protection of NH Forests. Co-authors on the resulting paper were: Carrie Deegan, Sarah Thorne, Ana Suppé, Kimberly L. Colson and Wanda Rice. Funding was provided by: Engaged Research Grant from the Einhorn Center for Community Engagement at Cornell University 2019 - 2023; Public Engagement with Science Grant (NSF grant #1713204) subcontract from Hubbard Brook Research Foundation; USDA Climate Hub; NSF-REU supplement under the HBR LTER (NSF grant #1637685) in 2021 and 2022 and HBR LTER in 2023 (NSF grant #2224545 ). Undergraduate students who helped on the project: Katie Sims, Alex Ding, Esmée deCortie, Sage Wentzell-Brehme, Colin Craig, Linda Mahecha, Roxy Moore. Community volunteers who contributed to field data collection and project meetings: Paul Doscher, Dave Heuss, Kim Sharp, Chris Brown, Tim Kendrick, Dan Poor, Rickey Poor, and Blaine Kopp. The study was conducted in four mature forest stands with a notable sugar maple component owned and managed by the Society for Protection of New Hampshire Forests (Forest Society) and spanning most of the latitudinal gradient in the state. Plots were established in autumn of 2018. In general, 12 plot locations were established for each of the four forest stands. Plots are spatially-uniform and placed as close to a 100 m grid system as possible with the restriction that the plot had to include three canopy sugar maple trees. The plots are 0.05 hectares or 500 m2 in size measured in a 12.62 m radius circular plot. Marked_sdlg_site_EDI: This data set contains survival, leaf area and leaf damage for 1191 sugar maple seedlings at four sites in New Hampshire. The sugar maple seedlings were two years old at the time of marking in 2019 and were from the 2017 mast year. The study followed the seedlings on 12 plots per site for 5 years (2019-2023). The data file also contains plot and site variables for t

ShareScore

44/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
12
Harmonization
16
Access
4
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4

Topics