Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,556
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,556 results for “assemblages”
Table 2 in Impacts of Wastewater Effluent on Temperate Stream Fish Assemblage Structure
<p>Table 2. Similarity percentage (SIMPER) showing species contributions (Contrib%) to dissimilarity between East and West Fork sites. West and East Fork average abundance (Av.Abund) columns list the transformed mean abundances for species in both forks, ‘Diss/SD’ represents the ratio between the average dissimilarity and standard deviation, and the cumulative % (Cum.%) column lists the cumulative dissimilarity across species with a 90% cutoff. The average dissimilarity between the East and West Forks was 58.74%.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Species</b></th><th><b>West Fork</b> <b>Av.Abund</b></th><th><b>East Fork</b> <b>Av.Abund</b></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr><tr><th><b>Av.Diss</b></th><th><b>Diss/SD</b></th><th><b>Contrib%</b></th><th><b>Cum.%</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Etheostoma spectabile</i></th><td>4.38</td><td>2.34</td><td>13.7</td><td>1.53</td><td>23.32</td><td>23.32</td></tr><tr><th><i>Etheostoma flabellare</i></th><td>0</td><td>2.26</td><td>11.97</td><td>1.73</td><td>20.38</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><th><i>Chrosomus erythrogaster</i></th><td>1.36</td><td>0.24</td><td>6.23</td><td>0.78</td><td>10.61</td><td>54.3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Noturus exilis</i></th><td>0.32</td><td>1.15</td><td>6.16</td><td>1.19</td><td>10.49</td><td>64.79</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cottus bairdii</i></th><td>1.32</td><td>1.72</td><td>5.97</td><td>1.27</td><td>10.17</td><td>74.96</td></tr><tr><th><i>Campostoma</i> sp.</th><td>1.15</td><td>0.45</td><td>5.62</td><td>1.18</td><td>9.57</td><td>84.54</td></tr><tr><th><i>Luxilus zonatus</i></th><td>0.71</td><td>0.2</td><td>3.82</td><td>0.84</td><td>6.51</td><td>91.05</td></tr></tbody></table>
Figure 1 in Importance of riparian vegetation and wood-pastures in the maintenance of bat assemblages in a highly fragmented landscape in Veracruz, Mexico
Figure 1: Location of the study site on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Land-use and climate drive shifts in Bombus assemblage composition.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Land-use and climate drive shifts in Bombus assemblage composition". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/c6fdb7c6-9597-44e2-8b82-32714bb7133c">https://bionomia.net/dataset/c6fdb7c6-9597-44e2-8b82-32714bb7133c</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/c6fdb7c6-9597-44e2-8b82-32714bb7133c">https://gbif.org/dataset/c6fdb7c6-9597-44e2-8b82-32714bb7133c</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Figure 9 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 9 Boxplots of beta-diversity of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests at the Lac la Biche location, 1992–93 ACarabidae and BStaphylinidae. Beta diversity was calculated within locations, within stands, and within lines for mature and old stands. Significant differences between stand age classes are indicated by asterisks above the boxplots (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)
Figure 8 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 8 Redundancy analysis (RDA) of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests at the Lac la Biche location, 1992–93 ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Each symbol represents the catch from a single pitfall trap pooled over two years.
Figure 7 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 7 Adjusted percentage of variance of assemblage composition in the regional dataset explained at each spatial scale – between locations, between lines in the same location and between traps in the same line ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae.
Figure 6 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 6 Boxplots of epigaeic beetle assemblage beta-diversity within regions, within locations and within lines for Boreal Forest (BF) and Foothills (FH) Natural Regions ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Significant differences between Natural Regions are indicated by asterisks above the boxplots (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 4 Principal components analysis of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in north-central Alberta, 1992–93 ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Each symbol represents the catch from a single pitfall trap averaged over two years. Black symbols represent the Lower Foothills Natural Region; open symbols represent the Central Mixedwood Subregion, light grey symbols represent the Dry Mixedwood Subregion and the dark grey symbols represent the Lower Boreal Highlands Subregion of the Boreal Forest Natural Region. Ellipses represent the standard deviation around the centroid of points in each group and dashed polygons represent the final nodes of the multivariate regression tree (MRT) model. The inset shows the major MRT nodes grouping lines based on assemblage structure.
Figure 5 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 5 Redundancy analysis of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in Alberta, 1992–93 ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Each symbol represents the catch from a single pitfall trap averaged over two years. Open symbols represent the Foothills Natural Region; the black symbols represent the Central Mixedwood Subregion, grey squares represent the Dry Mixedwood Subregion and the grey diamonds represent the Lower Boreal Highlands Subregion of the Boreal Forest Natural Region. Ellipses represent the standard deviation around the centroid of points in each group.
Supplementary material 1 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Supplementary tables
Figure 3 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 3 Coverage based rarefaction estimates of species richness and diversity of epigaeic beetles at each location in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests of north-central Alberta, 1992–93. Locations are distributed across four Natural Subregions (SR) and two Natural Regions (NR) ACarabidae (97.2% coverage) BStaphylinidae (97.6% coverage). Bars represent species richness (± 95% CI) and points represent the exponential of the Shannon diversity index (± 95% CI). For locations where there was significant interannual variation, the results for species richness are placed at the bottom of each bar, and results for diversity are placed in square brackets [] and are indicated above the point for that location.
Figure 2 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 2 Boxplot of the standardized catch of epigaeic beetles at seven locations in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in north-central Alberta, 1992–93. Locations are distributed across four Natural Subregions (SR) and two Natural Regions (NR) ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Locations with the same letter situated above the bar are not significantly different at α = 0.05 (post hoc Tukey's tests). For locations where there was significant interannual variation, the results are indicated above the bar for that location.
Figure 11 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 11 Principal components analysis of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in north-central Alberta, 1992–93 ACarabidae, 1992 BCarabidae, 1993 CStaphylinidae, 1992 DStaphylinidae, 1993. Each point represents the catch from a single pitfall trap. Ellipses represent the standard deviation around the centroid of points in each group.
Figure 10 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 10 Adjusted percentage of variance of species composition in the Lac la Biche dataset explained at each spatial scale – between locations, between lines in the same location and between traps in the same line ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae.
Figure 1 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 1 Location of aspen-dominated mixedwood study sites sampled in north-central Alberta, 1992 and 1993. INSET: location of individual pitfall trap lines at Lac la Biche, with lines used in the regional dataset surrounded with box.
Figure 3 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 3 Relationships between ground beetle biomass and canopy cover (A) and herb cover (B). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points (slightly jittered to improve visibility) represent observed values per trap. The fixed-effects explained 30% of the variation in ground beetle biomass.
Figure 4 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 4 Representatives of ground beetles from pitfall traps and flight interception traps in Gutianshan NP ACarabus kiukiangensisBCarabus davidisCLioptera erotyloidesDTricondyla macrodera.
Figure 2 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 2 Relationships between ground beetle species richness and canopy cover (A) and herb cover (B). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points represent observed values per trap. Note that some traps had similar richness and predictor values. The fixed-effects explained 12% of the variation in ground beetle species richness.
Figure 1 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 1 Relationships between ground beetle abundance and canopy cover (A), herb cover (B) and pH-value of the soil (C). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points represent observed values per trap. Note that some traps had similar abundance and predictor values. The fixed-effects explained 22% of the variation in ground beetle abundance.
Figure 7 from: Borisov RR, Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Novichkova AA (2021) Variability in macrozoobenthic assemblages along a gradient of environmental conditions in the stream water of karst caves (Lower Shakuranskaya Cave, western Caucasus). Subterranean Biology 39: 107-127. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.39.65733
Figure 7 dbRDA ordination for the model of the investigated cave sites (based on Bray–Curtis similarity) factored with distance ranges: 1 – 0–60 m, 2 – 280–380 m, 3 – 460–650 m.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.