Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Figs 4–5. Baltic amber fossil Anthomyzidae. 4 in Reliquantha eocena sp. nov., first tertiary representative of an extant genus of Anthomyzidae (Diptera)

Figs 4–5. Baltic amber fossil Anthomyzidae. 4 – Reliquantha eocena sp. nov., male holotype, left laterally (body length 2.30 mm). 5 – Lacrimyza lacrimosa Roháþek, 2013, male holotype, left laterally (body length 2.22 mm) (adopted from ROHÁýEK 2013a: Fig. 13A). Photo by J. Roháþek.

Figs 16–19 in The second species of Acartophthalmitesfrom Baltic amber (Eocene), with notes on the relationships of the genus (Diptera: Acalyptrata)

Figs 16–19. Acartophthalmites clusioides sp. nov., male holotype. 16 – apex of abdomen laterally, right side; 17 – the same, left side; 18 – head, dorsally; 19 – anteroventral part of head with antenna, right, laterally. Reconstructed parts in dashed lines. All scales = 0.2 mm. For abbreviations see text (p. 411).

Figs 9–15 in The second species of Acartophthalmitesfrom Baltic amber (Eocene), with notes on the relationships of the genus (Diptera: Acalyptrata)

Figs 9–15. Acartophthalmites clusioides sp. nov., male holotype. 9 – head and fore femur, left, sublaterally; 10 – thorax, left, laterally; 11 – left mid trochanter, femur, tibia and basitarsus, posteriorly; 12 – left fore tibia, posteriorly; 13 – left hind tibia, anteriorly; 14 – distal part of right mid tibia, posteriorly; 15 – left wing. Scales = 0.3 mm (Figs 9, 10), 0.5 mm (Figs 11–13, 15) and 0.2 mm (Fig. 14). For abbreviations see text (p. 411).

Figs 3–8 in The second species of Acartophthalmitesfrom Baltic amber (Eocene), with notes on the relationships of the genus (Diptera: Acalyptrata)

Figs 3–8. Acartophthalmites clusioides sp. nov., male holotype. 3 – Baltic amber sample embedded in polyester resin in situ (length of preparatum 13.8 mm); 4 – head and thorax dorsally; 5 – head and anterior part of thorax, left laterally; 6 – ditto, right, laterally; 7 – postabdomen, right, laterally (body length of holotype 3.85 mm); 8 – left wing (length 3.53 mm). Photo by J. Roháček.

Figs 1–2 in The second species of Acartophthalmitesfrom Baltic amber (Eocene), with notes on the relationships of the genus (Diptera: Acalyptrata)

Figs 1–2. Acartophthalmites clusioides sp. nov., male holotype. 1 – right side. 2 – left side. Length of holotype 3.85 mm. Photo by J. Roháček.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2008View details →

Figs. 1-2 in Pavlostysia wunderlichi gen. nov. and sp. nov., the first fossil spider-web bug (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha: Plokiophilidae) from the Baltic Eocene amber

Figs. 1-2. Pavlostysia wunderlichi gen. nov. and sp. nov., holotype, male habitus in dorsal view. 1 – photograph of amber inclusion (photo by D. E. Shcherbakov); 2 – reconstruction.

Fig. 121 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 121. Phylogeny of bee families overlaid on the geological column. The shaded area indicates the period of angiosperm diversification. Although flowering plants originated earlier than the shaded area indicates, the geological record does not show a dramatic increase in angiosperm diversity until when first indicated in the figure.

Fig. 120 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 120. Hypothesis of relationship for the corbiculate bees as envisioned by Cockerell (reproduced from Cockerell, 1908b). He did not include tribe Euglossini and the ages he used for particular deposits are now understood to be as follows: Calyptapis [considered as a junior subjective synonym of Bombus by Zeuner and Manning (1976)] is from early Oligocene deposits of Florissant, while the genera Sophrobombus, Chalcobombus, Protobombus, and Electrapis, all in Baltic amber, are middle Eocene in age. Most species of Synapis (a subgenus of Apis) are from Oligocene strata but at least two species are from early Miocene deposits (Engel, 1999c, unpubl. data). Meliponorytes (described by Tosi, 1896) is either a true fossil in Miocene amber from Sicily or perhaps misidentified in African copal and congeneric with living meliponines (see appendix 1).

Fig. 118 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 118. Phylogeny of corbiculate Apinae based on cladistic analysis of data presented in table 15 (Length 65, CI 0.81, RI 0.93). Black dots are unreversed changes; white dots homoplastic character transitions. The character number is indicated above the branch and the state change is indicated below. Anthophora, Centris, and Xylocopa are the outgroups.

Fig. 119 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 119. Distribution of social ethotypes among the corbiculate apines as well as fossils exhibiting worker morphologies. The euglossine genera (Euglossa, Eufriesea, and Eulaema) are generally communal or solitary, while the outgroups (not depicted here) are solitary. Extinct genera are italicized.

Fig. 117 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 117. Phylogeny of Xylocopinae based on cladistic analysis of data presented in table 13 (Length 16, CI 1.00, RI 1.00). Black dots are unreversed changes; white dots homoplastic character transitions. The character number is indicated above the branch and the state change is indicated below. Exomalopsis is the outgroup.

Fig. 116 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 116. Phylogeny of Lithurginae based on cladistic anlaysis of data presented in table 11 (Length 11, CI 0.88, RI 0.90). Black dots are unreversed changes; white dots homoplastic character transitions. The character number is indicated above the branch and the state change is indicated below. Fideliinae is the outgroup.

Figs. 113–115 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Figs. 113–115. Mesosomal structures of Liotrigonopsis rozeni, new species. 113. Forewing. 114. Outer surface of metatibia and metatarsus. 115. Metadistitarsus, claw, and arolium. Scale bars = 0.5 mm (a: for fig. 113) (b: for fig. 114); 0.25 mm (b: for fig. 115).

Fig. 111 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 111. Forewing of holotype female of Kelneriapis eocenica (KelnerPillault). Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Figs. 109–110 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Figs. 109–110. Wings of holotype female of Melissites trigona, new species. 109. Forewing. 110. Hind wing. Scale bars = 1 mm (a = fig. 109; b = fig. 110).

Fig. 112 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 112. Right lateral view of head of holotype female of Liotrigonopsis rozeni, new species. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Figs. 106–108 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Figs. 106–108. Leg structures of holotype female of Melissites trigona, new species. 106. Outer surface of metatibia and metabasitarsus. 107. Inner surface of metatibia and metabasitarsus. 108. Claw and arolium. Scale bar = 0.5 mm (figs. 106, 107); 0.25 mm (fig. 108).

Figs. 103–104 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Figs. 103–104. Wings of holotype female of Melikertes stilbonotus (Engel). 103. Forewing. 104. Hind wing. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 105 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Fig. 105. Frontal view of holotype female head of Melissites trigona, new species. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Figs. 100–101 in A Monograph Of The Baltic Amber Bees And Evolution Of The Apoidea (Hymenoptera)

Figs. 100–101. Holotype female of Melikertes stilbonotus (Engel). 100. Frontal view of head. 101. Dorsal view. Scale bars = 0.5 mm (a = fig. 101; b = fig. 100).