Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 3 in A lost species or the loss of stripes? The case of Contomastix lizards from Cabo Polonio, Uruguay, with observations on C. lacertoides (Duméril & Bibron) and Cnemidophorus grandensis Cope (Squamata, Teiidae)

FIGURE 3. Dorsal pattern of coloration in Contomastix lizards from Uruguay. On top, from left to right: C. lacertoides MNHN 5774, 5777 (Las Piedras, Artigas), MNHN 3196 (Pozo Hondo, Tacuarembó), MNHN 3190 (Tambores, Tacuarembó). Middle, from left to right: C. lacertoides MNHN 5767 (Aiguá, Lavalleja), MNHN 6222 (Route 8, km 162, Lavalleja), MNHN 5766, 5770 (Sierra de las Ánimas, Maldonado). Bottom, from left to right: C. lacertoides MNHN 3185 (Sierra de las Ánimas, Maldonado); C. charrua MNHN 3422, 3424, paratypes and MNHN 3423, holotype (Cabo Polonio, Rocha).

FIGURE 5 in A lost species or the loss of stripes? The case of Contomastix lizards from Cabo Polonio, Uruguay, with observations on C. lacertoides (Duméril & Bibron) and Cnemidophorus grandensis Cope (Squamata, Teiidae)

FIGURE 5. Paired dorsal and lateral views of the heads of: A Contomastix lacertoides (Quebrada de los Cuervos, Uruguay) MNHN 9464; B C. charrua MNHN 3424, paratype (Cabo Polonio, Uruguay); C Cnemidophorus grandensis ANSP 9593 (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil).

Figure 5 in Coding characters from different life stages for phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study on dragonfly adults and larvae, including a description of the larval head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes (Odonata: Epiophlebiidae)

Figure 5. The single most-parsimonious trees from the TNT analyses: A, matrix AC (artificial coding; tree length, L = 113; consistency index, CI = 79; retention index, RI = 77); B, matrix NMC, applying non-multistate coding and preferring the adult character state over the larval state in the case of character state conflict (L = 89; CI = 88; RI = 83); C, matrix MC, applying a multistate coding strategy in cases of conflict between larval and adult morphology (L = 57; CI = 91; RI = 85); D, matrix SC, coding larval and adult characters seperately within the same taxon (L = 159; CI = 88; RI = 82). Non-homoplasious character changes are indicat- ed with black squares; homoplasious characters are indicated with white squares. Trait numbers are indicated above squares, state changes below. The 'M' below the character state changes in (C) indicates a multistate character optimized as an autapomorphy. For trait references, see Table S1 and Table S6; for detailed trees, see Figure S7.

Figure 4 in Coding characters from different life stages for phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study on dragonfly adults and larvae, including a description of the larval head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes (Odonata: Epiophlebiidae)

Figure 4. SEM micrographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the maxillae, labium, and hypopharynx of Epiophlebia superstes. A, ventral view of the maxilla, scale bar: 1 mm. B, ventral view of the maxilla, with musculature shown. C, dorsal view of the maxilla. D, dorsal view of the maxilla, with musculature shown. E, labium in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm. E1, detail of the apical area of the labium. Scale bar: 500 μm. E2, detail of E1. Scale bar: 5 μm. F, musculature of the labium and hypopharynx in dorsolateral view. G, musculature of the labium and hypopharynx in lateral view. Abbreviations: ca, cardo; dse, dentisetae; eh, end hook; hyp, hypopharnyx; inc, incisivi; lac, lacinia; lp, labial palpus; mh, moveable hook; ml, median lobe; mp, maxillar palpus; pm, postmentum; prm, prementum; set, setae; st, stipes; trod, T-shaped cuticular rod. For muscle references see text and Table S2.

Figure 2 in Coding characters from different life stages for phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study on dragonfly adults and larvae, including a description of the larval head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes (Odonata: Epiophlebiidae)

Figure 2. Overview of the outer head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes: A, ventral view with the right part displayed as a three-dimensional reconstruction in order to show the peculiar muscle arrangement of the labial prehensile mask; B, lateral view; C, frontal view; D, dorsal view. Abbreviations: acl, anteclypeus; agp, anterior genal process; antb, antennal base; cl, cleavage line; cr0lb1 + 2, cranial origin of labral muscles 0lb1 and 0lb2; cr0lb5, cranial origin of labral muscle 0lb5; cr0te3, cranial origin of tentorial muscle 0te3; e, eye; fl, flagellum; fr, frons; lbr, labrum; loc, lateral occellus; lp, labial palpus; moc, middle occellus; oc, occiput; ocr, occipital ridge; pcl, postclypeus; pe, pedicellus; prm, prementum; sc, scapus. For muscle references, see text and Table S2. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 1 in Coding characters from different life stages for phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study on dragonfly adults and larvae, including a description of the larval head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes (Odonata: Epiophlebiidae)

Figure 1. Methodological workflow. In three matrices (AC, NMC, and MC) the full data set of 81 characters was used. The matrices differ in coding strategies. In matrix AC the larvae were coded as independent terminal taxa. In matrix NMC the larvae were omitted, thereby reducing the number of taxa from nine to six. If larval character states differed from adult ones, the character state of the adult was coded (non-multistate approach). In matrix MC we equally incorporated the larval character states into the adult character states, but in cases where larva possess a different character state than the adult these characters were coded as multistate characters. In matrix SC (separate coding) we coded larval and adult characters as separate characters within the same species, which resulted in a higher number of characters. If characters generated by the SC approach showed no variation they were omitted from the analysis, which is why not exactly twice as many characters as in matrices AC and MC are used.

Figure 3 in Coding characters from different life stages for phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study on dragonfly adults and larvae, including a description of the larval head anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes (Odonata: Epiophlebiidae)

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the outer and three-dimensional reconstructions of the inner anatomy of Epiophlebia superstes. Ventral (A) and dorsolateral (B) view of the mandible (A1, detail of the ventral region of the mandible; B1, detail of the region at the molar base). C, the labral, antennal, tentorial, and pharyngeal musculature in dorsal view. D, the mandibular muscles in dorsofrontal view (D1, same as D in dorsolateral view). E, epipharynx in posterior view (E1, detail of e). F, the labral, antennal, tentorial, and pharyngeal musculature in lateral view. Brain, 0an2, 0lb1, 0bu2, and 0hy2 omitted for clarity. Abbreviations: ata, anterior tentorial arms; br, brain; ct, corpotentorium; dta, dorsal tentorial arms; inc, incisivi; lbr, labrum; le, lateral extension of labrum; mo, mola; pe, pedicellus; phx, pharynx; sc, scapus. For muscle references see text and Table S2. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 10. Average and 95 in "Collection Bias" and the Importance of Natural History Collections in Species Habitat Modeling: A Case Study UsingThoracophorus costalisErichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Osoriinae), with a Critique of GBIF.org

Fig. 10. Average and 95% confidence intervals of model areas for each set of combined collections. The reference model is represented by a black dot at 38 collections = 100% area.

Figs. 1–8 in "Collection Bias" and the Importance of Natural History Collections in Species Habitat Modeling: A Case Study UsingThoracophorus costalisErichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Osoriinae), with a Critique of GBIF.org

Figs. 1–8. Exemplar distribution models. Red circles = specimen localities (county-level). 1) Reference model created using all specimen records. Insert: Thoracophorus costalis; 2) University of Wisconsin Insect Research Center, 4.4% reference area; 3) Mississippi State University, 11.9% reference area; 4) Florida State Collection of Arthropods, 28.9% reference area; 5) Canadian National Collection of Insects, 75.5% reference area, greatest of any single collection; 6) Downie and Arnett (1996), 8.5% reference area; 7) Bugguide.net, 11.9% reference area; 8) GBIF.org, 14.1% reference area.

Fig. 11 in "Collection Bias" and the Importance of Natural History Collections in Species Habitat Modeling: A Case Study UsingThoracophorus costalisErichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Osoriinae), with a Critique of GBIF.org

Fig. 11. Model area versus number of localities. Red circles = average and 95% confidence intervals of model areas for each set of random localities. Green circles = individual collections. Blue triangles = alternative distribution data.

Fig. 9 in "Collection Bias" and the Importance of Natural History Collections in Species Habitat Modeling: A Case Study UsingThoracophorus costalisErichson (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Osoriinae), with a Critique of GBIF.org

Fig. 9. Percentage of the reference area for each model created from individual collection data (see text for collections designated by codens). Bars for alternative data sources and total have tile fill. ** = collections with individually less than 1% of the reference model area.

opennotspecifiedSep 2005View details →

Fig. 2 in The Strange Case of Nothogaster paradoxa Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Brentidae)

opennotspecifiedSep 2011View details →

Fig. 1 in A Case ofCnestus mutilatus(Blandford) (Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) Females Damaging Plastic Fuel Storage Containers in Louisiana, U.S.A.

Fig. 1. Plastic gasoline storage container (23-L) with numerous holes created by female Cnestus mutilatus. White arrows indicate embedded beetles. Black arrow indicates detailed inset of holes and elytral apices of embedded beetles.

Fig. 2 in First Case ofStegobium paniceum(L., 1758) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) Infesting Paintings in a Taiwanese Museum

Fig. 2. Stegobium paniceum infestation in the Chi Mei Museum's painting storage. a) Severely damaged support layer of painting, b) Larvae and pupae visible under the holes on the fabric lining.

Fig. 1 in First Case ofStegobium paniceum(L., 1758) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) Infesting Paintings in a Taiwanese Museum

Fig. 1. Stegobium paniceum found in the Chi Mei Museum's painting storage, in dorsal (upper), ventral (middle), and lateral (lower) view.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →

PSS in the Automotive sector: Dataset and case study narratives

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

FIGURES 3–4. Klimeschiopsis spp., male genitalia. 3. K in Klimeschiopsis terroris auctt. from Spain-a further case of cryptic diversity in European Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae, Gelechiinae)

FIGURES 3–4. Klimeschiopsis spp., male genitalia. 3. K. arnoldfransorum sp. nov., holotype (gen. slide GEL 1350 ♁ P. Huemer); 4. K. terroris (gen. slide 3411 H. Hendriksen); scale bar = 0.5 mm.

FIGURES 1–2. Klimeschiopsis spp., adults. 1. K in Klimeschiopsis terroris auctt. from Spain-a further case of cryptic diversity in European Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae, Gelechiinae)

FIGURES 1–2. Klimeschiopsis spp., adults. 1. K. arnoldfransorum sp. nov., adult, paratype, female; 2. K. terroris, female; scale bar = 5 mm.

FIGURE 7 in Klimeschiopsis terroris auctt. from Spain-a further case of cryptic diversity in European Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae, Gelechiinae)

FIGURE 7. Klimeschiopsis arnoldfransorum sp. nov., female genitalia, paratype (gen. slide 02/1155 ♀ P. Huemer); scale bar = 0.5 mm.

FIGURES 5–6 in Klimeschiopsis terroris auctt. from Spain-a further case of cryptic diversity in European Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae, Gelechiinae)

FIGURES 5–6. Klimeschiopsis spp., male genitalia, details of valva-vinculum-complex. 5. K. arnoldfransorum sp. nov., holotype (gen. slide GEL 1350 ♁ P. Huemer); 6. K. terroris (gen. slide 3411 H. Hendriksen); scale bar = 0.5 mm.