Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedJul 2023View details →

Table 2 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 2. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of the genus Celtodoryx, shass length × width; head diameter are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and oxychaetes.Values in parentheses are means<table><tbody><tr><th>Celtodoryx species</th><th>Diactinal megascleres tylotes and strongyles (and derivates)</th><th>Arcuate isochelae</th><th>Oxychaetes</th></tr><tr><th>Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.</th></tr><tr><th>Holotype</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-144</th><td>TYa: 195–(213.8)–225 × 2–(2.65)–3; 2.5–(3.8)–5</td><td>20–(28)–32.5</td><td>51–(65.5)–95</td></tr><tr><td>STb: 213–(243.5)–273 × 2.5–(4.3)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Paratypes</th></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-161</th><td>TY: 197.5–(231.7)–261.5 × 3–(4.2)–5; 4.5–(5.4)–6.3</td><td>25–(28)–30</td><td>55–(71.3)–100</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 215–(264)–287.5 × 5.5–(7.1)–8</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-172</th><td>TY: 180–(206)–237.5 × 2.5–(3)–4.5; 3–(4)–5</td><td>20–(25.8)–30</td><td>30–(62.8)–90</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 187.5–(226)–287.5 × 3.7–(5.5)–8</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-260</th><td>TY: 150–(238.5)–275 × 2.5–(4.8)–5; 3.8–(5)–7.5</td><td>22.5–(24.3)–27.5</td><td>47.5–(64.8)–78</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 235–(248.2)–287.5 × 5–(6.4)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-292</th><td>TY:190–(221.6)–250 × 2.5–(2.9)–5; 3.7–(4.9)–7</td><td>20–(23.6)–25</td><td>40–(67)–80</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 220–(230)–252.5 × 5–(6.4)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-618</th><td>TY:210–(225)245 × 2.5–(3.3)–5; 3–(4.8)–6.3</td><td>22.5–(24.2)–7</td><td>57.5–(69)–77.5</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 212.5–(228.3)–250 × 3–(3–8)–5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-740</th><td>TY: 187.5–(216)–237.5 × 2.5(3.4)–4.5; 1.3–(4)–6.3</td><td>21.3–(25.2)–27.5</td><td>30–(75.5)–90</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 207–(231)–270 × 5(5.5)–7</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-797</th><td>TY: 180–(213)–240 × 2.5–(2.8)–3.8; 3–(3.5)–5</td><td>20–(21.5)–25</td><td>45–(65.5)–77.5</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 232.5–(248.3)–265 × 2–(4.2)–5.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-850</th><td>TY: 180–(237.8)–257.5 × 2–(3.7)–4.5; 3–(4.8)–7.5</td><td>20–(22.5)–25</td><td>62–(71)–75</td></tr><tr><td>ST: 207.5–(251)–297.5 × 2.5–(3.8)–7.5</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Celtodoryx ciocalyptoides (Burton, 1935) for comparison</th></tr><tr><th>Lectotype ZIN 10844e</th><td>SETYc: 170–(208)–290 × 1.5–(4.5)–6.5; 1.5–(5.7)–7.2</td><td>I: 48–(51)–56</td><td>62–(67)–72</td></tr><tr><td>AnSTd: 190–(273)–305 × 3.2–(8)–10.4</td><td>II: 22–(25)–30</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Paratype (MNHN D JV 93) of Celtodoryx girardae e</th><td>AnST: 165–(268)–320 × 5.8–(8.9)–12</td><td>I: 40–(48)–54</td><td>65–(74)–87</td></tr><tr><td>SETY:: 125–(195)–220 × 1.6–(4.2)–5.6, 2.4–(4.3)–6.4</td><td>II: 19–(23)–27</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>aTY,Smooth tylotes, bST, Smooth strongyles, cSETY,spined ends tylotes, dAnST,spined ends anisostrongyles, eSpicule measures from Henkel and Janussen 2011.

opennotspecifiedJul 2023View details →

Table 4 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetic position of new species and new records of Coelosphaeridae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific

Table 4. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of L. (L.) albemarlensis and L. (L.) isodictyalis. Shass length × width; head diameter are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and sigmas. Values in parentheses are means<table><tbody><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis material examined</th><th>Styles</th><th>Tylotes</th><th>Arcuate isochelae</th><th>Sigmas</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>AHF-1736-49</th><td>150–(161.5)–175 × 2.5–(3.4)–5</td><td>165–(175.1)–185 × 2.5–(2.5)–5; 4.5–(5.5)–7</td><td>17.5–(24.8)–30</td><td>15–(26.3)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>AHF-608-36</th><td>160–(169.2)–180 × 2.5–(3.5)–5</td><td>180–(193.3)–205 × 2.5–(3.1)–5</td><td>17.5–(21.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(18.5)–25</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-27</th><td>150–(169.5)–185 × 2.5–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>125–(178.6)–200 × 2.5–(3)–5; 3.8–(5)–6.3</td><td>11.3–(20.5)–32</td><td>15–(28.2)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-183</th><td>142.5–(159.5)–180 × 2.5–(4.2)–6.3</td><td>155–(170.3)–205 × 2.5–(4)–6.3; 5–(5.9)–7.5</td><td>20–(27)–30</td><td>20–(26.6)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-190</th><td>150–(166)–187.5 × 2.5–(4.9)–8.8</td><td>153.8–(172.5)–185 × 2.5–(3.6)–5; 3.8–(6)–8.8</td><td>12.5–(18.3)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(25.9)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-191</th><td>142.5–(172.2)–185 × 1.3–(5.2)–8.8</td><td>162–(178.8)–195 × 2.5–(3.5)–5; 5–(5.9)–7</td><td>12.5–(17.2)–27.5</td><td>15–(26)–31.3</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-193</th><td>135–(157.5)–185 × 1.3–(4.3)–6.3</td><td>150–(174)–190 × 2.5–(3.9)–5; 5–(5.7)–6.3</td><td>22.5–(25.5)–30</td><td>20–(26.3)–35</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-232</th><td>170–(183.4)–195 × 2.5–(5.9)–10</td><td>127.5–(172.8)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>10–(19.4)–30</td><td>15–(25.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-720</th><td>165–(177.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.7)–5</td><td>170–(181.6)–200 × 2.5–(3.3)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.3)–27.5</td><td>15–(27.0)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1018</th><td>145–(160.2)–175 × 2.5–(2.5)–2.5</td><td>180–(195.8)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>22.5–(25.9)–30</td><td>15–(23.4)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1104</th><td>150–(157.9)–175 × 2.5–(3.8)–5</td><td>175–(187.9)–215 × 2.5–(2.9)–5</td><td>17.5–(23.3)–27.5</td><td>20–(26.1)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1369</th><td>150–(162.8)–180 × 2.5–(2.8)–5</td><td>170–(186.5)–200 × 2.5–(2.6)–5</td><td>20–(25.7)–30</td><td>20–(23.3)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1443</th><td>145–(161.6)–175 × 2.5–(3.0)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>20–(23.4)–30</td><td>20–(25.1)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1553</th><td>150–(160.4)–180 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>170–(180.9)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>15–(24.1)–30</td><td>17.5–(23.5)–27.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1579</th><td>155–(170.2)–190 × 2.5–(3.6)–5</td><td>180–(186.5)–195 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(19.8)–27.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–37.5</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-1581</th><td>150–(169.2)–185 × 2.5–(3.2)–5</td><td>170–(181.2)–200 × 2.5–(2.7)–5</td><td>12.5–(21.9)–27.5</td><td>17.5–(28.1)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2374</th><td>125–(150.3)–175 × 2–(4.5)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(171.3)–190 × 3–(5)–6; 5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>15–(25.5)–32</td><td>15–(26)–30</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2377</th><td>167.5–(185)–198 × 2.5–(5.7)–7.5</td><td>162.5–(190)–200 × 2.5–(4.2)–5; 5–(5.5)–6.3</td><td>12.5–(22.2)–31.3</td><td>17.5–(33.6)–40</td></tr><tr><th>LEB-ICML-UNAM-2379</th><td>142.5–(158)–165 × 1.3–(6.2)–7.5</td><td>120–(167)–182.5 × 2.5–(4.3)–5; 3.8–(4.8)–5.5</td><td>17.5–(25.3)–32.5</td><td>20–(26.5)–32.5</td></tr><tr><th>For comparison (non-examined material)</th></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) albemarlensis from Desqueyroux-Faúndez and Van Soest 1997</th><td>123–(157)–190 × 4–8</td><td>107–(139)–170 × 5</td><td>16–26</td><td>16–26</td></tr><tr><th>L. (L.) isodictyalis (Carter, 1882); from Rützler et al. 2007</th><td>148.6–(164.6)–175.2 × 3.8–(4.8)–5.7</td><td>177.9–(198.3)–207.9 × 3.1–(3.9)–4.2</td><td>19.6–(26.3)–41.4</td><td>18.3(21)–22.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

MsnLib multi-stage fragmentation mass spectral libraries - raw positive

The data for <a href="https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-l1tqh-v2">MSnLib</a> are divided into several Zenodo records due to size constraints.  raw positive: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10966404">10966404</a> raw negative: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10967081">10967081</a> mzml positive and negative: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10966280">10966280</a> spectral libraries: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11163380">11163380</a> This record includes zipped files containing the raw positive data, acquired using a flow injection method on an Orbitrap ID-X instrument, for all compound libraries. 7 Compound Libraries: <ul> <li>Short Name: Full name, Provider (Catalog number), total compounds (not all detected during library building)</li> <li>mce_bioactive: Bioactive Compound Library, MedChemExpress (HY-L001), 10,315 compounds</li> <li>mce_scaffold: 5k Scaffold Library, MedChemExpress, (HY-L902), 4998 compounds</li> <li>nih: NIH NPAC ACONN collection of NP, NIH/NCATS, 3988 compounds</li> <li>otavapep: Alpha-helix Peptiomimetic Library, OTAVAchemicals (a-helix-Peptido), 1298 compounds</li> <li>enamdisc: Discovery Diversity Set -10, Enamine (DDS-10), 10,240 compounds</li> <li>enammol: Carboxylic Acid Fragment Library + Random, Enamine and Molport, 4378 compounds</li> <li>mcedrug: FDA-Approved Drug Library, MedChemExpress (HY-L022), 2610 compounds</li> </ul>

FIGURE 2 in A remarkable new genus of Sciomyzoidea from Japan, with discussion of its taxonomic position (Diptera, Acalyptratae)

FIGURE 2. Babakintaromyia albitarsis gen. et sp. nov., body parts of male. A, head, dorsal aspect; B, ditto, anterior aspect; C, ditto, lateral aspect; D, thorax, lateral aspect; E, legs (macerated); F, vertical area of head, anterior aspect; G, antenna (macerated); H, wing; I, prosternum; J, posterior half of abdomen (macerated), lateral aspect (iv, inner vertical bristle; cx1, fore coxa; rp1, right foreleg; lp2, left midleg; rp3, right hindleg; prst, prosternum; pv, postvertical seta).

FIGURE 5 in A remarkable new genus of Sciomyzoidea from Japan, with discussion of its taxonomic position (Diptera, Acalyptratae)

FIGURE 5. Babakintaromyia albitarsis gen. et sp. nov., female terminalia. A, posterior part of abdomen, ventral aspect; B, ditto, lateral aspect; C, ditto, enlarged; D, apical part of abdomen, ventral aspect; E, spermathecae and spermathecal ducts (white arrows); F, spherical spermathecae; G, oval spermathecae (cer, cercus; st7, sternum 7; st8, sternum 8; hyp, hypoproct; tg8, tergum 8; epp, epiproct).

FIGURE 4 in A remarkable new genus of Sciomyzoidea from Japan, with discussion of its taxonomic position (Diptera, Acalyptratae)

FIGURE 4. Babakintaromyia albitarsis gen. et sp. nov., male hypopygium (macerated). A, hypopygium, lateral aspect; B, cut right epandrium with surstyli, inner aspect; C, hypopygium, posterior aspect; D, epandrium with surstyli, posterior aspect; E, ventral part of hypopygium, lateral aspect; F, ditto, inner aspect; G, phallus, lateral aspect (ass, anterior surstylus; bph, basiphallus; cer, cercus; dph, distiphallus; ejap, ejaculatory apodeme; ejd, ejaculatory duct; ep, epandrium; ses, subepandrial sclerite; hp, hypandrium; pep, anterolateral process of epandrium; phap, phallic apodeme; prg, pregonite; pss, posterior surstylus; psg, postgonite).

FIGURE 1 in A remarkable new genus of Sciomyzoidea from Japan, with discussion of its taxonomic position (Diptera, Acalyptratae)

FIGURE 1. Babakintaromyia albitarsis gen. et sp. nov., adults and mouthparts. A, male; B, female; C, mouthparts (macerated), anterior aspect; D, ditto, lateral aspect; E, ditto, anterodorsal aspect (clp, clypeus; hpp, hypopharynx; lb, labrum).

FIGURE 3 in A remarkable new genus of Sciomyzoidea from Japan, with discussion of its taxonomic position (Diptera, Acalyptratae)

FIGURE 3. Babakintaromyia albitarsis gen. et sp. nov., pregenital segments of male. A, left lateral aspect; B, right lateral aspect; C, dorsal aspect; D, ventral aspect; E, anterior area, left lateral aspect; F, ventral area of left side on intersegmental area, ventral aspect (lsp6, left spiracle of segment 6; lsp7, left spiracle of segment 7; rsp6, right spiracle of segment 6; rsp7, right spiracle of segment 7; st5, sternum 5; st6, sternum 6; st7, sternum 7; st8, sternum 8; tg5 tergum 5; tg6, tergum 6; tg7, tergum 7; tg8, tergum 8).

Figure 10 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 10: Portrait and a frontal (middle) and lateral views (right) of the horseshoe of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n. (photo by J. Červený).

Figure 9 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 9: Type locality of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n.: small cave near the old park lodge in the Sehlabathebe National Park, Lesotho, and the bat colony containing the type series (photo by J. Červený).

Figure 6 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 6: Maximum likelihood tree of reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the Lesotho horseshoe bats with species of the fumigatus group and other Rhinolophus groups based on the nuclear dataset. Branch support values are shown by pie charts on the nodes.

Figure 5 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 5: Maximum likelihood tree of reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the Lesotho horseshoe bats with species of the fumigatus group and other Rhinolophus groups based on the Cyt-b dataset. Branch support values are shown by pie charts on the nodes.

Figure 4 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 4: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: condylocanine length of skull (LCc) against length of the upper tooth-row (CM3); values in millimetres. Explanations: Lesotho I = samples from Lesotho examined by molecular genetic analysis; Lesotho II = samples from Lesotho examined only by the morphological analysis; Namibia 0 = samples of R. damarensis examined only by the morphological analysis; Namibia 1 = samples of R. damarensis of the Namibia 1 lineage; Namibia 2 = samples of R. damarensis of the Namibia 2 lineage; damarensis T = holotype specimen of Rhinolophus darlingi damarensis; S Africa II = extremely small-sized specimens from South Africa (Free State) originally identified as R. clivosus (see text for details).

Figure 2 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 2: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: first two roots of the principal component analysis of 15 plain skull dimensions; for explanations see Figure 1.

Figure 7 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 7: Map of localities of the examined specimens of Rhinolophus acrotis (diamonds), R. damarensis (squares) and R. cervenyi sp. n. (circles) in southern Africa (A) and in Lesotho (B); L, Lesotho; M, Mozambique; SZ, Eswatini. Open symbols – localities of origin of the specimens examined by the molecular genetic methods (except those of R. acrotis), numbers at the symbols correspond with the mitochondrial haplotype numbers as in Figure 5 and Table S1, number script denotes the lineage assignation: regular – Namibia1, bold – Namibia2, italics – South Africa & Lesotho bats. Small letters denote known localities of R. cervenyi sp. n.: Lesotho (B): a – Ha Mokoto, b – Ha Natla, c – Hermon, d – Mateanong, e – Moqotoane, f – Mount Moorosi, g – Nkokamele, h – Phallang, i – Roma, cave, j – Sehlabathebe NP, lodge, k – Semonkong, l – Ski Lodge, Oxbow; South Africa (A): m – Jagersfontein, n – Uintjiesburg.

Figure 12 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 12: Occlusal views on the mesial part of the left upper tooth-row (C–M1) and the right lower toothrow (I –M) of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n. 3 1 (NMP 97760, holotype). Scale bar: 2 mm.

Figure 1 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 1: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: condylocanine length of skull (LCc) against length of the upper tooth-row (CM3); values in millimetres. Explanations: Abyssinia = samples of R. acrotis acrotis from Ethiopia, Eritrea and the Sudan; E Africa = samples of R. acrotis augur from East Africa (Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Malawi); S Africa = samples of R. acrotis augur from southern Africa (Mozambique, South Africa); types = holotype specimens of Rhinolophus augur (G), Rhinolophus augur zambesiensis (B), Rhinolophus augur zuluensis (U), and Rhinolophus darlingi damarensis (D); S Africa II = extremely small-sized specimens from South Africa originally identified as R. clivosus (see text for details); polygon = range extremes of the values for R. damarensis from Namibia.

Figure 8 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 8: General view of the type locality of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n.: upper parts of the Sehlabathebe National Park, Lesotho (photo by J. Červený).

Figure 3 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 3: Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Lesotho bats and comparative taxa: relative length of rostrum (CM3/LCc) against relative width of skull (LaZ/LCc); for explanations see Figure 1.

Figure 11 in On the systematic position of the horseshoe bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Lesotho

Figure 11: Skull in lateral view (top) and in dorsal view (below) of Rhinolophus cervenyi sp. n. (top – NMP 97760, holotype; below – NMP 97758, paratype). Scale bars: 5 mm.