Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 21–23 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 21–23. Plectrocnemia malaisei, new species, holotype. 21—genitalia, left lateral; 22—left gonopod, ventral; 23—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 24–27 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 24–27. Plectrocnemia thai, new species, holotype. 24—genitalia, left lateral; 25—genitalia, dorsal; 26—left gonopod, ventral; 27—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 18–20 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 18–20. Plectrocnemia kamba, new species, holotype. 18—genitalia, left lateral; 19—left gonopod, ventral; 20—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 14–17 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 14–17. Plectrocnemia dalat, new species, holotype. 14—genitalia, left lateral; 15—genitalia, dorsal; 16—left gonopod, ventral; 17—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 11–13 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 11–13. Plectrocnemia taungyia, new species, holotype. 11—genitalia, left lateral; 12—left gonopod, ventral; 13—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 4–6 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 4–6. Plectrocnemia ambaita, new species, holotype. 4—genitalia, left lateral; 5—right gonopod, ventral; 6— phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 7–10 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 7–10. Plectrocnemia kachin, new species, holotype. 7—genitalia, left lateral; 8—genitalia, dorsal; 9—left gonopod, ventral; 10—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

FIGURES 1–3 in Generic review of Polycentropodidae with description of 32 new species and 19 new species records from the Oriental, Australian and Afrotropical Biogeographical Regions 2435

FIGURES 1–3. Plectrocnemia martynovi, new species, holotype. 1—genitalia, left lateral; 2—left gonopod, ventral; 3—phallic apparatus, left lateral.

Figure 7 in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 7. Presence/absence of the 'robustus' morphotype and sexual systems of Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus shrimps synthesized on the tree resulting from the one-phase SATé-II analysis of maximum likelihood. Robustus morphotype: presence (black squares), absence (white squares), unknown (grey squares). Sexual system: separate sexes (white squares), protandry (black squares), unknown (grey squares). The photographs show a 'robustus' male morphotype of Rhynchocinetes typus (left, bottom) and a male specimen of the protandric Cinetorhynchus uritai (right, bottom). Males in the latter species exhibit poorly developed chelipeds and maxillipeds in comparison with 'robustus' males of species of Rhynchocinetes. For further details see text. Photographic credits: M. Thiel (C. uritai), I. Hinojosa (Rhynchocinetes typus).

Figure 4 in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 4. One-phase simultaneous alignment and tree estimation (SATé-II) analysis of maximum likelihood (ML) for representatives of the family Rhynchocinetidae using two nuclear genes. The phylogenetic tree resulted from the combined analysis of 12S, Histone (H3), and Enolase gene fragments of Rhynchocinetes (seven taxa and eight terminals), Cinetorhynchus (five taxa and 12 terminals), Lipkius (one taxon and two terminals), Eugonatonotus (one taxon), and outgroups. The numbers above or below the branches represent the bootstrap values obtained from the ML analyses in SATé-II.

Figure 1 in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 1. Some morphological characters of shrimps from the genera Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus. A, 'cage' position during mating in the shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus, the only species of marine caridean shrimp for which alternative mating tactics have been demonstrated so far. Notice the well-developed third maxillipeds and chelipeds characteristic of the 'robustus' male morphotype. B, habitus (view of the entire animal) of the hinged-beak shrimp genus Cinetorhynchus. C, lateral view of the rostrum of R. typus. Notice the articulation (arrow) of the rostrum with the remainder of the carapace. D, lateral view of the rostrum of Cinetorhynchus rigens. Notice the indistinct articulation between the carapace and the rostrum (compared with Rhynchocinetes). E, dorsal view of the carapace in C. rigens. Notice the three teeth at the median carina of the carapace and the absence of a supraorbital spine. F, dorsal view of the carapace in R. typus. Notice the two acute teeth at the median carina of the carapace and the supraorbital spine. G, lateral view of the fourth and fifth pereopods of R. typus. Notice the presence of only one row of meral spines on these pereopods. H, lateral view of the fourth and fifth pereopods of C. rigens. Notice the presence of two rows of meral spines. A from Correa et al. (2003); B–H from de Melo (2007).

Figure 3. A in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 3. A, one-phase simultaneous alignment and tree estimation (SATé-II) analysis of maximum likelihood (ML) for representatives of the superfamily Nematocarcinoidea using two nuclear genes. B, two-phase phylogenetic analysis of Bayesian inference (BI) using two nuclear genes for representatives of the superfamily Nematocarcinoidea. The two phylogenetic trees resulted from the combined analysis of Histone (H3) and Enolase gene fragments of Rhynchocinetes (seven taxa and eight terminals), Cinetorhynchus (five taxa and 12 terminals), Lipkius (one taxon and two terminals), Nematocarcinus (three taxa), Eugonatonotus (one taxon), and outgroups. In (B), the general topology of the trees obtained from two-phase ML and BI analyses was the same. In (A), the numbers above or below the branches represent the bootstrap values obtained from the ML analysis in SATé-II. In (B), numbers above or below the branches represent the posterior probabilities from the BI analysis in MrBayes and bootstrap values obtained from the ML analyses in TREEFINDER (ML/BI).

Figure 2 in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 2. Habitus and morphological diversity of hinged-beak shrimps from the genera Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus and allied species in the superfamily Nematocarcinoidea. A, lateral view of Eugonatonotus crassus (Eugonatonotidae) (photo credit: Charles Bump, SERT). B, lateral view of Cinetorhynchus cf. maningi (photo credit: Arthur Anker). C, pair of Cinetorhynchus hendersoni in situ (photo credit: Nicolas Ory). Notice the male on the right with extremely elongated pereopods. D, large aggregation of Rhynchocinetes uritai in Japan (photo credit: Martin Thiel). E, dorsal view of a 'robustus' male of Rhynchocinetes typus (photo credit: Ivan Hinojosa). Notice the elongated third maxillipeds and the dense setae in the chelipeds. F, small aggregation of Rhynchocinetes serratus (photo credit: Ivan Hinojosa). In the male perched on the roof of the crevice, notice the elongated third maxillipeds and the absence of dense setae on the chelipeds. G, lateral view of Cinetorhynchus cf. rigens (photo credit: Arthur Anker).

Figure 5 in Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhynchus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny

Figure 5. Two-phase (above) and three-phase (below) phylogenetic analyses of maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) for representatives of the family Rhynchocinetidae using three genes. The software MUSCLE was used for sequence alignment The two phylogenetic trees resulted from the combined analysis of 12S, Histone (H3), and Enolase gene fragments of Rhynchocinetes (seven taxa and eight terminals), Cinetorhynchus (five taxa and 12 terminals), Lipkius (one taxon and two terminals), Eugonatonotus (one taxon) and outgroups. The general topology of the trees obtained from two-phase and three-phase ML and BI analyses was the same. The numbers above or below the branches represent the posterior probabilities from the BI analysis in MrBayes and bootstrap values obtained from ML analyses in TREEFINDER (ML/BI).

opennotspecifiedDec 2009View details →

FIGURES 124–130 in On certain species of the genus Phyllium Illiger, 1798, with proposals for an intra-generic systematization and the descriptions of five new species from the Philippines and Palawan (Phasmatodea: Phylliidae: Phylliinae: Phylliini) 2322

FIGURES 124–130. Species of the frondosum species-group and the genus Chitoniscus Stål, 1875 124. Ph. (Pu.) frondosum Redtenbacher, 1906, ♀ (PNG, Morobe Prov.) [coll. FH, No. 0413-1]

FIGURE 43. A, B in A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462

FIGURE 43. A, B. Epiphallic flagellum mapped on to the morphological analysis of all taxa from the current study (A) and the molecular phylogeny of Hyman et al. (2007) (B). Pale grey indicates a simple flagellum without cryptae is present; dark grey indicates that a flagellum with internal cryptae is present; white indicates that the flagellum is absent. C, D. Epiphallic retractor caecum mapped on to the morphological analysis of all taxa from the current study (C) and the molecular phylogeny of Hyman et al. (2007) (D). Grey indicates an epiphallic caecum is present; white indicates that it is absent.

FIGURE 42. Radulae. A–C. Trochomorpha rubens, FMNH 175247. D–F. Videna planorbis, FMNH 160957. G–I. Dendrotrochus eva eva, FMNH 15719. J–L in A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462

FIGURE 42. Radulae. A–C. Trochomorpha rubens, FMNH 175247. D–F. Videna planorbis, FMNH 160957. G–I. Dendrotrochus eva eva, FMNH 15719. J–L. Orpiella concavum, BMNH no registration number. Scale bars 20 mm (A–L).

FIGURE 44 in A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462

FIGURE 44. Trees resulting from the phylogenetic analysis of two molecular datasets. Families and subfamilies are shaded. A. Mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [after Hyman et al. (2007)]. B. Nuclear gene 28S rRNA [after Wade et al. (2006)].

FIGURE 40. Radulae. SEM. A–C in A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462

FIGURE 40. Radulae. SEM. A–C. Coneuplecta pampini, AM C438751. D–F. Coneuplecta calculosa, AM C377891. G–I. Liardetia doliolum, BPBM 253684. J–L. Lamprocystis guttula, FMNH 174940. Scale bars 10 mm (A–I), 20 mm (J–L).

FIGURE 39. Reproductive systems. A in A morphological phylogenetic analysis and generic revision of Australian Helicarionidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora), and an assessment of the relationships of the family 2462

FIGURE 39. Reproductive systems. A. Everettia sp., BMNH 20020188. B. Lamarckiella lamarckiana sibuyanensis, FMNH 201967. C. Coneuplecta pampini, AM C438751. D. Coneuplecta calculosa, AM C377891. E. Coneuplecta dahli, MNHN no registration number. F. Hiona pilsbryi, BPBM 206801. G. Liardetia doliolum, BPBM 253684. Scale bars 1 mm (C–E, G), 2 mm (F), 5 mm (A–B). Abbreviations: alb, albumen gland; bc, bursa copulatrix; ca, carrefour; e, eggs / embryos; ep, epiphallus; fov, free oviduct; her, hermaphrodite duct; m, muscle attaching penial sheath to epiphallus; ov, ovotestis; p, penis; pd, penial diverticulum; pr, prostate; prm, penis retractor muscle; pt, penial sheath; pv, penial verge; st, stimulator; ut, uterus; v, vagina; vd, vas deferens.