Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 3. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 17 log-transformed measurements (n = 177) of Enteromius Cope, 1867: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 177) of Enteromius: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 2. A in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 2. A. ML tree based on 558-bp-long Enteromius COI sequences with 1000 bootstrap replications, with node support shown as NJ/ML bootstrap (bootstrap values> 95% are shown; lineages <2% sequence divergence were collapsed), the label 'Kisangani region' contains samples from the Lomami/ Lobaye system and the Lobilo. B. Map of the Congo basin with the sampled river stretches indicated according to the phylogenetic lineages.

Fig. 9 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 9. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 36) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 8 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 8. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 42) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Ituri 5 (◊), Ituri 6 (♦), Ituri/'Kisangani region' (∆), Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 7 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 7. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 22) of E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901): 'Kisangani region' 2 (◊), Ituri 3 (♦) and 'Kisangani region' 3 (∆). Also shown are the type specimens examined of E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (○) and E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (●).

Figs. 46 and 47 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 46 and 47. Vespa tropica color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 40 and 41 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 40 and 41. Vespa color forms, (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face. Fig. 40. V. orientalis. Fig. 41. V. philippinensis.

Figs. 36 and 37 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 36 and 37. Vespa mocsaryana color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 38 and 39 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 38 and 39. Vespa multimaculata color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 29 and 30 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 29 and 30. Vespa color forms, (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face. Fig. 29. V. dybowskii. Fig. 30. V. fervida.

Figs. 27 and 28 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 27 and 28. Vespa ducalis color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 33–35 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 33–35. Vespa mandarina color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 25 and 26 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 25 and 26. Vespa crabro color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 21 and 22 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 21 and 22. Vespa color forms, (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face. Fig. 21. Vespa binghami. Fig. 22. Vespa crabro.

Figs. 17 and 18 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 17 and 18. Vespa color forms. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face. Fig. 17. V. basalis. Fig. 18. V. bellicosa.

Figs. 13 and 14 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 13 and 14. Vespa morphology. (a, b) Dorsal view of scutum. (c, d) Lateral view of pronotal lobe. (e, f) Lateral view of anterior pronotal carina. (a) V. basalis. (b) V. ducalis. (c) V. vivax. (d) V. velutina. Fig. 14. V. affinis coloration. (a) Lateral view. (b) Dorsal view. (c) Front view of face.

Figs. 5–8. Vespa morphology. Fig. 5 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 5–8. Vespa morphology. Fig. 5. Lateral view of metasomal tergum 2. Fig. 6. (a, b) Lateral view of pretegular pronotal carina. (c, d) Front view of clypeus. Fig. 7. (a, b) Front view of clypeus. (c, d). Dorsal view of vertex. Fig. 8. (a, c) Lateral view of metasoma. (b, d, e) Dorsal view of metasoma. Fig. 5a, V. fervida. Fig. 5b, V. luctuosa. Figs. 6a, 6c, 7a, 8a, 8c, V. philippinensis. Figs. 6b, 6d, V. velutina. Figs. 7b, 7e, 7f V. tropica. Figs. 7c, 7d, 8d, V. ducalis. Fig. 8b, V. bicolor.

Figs. 1–4. Vespa morphology. Fig. 1 in The Diversity of Hornets in the Genus Vespa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Vespinae), Their Importance and Interceptions in the United States

Figs. 1–4. Vespa morphology. Fig. 1 (a) Hindwing. (b) Forewing apex. (c) Lateral view of pronotal lobe. (e) Hindtarsal claws. (f)Thoracic dorsum. (g) Lateral view of metasomal segment 1. Fig. 2. (a) Lateral view of pronotal lobe. (b) Dorsal view of vertex, i =distance from hind ocellus to posterior head margin, ii=distance between lateral ocellus and eye. (c) Lateral view of metasomal segment 1. (d) Costal margin of forewing apex. (e) Dorsal view of vertex. (c) Front view of clypeus and mandibles. Fig. 3. (a, b) Lateral view of head. (c, d) Lateral view of metasoma. (3a, 3c) V. soror. Fig. 4. (a, b) Lateral view of metasomal tergum 2. (c, d) Lateral view of pronotal carina. (e, f) Front view of clypeus. Figs. 1a-g, 2a, 2b, 3b, 3d, V. crabro. Fig. 2c, V. binghami. Figs. 2d, 2e, V. analis. Fig. 2f, V. bicolor. Figs. 4a, 4e, V. fervida. Fig. 4b, V. multimaculata. Figs. 4c, 4f, V. luctuosa. Fig. 4d, V. affinis.