Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,410
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,410 results for “results”
IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 2nd Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized in a single panel
<p>IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 2<sup>nd</sup> Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized in a single panel (all stakeholder groups in a single panel, 2 rounds), about the views of stakeholders regarding “This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of new medicines on a common basis” (2019)</p> <p>For details on the Web-Delphi process, see: IMPACT HTA, Work Package 7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2, Deliverable 7.2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Advancing knowledge and MCDA tools to assist HTA agencies in evaluating medicines on a common basis (2021) Oliveira, M.D. (IST), Panos Kanavos (LSE), Bana e Costa, C. (IST)</p>
IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1st Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels
<p>IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1<sup>st</sup> Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels (one panel per stakeholder group, 2 rounds), about the views of stakeholders regarding “This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of new medicines on a common basis” (2019)</p> <p>For details on the Web-Delphi process, see: IMPACT HTA, Work Package 7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2, Deliverable 7.2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Advancing knowledge and MCDA tools to assist HTA agencies in evaluating medicines on a common basis (2021) Oliveira, M.D. (IST), Panos Kanavos (LSE), Bana e Costa, C. (IST)</p>
Supplementary material: Experimental acoustic characterisation of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: first results
<p>Raw data connected to the journal article: </p> <p>Anastasiia Panfilova, Peiran Chen, Ruud J.G. van Sloun, Hessel Wijkstra, Michiel Postema, Albert T. Poortinga, Massimo Mischi. Experimental acoustic characterisation of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: first results. <em>Medical Physics</em>, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Volume 48, Issue 11, November 2021, Pages 6765-6780.</p>
Case study result data set for Energy Economics (submitted) article "On Wholesale Electricity Prices and Market Values in a Carbon-Neutral Energy System"
<p>The data set contains wholesale power price time series data for Germany and France focussing on price setting effects in a long term low carbon European energy system context (scenario year 2050) generated with the model SCOPE SD of Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology IEE. The single time series are focussing on the price setting effects of different flexible technologies including both traditional and new market participants due to cross-sectoral integration.</p> <p>Unit: Euro/Megawatthour</p> <p><strong>Abbreviations:</strong></p> <ul> <li>BEV - Battery Electric Vehicles</li> <li>GER - Germany</li> <li>FRA - France</li> <li>OCGT - Open Cycle Gas Turbine</li> <li>PHEV - Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles</li> <li>RES - Renewable energy sources (here: wind and solar power)</li> <li>th. - thermal</li> </ul>
Comparison results of FAIR Evaluation tools
<p>We studied and compared three automated FAIRness evaluation tools namely F-UJI, the FAIR Evaluator, and FAIR Checker examining three aspects: 1) tool characteristics, 2) the evaluation metrics, and 3) metrics tests for three public datasets. We find significant differences in the evaluation results for tested resources, along with differences in the design, implementation, and documentation of the evaluation metrics and platforms.</p> <p>This data is the comparison results we summarized from the study. All results are reported in our manuscript. This data is the supplementary material of the manuscript. </p>
Global knowledge and use of soil biodiversity: Results of an expert survey
<p>A global survey on soil biodiversity (see file Global Biodiversity Survey.pdf provided as an attachment) was conducted over a three-week period in March 2022 by the Global Soil Partnership (GSP) of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, as part of the activities of the International Network on Soil Biodiversity (NETSOB). The survey intended to obtain information on the current status of knowledge and use of soil organisms worldwide, i.e., to identify who is doing what, where, and how, as well as the main gaps, pitfalls, and opportunities across existing national initiatives and research.</p> <p>The survey included 122 questions that characterized the work undertaken by experts regarding microbes, fauna, and their activity in soils, community & functional assessments, inventories, mapping and monitoring activities, ecosystem services, applications, and threats to soil biodiversity, education, and communication activities, as well as public policies related to soil biodiversity. The online survey was created using the software Survey Monkey v. 11 and was sent out to over 70 thousand e-mail addresses with a link to complete the survey. </p> <p>Over 2,600 responses were received, representing >1,350 institutions from 135 countries, mainly from experts active in research and academia. The number of respondents was not equal for all questions, as the survey guided the respondents to different parts, depending on their replies.</p> <p>The 122 questions and the replies of the respondents are presented as separate tabs in the attached Excel file (Results survey for Zenodo.xlsx). The respondents and their identities, as well as their e-mails and any personal websites were removed in the current file to maintain anonymity. Institutional websites were maintained as long as they did not identify the respondent(s) directly. </p> <p>A detailed written description of the survey results was prepared as a manuscript for a special issue of the journal Soil Organisms, volume 97 (Brown et al., 2025). The survey was prepared by a team of scientists from the Brazilian Corporation for Agricultural Research (Embrapa) and collaborating institutions, with assistance from the board of the International Network on Soil Biodiversity (NETSOB), and with funding provided by the FAO. The work was further supported by the Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Agropecuário Edmundo Gastal (FAPEG), Brazil, a grant of CNPq (Processo No. 312824/2022-0) to GGB, and of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant program (# 05901–2019) to ZL, who was also supported by Western University.</p>
IIIF: raising awareness of the user benefits for scholarly editions - usability testing results
<p>Usability testing results of the bachelor's thesis titled <a href="https://doc.rero.ch/record/306498/"><em>"The International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF): raising awareness of the user benefits for scholarly editions"</em></a><a href="https://doc.rero.ch/record/306498/">.</a></p> <p>Remote and in-person usability tests on the <a href="http://universalviewer.io/">Universal Viewer</a> and <a href="http://projectmirador.org/">Mirador</a>, two IIIF-compliant clients, took place between March and May 2017. The tests were conducted with Loop11 (remote testing) and Morae (in-person testing).</p> <p>The dataset is composed of Excel files, screenshots (tasks and heat maps) as well as videos.</p>
prioritization data and result for the navigable danube
<p>Shape file containing data and results of the prioritization approach for the navigable Danube river for conservation and restortion planning.</p>
The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of the Quasar Survey Spectra
<p>Data files to reproduce the published figures from Alexander et al. (2022), AJ, in press (<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2022arXiv220808517A/arxiv:2208.08517">arXiv:2208.08517</a>), titled "The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of the Quasar Survey Spectra". The figure number is encoded in the file name to make it easy to relate the published figures to the corresponding data file. Please see the published paper for detailed information on what is plotted for each figure.</p>
THOR RNA-sequencing results
<p>Summarized results of RNA-sequencing performed within THOR (targeting smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis). THOR is a collaborative project of Aarhus University and Novo Nordisk A/S as a part of the Open Discovery Innovation Network (ODIN) initiative.</p> <p>See detailed data description in the file "DESCRIPTION.md".</p>
Result data related to "Cost-potential curves of onshore wind energy: the role of disamenity costs"
<p>This dataset estimates the impact of incorporating disamenity costs of wind onshore in Europe (in addition to technology cost). The data haset has been generated and used for the publication:</p> <blockquote> <p>Ruhnau, O., Eicke, A., Sgarlato, R., Tröndle, T., Hirth, L., 2022. Cost-potential curves of onshore wind energy: the role of disamenity costs. Environmental and Resource Economics. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00746-2">10.1007/s10640-022-00746-2</a></p> </blockquote> <p>The corresponding code is published on <a href="https://github.com/timtroendle/wind-onshore-cost-potential">GitHub</a>.</p> <p>The dataset includes:</p> <ol> <li>Maps that exhibit the population count within a predefined distance (e.g., "population-within-1km.tif") and the resulting disamenity costs ("disamenity-cost.tif")</li> <li>Tables that summarize the engineering and disamenity costs faced at each potential turbine location in the EU (e.g., "turbines-AT.csv")</li> </ol>
Datasets containing the results from the analysis on SDGS and eHealth inside the Citizen Science Community on Twitter
<p>This datasets contain the results from our analyses of the Citizen Science Community on Twitter. These analyses have been done to better understand the discussion about SDGs, eLearning and eHealth.</p> <p><strong>T</strong>he purpose of sharing these datasets is to provide the basis to reproduce the results reported in the associated deliverable. These files are not raw data, since due to privacy concerns we can not share personal information from Twitter.</p> <p><strong>dominant_topics_anonym.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contians the distribution of the most discussed topics inside the SDGs discussion.</p> <p><strong>Edges_Hashtag_connected.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the edges to build the network of connected hashtags. This edges can be used to build a network and explore the connections or to statiscally analyse the results.</p> <p><strong>hashtags.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the results of the most used hashtags in the analysis about eLearning. <br> </p> <p><strong>hashtags_treemap_health.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contains the results of the most frequent hashtags in the eHealth analysis.</p> <p><strong>ldavis_prepared_ieee17.html</strong>: HTML file. This file contains the Intertopic distance map and most salient terms from the topic modelling analysis done in the SDGs conversation study.</p> <p><strong>Most_retweeted_accounts.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contains the top 20 users that receive more retweets in the conversation around eHealth. The column called Indegree refers to the topological value calculated from the network of retweets. This indegree is equivalent to the number of retweets received. On the other hand, Outdegree is the opposite, so number of retweets given to others.</p> <p><strong>Most_retweeting_account.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset presents the opposite part of the previous one, the accounts that retweet the most from the eHealth analysis. The columns contain the same indicators: Indegree and Outdegree.</p> <p><strong>sdgs_count_publish.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the number of tweets assigned to the different SDGs from the analysis done on the conversation about these Goals.</p> <p><strong>sdgs_tweets_sdgsaccess.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. Same file as the previous one in other format to ease the handling in Excel.</p> <p><strong>top_hash_health.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. The most used hashtags inside the conversation about eHealth.</p> <p><strong>topics_tweets_sdgsaccess.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. Tweets by topic extracted using Machine Learning in the SDGs analysis.</p> <p> </p> <p>This repository will receive updates in the future in order to present all the data available and publishable from the different analysis that were described.</p>
ITACA agent-based simulation model results
<p>This files downloaded present the raw results and derived indicators per scenario considered obtained with the agent-based model developed for policy assessment in the scope of the ITACA project (<a href="https://www.itaca-h2020.eu/">https://www.itaca-h2020.eu/</a>).</p> <p>The files are structured in three different case studies:</p> <ul> <li>CS01 - Past unsuccessful and delayed solutions</li> <li>CS02 - Past successful solutions</li> <li>CS03 - Future solutions</li> </ul> <p>In each case study there are included a set of scenarios, each of them testing one or several policy measures. Each scenario file includes the short name of the policy under study. For example, "Results_visualisation_CS01_Mandates.xlsm" includes the results when testing mandates as policy measure in the CS01 case study. The corresponding raw outputs of the simulator are included in the folder "yyyymmdd_hhmmss_CS01_Mandates".</p> <p>Each excel file contains the following tabs:</p> <ul> <li>Files - Files loaded to create the file. The loading interactive buttons have been disabled to avoid errors.</li> <li>H0 - Tab containing the visualisation of different raw outputs for the adopters agents. The user can select all agents or one specific agent to look at the results by selecting its ID in the slicers on top of each agent type (enable editing in excel to do so).</li> <li>H0_KPI_tech - Shows the number of adoptions per technology and agent type</li> <li>H0_KPI_eco - Shows the surpluses per agent type and total social welfare</li> <li>H0_KPI_eco_metrics - Same results, disaggregated in a tabular format.</li> <li>H0_KPI_op - Shows the total fuel burnt, throughput and Determined Unitary Cost (DUC) for enroute and terminal ANS.</li> <li>H1 - Configuration file used as input for the simulation.</li> <li>H2 - Raw results for airlines.</li> <li>H3 - Raw results for airports.</li> <li>H4 - Raw results for enroute ANSPs.</li> <li>H5 - Raw results for terminal ANSPs.</li> <li>H6 - Raw results per route.</li> <li>H7 - Raw results for regulators.</li> </ul> <p>The raw results folders include, apart from the data shown in the visualisation excel files, the input data per stakeholder, policy parameters, technology parameters, exogenous variables that affect the agents and the charging zones defined in the European airspace. </p> <p>The complete description of the case studies and scenarios tested is included in ITACA's deliverable <a href="http://www.nommon-files.es/itaca/ITACA-D5.1_Impact_assessment_of_policies_and_regulations_to_boost_ATM_technology_adoption_v01.00.00.pdf">D5.1 Impact Assessment of Policies and Regulations to Boost ATM Technology Adoption</a>.</p> <p>Thank you for downloading the dataset! It would be very helpful if you share your view on the data show with us. We have created the following short <a href="https://forms.gle/EgVAW57siXizsEn8A">questionnaire</a> to facilitate the task. </p>
Dataset for the article EDM-GNSS distance comparison at the EURO5000 calibration baseline: preliminary results
<p>GNSS RINEX observation files for the observation campaign used in the article "EDM-GNSS distance comparison at the EURO5000 calibration baseline: preliminary results" by Kinga Wezka, Luis García-Asenjo, Dominik Próchniewicz, Sergio Baselga, Ryszard Szpunar, Pascual Garrigues, Janusz Walo and Raquel Luján, Journal of Applied Geodesy https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0049. The work leading to this paper was performed within the 18SIB01 GeoMetre project of the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR). This project has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, funder ID: 10.13039/100014132. Raquel Luján acknowledges the funding from the Programa de Ayudas de Investigación y Desarrollo (PAID-01-20) de la Universitat Politècnica de València.</p>
The Quest for the Missing Dust: New Herschel Maps of Local Group Galaixes (LMC, SMC, M31, M33) that Restore Previously-Missed Extended Emission, Along With SED-Fitting Results, Hydrogen Gas Maps, and Swift UV Observations
<p>Here we provide the data products from publications:</p> <p>Clark, C.J.R., et al., <em>The Quest for the Missing Dust: I – Restoring Large Scale Emission in Herschel Maps of Local Group Galaxies</em>, ApJ 921 35</p> <p>Clark, C.J.R., et al., <em>The Quest for the Missing Dust: II – Two Orders of Magnitude of Evolution in the Dust-to-Gas Ratio Resolved Within Local Group Galaxies</em>, ApJ 946 42</p> <p>This data concerns four Local Group galaxies: the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), M31, and M33.</p> <p> </p> <p>For each galaxy, we provide our new Herschel maps, as described in the above publications, which were combined in Fourier space ('feathered') with Planck, IRAS, and COBE data, in order to restore extended emission that was removed from previous Herschel reductions for these galaxies.</p> <p>For each galaxy, we provide this new Herschel data for 5 Hershcel bands: the PACS 100 and 160 <span>\(\mu\)</span>m bands, and the SPIRE 250, 350, and 500 <span>\(\mu\)</span>m bands. This data is provided in FITS format, with one FITS file for each band for each galaxy. Each of these files contains 4 extensions. Extension 1 (IMAGE) provides the standard feathered map. Extension 2 (UNC) provides the uncertainty map. Extension 3 (MASK) provides a binary mask map indicating the portion of the data where reliable, fully-feathered high-resolution coverage is available. Extension 4 provides the foreground-subtracted version of the feathered map (FGND_SUB), the header of which also describes the uncertainty on that subtraction. All maps are in units of MJy/sr (except the MASK extension, which is boolean).</p> <p> </p> <p>We also provide the outputs of our Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) fitting to this data, as described in the publications. For each galaxy, we provide FITS files giving the median value of each parameter in each pixel, and maps of the uncertainties on those medians (being the 68.3% quantile around the median). The parameters are dust mass surface density (SED_Sigma_Mass.fits), dust temperature (SED_Temp.fits), beta 1 (SED_Beta1.fits), beta 2 (SED_Beta2.fits), break wavelength (SED_Break.fits), and 500 <span>\(\mu\)</span>m excess (SED_Excess500.fits). Each of these files contain 2 extensions. Extension 1 (median) provides the map of pixel parameter median values. Extension 2 (uncert) provides the map of uncertainties on those medians.</p> <p>Additionally, we provide the full posterior probability distribution for all SED parameters, consisting of 1000 posterior samples, for all pixels, in the form of a FITS file containing a 4-dimensional hypercube, with axes corresponding to right ascension, declination, parameters (in order: dust mass surface density, dust temperature, beta 1, beta 2, break wavelength, and 500 <span>\(\mu\)</span>m excess), and samples. This is provided as a gzip compressed FITS file for each galaxy.</p> <p>Furthermore, provide the Swift-UVOT maps used in Paper II. This data is provided for Swift-UVOT bands W1, W2, and M2. For each band, we provide a FITS file containing 3 extensions. Extension 1 (SURF_BRI) provides the map of surface brightness in MJy/sr (converted using the Swift-UVOT zero points given in Breeveld et al., 2011). Extension 2 (RATE) provides the map of count rate (in photons/sec). Extension 3 (EXP) provides the map of exposure time (in sec). The maps for the LMC and SMC are those presented in Hagen et al. (2017). The maps for M31 and M33 are were reduced following the same process as those in Hagen et al. (2017), and will be fully presented in Decleir et al. (in prep.), but are provided here for the purposes of reproducibility.</p> <p>Lastly, for each galaxy, we provide our maps of the hydrogen surface density (Sigma_H.fits), and dust-to-gas ratio (DtG.fits). None of the maps presented have had deprojection corrections applied</p> <p> </p>
Radiative transfer calculation results for Arctic cirrus
<p>Data of the figure content from the radiative transfer calculations in the publication Marsing, Meerkötter et al: Investigating the radiative effect of Arctic cirrus measured in situ during the winter 2015/2016</p> <p>Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-395</p>
Geophysical and physical oceanography data and acoustic facies mapping results of the Central Basin in the northwestern Ross Sea margin, Antarctica
<p>Multi-channel seismic (MCS), sub-bottom profiler (SBP), multi-beam echosounder (MBES) and expandable conductivity-temperature-depth (XCTD) data and acoustic facies mapping results of the Central Basin in the northwestern Ross Sea margin, Antarctica. The Coordinate Reference System (CRS) for the MCS, SBP, MBES data and acoustic mapping results is WGS 84 / Antarctic Polar Stereographic (EPSG:3031). ). The geophysical data (MCS, SBP, MBES) and oceanographic measurements (XCTD) collected by the RV <em>Araon</em> are provided by the Korea Polar Data Center (<a href="https://kpdc.kopri.re.kr">https://kpdc.kopri.re.kr</a>).</p>
MOM6-COBALTv2 model result for ecosystem response to marine heat waves
<p>0.5 × 0.5 resolution, Northeast Pacific ocean (184.8-120.2W, 28.06-64.97N). Monthly results from 1958-2019, all detrended with linear trend over full period removed. </p>
Coverage of DOAJ journals' citations through OpenCitations - Result DataSet
<p>The dataset contains: </p> <ul> <li><strong>by_journal.json</strong>: a file containing all information extracted by Open Citations about DOAJ journals divide by year and journal name. Inside the file, the metadata about the journal are: <ul> <li>ISSN</li> <li>EISSN</li> <li>number of articles overall in the journal</li> <li>subject(s) </li> <li>number of citations received</li> <li>number of citations done</li> <li>ratio between citations done and received</li> <li>number of citations received from DOAJ journals</li> <li>number of citations done to DOAJ journals</li> <li>ratio between citations done to and received from DOAJ journals.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li><strong>normal.json</strong>: a file containing all information extracted from Open Citations about DOAJ journals divided only by year. Inside the file, the data by year are: <ul> <li>number of citations received.</li> <li>number of citations done.</li> <li>ratio between citations done and received.</li> <li>number of self-citations made by DOAJ inside Open Citations.</li> <li>ratio between the self-citation and the total citations received and done by DOAJ.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li><strong>errors.json</strong>: a file containing the count of all errors obtained from computations. Inside the file: <ul> <li>errors about records that don't have any specified date (null dates).</li> <li>errors about records that have impossible dates (wrong dates).</li> <li>errors about articles that don't have any specified Dois.</li> <li>errors about Open Citations records that don't have any Dois in the citing or cited fields.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>DOAJ_metrics.json</strong>: a file containing metrics about DOAJ and Open Citations, obtained by computations. Inside the file are these fields: <ul> <li>number of journals with dois.</li> <li>number of articles which have been processed during computations.</li> <li>number of used Dois. All dois (with no repetition) which are used for the adding journal operation.</li> <li>number of repeated Dois. All dois which are repeated inside the same or in another journal.</li> <li>number of accepted Dois. All articles (with repetition) which have both a defined journal and a defined doi.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p>
Dataset - Simulation results GNSS raytracing INTOMO
<p>The 3D ray-tracing algorithm is based on the reconstruction of the signal path within the grid model (3D refractivity field). For our studies, an extension of the original 3D ray-tracing module from ATom (Atmospheric Tomography) GNSS software package [37] is used. The necessary modifications were inspired by Javaherian et al. [44]. The first step of ray-tracing in our approach (shooting<br> technique) is based on the prior knowledge of transmitter and receiver positions, as well as information about weather parameters and thus, refraction at nodal points of the grid. The transmitter and receiver are the GPS satellite and the LEO satellite, respectively. In the current version, coordinates are delivered by atmPhs files in an earth-centered inertial (ECI) coordinate system [45].</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.