Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 from: VanMaurik LN, Wortham JL (2014) Grooming as a secondary behavior in the shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea). In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 55-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6292

Figure 7 - Mean total frequency of grooming behaviors of Macrobrachium rosenbergii females (N=21) and male morphotypes (SM: N=28, OC: N=25, BC: N=20) in 30-min time period (mean ± SE). Note: BC = blue-clawed males; F = females, OC = orange-clawed males; SM = small males. No significant differences between the groups, p>0.05.

Figure 3 from: VanMaurik LN, Wortham JL (2014) Grooming as a secondary behavior in the shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea). In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 55-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6292

Figure 3 - Mean frequency of use of grooming appendages of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (N=94) in 30-min time period (mean ± SE). Note: different letters indicate significant differences among use of appendages.

Figure 2 from: VanMaurik LN, Wortham JL (2014) Grooming as a secondary behavior in the shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea). In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 55-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6292

Figure 2 - Relative size of Macrobrachium rosenbergii female and male morphotypes. A Female B Small-clawed (SM) male C Orange-clawed (OC) male D Blue-clawed (BC) male. Note the difference in the size of the chelipeds.

Figure 4 from: VanMaurik LN, Wortham JL (2014) Grooming as a secondary behavior in the shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea). In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 55-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6292

Figure 4 - Mean frequency of use of grooming appendages of Macrobrachium rosenbergii females (N=21) and male morphotypes (SM: N=28, OC: N=25, BC: N=20) in 30-min time period (mean ± SE). Note: BC = blue-clawed males; F = females, OC = orange-clawed males; SM = small males.

Figure 3 from: Kronmüller C, Lewis JGE (2015) On the function of the ultimate legs of some Scolopendridae (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8674

Figure 3 - A Scolopendra dehaani hanging from a camera tripod just using the ultimate legs B Scolopendra multidens and C Scolopendra heros showing possible auto mimicry as the ultimate legs and last segments of the trunk mimic the head and antennae.

Figure 1 from: Kronmüller C, Lewis JGE (2015) On the function of the ultimate legs of some Scolopendridae (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8674

Figure 1 - Different shape of ultimate legs: A The least specialised ultimate legs of Scolopendra gigantea B pincer-like ultimate legs in Asanada akashii C leaf-like ultimate legs of Alipes grandidieri D the long and slender ultimate legs of Rhysida longipes that can be autotomised.

Figure 5 from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 5 - Hydroschendyla submarina, selection of micrographs of transverse sections through the head from anterior to posterior. A Section through the anterior head part, showing the mandibulo-tentorial complex at the level of the epipharyngeal bar B Section through the mandibulo-tentorial complex (right side of head) at the level of the junction between epipharyngeal bar and supramandibular arch. C Section through the mandibulo-tentorial complex (left side of head) between the levels shown in B and D. D Section through posterior part of tentorium and mandible (right side of head) at the level of the mesial interconnection of the mandibles by muscle 26. Numbers refer to muscles as listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: br brain cl clypeus, cl-ecr clypeo-epicranial muscle eb epipharyngeal bar of tentorium, ecr epicranium hy hypopharynx lbs labral sidepiece mb mandibular base md mandible mxI first maxilla ph pharynx pp posterior process of tentorium sma supramandibular arch of tentorium sog subesophageal ganglion tb transverse bar of tentorium tmxII telopodite of second maxilla.

Figure 4 from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 4 - Dicellophilus carniolensis, selection of micrographs of transverse sections through the head from anterior to posterior. A Section through anterior head part in front of the mandibulo-tentorial complex, highlighting muscles arising from the clypeus B Section through the mandibulo-tentorial complex (left side of head) slightly anterior to C; in the inset (scale: 25 µm) the area of flexibility (arrow) between mandibular gnathal lobe and base is magnified. C Section through the mandibulo-tentorial complex (right side of head) at the level of the cuticular tendon (arrow in inset; scale: 25 µm) of the mandibular gnathal lobe. D Section through posterior part of tentorium and mandible (left side of head), showing collagenous tendon system and mandibular septum. Numbers refer to muscles as listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: br brain cl-ecr clypeo-epricranial muscle cl-ep clypeo-epipharyngeal muscle cl-lbr clypeo-labral muscle ct collagenous tendon, ecr epicranium hb hypopharyngeal bar of tentorium lbs labral sidepiece mb mandibular base md mandible mgl mandibular gnathal lobe, mxI first maxilla ph pharynx pp posterior process of tentorium, se septum of mandibular gnathal pouch sma supramandibular arch of tentorium st stilus tb transverse bar of tentorium tmxII telopodite of second maxilla.

Figure 3C from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 3C - Hydroschendyla submarina, surface model of the left mandibulo-tentorial complex in situ. Click on the image to activate the interactive 3D-mode. (download 3D model)

Figure 3 from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 3 - Hydroschendyla submarina, surface model of the left mandibulo-tentorial complex. A Medio-frontal view, tentorial muscles 14, 18, and 22b removed as well as hypopharyngeal muscle 25; arrow points to condyle of mandibular gnathal lobe B Oblique dorso-frontal view, extrinsic mandibular muscles 3, 5, and 13 removed as well as tentorial muscles 18 and 22b. Numbers refer to muscles as listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: md mandible tt tentorium.

Figure 2 from: Kronmüller C, Lewis JGE (2015) On the function of the ultimate legs of some Scolopendridae (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 269-278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8674

Figure 2 - A Warning posture of Scolopendra spinosissima B Warning posture with lifted ultimate legs as well as the last pairs of locomotory legs in Scolopendra galapagoensis C Interlocked ultimate legs in a pair of Scolopendra galapagoensis just before mating D antennae tapping under the lifted ultimate legs in Scolopendra dehaani in courtship behaviour.

Figure 2C from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 2C - Dicellophilus carniolensis, surface model of the left mandibulo-tentorial complex in situ. Click on the image to activate the interactive 3D-mode. (download 3D model)

Figure 1 from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 1 - Surface model of the mandibulo-tentorial complex, dorsal view onto the left complex within the head capsule (anterior is top). A Dicellophilus carniolensis B Hydroschendyla submarina, tentorial muscles 18 and 22b removed. Numbers refer to muscles as listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: an antenna cl clypeus, ecr epicranium, md mandible, tt tentorium.

Figure 2 from: Koch M, Schulz J, Edgecombe GD (2015) Tentorial mobility in centipedes (Chilopoda) revisited: 3D reconstruction of the mandibulo-tentorial musculature of Geophilomorpha. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8840

Figure 2 - Dicellophilus carniolensis, surface model of the left mandibulo-tentorial complex. A Medio-frontal view, tentorial muscle 14 removed; arrow points to condyle of mandibular gnathal lobe B Oblique dorso-frontal view, extrinsic mandibular muscles removed. Numbers refer to muscles as listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: md mandible tt tentorium.

Figure 2 from: Hilken G, Edgecombe GD, Müller CHG, Sombke A, Wirkner CS, Rosenberg J (2015) Interaction of the tracheal tubules of Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopoda, Notostigmophora) with glandular structures of the pericardial septum. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 233-242. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8644

Figure 2 - Pericardial glands and mucoid substances. A Longitudinal section of a connection of the tip of a tracheal tubule and a canal cell of a glandular unit B Cross section of a connection between a tracheal tubule and a canal cell of a glandular unit C Tracheal tubule in the vicinity of a glandular unit. The tracheal tubule is filled with mucoid substances D Cross section of the ending of a tracheal tubule surrounded by the epithelium of a glandular unit. The tracheal lumen is filled with different mucoid substances E Longitudinal section of a tracheal tubule near the pericardial septum filled with electron-dense and electron-lucent mucoid substances F Part of a longitudinal section of a tracheal tubule. The specialized cuticle is covered by mucoid substances G Oblique section of a tracheal tubule. The tracheal cuticle is covered by a distinct mucoid substance. bl basal lamina; c cuticle; cc canal cell; cd cuticular duct of the canal cell; ed electron-dense fraction of mucous; el electron-lucent fraction of mucus; ic intermediary cell; m mucoid substance; sc secretory cell, sr secretory reservoir; te tracheal epithelium; tt tracheal tubules; arrows, presumed interdigitations between tracheae and glandular compartment.

Figure 1 from: Hilken G, Edgecombe GD, Müller CHG, Sombke A, Wirkner CS, Rosenberg J (2015) Interaction of the tracheal tubules of Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopoda, Notostigmophora) with glandular structures of the pericardial septum. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 233-242. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8644

Figure 1 - Tracheal system and pericardial septum of Scutigera coleoptrata. A Spiracle (stomata) situated dorsomedially on long tergite 4 (SEM) B Tracheal system with its atrium and hundreds of tracheal tubules (SEM) C Cross-section of tracheal system with its tracheal tubules within the pericardial sinus. The sinus is surrounded by the specialized part of the pericardial septum (LM) D Inset showing details of the tergal cuticle with epidermis and the pericardial septum. The tracheal tubules extend into the epithelium of the pericardial septum (LM) E Overview of the epithelium of the pericardial septum with endings of two tracheal tubules and nuclei of glandular units (TEM) F Detail of a glandular unit within the pericardial septum consisting of a secretory cell, an intermediary cell, and a canal cell. In the secretory cell, parts of the microvilli of the secretory reservoir are visible, as are parts of the canaliculi system in the intermediary cell. a atrium, bc body cavity; bl basal lamina, c, cuticle, ca canaliculi system, cc canal cell, ic intermediary cell, e epidermis, gu glandular unit, h dorsal heart, mu body muscle; n nuclei of glandular unit cells, pc pericardial cavity; ps pericardial septum, s spiracle, sc secretory cell, sr reservoir of the secretory cell, te tergite, tt tracheal tubules

Figure 1 from: Ravnjak B, Kos I (2015) The current knowledge on centipedes (Chilopoda) in Slovenia: faunistic and ecological records from a national database. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 223-231. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8672

Figure 1 - Number of centipede species and specimens caught in individual UTM quadrants from 1921 till 2014 in Slovenia.

Figure 6 from: Short M (2015) New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 209-222. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8668

Figure 6 - Ivan H. Tuf and Daria Kuznetsova collecting invertebrates including Lophoproctus coecus from sieved soil and litter, Utrish Nature Reserve, Krasnodar province, Russia.

Figure 5 from: Short M (2015) New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 209-222. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8668

Figure 5 - Map indicating geographic distribution of Lophoproctus species. Legend: red star = Lophoproctus coecus; yellow circle = Lophoproctus lucidus; white star = Lophoproctus coecus/Lophoproctus lucidus? (many in similar localities as Lophoproctus coecus and hence hidden); aqua triangle = Lophoproctus jeanneli; purple square = Lophoproctus pagesi; purple hexagon = Lophoproctus cf. pagesi; white circle = Lophoproctus sp. indet. Map created using SimpleMappr, http://www.simplemappr.net, (Shorthouse 2010).

Figure 4 from: Short M (2015) New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 209-222. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8668

Figure 4 - Lophoproctus coecus (Pocock, 1888) Krasnodar Province, Russia. A Lateral view showing antenna B Dorso-lateral view showing tergal trichomes. Scale bars: 1 mm.