Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 11. Wallaceophis gujaratensis with two distinct lateral stripes, from Saldi village, Amerli district, Gujarat. Photo credit Bhavesh Trivedi.

Fig. 5. Individual B in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 5. Individual B, both sides eight supralabials, fourth and fifth in contact with eye, and second and third supralabials in contact with loreal scale. (A) Left side. (B) Right side. (C) Live individual with same scalation. Photo credit Dikansh S. Parmar.

Fig. 4. Individual C in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 4. Individual C, both sides nine supralabials, fifth and sixth supralabials in contact with eye, and second, third, and fourth supralabials in contact with loreal scale. (A) Left side. (B) Right side. Photo credit Dikansh S. Parmar.

Fig. 3. Individual A in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 3. Individual A, both sides nine supralabials, fifth and sixth supralabials in contact with eye, and second, third, and fourth supralabials in contact with loreal scale. (A) Left side. (B) Right side. Photo credit Dikansh S. Parmar.

Fig. 1 in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 1. Two colors of Coronella brachyura. (A) Black color. (B) Brown color. Photo credit Dikansh S. Parmar.

Fig. 2 in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 2. (A) Male individual found in road kill. (B) Close up of its hemipenis. Photo credit Dikansh S. Parmar.

Fig. 9 in Description of head scalation variation, hemipenis, reproduction, and behavior of the Indian Smooth Snake, Coronella brachyura (Günther 1866)

Fig. 9. Distribution shown in map in all four states of India along with Tropic of Cancer, Narmada and Tapi rivers. Distribution and localities shown separately in Gujarat state, Surat and Tapi districts. Map prepared by Nitin Patel and Smita Ramkumar.

Fig. 7 in Reproductive behavior and sex pheromone production in Eutectona machaeralis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Fig. 7. Mean behavioral responses of Eutectona machaeralis males to sex pheromone gland crude extracts and the control in a wind tunnel. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Reproductive behavior and sex pheromone production in Eutectona machaeralis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Fig. 2. The influence of age on daily emergence of Eutectona machaeralis adults (mixed sex) in the laboratory during scotophase. Values with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 5 in Reproductive behavior and sex pheromone production in Eutectona machaeralis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Fig. 5. Mean electroanntenogram response of male Eutectona machaeralis to sex pheromone gland crude extract obtained from 2-d-old virgin females at different hours during scotophase. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 4 in Reproductive behavior and sex pheromone production in Eutectona machaeralis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Fig. 4. Mean percentage of Eutectona machaeralis females that exhibited calling behavior during scotophase. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 1 in Reproduction and spawning behavior in the frog, Engystomops pustulatus (Shreve 1941)

Fig. 1. Size and fecundity rates for amplectant pairs of Engystomops pustulatus. After collected in amplexus in the field, pairs were left in plastic containers where they could spawn. (A) Proportion of unfertilized eggs among pairs that successfully built a nest, (B) Female vs. male snout-vent length (SVL) with linear regression and 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines).

Fig. 5 in Reproduction and spawning behavior in the frog, Engystomops pustulatus (Shreve 1941)

Fig. 5. Relationship (in log space) for body and testis mass among 11 species of Leptodactylinae frogs. Except for Engystomops pustulatus, data is from Prado and Haddad (2003). Open circles indicate species on which multimale spawning has been reported. Note that E. pustulatus, in which multi-male spawning apparently occurs, also has larger testis than other Leptodactylinae.

Fig. 2 in Reproduction and spawning behavior in the frog, Engystomops pustulatus (Shreve 1941)

Fig. 2. Bivariate plots for (A) nest volume vs. number of eggs, (B) females size vs. nest volume, and (C) male size vs. number of eggs in Engystomops pustulatus. Linear regressions with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines), determination coefficients (R2), and ANOVA's P values are shown.

Fig. 4 in Reproduction and spawning behavior in the frog, Engystomops pustulatus (Shreve 1941)

Fig. 4. Engystomops pustulatus nesting couple (QCAZ 26671– 72) and β-male (QCAZ 26673). The couple builds the foam nest as the male kicks the egg masses extruded by the female. Frame from video (infra-red recording). See text for details.

Fig. 3 in Reproduction and spawning behavior in the frog, Engystomops pustulatus (Shreve 1941)

Fig. 3. Spawning of Engystomops pustulatus nesting couple (QCAZ 26671–72) and β-male (QCAZ 26673). Above: duration of kicking bursts. Below: number of bursts per minute; asterisks indicate β-male movements in the foam. Measurements are shown in sequence from the beginning of the observation until the couple left the nest. See text for details.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2011View details →

Fig. 4 in Population structure and reproductive behavior of Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani (Jordan, 1889) in a tropical reservoir

Fig. 4. Relationship between standard length and total weight (SL-TW) of the Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani in the Aguamilpa Reservoir in Nayarit, Mexico.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2011View details →

Fig. 3 in Population structure and reproductive behavior of Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani (Jordan, 1889) in a tropical reservoir

Fig. 3. Monthly frequency distribution of size and modal groups of Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani in the Aguamilpa Reservoir in Nayarit, Mexico.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2011View details →

Fig. 2 in Population structure and reproductive behavior of Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani (Jordan, 1889) in a tropical reservoir

Fig. 2. (a) Monthy sex ratio; (b) Length-frequency distribution by gender for Sinaloa cichlid Cichlasoma beani in the Aguamilpa Reservoir in Mexico. Asterisks indicate significant differences.