Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
293
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
293 results for “Clamping”
ASDF: Assembly State Detection Utilizing Late Fusion by Integrating 6D Pose Estimation - Training Set - Corner Clamp Part 1
<p>@article{schieber2024asdf,<br> title={ASDF: Assembly State Detection Utilizing Late Fusion by Integrating 6D Pose Estimation},<br> author={Schieber, Hannah and Li, Shiyu and Corell, Niklas and Beckerle, Philipp and Kreimeier, Julian and Roth, Daniel},<br> journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16400},<br> year={2024}<br>}</p>
CLAMPS NWC/RIL Observations
<p>CLAMPS observations from CLAMPS1 during a local/internal deployment to restart operations after COVID19 pause of deployments. CLAMPS2 did not deploy. These datasets include boundary-layer profiles of wind, temperature, and humidity collected from the CLAMPS system. </p> <p>These data can be accessed on the <a href="https://data.nssl.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/FRDD/CLAMPS/campaigns/PBLtops/catalog.html">NOAA National Severe Storms THREDDS Archive</a>. The readme contained here provides information about how to access and available resources for users. </p> <p>After a full pause of all observation activity due to the COVID19 pandemic, the CLAMPS1 facility was deployed just outside the National Weather Center in Norman, OK to restart observation practices. The location is between the National Weather Center and the OU Radar Innovations Laboratory and directly adjacent to the KOUN NWS-Norman Sounding release location. Observations are generally continuous throughout the period, though some non-standard scan and operations modes may be included as a result of tests conducted by the operations team during the deployment. </p>
PBL Tops CLAMPS observations
<p>CLAMPS observations from both CLAMPS1 and CLAMPS2 during PBL Tops: Evaluating Polarimetric Retrievals of Boundary Layer Height Using State-of-the-Art Boundary Layer Profiling, a project supported by OU/CIWRO's Director's Discretionary Funds. Details about the instruments onboard CLAMPS can be found on the <a href="https://apps.nssl.noaa.gov/CLAMPS/instrumentation.php">NSSL CLAMPS</a> webpage. These datasets include boundary-layer profiles of wind, temperature, and humidity collected from the CLAMPS systems.</p> <p>These data can be accessed on the <a href="https://data.nssl.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/FRDD/CLAMPS/campaigns/PBLtops/catalog.html">NOAA National Severe Storms THREDDS Archive</a>. The readme contained here provides information about how to access and available resources for users. </p> <p>Observations cover a 4-week observation period, split into two 2-week blocks. During block 1, each CLAMPS will deploy near KTLX (Norman, OK) at a radar-adjacent site (0-5 km) and a radar-distant site at Kessler Atmospheric and Ecologial Field Station (10-20 km), respectively. During block 2, the radar-distant CLAMPS will reposition to a radar-adjacent site at KSHV (Shreveport, LA). The observational approach providess one continuous 4-week time series within 5 km of KTLX. By moving the second CLAMPS platform between the two blocks (from Kessler Station to KSHV), the data can be used to evaluate differences due to distance from radar and the local climatology or land-use characteristics, which may modify expected boundary-layer evolution. </p> <p>Owing to the sparse distribution of atmospheric profilers, numerous studies have sought to use radar detection of Bragg scattering to observe the evolution of planetary boundary layer (BL) height, including efforts using the operational NWS WSR-88D network by Banghoff et al. (2018; hereafter B18) using. The B18 method uses quasi-vertical profiles obtained from azimuthal averaging (Ryzhkov et al. 2016) and offers the promise of national, real-time estimates of BL height. However, the B18 method was only initally validated using twice-daily radiosonde observations, thus obscuring its efficacy for retrieving BL height estimates during periods of evolution and complex structure (e.g., morning/evening transitions, residual layers, etc.). The observations in this dataset were collected in an effort to (1) validate the polarimetric B18 method using specialized independent measurements from both CLAMPS; (2) extend validation times to include important BL evolution periods beyond synoptic sampling times and identify failure periods and regimes; (3) contextualize and interpret signatures observed in B18 using novel near-continuous data (e.g., overnight signatures); and (4) quantify the skill of the B18 method.</p> <p>Banghoff, J.R., D.J. Stensrud, and M.R. Kumjian, 2018: Convective Boundary Layer Depth Estimation from S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 35, 1723–1733.</p> <p>Ryzhkov, A., P. Zhang, H. Reeves, M. Kumjian, T. Tschallener, S. Trömel, and C. Simmer, 2016: Quasi-Vertical Profiles—A New Way to Look at Polarimetric Radar Data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 33, 551–562.</p>
CHEESEHEAD CLAMPS observations
<p>The Chequamegon Heterogeneous Ecosystem Energy-balance Study Enabled by a High-density Extensive Array of Detectors (CHEESEHEAD) experiment was conducted near Falls Park, Wisconsin in mid-summer to early fall 2019 (Butterworth et al., 2021). Primarily sponsored by the National Science Foundation, additional support from NOAA enabled the concurrent deployment of CLAMPS1 and CLAMPS2 at Lakeland and Prentice airports, respectively, for approximately five weeks of data collection. CHEESEHEAD also included radiosonde launches near the WLEF-TV 400-m very tall tower site, which was approximately 45 km away from both CLAMPS locations (north of Prentice, west of Lakeland) and many other instruments. There are additional observations after this time, but the main period of quality data is 19 September 2019 to 10 October 2019.</p> <p>These data can be accessed on the <a href="https://data.nssl.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/FRDD/CLAMPS/campaigns/PBLtops/catalog.html">NOAA National Severe Storms THREDDS Archive</a>. The readme contained here provides information about how to access and available resources for users. These data are also published in the CHEESEHEAD EOL catalog.</p> <p>The CLAMPS1 (located at Lakeland Airport, 45.92◦ N, 89.73◦ W) DL collected plan position indicator (PPI) scans at 70 ◦ elevation every 20 minutes, and remained in a zenith pointing mode otherwise. The DL provides range-resolved, line-of-sight measurements of radial velocity, intensity (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]+1), and attenuated backscatter. In the case of PPI scans meant for velocity azimuthal display (VAD) analysis, these data are post-processed to produce profiles of horizontal wind speed and direction. The zenith pointing scans are used for vertical velocity information, and are post-processed to provide turbulence information such as vertical velocity variance. The DL was configured to provide profiles with 18-m vertical spacing. The CLAMPS1 MWR and AERI were both deployed, and thermodynamic profiles as retrieved by the TROPoe physically based algorithm (previous versions known as AERIoe; Turner and Löhnert, 2014) were made available every ten minutes. For different user needs and use cases we provided retrievals using only AERI data, only MWR data, and combining the data from both the AERI and the MWR in the TROPoe retrieval algorithm.</p> <p>The CLAMPS2 facility (located at Prentice Airport, 45.54◦ N, 90.28◦ W) operated similarly, but the DL collected PPIs at 60 ◦ elevation every 5 minutes. The onboard MWR was deployed similarly, but CLAMPS2’s AERI was damaged in transit and did not operate for CHEESEHEAD. As such, CLAMPS2 retrievals are limited to MWR-only. </p> <p><em>Turner, D. D. and Löhnert, U.: Information Content and Uncertainties in Thermodynamic Profiles and Liquid Cloud Properties Retrieved from the Ground-Based Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI), Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 53, 752–771, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0126.1, 2014.</em></p>
Tension clamp X-ray CT data of non-crimp fabric based fibre composite under fatigue loading
<p>Tension clamp X-ray CT fatigue testing data published with data in brief: </p> <p>Jespersen, K. M., Glud, J. A., Zangenberg, J., Hosoi, A., Kawada, H., & Mikkelsen, L. P. (2018). <em>Ex-situ X-ray computed tomography, tension clamp and in-situ transilluminated white light imaging data of non-crimp fabric based fibre composite under fatigue loading. Data in Brief.</em></p> <p>as a part of the below journal paper.</p> <p>Jespersen, K. M., Glud, J. A., Zangenberg, J., Hosoi, A., Kawada, H., & Mikkelsen, L. P. (2018). Uncovering the fatigue damage initiation and progression in uni-directional non-crimp fabric reinforced polyester composite. Composites Part A.</p> <p>If using the data, please refer to one of the two.</p>
In situ clamped beam bending of accumulative roll bonded Cu/Nb with 16 nm individual layer thickness
<p>In situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) videos of clamped beam bending of Cu/Nb ARB nanolaminates with 16 nm layer thickness. Each video contains the video captured with SEM and the corresponding measured load vs. displacement curve.</p> <p>The beams were fabricated using focused ion beam (FIB) milling from bulk Cu/Nb sample produced in Los Alamos National Lab, USA. The sample was made using accumulative roll bonding (ARB) process, described in ref. [1]. </p> <p>All the beam lengths are aligned with rolling direction (RD) of the sample. Each beam has a rectangular notch located in the center of the beam length. Each notch spans through the beam width. Owing to limited accuracy of FIB, the notch depth was not always same at the front and rear sides of the beam (typically, smaller at the rear sides)</p> <p>Beam geometries:</p> <p>Id | Length, µm | Width, µm | Thickness, µm | Notch depth (front), nm | Notch width (front), nm</p> <p>ARBRD1 | 40 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 800 | 180</p> <p>ARBRD2 | 40 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 350 | 160</p> <p>All the beams were loaded using Hysitron PI85 picoindenter with truncated cone shape (5 µm diameter). The indenter tip was aligned with the notch location and the middle of beam width. </p> <p>All the beams were loaded under displacement control with displacement rates between 2nm/s to 10nm/s until failure.</p> <p>The SEM videos were captured using JEOL JSM-7600F SEM. </p> <p>[1] Irene J Beyerlein et al. “Interface-driven microstructure development and ultra high strength of bulk nanostructured Cu-Nb multilayers fabricated by severe plastic deformation”. In: Journal of materials research 28.13 (2013), pp. 1799–1812</p>
In situ clamped beam bending of physical vapor deposited Cu/Nb nanolaminate with 20 nm individual layer thickness
<p>In situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) videos of clamped beam bending of Cu/Nb PVD nanolaminate with 20 nm layer thickness and 42+-10 nm grain size at the surface layer. Each video contains the video captured with SEM and the corresponding measured load vs. displacement curve.</p> <p>The beams were fabricated using focused ion beam (FIB) milling from the Cu/Nb sample produced in Los Alamos National Lab, USA. The sample was made using magnetron sputtering, described in ref. [1]. </p> <p>Each beam has a rectangular notch located in the center of the beam length. Each notch spans through the beam width. Owing to limited accuracy of FIB, the notch depth was not always same at the front and rear sides of the beam (typically, smaller at the rear sides)</p> <p>Beam geometries:</p> <p>Id | Length, µm | Width, µm | Thickness, µm | Notch depth (front), nm | Notch width (front), nm</p> <p>PVD1 | 29 | 5 | 1.6 | 380 | 120</p> <p>PVD2 | 29 | 5 | 1.5 | 290 | 305</p> <p>All the beams were loaded using Hysitron PI85 picoindenter with truncated cone shape (5 µm diameter). The indenter tip was aligned with the notch location and the middle of beam width. </p> <p>All the beams were loaded under displacement control with displacement rates between 2nm/s to 10nm/s until failure.</p> <p>The SEM videos were captured using JEOL JSM-7600F SEM. </p> <p>[1] D. Bhattacharyya et al. “Transmission electron microscopy study of the deformation behavior of Cu/Nb and Cu/Ni nanoscale multilayers during nanoindentation”. In: Journal of Materials Research 24.3 (2009), pp. 1291-1302. </p>
Data and code for "Clamp-tapering increases the quality factor of stressed nanobeams"
<p>Data presented (ringdown traces and Q factor calculations) with codes used to analyze the data and produce the figures for the results in "Clamp-tapering increases the quality factor of stressed nanobeams".</p>
Experimental recordings of cross-flow vortex-induced vibrations on slender free-clamped ends cylinder and cylinder with a pair of branches in constant uniform flow for different reduced velocities.
<p>Dataset of the experiments done on a cylinder (N=0) and a coral model (N=1) 3D-printed with SLS out of TPE material. Cross-flow VIV are recorder with a GoPro in a test section of a water tunnel for different reduced velocities (Ur). </p> <p>This was made for our publication "Modelling vortex-induced vibrations of branched structures by coupling a 3D-corotational frame finite element formulation with wake-oscillators" in the Journal of Fluids and Structures.</p>
Umbilical Cord Clamping: What Are the Benefits
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03878602. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
Cardiac and Cerebral Hemodynamics With Umbilical Cord Milking Compared With Early Cord Clamping
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03621956. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.
Albiglutide Glucose Clamp Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01475734. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Cord Clamping Level Above or Below Mother's Perineum
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02659605. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Effect of the Hyperinsulinemic Normoglycemic Clamp on Myocardial Function and Utilization of Glucose
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01187329. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Clamping the Double Lumen Tube
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03508050. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Full Term Neonates
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02454101. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 15.
A Euglycemic Insulin Clamp Study in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Oral Insulin (ORAMED)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02535715. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Effect of Intermittent Pedicle Clamping on Hepatocellular Injury During Liver Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01099475. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Delayed Cord Clamping for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03314233. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Patch clamp dataset for: A massively parallel assay accurately discriminates between functionally normal and abnormal variants in a hotspot domain of KCNH2
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.