Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2016View details →

Figure 3. Comparison between A. glebaria and A in Review of the brachypterous species of Alloxysta Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Charipinae) with a description of two new species

Figure 3. Comparison between A. glebaria and A. mullensis: a) antenna of A. mullensis; b) antenna of A. glebaria; c) pronotum of A. glebaria; d) pronotum of A. mullensis; e) forewing of A. glebaria; f) propodeum of A. mullensis; g) radial cell of A. mullensis.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Hymenoptera: Eucoilinae (Cynipoidea).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Hymenoptera: Eucoilinae (Cynipoidea)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/397bbcde-bb17-4314-b3be-0873b041cbff">https://bionomia.net/dataset/397bbcde-bb17-4314-b3be-0873b041cbff</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/397bbcde-bb17-4314-b3be-0873b041cbff">https://gbif.org/dataset/397bbcde-bb17-4314-b3be-0873b041cbff</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

FIG. 4 in Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.

FIG. 4. — Diagnostic characters of Amphithectus and Sarothrus (A-D) and paralectotype not conspecific of A. dahlbomi (E,F): A, head in anterior view of A. areolatus; B, head in anterior view of S. tibialis; C, forewing of A. areolatus; D, forewing of S. tibialis; E, habitus of paralectotype not conspecific of A. areolatus (= A. dahlbomi Hartig); F, detail of anterior part of mesosoma of paralectotype not conspecific of A. areolatus.

FIG. 3 in Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.

FIG. 3. — Amphithectus areolatus Hartig, 1840 (= A. dahlbomi Hartig). A, head, anterior view; B, mesosoma, dorsal view; C, F1-F3 ♂, dorsal view; D, ♂, dorsal view of scutellum+metasoma; E, forewing and radial cell; F, T2-T3 ♀, lateral view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 2. — Amphithectus coriaceus n in Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.

FIG. 2. — Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.: A, head, anterior view; B, mesosoma, dorsal view (arrow indicates long interfoveal carina); C, head posterior view, and pronotal plate dorsal view; D, mesoscutum, detail of coriaceous sculpture; E, habitus ♀. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 1 in Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.

FIG. 1. — Metasomal morphology of females of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 and Sarothrus Hartig, 1840: A, lectotype of A. dahlbomi Hartig, 1840 ♀, dorsal view of scutellum+metasoma; B, S. tibialis (Zetterstedt, 1838) ♀, dorsal view of scutellum+metasoma; C, lateral view of metasoma of A. areolatus Hartig, 1840 ♀; D, lateral view of metasoma of S. tibialis ♀. Scale bars: A, B: 1 mm. Arrows in C, D indicate seventh sternite.

Figure 2 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 2. Electron micrographs of the ovipositor clip of Trybliographa (Eucoilinae). (A) Overview, ventral side; (B) enlargment of boxed area in (A). 2vlv, second valvulae; L, lobe; LL, lateral lip; Se, sensillae; T, teeth. Scale bar: 10 Mm.

Figure 5 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 5. Examples of the ovipositor clip within Eucoilinae. (A) Aganaspis daci (Weld); (B) Leptopilina; (C) Dieucoila; (D) Nordlandiella; (E) ''Eucoila'' impatiens Say; (F) Odontosema anastrephae Kieffer; (G) Ganaspis mundata Foerster; (H) Triplasta; (I) Glauraspidia; (J) Trybliographa; (K) Kleidotoma; (L) Aporeucoela. 2 vlv, fused ovipositor valve.

Figure 1 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 1. Electron micrographs of the ovipositor clip of Neralsia (Figitinae). (A) Overview of ovipositor tip, lateral side; (B) enlargement of boxed area in (A). 1vlv, first valvulae; 2vlv, second valvulae; L, lobe; S, slot, Ser, apical serration. Scale bar: 10 Mm.

Figure 4 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 4. Examples of the ovipositor clip present within Figitinae. (A) Neralsia; (B) Amphithectus; (C) Trischiza; (D) Xyalophora. The viewing angle in (B) is dorsal and not lateral; the asterisk and lines are meant to delineate the extent of the clip. 2 vlv, fused ovipositor valve.

Figure 7 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 7. Presence of the ovipositor clip mapped on to two possible cladograms for relationships of Figitidae (from Buffington et al. forthcoming). (A) Parsimony analysis; (B) Bayesian analysis. Numbers next to terminal names indicate the number of taxa sampled. Letters in boxes at tree tips refer to niche type in which the host is attacked: C, concealed; S, semi-concealed; E, exposed; G, gall inducer/inquilline;?, unknown. Black bars indicate clades for which all members possess the ovipositor clip. ''+ACC'' indicates presence of character based on ACCTRAN optimization; ''+ DEL'' indicates presence of character based on DELTRAN optimization (Swofford and Maddison 1987).

Figure 3 in The occurrence and phylogenetic implications of the ovipositor clip within the Figitidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Figure 3. Examples of Figitidae that lack the ovipositor clip. (A–C) Anacharitinae: (A) Aegilips, (B) Xyalaspis, (C) Anacharis; (D, E) Aspicerinae: (D) Melanips; (E) Callaspidea; (F) Charipinae (Alloxysta); (G) Emargininae (Thoreauella); (H) Thrasorinae (Euceroptres). 2 vlv, fused ovipositor valve.

Fig. 27 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 27. Phylogeny of Eucoilinae after Fontal-Cazalla et al. (2002) with the putative positions of the three Cretaceous amber taxa (Anteucoila, Jerseucoila, and Syneucoila) being noted (support for clades is outlined in table 4).

Fig. 26 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 26. Phylogeny of the Cynipoidea summarizing relationships among major lineages. Fossil records are tabulated in appendix 1. Abbreviations for particular deposits are: Rott (Rott, Germany), Fr (Cantal, France), Wig (Isle of Wight, England), Flor (Florissant, Colorado), Biamo (Biamo, today Bol'shaya Svetlovodnaya), Baltic (Baltic amber), Can (Canadian amber), Sib (Siberian amber of the Taimyr Peninsula), NJ (New Jersey amber), and Obe (Obeshchayushchiy Creek).

Fig. 24 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 24. Character optimization showing unambiguous character changes on internodes of one of the single shortest trees from figure 23 (the two minimal length topologies differ only in relationships within Liopteridae, and thus the subfamilies of this group are collapsed into a single terminal for the purposes of the figure, with those unambiguous character optimizations for the modern liopterid clade being noted). Solid circles indicate unambiguous character transformations; open circles show homoplastic character transformations.

Fig. 25 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 25. Preferred cladogram of cynipoid relationships; character optimization showing unambiguous character changes on internodes of the single shortest tree from figure 21 (the two minimal length topologies differ only in relationships within Liopteridae, and thus the subfamilies of this group are collapsed into a single terminal for the purposes of the figure, with those unambiguous character optimizations for the modern liopterid clade being noted). Solid circles indicate unambiguous character transformations; open circles show homoplastic character transformations.

Fig. 22 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 22. Strict consensus tree of the two shortest trees (L 5 235, CI 5 54, RI 5 79) resulting from analyses of the data matrix (as described in the text and in fig. 20), with the inclusion of two additional Cretaceous amber taxa known only from males (i.e., Tanaoknemus and Micropresbyteria) and no constraints.

Fig. 23 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 23. Strict consensus tree of the two shortest trees (L 5 239, CI 5 55, RI 5 79) resulting from analysis of the data matrix from figure 22 (i.e., with Tanaoknemus and Micropresbyteria included), with the phylogenetic relationship of Anteucoila with the two representative figitids constrained.

Fig. 21 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 21. Preferred set of cladistic relationships among Cynipoidea; strict consensus of the two shortest tree (L 5 228, CI 5 57, RI 5 80) resulting from analysis of the data matrix (as described in the text and in fig. 20), with the phylogenetic position of Anteucoila with the two representative figitids constrained.

Fig. 9 in Phylogeny and Geological History of the Cynipoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea)

Fig. 9. Photomicrograph of holotype male of Micropresbyteria caputipressa Liu and Engel, new genus and species (RTMP-96-9-170).