Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 10 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 10. Size variation between ages, in males. Quantile plots of size variation between ages in males. Each box shows the median as a line across the middle and the quartiles (10th and 90th percentiles) as its ends. Units are pixels. A. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks. B. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks and 23 semilandmarks. C. Size computed from outlines, as the square root area of the first harmonic ellipse.

Figure 9 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 9. Size variation between ages, in females. Quantile plots of size variation between ages in females. Each box shows the median as a line across the middle and the quartiles (25th and 75th percentiles) as its ends. Units are pixels. A. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks. B. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks and 23 semilandmarks. C. Size computed from outlines, as the square root area of the first harmonic ellipse.

Figure 7 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 7. Superposition of males and females, according to the side. A, C, E. Female and male left condyles. B, D, F. Female and male right condyles. A–B. Shape obtained with 5 landmarks. C–D. Shape obtained with 5 landmarks and 23 semilandmarks. E– F. Shape obtained with pseudo-landmarks describing the contours.

Figure 6 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 6. Size variation between genders. Quantile plots of size variation between genders. Each box shows the median as a line across the middle and the quartiles (10th and 90th percentiles) as its ends. Units are pixels. A. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks. B. Centroid size computed from 5 landmarks and 23 semilandmarks. C. Size computed from outlines, as the square root area of the first harmonic ellipse. (2-line represent male and 1-represent female).

Figure 8 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 8. Superposition of left and right sides. A, C, E. Shape superposition of left and right sides in females. B, D, F. Shape superposition of left and right sides in males. A–B. Obtained with 5 landmarks. C–D. Obtained with 5 landmarks and 23 semilandmarks. E–F. Obtained with pseudo-landmarks describing the contours.

Figure 3. The figures A in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 3. The figures A to E show semilandmark points (yellow circles) as generated by the CLIC program to generate semilandmark between each successive landmark. A. 3 semilandmarks between LM1 and LM2. B. 5 semilandmarks between LM2 and LM3. C. 5 semilandmarks between LM3 and LM4. D. 5 semilandmarks between LM4 and LM5. E. 5 semilandmarks between LM5 and LM1.

Figure 4 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 4. The distal end of femur with scale attached, illustrating the pseudolandmarks plotting around the contour of distal femur.

Figure 2 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 2. Picture of distal end of femur and five landmarks were defined in number 1–5, the most anterior points of lateral and medial condyle (1, 2 respectively), the most posterior points of medial and lateral condyle (3, 5 respectively) and the deepest point of the intercondylar fossa (4).

Figure 1 in Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Figure 1. Setting for image taking, the femoral shaft was place parallel to the camera holding arm of stand by distal end of the femur faced up towards the camera 10 cm constantly apart with centimeter calibration scale.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2011View details →

FIGS. 26–33. Nopsides ceralbonus Chamberlin, male. 26. Palp, prolateral view. 27. Same, ventral view. 28. Same, retrolateral view. 29. Stridulatory pick from palpal femur, prolateral view. 30. Anterior spinnerets, apical view. 31. Anterior lateral spinneret, apical view. 32. Posterior median spinneret, apical view. 33 in The Haplogyne Spider Genus Nopsides (Araneae, Caponiidae), with Notes on Amrishoonops

FIGS. 26–33. Nopsides ceralbonus Chamberlin, male. 26. Palp, prolateral view. 27. Same, ventral view. 28. Same, retrolateral view. 29. Stridulatory pick from palpal femur, prolateral view. 30. Anterior spinnerets, apical view. 31. Anterior lateral spinneret, apical view. 32. Posterior median spinneret, apical view. 33. Posterior lateral spinneret, apical view.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

Text-fig. 6. Right femur of the large Staniantsi-beaver (GPIT/MA/09934) in cranial and caudal view with the illustration of the anatomical terms used for the description of the femur. Drawing: T. Lechner. in Castor-Like Postcranial Adaptation In An Uppermost Miocene Beaver From The Staniantsi Basin (Nw Bulgaria)

Text-fig. 6. Right femur of the large Staniantsi-beaver (GPIT/MA/09934) in cranial and caudal view with the illustration of the anatomical terms used for the description of the femur. Drawing: T. Lechner.

FIG. 58. — Right IMG Femur 8 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 58. — Right IMG Femur 8; A-C, the whole bone; A, anterior view; B, posterior view; C, medial view; D-G, details; D, anterior view; E, posterior view; F, proximal view; G, distal view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bars: A- C, 4 mm; D-G, 2 mm.

FIG. 51. — A-C, left nearly complete IMG Femur 3 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 51. — A-C, left nearly complete IMG Femur 3; A, proximal view; B, anteroir view; C, posterior view; D-F, left nearly complete IMG Femur 4; D, proximal view; E, anteroir view; F, posterior view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bars: 2 mm.

FIG. 50. — A, B, left incomplete IMG Femur 1 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 50. — A, B, left incomplete IMG Femur 1; A, anterior view; B, posterior view; C-F, left incomplete IMG Femur 2; C, E, anterior view; D, F, posterior view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bar: 2 mm.

FIG. 57. — Left IMG Femur 7 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 57. — Left IMG Femur 7. Two specimens (A-C et D-G); A, D, anterior view; B, E, posterior view; C, F, proximal view; G, distal view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bars: 2 mm.

FIG. 59. — Left IMG Femur 9 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 59. — Left IMG Femur 9; A-D, F, G, first specimen; A, F, anterior view; B, G, posterior view; C, distal view; D, proximal view; E, H, I, second specimen; E, proximal view; H, anterior view; I, posterior view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bars: A, B, 4 mm; C-I, 2 mm.

FIG. 49. — A, D, IMG Femur 8 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 49. — A, D, IMG Femur 8 (DGM 1.203XIII-M), specimen from the right side; A, anterior view; D, posterior view; B, E, IMG Femur 9 (DGM 1.203XIIA-M), specimen from the right side; B, anterior view; E, posterior view; C, F, IMG Femur 10 (DGM 2040M), specimen from the left side; C, anterior view; F, posteri- or view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

FIG. 48. — A, E, IMG Femur 3 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 48. — A, E, IMG Femur 3 (DGM 1.201A-M), right specimen; A, anterior view; E, posterior view; B, F, IMG Femur 4 (DGM 1.202A-M), right specimen; B, anterior view; F, posterior view; C, G, IMG Femur 6 (DGM 1.203VIIIC-M), right specimen; C, anterior view; G, posterior view 6; D, H, IMG Femur 7 (DGM 1.203XI-M), left specimen; D, anterior view; H, posterior view. Scale bar: 4 mm.

FIG. 60. — A-D, left IMG Femur 8 in Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria

FIG. 60. — A-D, left IMG Femur 8, two specimens, proximal halves; A, C, anterior view; B, D, posterior view; E-H, left IMG Femur 10, two specimens, proximal halves; E, G, anterior view; F, H, posterior view. For numbered designations of specific characters see text. Scale bars: 4 mm.