Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5. Uteropolystomoides multifalx n in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 5. Uteropolystomoides multifalx n. comb. (Stunkard, 1924). A: Full parasite; B: Genital bulb with genital spines; C: Sclerotized haptoral hooks. Abbreviations: Gb, genital bulb; Ha, haptor; Hm, hamulus; Hm1, hamulus 1; Hm2, hamulus 2; Mh1, marginal hooklet 1; Mo, mouth; Ph, pharynx; Su, sucker; Te, testis; Ut, Uterus with eggs; Va, vagina; Vi, vitellarium. Scale bars: A = 500 µm; B = 200 µm; C = 50 µm.

Figure 4 in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 4. Bayesian tree inferred from the analysis of 28S sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP). Only BPP » 0.95 are indicated. Scale bar reflects expected changes per site. * designates Hnuc20 haplotype that also characterizes specimens of Polystomoides multifalx (Stunkard, 1924) (see Table 3 for more details).

Figure 3 in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 3. Bayesian tree inferred from the analysis of COI sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP). Only BPP » 0.95 are indicated. Scale bar reflects expected changes per site. * designates haplotypes characterizing specimens of Polystomoides multifalx (Stunkard, 1924) that were, for some of them, collected from Pseudemys concinna (Le Conte), for the others, from P. floridana (Le Conte) (see Table 3 for more details).

Figure 1. A in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 1. A: Non-lethal procedure for retrieving a polystome from the pharyngeal pouches of a freshwater turtle; B: polystome collected on wooden stem cotton swab.

Figure 2 in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 2. Micrograph of the reproductive system of Polystomoides multifalx (Stunkard, 1924). Abbreviations: Gb, genital bulb; Te, testis; Ut, Uterus with eggs; Va, vagina. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Figure 7. Indopolystoma parvum n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 7. Indopolystoma parvum n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus omeimontis. Dorsal view of holotype. (A) A drawing; (B) A photograph. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 5. Indopolystoma elongatum n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 5. Indopolystoma elongatum n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus arboreus. Ventral view of holotype. (A) A drawing; (B) A photograph. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 4. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 4. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus viridis. Marginal hooklets from paratypes. (A) Marginal hooklet C1; (B) Marginal hooklet C8; (C) Marginal hooklets C2–C7. Scale bar: 20 µm.

Figure 3. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 3. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus viridis. Hamuli from holotype and paratypes. (A–A') Holotype; (B–H) Paratypes. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Figure 6. Indopolystoma elongatum n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 6. Indopolystoma elongatum n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus arboreus. Hamuli and marginal hooklets from holotype and paratypes. (A–A') Holotype; (A''–A''') Paratypes; (B) Marginal hooklet C1; (B') Marginal hooklet C3; (B'') Marginal hooklet C8. Scale bar: 100 µm (A–A'''), 20 µm (B–B'').

Figure 1 in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 1. Bayesian tree for neobatrachian polystomes inferred from the analysis of four concatenated genes, namely 18S, 28S, COI and 12S. Numbers on nodes indicate Bayesian Posterior Probabilities. Indopolystoma spp. were regarded earlier as Polystoma spp. in Badets et al. [2] and Héritier et al. [22]. B. w. refers to Blommersia wittei and Z. s. to Zhangixalus smaragdinus. See also Table 1 for other host species. Scale bar represents 0.1 substitution/site.

Figure 8. Indopolystoma parvum n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 8. Indopolystoma parvum n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus omeimontis. Hamuli and marginal hooklets from holotype and paratype. (A–A') Holotype; (A''–A''') Paratype; (B) Marginal hooklet C1; (B') Marginal hooklet C2; (B'') Marginal hooklet C6 or C7. Scale bar: 100 µm (A–A'''), 20 µm (B–B'').

Figure 2. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n in Indopolystoma n. gen. (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species and reassignment of eight known Polystoma species from Asian frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae)

Figure 2. Indopolystoma viridi n. gen. n. sp. from Zhangixalus viridis. Dorsal view of holotype. (A) A drawing; (B) A photograph. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata

Fig. 5. Scatter diagram of a × c plotted against b × c for all known Madapolystoma spp., M. magnahami n. sp. and M. isaloensis n. sp. The ellipses represent 95% of the confidence interval about the mean.

Fig. 4. a–b in First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata

Fig. 4. a–b) Ventral view of M. isaloensis n. sp. holotype. (c) Hamuli from mature specimens and (d) Marginal hooklets 1–8. Scale bars: B, 200 μm; C, 100 μm; D, 20 μm. Abbreviations: de, developing embryo; ee, early embryo; ev, excretory vessel; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito-intestinal canal; ha, hamuli. hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mh, marginal hooklet; mo, mouth; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, seminal vesicle; va, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline follicles; vv, vitelline duct.

Fig. 3. a–b in First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata

Fig. 3. a–b) Ventral view of M. magnahami n. sp. holotype. (c) Hamuli from mature specimens and (d) Marginal hooklets 1 (top) and 2–8 (bottom). Scale bars: B, 500 μm; C, 100 μm; D, 25 μm. Abbreviations: em, embryo; ev, excretory vessel; gb, genital bulb; gc, genito-intestinal canal; ha, hamuli. hp, haptor; ic, intestinal caecum; mh, marginal hooklet; mo, mouth; pe, potential embryo; ph, pharynx; su, sucker; sv, seminal vesicle; va, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vi, vitelline follicles; vv, vitelline duct.

Fig. 2 in First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata

Fig. 2. Minimum Evolution tree for Madapolystoma spp. Numbers on nodes indicate bootstrap support values. Madapolystoma sp. from B. domerguei refers to M. magnahami n. sp. and Madapolystoma sp. from M. expectata refers to M. isaloensis n. sp.

Fig. 1. a in First record of viviparity in polystomatid flatworms (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of two new species of Madapolystoma from the Madagascan anuran hosts Blommersia domerguei and Mantella expectata

Fig. 1. a) Map of Madagascar with the distribution areas and sampling localities of the two investigated frogs; b) Blommersia domerguei; c) Mantella expectata. (Map-Library, 2007).

Fig. 4 in Classification of pleurodire polystomes (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) revisited with the description of two new genera from the Australian and Neotropical Realms

Fig. 4. Haptor of Polystomoides brasiliensis showing the deep incisions between suckers. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Fig. 3 in Classification of pleurodire polystomes (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) revisited with the description of two new genera from the Australian and Neotropical Realms

Fig. 3. Violin plot of the genital spines number. A = Aussietrema infecting pleurodires; B = Neopolystoma infecting pleurodires; C = Polystomoides infecting pleurodires; D = Uropolystomoides infecting pleurodires of the Australian Realm; E = Uropolystomoides infecting pleurodires of the Ethiopian Realm; F = Fornixtrema infecting cryptodires; G = Neopolystoma infecting cryptodires; G = Polystomoides infecting cryptodires; I = Uropolystomoides infecting cryptodires; J = Apalonotrema moleri infecting a cryptodire host. K = Uteropolystomoides nelsoni infecting a cryptodire host.