Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
37
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
37 results for “adcp data”
Towed ADCP DATA off Cape Canaveral from Oct 2013 to Jun 2016
<p>ADCP data collected underway with Teledyne ADCP instrumentation over 12-hr tidal cycles during experiments shown in 'experiments.jpg' that appear with all ADCP files. ADCP data files are in ASCII format (with extension 000 or 001 or 002 or...) with the format description given in the PDF file that appears with te ADCP data. The filenames contain the month, day and year (e.g., MMDDYY000t.000) in which they were collected. Location of each profile is within its corresponding header, as described in the PDF file.</p>
Data from a tidal cycle continuous survey using ADCP and CTD in Sand Shoal Inlet, Virginia
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Data from a tidal cycle continuous survey using ADCP and CTD in Sand Shoal Inlet, Virginia.</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p>These are data files from a 12.5-hour continuous survey done in Sand Shoal Inlet in Eastern Shore of Virginia on the Delmarva Peninsula on May 12, 1999.</p> <p>The ADCP data files are: SS01002T.000, SS01003T.000, and SS01004T.000.</p> <p>The CTD data files are named as SNDSHL**.CNV (a total of 33 files).</p> <p> </p> <p>ADCP data are measured from the RDI’s old program Transect.</p> <p><em>Ship Track:</em> Repeated samplings of ADCP were made along four transects connected by four points:</p> <p> [1] 37 17.918 N, 75 48.596 W</p> <p> [2] 37 18.344 N, 75 48.248 W</p> <p> [3] 37 17.884 N, 75 47.981 W</p> <p> [4] 37 18.054 N, 75 47.664 W</p> <p><em>CTD stations:</em></p> <p><em> {1} 37 18.174 N, 75 48.378 W</em></p> <p><em> {2} 37 17.978 N, 75 47.787 W</em></p> <p><em> Cast # Station #<br> 00 1<br> 01 2<br> 02 1<br> 03 2<br> 04 1<br> 05 2<br> 06 1<br> 07 n/a extra cast at ADCP [2]<br> 08 2<br> 09 1<br> 10 2<br> 11 n/a extra cast north of a front<br> 12 1<br> 13 2<br> 14 1<br> 15 2<br> 16 1<br> 17 2<br> 18 1<br> 19 2<br> 20 1<br> 21 2<br> 22 1<br> 23 2<br> 24 1<br> 25 2<br> 26 1<br> 27 2<br> 28 1<br> 29 2<br> 30 1<br> 31 2<br> 32 1<br> 33 2</em><br> </p> <p><strong>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</strong></p> <p>Thanks to Arnoldo Valle-Levinson and Larry Atkinson for the research support. The field trip participants included Cristobal Creyes, Bob Bray, RC Kidd, Rosario Sanay, Kris Holderied, Andres Sepulveda as well as a person by the first name Wildo. The data were used in Li (2002).</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C. (2002). Axial convergence fronts in a barotropic tidal inlet - Sand Shoal Inlet, VA, <em>Continental Shelf Research</em>, 22: 2633-2653. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(02)00118-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(02)00118-8</a>.</p>
Current velocity data from a quasi-continuous survey using ADCP in Satilla River Estuary, Georgia.
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a quasi-continuous survey using ADCP in Satilla River Estuary, Georgia.</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel-towed ADCP obtained in the Satilla River Estuary during a survey conducted on 17–18 November 2004. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP. The survey was done mostly during daylight time along a 90-degree bend in the middle of the Satilla River Estuary. The observations covered nearly two semidiurnal tidal cycles with 15 repetitions and 33 hours in measurement time. The route is about 11 km in length and covers both the West and East sides of the bend of the channel. Note that tide in this area is essentially semidiurnal which makes 12-h observations sufficient to resolve the main tidal constituents.</p> <p>The ADCP was mounted on one side of the boat approximately 0.4 m below the surface. The vertical bins were 0.5 m. The surveys were conducted at an average cruise speed of about 2.5–3 m/s except at the turns when the vessel had to slow down and during CTD casts when the vessel had to stop for a few minutes. A Seabird Electronic SBE 19 plus CTD was used to measure the vertical profiles of water temperature, salinity, fluorescence, light attenuation, and dissolved oxygen at two to three locations during each survey. Note that only ADCP data are included in this dataset.</p> <p>The data are averaged at about 8-second intervals, excluding bad data. The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. There are a total of seven data files. There are:</p> <p> </p> <p>ADCP_Nov17_2004_Satilla_River_000t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov17_2004a_Satilla_River_000t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov17_2004a_Satilla_River_001t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov17_2004a_Satilla_River_002t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov18_2004a_Satilla_River_000t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov18_2004a_Satilla_River_001t.000</p> <p>ADCP_Nov18_2004a_Satilla_River_002t.000</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p> 50 25 42 124 10 20 1</p> <p>4 11 17 15 3 34 86 19 10 3.220 -0.410 331.714 17.460</p> <p>-50.84 11.65 -0.88 0.42 0.00 4.00 0.00 -21.08 7.38 7.38 7.52 7.31</p> <p>3.57 6.85 0.78 -3.48 3.57</p> <p>30.9708933 -81.5066250 -47.77 0.00 3.6</p> <p>-4.8 -1.0 -0.5 -12.5 10.0 -12.5 10.0 1.28 6.28</p> <p>30 cm BT dB 0.44 0.082</p> <p> 1.28 50.99 309.66 -39.3 32.5 -3.2 -3.9 99.7 101.2 102.8 101.7 100 -0.03</p> <p> 1.78 53.58 304.67 -44.1 30.5 -0.2 4.0 102.6 103.8 105.5 104.4 100 -0.04</p> <p> 2.28 43.23 318.41 -28.7 32.3 -1.7 -5.8 102.3 103.7 105.2 104.6 100 -0.02</p> <p> 2.78 53.59 320.14 -34.3 41.1 -2.3 8.6 101.3 103.0 105.1 104.3 90 -0.08</p> <p> 3.28 46.16 304.23 -38.2 26.0 -0.6 2.2 100.1 103.6 104.0 102.8 100 -0.06</p> <p> 3.78 55.55 309.19 -43.1 35.1 -1.2 -2.4 100.1 101.3 102.7 102.0 100 -0.09</p> <p> 4.28 47.84 308.45 -37.5 29.7 1.8 2.5 99.6 100.8 101.7 100.9 100 -0.02</p> <p> 4.78 47.27 311.81 -35.2 31.5 -2.4 5.7 98.5 101.7 102.0 100.8 100 -0.02</p> <p> 5.28 40.47 308.48 -31.7 25.2 0.5 0.1 98.1 101.0 101.4 100.8 100 -0.05</p> <p> 5.78 43.89 314.42 -31.3 30.7 -1.8 5.7 97.8 100.9 101.2 101.0 100 -0.11</p> <p> 6.28 44.51 317.27 -30.2 32.7 0.8 2.2 97.3 101.4 100.9 100.6 100 -0.00</p> <p> 6.78 38.19 315.72 -26.7 27.3 -3.2 35.8 107.0 104.9 101.9 112.0 50 2147483647</p> <p> 7.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 121.6 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 7.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 8.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 8.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 9.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 9.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 10.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 10.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 11.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 11.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 12.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 12.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 13.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 13.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 14.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 14.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 15.28 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p> 15.78 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p>The data were used in Li et al. (2008).</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C., C. Chen, D. Guadagnoli, and I. Y. Georgiou (2008). Geometry-induced residual eddies in estuaries with curved channels: Observations and modeling studies, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research</em>, Vol. 113, C01005, doi:10.1029/2006JC004031.</p>
Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Wilmington River Estuary, Georgia, USA
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Wilmington River Estuary, Georgia, USA</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel towed ADCP obtained in the Wilmington River Estuary during a survey conducted on Sep. 29, 2004, for ~ 11.5 hours. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP.</p> <p>The ADCP was mounted on a sled towed by the boat. The vertical bins were 0.5 m. The surveys were conducted at an average cruise speed of about 2.5–3 m/s except at the turns when the vessel had to slow down and during CTD casts when the vessel had to stop for a few minutes. A Seabird Electronic SBE 19 plus CTD was used to measure the vertical profiles of water temperature, salinity, fluorescence, light attenuation, and dissolved oxygen during the survey. Note that only ADCP data are included in this dataset.</p> <p>The data are averaged at about 30-second intervals, excluding bad data. The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. There are a total of two data files. There are:</p> <p>ADCP_Sep29_2004_WM_000_ASC.TXT</p> <p>ADCP_Sep29_2004_WM_001_ASC.TXT</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p> 50 50 42 50 1 20 1</p> <p>4 9 29 11 32 26 57 468 60 2.361 -0.824 118.753 24.276</p> <p>49.04 93.15 -0.17 -0.46 0.00 6.00 0.00 3.08 6.63 6.64 6.68 6.59</p> <p>30.53 28.91 26.93 14.22 30.45</p> <p>32.00327167 -81.01664167 31.50 92.41 30.4</p> <p>-22.0 -7.2 -3.2 -11.2 10.0 -10.8 10.0 1.53 5.53</p> <p>50 cm BT dB 0.43 0.073</p> <p> 1.53 52.35 193.13 -11.9 -51.0 -0.3 3.5 92.1 94.8 94.6 95.6 100 -2.02</p> <p> 2.03 49.89 189.47 -8.2 -49.2 -0.1 -2.1 97.7 99.9 100.4 100.4 100 -2.28</p> <p> 2.53 52.68 187.22 -6.6 -52.3 0.7 4.0 99.0 101.3 101.7 101.2 98 -2.84</p> <p> 3.03 48.92 190.92 -9.3 -48.0 -0.2 5.1 99.2 101.3 101.9 101.6 100 -2.21</p> <p> 3.53 51.77 185.37 -4.8 -51.5 0.3 5.7 98.6 101.4 102.0 101.2 100 -2.99</p> <p> 4.03 48.03 186.14 -5.1 -47.8 1.0 1.2 98.5 101.1 101.9 101.0 100 -2.64</p> <p> 4.53 50.69 190.02 -8.8 -49.9 0.5 3.6 98.5 101.2 101.9 101.2 100 -2.32</p> <p> 5.03 43.70 186.57 -5.0 -43.4 0.7 4.4 98.3 101.2 101.9 101.2 100 -2.34</p> <p> 5.53 41.22 186.13 -4.4 -41.0 1.5 -0.3 98.5 101.6 102.0 101.4 83 -2.35</p> <p> 6.03 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p>The ADCP data were used in Li et al. (2008).</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>I would like to thank Captain Harry Carter who assisted me by driving the boat for the whole day. He also assisted me with CTD casts, deployment, and retrieval of other CTDs. It was a great day working out with him.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C., C. Chen, D. Guadagnoli, and I. Y. Georgiou (2008). Geometry-induced residual eddies in estuaries with curved channels: Observations and modeling studies, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research</em>, Vol. 113, C01005, doi:10.1029/2006JC004031.</p> <p> </p>
alvitello/ADCP_Data_SanFelice_Venice: ADCP Data San Felice Venice 2016
<p>ADCP data from Finotello et al., "Three-dimensional flow structures and morphodynamic evolution of microtidal meandering channels" (submitted to Water Resource Research)</p>
Processed ADCP and CTD Data for the Processes Driving Exchange at Cape Hatteras (PEACH) Program
<p>These are the hourly acoustic doppler current profiler (ADCP) and conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD files from the ten moored bottom frames and buoys deployed as part of the PEACH program. Level 2 data have been quality-controlled and gridded to an hourly time-base. A technical report describing the details of processing and moored aspects of the experiment can be found in: Haines, S., <em>et al.</em> (2022) Mooring Data Report for the Processes driving Exchange at Cape Hatteras (PEACH) Project. (doi:10.5281/zenodo.6380851). </p>
ADCP data from Poseidon E1-M3A observatory
<p>Acoustic Doppler current profiler data from Poseidon E1-M3A observatory.</p> <ul> <li>Instrument: Teledyne RD Instruments Longranger 75 kHz ADCP</li> <li>Location: Cretan Sea, 25.12° E 35.74° N</li> <li>Time span: 15 Nov 2012 – 02 Jun 2015 </li> </ul> <p>A data description is available in "ADCP observations of migration patterns of zooplankton in the Cretan Sea" by Potiris E, Frangoulis C, Kalampokis A, Ntoumas M, Pettas M, Petihakis G and Zervakis V (2018), https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2018-10.</p>
Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Sapelo Sound, Georgia, USA
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Sapelo Sound, Georgia, USA</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel towed ADCP obtained in the Sapelo Sound during a survey conducted on Sep. 16, 2000, for ~ 13 hours. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP.</p> <p>The ADCP was mounted on a sled towed by the boat. The vertical bins were 0.5 m. The surveys were conducted at an average cruise speed of about 2.5–3 m/s except at the turns when the vessel had to slow down and during CTD casts when the vessel had to stop for a few minutes. A Seabird Electronic SBE 19 plus CTD was used. Note that only ADCP data are included in this dataset.</p> <p>The data are averaged at about 20-second intervals, excluding bad data. The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. The data file is:</p> <p>SAPELO0T.000</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p> 50 50 25 40 4 0 4</p> <p>0 9 16 10 11 17 74 1 13 3.290 -2.490 108.000 28.290</p> <p>270.90 216.00 0.00 0.70 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 4.04 4.17 4.19 3.97</p> <p>70.92 20.47 -44.29 -55.38 70.91</p> <p> 31.5040556 -81.3190833 301.50 208.30 53.3</p> <p>-17.2 -16.3 -5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0</p> <p>28 cm BT counts 0.43 0.034</p> <p> 1.48 56.51 251.854 -53.7 -17.6 17.9 -2.2 157.0 170.0 164.0 166.0 100 -0.55</p> <p> 1.98 50.49 243.536 -45.2 -22.5 14.4 -0.1 164.0 178.0 172.0 172.0 100 -0.28</p> <p> 2.48 53.94 242.390 -47.8 -25.0 13.6 4.5 163.0 178.0 171.0 171.0 100 -0.28</p> <p> 2.98 55.93 245.268 -50.8 -23.4 10.2 9.3 162.0 176.0 168.0 170.0 100 -0.32</p> <p> 3.48 44.55 242.745 -39.6 -20.4 8.4 1.0 174.0 178.0 171.0 189.0 100 2147483647</p> <p> 3.98 7.17 59.859 6.2 3.6 0.4 -0.8 203.0 220.0 210.0 213.0 100 2147483647</p> <p> 4.48 42.56 53.696 34.3 25.2 4.0 -48.8 112.0 146.0 149.0 119.0 23 2147483647</p> <p> 4.98 78.55 357.957 -2.8 78.5 -0.5 -24.9 85.0 103.0 94.0 97.0 92 2147483647</p> <p> 5.48 90.74 36.756 54.3 72.7 -21.8 51.6 77.0 98.0 84.0 94.0 38 2147483647</p> <p> 5.98 129.25 14.563 32.5 125.1 -34.4 36.1 74.0 96.0 82.0 93.0 15 2147483647</p> <p> 6.48 59.84 92.011 59.8 -2.1 83.9 -276.1 74.0 94.0 79.0 93.0 8 2147483647</p> <p> 6.98 111.03 42.701 75.3 81.6 58.8 61.3 79.0 90.0 76.0 94.0 8 2147483647</p> <p> 7.48 94.48 7.847 12.9 93.6 -1.8 53.9 98.0 94.0 84.0 103.0 46 2147483647</p> <p> 7.98 28.63 39.472 18.2 22.1 -8.4 -96.0 92.0 98.0 95.0 103.0 92 2147483647</p> <p> 8.48 55.17 60.461 48.0 27.2 -6.7 -17.5 97.0 110.0 112.0 105.0 100 2147483647</p> <p> 8.98 70.91 54.876 58.0 40.8 -7.2 -50.9 94.0 120.0 110.0 102.0 92 2147483647</p> <p> 9.48 87.63 46.156 63.2 60.7 -4.7 -52.4 85.0 108.0 99.0 98.0 85 2147483647</p> <p> 9.98 149.70 45.189 106.2 105.5 -7.8 -8.6 79.0 96.0 86.0 94.0 62 2147483647</p> <p> 10.48 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 74.0 89.0 78.0 92.0 0 2147483647</p> <p>The ADCP data were used in Li (2013).</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>The data were collected on R/V Bluefin funded by NSF-LTER.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C. (2013). Subtidal Water Flux through a Multi-inlet System: Observations Before and During a Cold Front Event and Numerical Experiments, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans</em>, Vol. 118, 1–16, doi:10.1029/2012JC008109, 2013.</p>
Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Doboy Sound, Georgia, USA
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Doboy Sound, Georgia, USA</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel mounted ADCP obtained in the Doboy Sound during a survey conducted on Mar. 26, 2002, a 12.5-hour continuous survey. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP.</p> <p>The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. There is one data file:</p> <p>Doboy_Mar26000_ASC.TXT</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p> 50 50 213 30 12 50 1</p> <p>2 3 25 17 53 58 83 96 3 -1.897 0.760 105.297 18.920</p> <p>1.99 0.12 -0.17 0.10 0.00 16.00 0.00 18.66 9.13 9.28 9.03 9.37</p> <p>0.92 24.80 -0.10 0.77 0.77</p> <p>31.39938333 -81.29868333 6.34 0.00 1.6</p> <p>-1.4 -0.9 -0.2 -0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 3.24 7.74</p> <p>30 cm BT dB 0.44 0.086</p> <p> 3.24 39.55 347.44 -8.6 38.6 3.3 -7.8 77.1 83.5 80.2 82.1 100 -0.07</p> <p> 3.74 38.34 346.75 -8.8 37.3 3.4 -0.4 80.8 87.8 83.8 85.7 100 -0.10</p> <p> 4.24 41.47 343.01 -12.1 39.7 3.1 0.3 82.4 89.3 85.3 86.9 100 -0.11</p> <p> 4.74 34.01 341.50 -10.8 32.2 2.0 2.8 83.4 89.8 86.1 87.4 100 -0.10</p> <p> 5.24 42.40 352.00 -5.9 42.0 1.9 -8.1 84.0 89.9 87.2 87.6 100 -0.12</p> <p> 5.74 33.01 342.17 -10.1 31.4 2.6 0.7 84.5 90.3 87.5 88.0 100 -0.09</p> <p> 6.24 36.56 340.23 -12.4 34.4 1.7 -2.4 84.8 90.5 87.7 88.7 100 -0.09</p> <p> 6.74 37.87 347.51 -8.2 37.0 2.4 -4.3 85.1 91.5 88.5 89.3 100 -0.09</p> <p> 7.24 33.31 344.43 -8.9 32.1 1.4 -0.7 85.9 92.0 89.4 90.0 100 -0.08</p> <p> 7.74 27.63 342.97 -8.1 26.4 -1.0 1.7 86.1 92.3 89.7 90.1 99 -0.05</p> <p> 8.24 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>The data were collected on R/V Savannah funded by NSF-LTER.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Altamaha Sound, Georgia, USA
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Altamaha Sound, Georgia, USA</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel towed ADCP obtained in the Sapelo Sound during a survey conducted on Sep. 13-15, 2000, which includes 16-hour stationary mooring measurements, a 16-hour continuous survey along a triangle (14 Sep, 06:21 14 Sep, 22:01 UTC), and overnight mooring for ~ 13 hours. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP.</p> <p>The ADCP was mounted on a sled towed by the boat. The vertical bins were 0.5 m. The surveys were conducted at an average cruise speed of about 2.5–3 m/s except at the turns when the vessel had to slow down and during CTD casts when the vessel had to stop for a few minutes. A Seabird Electronic SBE 19 plus CTD was used. Note that only ADCP data are included in this dataset.</p> <p>The data are averaged at about 30-second intervals, excluding bad data. The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. There are three data files:</p> <p>ALT00T.000</p> <p>ALT00T.001</p> <p>ALT00T.002</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p>50 50 25 40 4 0 4</p> <p>0 9 13 12 25 46 90 1 18 3.560 -2.580 304.440 26.860</p> <p>-369.50 -131.20 -0.80 -0.10 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 9.22 9.08 9.19 9.09</p> <p>121.98 31.10 41.03 114.87 121.98</p> <p> 31.9893333 -81.0330833 -314.40 -146.20 91.8</p> <p>69.8 1.8 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0</p> <p>28 cm BT counts 0.43 0.034</p> <p> 1.48 23.08 254.157 -22.2 -6.3 13.3 2.5 161.0 170.0 167.0 169.0 100 0.04</p> <p> 1.98 26.23 267.378 -26.2 -1.2 13.0 2.2 166.0 175.0 172.0 173.0 100 0.28</p> <p> 2.48 28.51 271.809 -28.5 0.9 12.9 4.9 163.0 171.0 170.0 170.0 100 0.36</p> <p> 2.98 32.63 279.347 -32.2 5.3 11.6 2.1 160.0 168.0 167.0 167.0 100 0.54</p> <p> 3.48 32.65 266.840 -32.6 -1.8 9.7 1.7 157.0 166.0 164.0 164.0 100 0.35</p> <p> 3.98 32.11 271.249 -32.1 0.7 7.7 0.3 155.0 164.0 162.0 162.0 100 0.39</p> <p> 4.48 32.10 269.286 -32.1 -0.4 6.6 1.3 154.0 162.0 161.0 161.0 100 0.35</p> <p> 4.98 30.31 268.299 -30.3 -0.9 5.2 2.4 152.0 160.0 158.0 159.0 100 0.31</p> <p> 5.48 30.32 264.891 -30.2 -2.7 3.9 5.3 150.0 158.0 157.0 157.0 100 0.28</p> <p> 5.98 30.73 255.873 -29.8 -7.5 3.4 0.1 148.0 155.0 155.0 155.0 100 0.10</p> <p> 6.48 28.87 263.835 -28.7 -3.1 2.2 1.5 147.0 157.0 154.0 156.0 100 0.30</p> <p> 6.98 25.12 264.289 -25.0 -2.5 1.5 -1.6 154.0 165.0 160.0 164.0 89 0.23</p> <p> 7.48 27.16 260.676 -26.8 -4.4 1.8 -0.1 156.0 166.0 163.0 164.0 94 0.26</p> <p> 7.98 28.57 265.986 -28.5 -2.0 1.0 -1.5 147.0 161.0 157.0 155.0 83 0.31</p> <p> 8.48 25.42 257.276 -24.8 -5.6 1.2 -0.5 149.0 162.0 155.0 158.0 72 0.30</p> <p> 8.98 19.80 278.130 -19.6 2.8 0.3 0.7 154.0 169.0 160.0 164.0 61 0.63</p> <p> 9.48 14.44 257.600 -14.1 -3.1 -0.4 6.9 154.0 172.0 162.0 164.0 44 2147483647</p> <p> 9.98 11.79 320.505 -7.5 9.1 -1.3 -2.2 146.0 163.0 153.0 154.0 33 2147483647</p> <p> 10.48 8.79 348.179 -1.8 8.6 -0.2 8.0 130.0 142.0 135.0 137.0 22 2147483647</p> <p> 10.98 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 110.0 125.0 116.0 121.0 0 2147483647</p> <p>The ADCP data were used in Li (2013).</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>The data were collected on R/V Bluefin funded by NSF-LTER.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C. (2013). Subtidal Water Flux through a Multi-inlet System: Observations Before and During a Cold Front Event and Numerical Experiments, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans</em>, Vol. 118, 1–16, doi:10.1029/2012JC008109, 2013.</p>
Data from: A method of separating linear internal wave and vortical mode energies using shipboard ADCP velocity measurements
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Moored ADCP, current meters, and CTD data in the southern Japan Sea in 2014 and 2015
<p>These datasets contain velocities observed in the southern Japan Sea with an ADCP and current meters during May and October in both 2014 and 2015. Temperature and salinity measurements in the southwestern Japan Sea with a CTD are also included. These are for the publication of the manuscript entitled “Flow intensification due to the superimposition of near-inertial internal waves in the abyssal Japan Sea (East Sea)” by Senjyu, T. and Shin, H.R., which will be submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans.</p>
Langmuir Cells from glider mounted ADCP data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Gridded Oleander ADCP Data
<p>Oleander acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) from 1994-2018. These data are processed as described in Forsyth et al., (in submission 2020). The product is quality controlled and detided. The gridding is done on a 4 km distance grid, and an 8 m depth grid. Velocity fields are rotated with U south-west, and V south-east. </p>
CAT, TD, ADCP data for CAT research paper to be published in Journal of Water Resource Research
<p>This file contain experiment data obtained in Huangcai reservoir, Hunan, China in September, 2020. The field experiment aimed to reconstruct multi-layer current field using three-dimensional inversion technique to visualize spatiotemporal current structure.</p>
ADCP data from mooring M2
<p>Downward looking instrument produced vertical profile of water column velocity from 250 m above seabed to the seafloor, seperated into bins, every 45 seconds. Bin size was 6 m. These measurements include several turbidity current events. Data is provided in raw .nc file format</p>
Pearl River ADCP data - momentum redistribution
<p>These three-dimensional velocity data were acquired using a boat-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) on a series of six consecutive meander bends of the Pearl River, near Bogalusa, Louisiana. Data were collected during campaigns in 2017 and 2018. In this published dataset, there are raw ADCP files, as well as processed data provided within a Matlab .mat file.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.