Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Populations of Odontesthes (Teleostei: Atheriniformes) in the Andean region of Southern South America: body shape and hybrid individuals

Fig. 1. Distribution of O. hatcheri (light gray) and O. bonariensis (dark gray) described by Dyer (2006) and sampling localities: ULLM, Ullum Reservoir; CARZ, Carrizal Reservoir; NIHL, Nihuil Reservoir; D, Lake San Lorenzo; URRE, Lake Urre Lauquen; CDP, Casa de Piedra Reservoir; PELE, Lake Pellegrini; PDA, Piedra del Aguila Reservoir; MITO, Lake Morenito; CARI, Lake Carilafquen; EPU, Lake Epuyén; RIV, Lake Rivadavia; ROS, Lake Rosario; AME, Florentino Ameghino Reservoir; CHU, Chubut River at Los Altares; MUS, Lake Musters; LBA, Lake Buenos Aires; PUY, Lake Pueyrredón. White triangles show the location of the three hatcheries (Estación Hidrobiológica de Chascomús 35º36'S, 58º01'W, Estación de Piscicultura de Embalse 32º13'S, 64º29'W, and Estación de Piscicultura Río Limay 38º59'S, 68º14'W), sources of stocking practices.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

OccuTherm: Occupant Thermal Comfort Inference using Body Shape Information

OccuTherm: Occupant Thermal Comfort Inference using Body Shape Information This repository contains the official data from a USDOE-funded project at Carnegie Mellon University and Bosch Research Pittsburgh.  The primary goal of the project was to investigate the relationship between indoor commercial building occupant thermal comfort and various biometric and environmental predictors. We performed 77 individual comfort experiments, approved by our Institutional Review Board (IRB) and in satisfaction of participant consent guidelines. Our goal was to generate a dataset than enables comprehensive study of human thermal comfort preferences, in a commercial building environment, across a wide range of indoor environmental conditions. The data is comprised of the following feature groups: depth camera frames, biometrics sensor data, body shape information, subjective comfort data from the mobile device application, environmental sensor data from the commercial building HVAC system, and outdoor weather station data. This is the official dataset release for the following conference paper: <blockquote> Jonathan Francis*, Matias Quintana*, Nadine von Frankenberg, Sirajum Munir, and Mario Bergés. 2019. OccuTherm: Occupant Thermal Comfort Inference using Body Shape Information. In BuildSys '19: ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, November 13–14, 2019, New York, NY. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. </blockquote> To use this dataset, first download all the files. Next, issue the following commands on, e.g., Linux terminal: <pre><code class="language-bash">>$ cd /path/to/dataset/files >$ cat occutherm_dataset_v0-0-0.tar.gza* > archive.tar.gz >$ tar -xvzf archive.tar.gz</code></pre> Modeling and mobile application code are available in our project repository: <a href="https://github.com/jonfranc/occutherm">https://github.com/jonfranc/occutherm</a> If you find the repository or the dataset useful, please cite our paper: <pre><code>@inproceedings{francis_buildsys2019, author = {Francis, Jonathan and Quintana, Matias and von Frankenberg, Nadine and Munir, Sirajum and Berges, Mario}, title = {OccuTherm: Occupant Thermal Comfort Inference using Body Shape Information}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation}, series = {BuildSys '19}, year = {2019}, isbn = {978-1-4503-7005-9/19/11}, location = {New York, NY}, numpages = {10}, acmid = {3360858}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, keywords = {Thermal Comfort, Human Studies, Machine Learning}, }</code></pre>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Figure 1. Photomicrographs ofLepidochaetus zelinkai from live. A, B, E. Specimens, showing the body shape. C, D in Short Communication First record of Lepidochaetus zelinkai (Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida) from India

Figure 1. Photomicrographs ofLepidochaetus zelinkai from live. A, B, E. Specimens, showing the body shape. C, D. Details of mouth, tentacles (arrowheads in C), pharynx (C) and long and thin posterior spine (arrowhead in D). F, G. Anterior and middle portion of a specimen showing mouth, tentacles (arrowheads in F) and internal structures. At, adhesive tubes; C, cirri; EG, epidermal gland; M, mouth; P, pharynx; PJ, pharyngeal junction; Pn, protonephridia; S, scales. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Fig. 11 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 11. Left humerus of giant Mosbach mammoth (MNHM PW1947/23) from Middle Pleistocene, Mosbach, Germany; in lateral view.

Fig. 10 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 10. Different growth curves for Loxodonta africana from average-sized to world record specimens based on isometric growth (red), Laws' (1975) equations for wild population in good conditions up to average size (brown), Homo sapiens (in optimal conditions) allometric growth (grey), and the proposed allometric growth curve for proboscideans in this study (black).

Fig. 6 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 6. Femur length vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data).

Fig. 3 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 3. Humerus lengths vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data). The ratios shaded in grey correspond to the maximal length of the humerus and the white ones to the articular length of the humerus.

Fig. 9 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 9. Plot of height vs. weight for 561 male Homo sapiens in optimal conditions from 170 cm (low average) to 225 cm tall. Average growth curve (red line).

Fig. 2 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 2. Scapula lengths vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data). The ratios shaded in grey correspond to the maximal length of the scapula and the white ones to the articular length of the scapula.

Fig. 5 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 5. Radius length vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data).

Fig. 1 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 1. Reconstruction of the forelimb of the Zhalainuoer III mammoth in anatomical position. The actual shoulder height (black): total height in anatomical position 3690 mm. The height obtained by adding the articular (green): manus (500 mm) + ulna (960 mm) + humerus (1233 mm) + scapula (1075 mm) = 3768 mm. Maximal lengths of different bone elements (red): manus (500 mm) + radius (985 mm) + humerus (1274 mm) + scapula (1115 mm) = 3874 mm. The actual shoulder height can be calculated by multiplying the result by 0.98 in the case of the sum of articular lengths and by 0.95 in the case of maximal lengths.

Fig. 4 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 4. Ulna lengths vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data). The ratios shaded in grey correspond to the maximal length of the humerus, and the white ones to the articular length of the humerus.

Fig. 8 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 8. Fibula length vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data).

Fig. 7 in Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans

Fig. 7. Tibia length vs. skeletal shoulder height ratio of selected proboscideans based on the data collected in this study (Appendix 1, SOM: table 2; AL unpublished data).

FIGURE 1 in Testing spatial and environmental factors to explain body shape variation in the widespread Central American Blackbelt cichlid Vieja maculicauda (Teleostei: Cichlidae)

FIGURE 1 | Points representing geographic location for the lots of Vieja maculicauda used in the current study. Straight black lines represent the approximate location of geological block divisions. Purple shading represents a modified version of IUCN redlist data for the distribution of this species (Lyons, 2019).

FIGURE 4 in Testing spatial and environmental factors to explain body shape variation in the widespread Central American Blackbelt cichlid Vieja maculicauda (Teleostei: Cichlidae)

FIGURE 4 | Canonical variate analysis and shape changes along both axes. Shape change has been magnified by two for increased visualization.

FIGURE 3 in Testing spatial and environmental factors to explain body shape variation in the widespread Central American Blackbelt cichlid Vieja maculicauda (Teleostei: Cichlidae)

FIGURE 3 | Principal component analysis of size-corrected shape and deformation grids along each axis.

FIGURE 2 in Testing spatial and environmental factors to explain body shape variation in the widespread Central American Blackbelt cichlid Vieja maculicauda (Teleostei: Cichlidae)

FIGURE 2 | Landmarks (in blue) and semilandmarks (in red) as placed on each specimen. Landmark positions are described on Tab. S1.