Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

829

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

829 results for “evolvability”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad40/100

Data from: Independently evolved and gene flow‐accelerated pesticide resistance in two‐spotted spider mites

<p>Pest species are often able to develop resistance to pesticides used to control them, depending on how rapidly resistance can emerge within a population or spread from another resistant population. We examined the evolution of bifenazate resistance in China in the two‐spotted spider mite (TSSM) <em>Tetranychus</em> <em>uticae</em> Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), one of the most resistant arthropods, by using bioassays, detection of mutations in the target <em>cytb</em> gene, and population genetic structure analysis using microsatellite markers. Bioassays showed variable levels of resistance to bifenazate. The <em>cytb</em> mutation G126S, which confers medium resistance in TSSM to bifenazate, had previously been detected prior to the application of bifenazate and was now widespread, suggesting likely resistance evolution from standing genetic variation. G126S was detected in geographically distant populations across different genetic clusters, pointing to the independent origin of this mutation in different TSSM populations. A novel A269V mutation linked to a low‐level resistance was detected in two southern populations. Widespread resistance associated with a high frequency of the G126S allele was found in four populations from the Beijing area which were not genetically differentiated. In this case, a high level of gene flows likely accelerated the development of resistance within this local region, as well as into an outlying region distant from Beijing. These findings, therefore, suggest patterns consistent with both local evolution of pesticide resistance as well as an impact of migration, helping to inform resistance management strategies in TSSM.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2018View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Erdos Renyi Topology Median Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topology&nbsp;used for the spatial tournaments has been the Erdős R&eacute;nyi random network. The objective function taken into account has been the median normalized rank.&nbsp;Three files are contained here based on the list of strategies,deterministic and non, and on the sample size.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Random Topology Median Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topologies used for the spatial tournaments has been random between, small world, random and complete. The objective function taken into account has been the median normalized rank. Three files are contained here based on the list of strategies,deterministic and non, and on the sample size.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Watts Strogatz Topology Median Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topology&nbsp;used for the spatial tournaments has been the Watts Strogatz small world&nbsp;network. The objective function taken into account has been the median normalized rank.&nbsp;Three files are contained here based on the list of strategies,deterministic and non, and on the sample size.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Erdős Rényi Topology Median Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topology&nbsp;used for the spatial tournaments has been the Erdős R&eacute;nyi random network. The objective function taken into account has been the median normalized rank. Three&nbsp;files are contained here based on the strategies list, deterministic and non and on the sample size.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Complete Topology Median Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topology&nbsp;used for the spatial tournaments has been a complete&nbsp;network. The objective function taken into account has been the median normalized rank. Three files are contained here based on the list of strategies,deterministic and non, and on the sample size.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Spatial Evolve Algorithm Results for Random Topology Minimum Normalized Rank - MSc Dissertation

<p>A data set containing the results of the spatial evolve lookup algorithm. The topologies used for the spatial tournaments has been random between, small world, random and complete. The objective function taken into account has been the minimum&nbsp;normalized rank. Two&nbsp;files are contained here based on the sample size. All 132 strategies of the Axelrod have&nbsp;been used.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Data from: Stochastic phenotypic switching arises in response to directional selection in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.

<p><span lang="EN">This BBC_2025__README.txt file was generated on 2025-09-24 by Beatriz Baselga Cervera</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">GENERAL INFORMATION</span></p> <ol> <li><span lang="EN">Title of Dataset and code: Data from: Stochastic phenotypic switching arises in response to directional selection in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.</span></li> </ol> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">2. Author Information</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Corresponding Investigator</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Name: Ph.D. Beatriz Baselga-Cervera</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Institution: University of Minnesota Twin cities, Minnesota, US.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Email:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:bbaselga@umn.edu"><span>bbaselga@umn.edu</span></a>; beabaselga@gmail.com</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Co-investigator 1</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Name: Ph.D. Nahui <span>Olin Medina-Ch&aacute;vez</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Institution: University of Minnesota Twin cities, Minnesota, US.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Email: nmedinac@umn.edu</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Co-investigator 2</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Name: Ph.D. Noah Gettle</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Institution: Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Email: nbgettle@gmail.com </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Co-investigator 3</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Name: Ph.D. Michael Travisano</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Institution: University of Minnesota Twin cities, Minnesota, US.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Email: travisan@umn.edu</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">3. Data collectors: Ph.D. Beatriz Baselga-Cervera, Ph.D. Nahui Olin Medina-Ch&aacute;vez &amp; Ph.D. Noah Gettle.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">4. Date of data collection: 2022-2024</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">5. Geographic location of data collection: Saint Paul, US</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">6. Funding sources that supported the collection of the data: Fundaci&oacute;n Alfonso Mart&iacute;n Escudero, Madrid, Spain (BBC).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">7. Recommended citation for this dataset: Baselga-Cervera et al. (2024), Data from: Stochastic phenotypic switching arises in response to directional selection in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">DATA &amp; FILE OVERVIEW</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">8. Description of dataset</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">In this study, we address whether stochastic phenotypic switching can shape biological diversity contributing to evolutionary change across the transition from singles cells to multicellular clutters in <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae </em>multicellular yeast system. Populations characterization was conducted with a Coulter Counter multisize 4, a FlowCam 3, under the optic microscope, via ACE2 gene sequencing and RNA sequencing and mathematical modeling. The populations studied were the genetically uniform diploid wild-type&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>). </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">9. File list:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Coulter Counter size distribution data:&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 1 name:&nbsp; File_1_Coulter_Counter_Counts_20h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 1 description: Size distributions of&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockout, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD&nbsp;at 20-hours growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 1A, Fig. 3A and Fig. S2, Table S2 and Table S3.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 2 name:&nbsp; File_2_Coulter_Counter_Counts_24h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 2 description: Size distributions of&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockout, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 24-hours growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 1A, Fig. 3A, Fig. S2, Table S2 and Table S3. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 3 name:&nbsp; File_3_Coulter_Counter_Counts_48h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 3 description: Size distributions of&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockout, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD&nbsp;at 48-hours growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 1, Fig. 3A, Fig. S2, Table S2 and Table S3.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File name:&nbsp; File_4_Coulter_Counter_Counts_Constructed_strains_diversity.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 4 description: Size distributions of the&nbsp;constructed ACE2 knockout and a strain containing the homozygous missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Size distributions were obtained from populations before (initial) and five resuspended colonies obtained from small-size particles by plating the top fraction of the population after gravitational selection from three isolates per strain. Data for: Fig. 1, Fig. S2, Table S2 and Table S3.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 5 name:&nbsp; File_5_Coulter_Counter_Counts_Selection_Experiment.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 5 description: Size distributions of C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains&nbsp;in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Size distributions from the selection experiment for small-size particles by plating the top fraction of the population after gravitational selection over three cycles of selection. Data for: Fig. 2B and Fig. S6.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 6 name:&nbsp; File_6_Coulter_Counter_Counts_12h.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 6 description: Size distributions of C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockout, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 12-hours growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 3A and Fig. S3. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">FlowCam data:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 7 name:&nbsp;File_7_Rawdata_FlowCam_all.csv </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 7 description: FlowCam data from&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 c.1934 A&gt;T) in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. S4. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Data generated statistically:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 8 name: File_8_C1W8.2_overlapPairs_Selection_Experiment.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 8 description: overlapping indexes (&eta;) of the KDE distributions were computed using the R-package &lsquo;overlapping&rsquo; from the&nbsp;Coulter Counter data of the C1W8.2 derived strain over the selection experiment. Data for: Fig. S6D.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 9 name: File_9_C1W8.1_overlapPairs_Selection_Experiment.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 9 description: overlapping indexes (&eta;) of the KDE distributions were computed using the R-package &lsquo;overlapping&rsquo; from the&nbsp;Coulter Counter data</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">of the C1W8.1 derived strain over the selection experiment. Data for: Fig. S6C.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 10 name: File_10_ overlapPairs_Constructed_strains_diversity.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 10 description: overlapping indexes (&eta;) of the KDE distributions were computed using the R-package &lsquo;overlapping&rsquo; from the&nbsp;Coulter Counter data</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">of the&nbsp;constructed ACE2 knockout and a strain containing the homozygous missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Size distributions were obtained from populations before (initial) and after gravitational selection of five resuspended colonies from three isolates per strain. Data for: Fig. S7.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Data from ImageJ:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 11 name: File_11_ImageJ_analyses.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 11 description: ImageJ analyses of the microphotographs from&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>). Cultures were grown in culture tubes with 10 ml of media, 50 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 10 mL and 30 mL of media, in YPD under non-shaking and shaking at 250 rpm. YPD media was used across all conditions. Cultures were assessed after 24 hours growth at 30&deg;C.<span>&nbsp; </span>Microphotographs of each condition and strain were obtained with a Nikon TE2000 microscope using 10x objective.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Pictures:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 12 name: File_12_ FlowCam_Pictures.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 12 description FlowCam IMAGES from&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 1B. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 13 name: File_13_Microphotography_controled_experimental_conditions.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 13 description: Microphotographs<em> </em>from&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>). Cultures were grown in culture tubes with 10 mL of media, 50 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 10 mL and 30 mL of media, in YPD under non-shaking and shaking at 250 rpm. YPD media was used across all conditions. Cultures were assessed after 24 hours of growth at 30&deg;C. Pictures were obtained with a Nikon TE2000 microscope using 10x objective.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Mathematical Model</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 14 name: File_14_Mathematical_model.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 14 description: Mathematical model R code and generated values. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">ARN data</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 15 name: File_15_rnaseq-final-results-Top_v_Bottom.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 15 description: RNA analyses final results Top vs Bottom phenotypic subdistributions. Top is used as control. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 16 name: File_16_Variant_Call_format_file.vcf</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 16 description: Variant Calling analyses of the sample ARN sample <em>Top 1. </em>Adhesion number: SRR32105384. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Time-lapse videos</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 17 name: Supp. Video 1. C1W8.1 from 17 to 22 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 17 description: Supplementary Video 1. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast video between 17 and 22 hours of growth (C1W8.1-derived strain) &mdash; time-lapse video of the formation of a single-cell propagule from a multicellular cluster<strong>. </strong></span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 18 name: Supp. Video 2. Ace2x2KO over 26 hours growth.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 18 description: Supplementary Video 2. <em>ace2&Delta; knockout</em> constructed strain growth &mdash; time-lapse video of a single large multicellular cluster over 26 hours. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 19 name: Supp. Video 3. C1W8.1 over 6 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 19 description: Supplementary Video 3. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast growth between 6 and 12 hours of growth (C1W8.1-derived strain). </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 20 name: Supp. Video 4. C1W8.1 over 24 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 20 description: Supplementary Video 4. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast growth over 24 hours (C1W8.1-derived strain) &mdash; cell division stops in small ancestral-like phenotypes. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 21 name: Supp. Video 5. Ace2x2KO over 24 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 21 description: Supplementary Video 5. <em>ace2&Delta; knockout</em> constructed strain growth &mdash; time-lapse video of multiple large multicellular clusters over 24 hours. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 22 name: Supp. Video 6. Ace2x2missense from 0 to 3h45m hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 22 description: Supplementary Video 6. <em>ace2&Delta; missense</em> constructed strain growth &mdash; time-lapse video of multiple large multicellular clusters up to 3 hours 45 min. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Strains: ancestral wildtype (Y55 strains), C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular derived strains isolated after 60 days of selection in YPD media, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Media: Growth media used in this study were Yeast Peptone Dextrose media (YPD; 1% (v/w) yeast extract, 2% (v/w) peptone, 2% (v/w) D-glucose, pH 5.8).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Phenotypic characterization of the different strains was conducted in a Coulter Counter Multisizer 4 and FlowCam&reg; 3.0 Fluid Imaging Technologies, optic microscopy and a mathematical model. Replicate populations of different individual isolates per strain were analyzed to obtain the population distributions in YPD media.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">RNA was extracted using an Invitrogen&reg; PureLink RNA Mini Kit. Three out of four extracted samples per treatment with the highest RNA integrity score were submitted for TrueSeq Stranded RNA-Seq. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">10. Detailed description</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>●<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">Coulter Counter size distribution data of all the populations:&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 1 name:&nbsp; File_1_Coulter_Counter_Counts_20h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 1 description: strains naming convention; strain_Isolate_run.pseudoreplicate. Strains: ace2x2m=strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 c.1934 A&gt;T); ace2x2= ACE2 knockout; C1W8.1= C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain; C1W8.2= C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain; Y55= ancestral strain.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Columns 3 to the last column: strains counts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 2 name:&nbsp; File_2_Coulter_Counter_Counts_24h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 2 description: strains naming convention; strain_Isolate_run.pseudoreplicate. Strains: ace2x2m=strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 c.1934 A&gt;T); ace2x2= ACE2 knockout; C1W8.1= C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain; C1W8.2= C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain; Y55= ancestral strain.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Columns 3 to the last column: strains counts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 3 name:&nbsp; File_3_Coulter_Counter_Counts_48h.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 3 description: strains naming convention; strain_Isolate_run.pseudoreplicate. Strains: ace2x2m=strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 c.1934 A&gt;T); ace2x2= ACE2 knockout; C1W8.1= C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain; C1W8.2= C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain; Y55= ancestral strain.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3 to the last column: strains counts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File_4_Coulter_Counter_Counts_Constructed_strains_diversity.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 4 description: strains naming convention; strain_Isolate_colony_run.pseudoreplicate. Strains: ace2x2m=strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 c.1934 A&gt;T); ace2x2= ACE2 knockout.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3 to the last column: strains counts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File_5_Coulter_Counter_Counts_Selection_Experiment.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 5 description: strains naming convention; strain_colony.phenotype_selection.cycle_run.pseudoreplicate. Strains: C1W8.2= C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain and C1W8.1= C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3 to the last column: strains counts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 6 name:&nbsp; File_6_Coulter_Counter_Counts_12h.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 6 description: Size distributions of C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockout, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 12-hours growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 3A and Fig. S3. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Volume (um3)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Diameter (um2)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: Time</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 4: replicate</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 5: Strain name (strain_f)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 6: Isolate (isolate_f)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 7 name: File_3_Rawdata_Flowcam_all.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 7 description: strains naming convention; ace2_isolate= ACE2 knockout;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Ace2m_isolate= strain containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 <em>c.1934 A&gt;T</em>); c1w82_isolate=C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain; C1W81_isoalte C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain; Y55_isolate=ancestral strain. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1:</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 1: Particle ID</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 2: Area ABD</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 3: Aspect Ratio (Width/Length)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 4: Circle Fit</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 5: Area base Diameter (ABD)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 6: Equivalent Spherical Diameter (ESD)</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 7: Elongation</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 8: Perimeter</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 9: Roughness</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 10: Volume ABD-based</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 11: Volume ESD-based</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 12: Width</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Column 13: Source. Name of the sample.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 8 name: File_8_C1W8.2_overlapPairs_Selection_Experiment.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 8 description: C1W8.2 _lineage_selection.cycle= C1W8.2 evolved multicellular strain, lineage (A=ancestral, M1= lineage 1,<span>&nbsp; </span>M2= lineage 2 , M3= lineage 3) and selection cycle<span>&nbsp; </span>(0, 1, 2 and 3).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Var1= strain 1</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Var2= strain 2</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: overlap value of both strains compared.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 9 name: File_9_C1W8.1_overlapPairs_Selection_Experiment.csv</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 9 description: C1W8.1 _lineage_selection.cycle =C1W8.1 evolved multicellular strain, lineage (A=ancestral, M1= lineage 1,<span>&nbsp; </span>M2= lineage 2 , M3= lineage 3) and selection cycle<span>&nbsp; </span>(0, 1, 2 and 3).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Var1= strain 1</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Var2= strain 2</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: overlap value of both strains compared.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 10 name: File_10_overlapPairs_Constructed_strains_diversity.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 10 description: variables naming convention; strain _isolate_colony.number. Strains; ace2x2m=strains containing the ACE2 missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>); ace2x2= ACE2 knockout. Isolate; 1,2 and 3. Colony.number; Initial=initial population and colony number (1,2,3,4 and 5).</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Var1= strain 1</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: Var2= strain 2</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: overlap value of both strains compared.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 11 name: File_11_ ImageJ _analyses.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 11 description: ImageJ analyses of the microphotographs from&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>). Cultures were grown in culture tubes with 10 mL of media, 50 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 10 mL and 30 mL of media, in YPD under non-shaking and shaking at 250 rpm. YPD media was used across all conditions. Cultures were assessed after 24 hours growth at 30&deg;C.<span>&nbsp; </span>Microphotographs of each condition and strain were obtained with a Nikon TE2000 microscope using 10x objective.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: Var1= strain 1</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: </span><span lang="EN">Var2 =<span> strain 2</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: overlap value of both strains compared.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 12 name: File_12_ FlowCam_Pictures.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 12 description: FlowCam runs, images, and raw data of&nbsp;<em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>&nbsp;Y55 strain clones, C1W8.1 and&nbsp;C1W8.2 multicellular evolved strains, constructed ACE2 gene knockouts, and strains containing the missense mutation (ACE2 <sup>c.1934 A&gt;T</sup>) in YPD at 24h growth.&nbsp;Data for: Fig. 1B. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 13 name: File_13_Microphotography_controled_experimental_conditions.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 13 description: 149 microphotographs. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp;Folder 1:<span>&nbsp; </span>Images </span><span lang="EN">of Erlenmeyer flasks<span> with 30ml of YPD</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp;Folder 2:<span>&nbsp; </span>Images </span><span lang="EN">of <span>Erlenmeyer&rsquo;s and tubes with 10ml of YPD</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 14 name: File_14_Mathematical_model.zip</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 14 description: Mathematical model, R code, and generated values. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Document 1:<span>&nbsp; </span>R code of the model</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Document 2:<span>&nbsp; </span>Resulted data from </span><span lang="EN">the <span>mathematical model with different inset</span> <span>values of <em>k</em>, alpha</span>,<span> and beta. </span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Document 2:<span>&nbsp; </span>Resulted data from the mathematical model with different inset values of <em>k</em>, alpha, gamma, and beta. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 15 name: File_15_rnaseq-final-results-Top_v_Bottom.xlsx</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 15 description: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&sect;&nbsp; Page 1: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 1: number</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 2: ID</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 3: protID</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 4: gene_symbol<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 5: chr</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 6: chr_latin</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 7: location </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 8: baseMean</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 9: log2FoldChange</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 10: lfcSE</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 11: stat</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 12: pvalue<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>padj</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 13: test</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 14: log10padj</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 15: log10baseMean</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 16: blast_pident</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 17: transcript_length</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 18: blast_evalue</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 19: blast_bitscore</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 20: rnaID</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 21: feature</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 22: accession</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">Column 23: strain</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Column 24: gene_accession</span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 16 name: File_16_Variant_Call_format_file.vcf</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 16 description: Variant Calling analyses of the<span>&nbsp; </span>ARN sample <em>Top 1. </em>Adhesion number: SRR32105384. </span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 17 name: Supp. Video 1. C1W8.1 from 17 to 22 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 17 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 1. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast video between 17 and 22 hours of growth (C1W8.1-derived strain) &mdash; time-lapse video of the formation of a single-cell propagule from a multicellular cluster. </strong>The time-lapse video captures growth dynamics over this period, highlighting the formation of a single-cell propagule from a multicellular cluster on two occasions (visible in the lower left region of the frame). Images were acquired every 15 minutes using a 10x objective lens.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 18 name: Supp. Video 2. Ace2x2KO over 26 hours </span><span lang="EN">of <span>growth.</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 18 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 2. <em>ace2&Delta; knockout</em></strong> <strong>constructed strain growth</strong> <strong>&mdash; time-lapse video of a single large multicellular cluster over 26 hours.</strong> The video captures large, multicellular clusters that produce both large, multicellular and small, ancestral-like clusters. The video shows a single large multicellular cluster fragmenting into two large multicellular clusters at ~ 13 hours of growth (from 02:09 to 02:10 minutes in the time-lapse) and generating two small ancestral-like propagules at ~19 hours of growth (from 03:07 to 03:09 minutes in the time-lapse). Microphotographs were obtained at 3-minute intervals under a 10x objective over 26 hours.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 19 name: Supp. Video 3. C1W8.1 over 6 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 19 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 3. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast growth between 6 and 12 hours of growth (C1W8.1-derived strain). </strong>The time-lapse video captures large, multicellular clusters of the C1W8.1 strains, which produce both large, multicellular and small, ancestral-like clusters. Additionally, small ancestral-like clusters are observed undergoing cellular division <strong>&mdash;</strong>no separation is observed<strong>&mdash;</strong> during the first 2 to 3 hours, followed by a cessation of division for the remainder of the time-lapse. Images were acquired every 30 seconds using a 10x objective lens.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 20 name: Supp. Video 4. C1W8.1 over 24 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 20 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 4. Experimentally evolved multicellular yeast growth over 24 hours (C1W8.1-derived strain) &mdash; cell division stops in small ancestral-like phenotypes. </strong>The footage captures multiple large multicellular clusters undergoing fragmentation into propagules. Additionally, a small ancestral-like cluster is observed undergoing division during the first 2 to 3 hours, followed by a cessation of division for the remainder of the time-lapse (visible in the lower left region of the frame). This early division phase is evident during the first 10 seconds of the video. Images were acquired every 5 minutes using a 10x objective lens.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 21 name: Supp. Video 5. Ace2x2KO over 24 hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 21 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 5. <em>ace2&Delta; knockout</em> constructed strain growth</strong> <strong>&mdash; time-lapse video of multiple large multicellular clusters over 24 hours.</strong> The video shows multiple large multicellular clusters fragmenting into large clusters and several small ancestral-like clusters being dragged by Brownian motion and evaporation of the sample. Microphotographs were obtained at fixed intervals of 3 minutes under the 10x objective over 24 hours.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 22 name: Supp. Video 6. Ace2x2missense from 0 to 3h45m hours growth</span></p> <p><span lang="EN"><span>o<span>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span><span lang="EN">File 22 description: <strong>Supplementary Video 6. <em>ace2&Delta; missense</em> constructed strain growth</strong> <strong>&mdash; time-lapse video of multiple large multicellular clusters up to 3 hours 45 min.</strong> The video shows multiple large multicellular clusters fragmenting into large clusters</span><span lang="EN">,<span> generating two small ancestral-like propagules before being dragged by Brownian motion and evaporation of the sample. Microphotographs were obtained at </span>3-minute intervals <span>under the 10x objective.&nbsp;</span></span></p> <p><span lang="EN">&nbsp;</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →
dryad40/100

How new communication behaviors evolve: Androgens as modifiers of neuromotor structure and function in foot-flagging frogs

<p>How diverse animal communication signals have arisen is a question that has fascinated many. <em>Xenopus</em> frogs have been a model system used for three decades to reveal insights into the neuroendocrine mechanisms and evolution of vocal diversity. Due to the ease of studying central nervous system control of the laryngeal muscles <em>in vitro</em>, <em>Xenopus</em> has helped us understand how variation in communication signals between sexes and between species is produced at the molecular, cellular, and systems levels. Yet, it is becoming easier to make similar advances in non-model organisms. Here, we summarize our research on a group of frog species that have evolved a novel hind limb signal known as 'foot flagging.' We have shown that the evolution of foot flagging in multiple species is accompanied by the evolution of higher androgen hormone sensitivity in the leg muscles and an increased density of spinal interneurons in the neuromotor system that controls the hind limb. Comparing this work to prior work in <em>Xenopus</em>, we highlight which patterns of hormone sensitivity and neural circuit properties are shared between <em>Xenopus</em> and foot-flagging frogs and which appear to be species-specific. Overall, we aim to illustrate the power of drawing inspiration from experiments in model organisms, in which the mechanistic details have been worked out, and then apply these ideas to a non-traditional model species to reveal new details, further complexities, and fresh hypotheses.</p>

opencc-zeroApr 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Spontaneous parthenogenesis in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia typhae: low frequency anomaly or evolving process?

<p>Raw data linked to the manuscript, including phenotyping and genotyping results for all Cotesia typhae females analyzed in this study.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Rapid-cycling Brassica rapa evolves even earlier flowering under experimental drought

<p><strong>Premise</strong></p> <p>Changes in climate can impose selection on populations and may lead to rapid evolution. One such climatic stress is drought, which plant populations may respond to with escape (rapid growth and early flowering) or avoidance (slow growth and efficient water use). However, it is unclear if drought escape would be a viable strategy for populations that already flower early from prior selection.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>In an experimental evolution study, we subjected rapid-cycling <em>Brassica rapa</em> (RCBr), which was previously selected for early flowering, to four generations of experimental drought or watered conditions. We then grew ancestral and descendant populations concurrently under drought and watered conditions to assess evolution, plasticity, and adaptation.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>RCBr evolved under drought had earlier flowering and lower water-use efficiency than RCBr evolved under watered conditions, indicating evolutionary divergence. The drought descendants also had a trend of earlier flowering compared to ancestors, indicating evolution. Evolution of earlier flowering under drought followed the direction of selection and increased fitness, and was consistent with studies in natural and experimental populations of this species, suggesting adaptive evolution.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> <p>We found evidence for rapid adaptive evolution of drought escape in RCBr and little evidence for constraints on flowering, even though RCBr already flowers extremely early. Our results suggest that some populations may harbor sufficient genetic variation for evolution even after strong selection has occurred. Our study also illustrates the utility of combining artificial selection, experimental evolution, and the resurrection approach to study the evolution of functional traits.</p>

opencc-zeroApr 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Code: The effects of model complexity on model output uncertainty in co-evolved coupled natural–human systems

<p>This is the code archive for the publication &quot;The effects of model complexity on model output uncertainty in co-evolved coupled natural&ndash;human systems&quot; in Earth&#39;s Future.</p> <p>Abstract:</p> <p>Studies have recently focused on using coupled natural&ndash;human systems (CNHS) to inform policymaking. However, model uncertainty can increase with model complexity and affect the variance of the model outcomes. Therefore, this study explores an uncertainty analysis of coupled hydrological and human decision models to better evaluate CNHS modeling properties. Five coupled models are proposed with different model complexities for human behavior settings (i.e., model structure and the number of calibrated parameters): one static, two adaptive, and two learning adaptive. Learning adaptive models (the most complex) have both a learning component (capturing long-term trends) and an adaptive component (capturing short-term variations), while adaptive models omit the learning component. The static model is the simplest, without learning or adaptive components. Applying the law of total variance, the model output uncertainty is decomposed into three sources: (1) climate change scenario uncertainty, (2) climate internal variability, and (3) different model configurations with parameter sets or model structures that are equally capable of producing similar outcomes. Our exploratory analysis demonstrated that model uncertainty would likely increase with model complexity given uncertain input data (e.g., climate forcing) and different model configurations; the inclusion of a learning mechanism in the human system can potentially offset the impact of the natural system on uncertainty through coupling natural and human systems. We also discuss other uncertainty sources, such as assumptions about model structure due to incomplete knowledge and metrics for calibration target selection for future studies.</p>

opengpl-2.0May 2022View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Evolved differences in thermal plasticity of mosquitofish mating behavior are unrelated to source temperature

<p>Phenotypic plasticity in response to temperature is expected to play a key role in how organisms cope with climate change. Evolved differences in plastic responses are often linked to historical differences in average temperatures, yet we know little about how behavioral plasticity is affected by prevailing thermal environments. In this study, we used a common-garden design to test whether historical differences in average temperatures caused evolutionary divergence in the plasticity of mating behavior of Western mosquitofish (<em>Gambusia affinis</em>) inhabiting geothermal springs with average source temperatures spanning from 18.8 to 33.3 C. We found population differences in the thermal plasticity of courtship displays, copulation attempts, copulations, and mating efficiency, but these differences could not be explained by average source temperatures. We also tested for differences in thermal optima and maximum performance in mating behavior among populations. We found that only the maximum number of displays differed among populations, although these differences were also unrelated to source temperature. While temperature may have predictable evolutionary consequences for some thermally sensitive traits, our findings are inconsistent with theoretical predictions of evolutionary responses to divergent average temperatures, highlighting the need for greater synergy between empirical and theoretical work to understand thermal adaptation.</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2022View details →
dryad40/100

Can disease resistance evolve independently at different ages? Genetic variation in age-dependent resistance to disease in three wild plant species

<p>1. Juveniles are typically less resistant (more susceptible) to infectious disease than adults, and this difference in susceptibility can help fuel the spread of pathogens in age-structured populations. However evolutionary explanations for this variation in resistance across age remain to be tested.</p> <p>2. One hypothesis is that natural selection has optimized resistance to peak at ages where disease exposure is greatest. A central assumption of this hypothesis is that hosts have the capacity to evolve resistance independently at different ages. This would mean that hosts populations have a) standing genetic variation in resistance at both juvenile and adult stages, and b) that this variation is not strongly correlated between age-classes so that selection acting at one age does not produce a correlated response at the other age</p> <p>3. Here we evaluated the capacity of three wild plant species (Silene latifolia, S. vulgaris, and Dianthus pavonius) to evolve resistance to their anther-smut pathogens (Microbotryum fungi), independently at different ages. The pathogen is pollinator-transmitted, and thus exposure risk is considered to be highest at the adult flowering stage.</p> <p>4. Within each species we grew families to different ages, inoculated individuals with anther smut, and evaluated the effects of age, family and their interaction on infection.</p> <p>5. In two of the plant species, S. latifolia and D. pavonius, resistance to smut at the juvenile stage was not correlated with resistance to smut at the adult stage. In all three species, we show there are significant age*family interaction effects, indicating that age-specificity of resistance varies among the plant families.</p> <p>6. Synthesis: These results indicate that different mechanisms likely underlie resistance at juvenile and adult stages and support the hypothesis that resistance can evolve independently in response to differing selection pressures as hosts age. Taken together our results provide new insight into the structure of genetic variation in age-dependent resistance in three well-studied wild host-pathogen systems.</p>

opencc-zeroJul 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Appendices of the work "On the perceived relevance of critical internal quality attributes when evolving software features"

<p><strong>Context:</strong>&nbsp;Several refactorings performed while evolving software features aim to improve internal quality attributes like cohesion and complexity. Studies shows that non-assisted refactorings might worsen, not improve, internal attributes. Current knowledge is scarce on how developers perceive the relevance of critical internal attributes while evolving features. Internal attributes are critical if their measurement assumes anomalous values. <strong>Objective:</strong>&nbsp;This qualitative study aims at revealing the developer&#39;s perception on the relevance of critical internal attributes when evolving features. We target six class-level critical attributes: low cohesion, high complexity, high coupling, large hierarchy depth, large hierarchy breadth, and large size. <strong>Method:</strong>&nbsp;We performed two industry case studies based on online focus group sessions. We asked developers to discuss how much (and why) critical attributes are relevant for adding or enhancing features. We assessed the relevance of critical attributes individually and relatively, reasons behind the relevance of each critical attribute, and interrelations of critical attributes. <strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;Low cohesion and high complexity were perceived as very relevant because they often make evolving features hard while tracking failures and adding features. The other critical attributes were perceived as less relevant when reusing code or adopting design patterns, for instance. Examples of interrelations include large size leads to low cohesion and high complexity leads to high coupling. <strong>Conclusions:</strong>&nbsp;Our findings could be combined with previous results on how refactorings affect quality attributes to assist developers in applying refactorings that may have a practically relevant impact on critical attributes.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
dryad40/100

Fitness of evolving bacterial populations is contingent on deep and shallow history but only shallow history creates predictable patterns

<p><span>Long term evolution experiments have tested the importance of genetic and environmental factors in influencing evolutionary outcomes. Differences in phylogenetic history, recent adaptation to distinct environments, and chance events all influence the fitness of a population. However, the interplay of these factors on a population's evolutionary potential remains relatively unexplored. We tracked the outcome of 2,000 generations of evolution of four natural isolates of Escherichia coli bacteria that were engineered to also create differences in shallow history by adding previously identified mutations selected in a separate long-term experiment. Replicate populations started from each progenitor were evolved in four environments. We found that deep and shallow phylogenetic histories both contributed significantly to differences in evolved fitness, though by different amounts in different selection environments. With one exception, chance effects were not significant. Whereas the effect of deep history did not follow any detectable pattern, effects of shallow history followed a pattern of diminishing-returns whereby fitter ancestors had smaller fitness increases. These results are consistent with adaptive evolution being contingent on the interaction of several evolutionary forces but demonstrate that the nature of these interactions is not fixed and may not be predictable even when the role of chance is small.</span></p>

opencc-zeroSep 2022View details →
dryad40/100

Direct and indirect phenotypic effects on sociability indicate potential to evolve

<p class="MsoNormal">The decision to leave or join a group is important as group size influences many aspects of organisms' lives and their fitness. This tendency to socialise with others, sociability, should be influenced by genes carried by focal individuals (direct genetic effects) and by genes in partner individuals (indirect genetic effects), indicating the trait's evolution could be slower or faster than expected. However, estimating these genetic parameters is difficult. Here, in a laboratory population of the cockroach <em>Blaptica dubia</em>, I estimate phenotypic parameters for sociability: repeatability (<em><span>R</span></em>) and repeatable influence (<em><span>RI</span></em>), which indicate whether direct and indirect genetic effects respectively are likely. I also estimate the interaction coefficient (<em><span>Ψ</span></em><em>)</em>, which quantifies how strongly a partner's trait influences the phenotype of the focal individual and is key in models for the evolution of interacting phenotypes. Focal individuals were somewhat repeatable for sociability across a three-week period (<em><span>R</span></em> = 0.080), and partners also had marginally consistent effects on focal sociability (<em><span>RI</span></em> = 0.053). The interaction coefficient was non-zero, although in the opposite sign for the sexes; males preferred to associate with larger individuals (<em><span>Ψ</span></em><sub>male </sub>= -0.129) while females preferred to associate with smaller individuals (<em><span>Ψ</span></em><sub>female</sub><strong><sub> </sub></strong>= 0.071). Individual sociability was consistent between dyadic trials and in social networks of groups. These results provide phenotypic evidence that direct and indirect genetic effects have limited influence on sociability, with perhaps the most evolutionary potential stemming from heritable effects of the body mass of partners. Sex-specific interaction coefficients may produce sexual conflict and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in social behaviour.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

A rapidly evolving high-amplitude δ Scuti star crossing the Hertzsprung Gap

<p>The datasets includes the work folder which we used in the paper to construct the evolutionary models based on MESA (r15140).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

BRAIN Journal-Evolving Spiking Neural Networks for Control of Artificial Creatures-Figure 14. Number of artificial creatures that could survive in the external environment

<p>Artificial creatures and the virtual environment are designed and implemented in a C++ platform in which simulations are performed. In the GA algorithm, at First step a population of 100 complex artificial creatures that each of them had 150 neurons were tested and evaluated by GA; each neuron connected to 15 post-synaptic neurons with different axonal conduction delays between every two neurons. In every generation fitness function has been calculated for all population. The initial energy level for each creature is considered as 50. Figure 14 the number of survived chromosome increases with<br> generation progressing.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2013View details →
zenodo40/100

BRAIN Journal-Evolving Spiking Neural Networks for Control of Artificial Creatures-Figure 11. Crossover with two cut points

<p>Then next generation are produced by combination of the elites (15%), crossover (55%) and mutation (30%) of the initial population. Elites are the best chromosomes which are directly transferred to the next generation. Because of long chromosome length, for crossover, five points are randomly chosen in each parent as cut points. Figure 11 shows a typical crossover with two cut points and Figure 12 illustrates a flowchart for the proposed evolutionary model. Selections are based on Roulette Wheel selection, more detailed information can be found in.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2013View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record