Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38 results for “flower strips”
Attractiveness of sown wildflower strips to flower-visiting insects depends on seed mixture and establishment success
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: High effectiveness of tailored flower strips in reducing pests and crop plant damage
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Enhancing natural enemies in sugar beet fields: The impact of flower strip types and landscape elements
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Tailored flower strips promote natural enemy biodiversity and pest control in potato crops
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Figure 4 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
Figure 4 The percentage of bee species recorded at each flower strip that is also found in the surrounding area at distances of 500, 1000, and 1500 m.
Supplementary material 3 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
: Data type: species data
Figure 2 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
Figure 2 The flower strip at Fockensteinstraße as an example of the urban context of the flower strips studied here.
Figure 1 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
Figure 1 The nine flower strips monitored for this study (modified from https://www.openstreetmap.org, using QGIS 3.8.2 (QGIS Development Team 2019) and Munich's bee records (sightings and/or specimens) between 1997 and 2017.
Figure 3 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
Figure 3 Numbers of species and individuals recorded between 1997 and 2017 within a radius of 500, 1000, and 1500 m from the centre of the respective flower strip (compare Fig. 1). For details of how past recordings were made see Materials and Methods.
Supplementary material 1 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
: Data type: species data
Supplementary material 2 from: Hofmann MM, Renner SS (2020) One-year-old flower strips already support a quarter of a city's bee species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 75: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47507
: Data type: accession numbers
Supplementary material 2 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Table S1
Figure 4 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Figure 4 Mean flight distances (with standard deviations) calculated from the 450 bee re-sightings shown in Suppl. material 2: Table S1, with year of observation given for Osmia cornuta, studied in both 2017 and 2018. All remaining data are from 2017. Species body sizes are from Amiet et al. (2004) and Scheuchl (2006). For the smaller species Chelostoma florisomne, C. rapunculi, and Heriades truncorum, which were colour-tagged rather than number-tagged, we cannot exclude repeated observations of the same individual.
Figure 3 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Figure 3 Marking of an Osmia cornuta male (photos: J. Kirndorfer) a application of the glue and b, c attaching of the apiarists' tag d a labeled male ready to take off.
Figure 2 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Figure 2 Marking of an Osmia cornuta female (photos: J. Kirndorfer). a, b A female caught with an insect net is transferred to the queen-marking tube and c, d pushed with the plunger to immobilize it (e, f a stylus is used to put glue on the mesonotum g, h the numbered colour plate is attached and i the bee released.
Figure 1 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Figure 1 Marked individuals of AChelostoma florisomneBC. rapunculiCHeriades truncorumDHoplitis aduncaEOsmia bicornis, and FOsmia cornuta.
Supplementary material 1 from: Hofmann MM, Fleischmann A, Renner SS (2020) Foraging distances in six species of solitary bees with body lengths of 6 to 15 mm, inferred from individual tagging, suggest 150 m-rule-of-thumb for flower strip distances. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 77: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.77.51182
Figure S1. Map showing the garden lay-out and location of the nest boxes at with bees were tagged
The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.