Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
123
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
123 results for “review paper”
Dataset for the paper submitted for peer-review with the title "Quantifying heterotrophic bacteria parameters and dissolved organic carbon biodegradability through oxygen data assimilation in a river water quality model"
<p>The proposed dataset is related to the following article submitted for peer review:</p> <p>Hasanyar, M., Flipo, N., Romary, T., Wang, S. (2023), Quantifying heterotrophic bacteria parameters and dissolved organic carbon biodegradability through oxygen data assimilation in a river water quality model, UNDER PEER-REVIEW</p> <p>It consists of command files for the prose-pa0.74 software available here: https://gitlab.com/prose-pa/prose-pa </p> <p>To run the model :</p> <p>1. Compile prose-pa0.74</p> <p>2. Copy the executable in the current directory</p> <p>3. In a terminal launch</p> <p>> ./prose-pa0.74 simulation.COMM test.log</p> <p>The “simulation.COMM” holds the settings for the ProSe-PA simulation related to the paper mentioned in the front head of the current file. </p> <p>The information on different parameters of “simulation.COMM” are included in “bathymetrie”, “Cmds”, “Inflows”, “layers”, “meteo”, “o2_obs”, “param_bio”, “Reaches” and “Singularities” folders.</p> <p>The “bathymetrie” folder holds the geometric information of several cross-sections along the river. </p> <p>The Cmds folder holds the “simulation.COMM” file. </p> <p>The “Inflows” folder the information about the boundary condition inflows to the river such as discharge, concentration of organic carbon, etc.</p> <p>The layer folder holds data of the initial conditions of the model (Table 2 in the article).</p> <p>The “meteo” folder holds the meteorological information.</p> <p>The “o2_obs” folder holds the observed oxygen data needed to do data assimilation. </p> <p>The “param_bio” folder holds information on the physiology of bacteria, phytoplankton, and other model species.</p> <p>The “Reaches” folder holds information about river reaches and their manning coefficient. </p> <p>The “param_range” file holds the variation range of model parameters considered in data assimilation together with their perturbation percentage.</p> <p>The output files are written in $HOME/Outputs folder. It is possible to change it directly in simulation.COMM, last entry “Output_folder”.</p>
Data for paper "The Two Faces of AI in Green Mobile Computing: A Literature Review"
<p>This is the data associated with the literature review presented in the paper “The Two Faces of AI in Green Mobile Computing:<br> A Literature Review” accepted at SEAA 2023.</p>
Appendix 1. The papers included in the scoping review: Exploring the Applications of QR Codes in STEM Subjects
<p>This is a list of the papers included in the scoping review: <strong>Exploring the Applications of QR Codes in STEM Subjects.</strong></p> <p><strong>Published paper:</strong></p> <p>Tsoukala, E., Lefkos, I., Fachantidis, N. (2024). Exploring the Applications of QR Codes in STEM Subjects. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) Smart Mobile Communication & Artificial Intelligence. IMCL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 936. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54327-2_13">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54327-2_13</a></p>
Fig. 1A–D in Review paper A Half-century of Research on Free-living Amoebae (1965-2017): Review of Biogeographic, Ecological and Physiological Studies
Fig. 1A–D. Column graphs showing the number of published papers reviewed (ordinate) grouped by decades (abscissa). 1A – Total; 1B – Biogeography; 1C – Ecology; 1D – Physiology.
Paper Repository and References for "Early software defect prediction: A systematic map and review"
<p>Context: Software defect prediction is a trending research topic, and a wide variety of the published papers focus on coding phase or after. A limited number of papers, however, includes the prior (early) phases of the software development lifecycle (SDLC).<br> Objective: The goal of this study is to obtain a general view of the characteristics and usefulness of Early Software Defect Prediction (ESDP) models reported in scientific literature. <br> Method: A systematic mapping and systematic literature review study has been conducted. We searched for the studies reported between 2000 and 2016. We reviewed 52 studies and analyzed the trend and demographics, maturity of state-of-research, in-depth characteristics, success and benefits of ESDP models. <br> Results: We found that categorical models that rely on requirement and design phase metrics, and few continuous models including metrics from requirements phase are very successful. We also found that most studies reported qualitative benefits of using ESDP models.<br> Conclusion: We have highlighted the most preferred prediction methods, metrics, datasets and performance evaluation methods, as well as the addressed SDLC phases. We expect the results will be useful for software teams by guiding them to use early predictors effectively in practice, and for researchers in directing their future efforts.</p>
Replication Package for the Paper: "An Empirical Analysis of the Manual Detection of Code Smells via Code Review"
<p>This repository contains the data and results from the paper "An Empirical Analysis of the Manual Detection of Code Smells via Code Review" submitted to SANER 2021.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>1. "data.zip" file contains the following three folders: </strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>1). data folder</strong></p> <p>The data folder contains the retrieved 1,174 reviews that discuss code smells. Each review includes four parts: Code Change URL, Code Smell, Code Smell Discussion, and Source Code URL.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>2). scripts folder</strong></p> <p>The scripts folder contains the Python script that was used to search for code smell terms and the list of code smell terms.</p> <ul> <li><em>keywords.txt</em> contains the keywords keywords asociated with code smells, such as "smell, duplication, and dead".</li> <li><em>get_changes.py</em> is used for getting code changes from OpenStack.</li> <li><em>get_comments.py</em> is used for getting review comments for each code change.</li> <li><em>keywords_search.py</em> is used for searching review comments that contain at least one keyword.</li> <li>keywords_improve.py is used for improving the keyword-based mining approach.</li> <li>tools.py is used for supporting the process of keywords improving.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>3). project folder</strong></p> <p>The project folder contains the MAXQDA project files. The files can be opened by MAXQDA 12 or higher versions, which are available at https://www.maxqda.com/ for download. You may also use the free 14-day trial version of MAXQDA 2018, which is available at https://www.maxqda.com/trial for download.</p> <ul> <li><em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ2.mx12</em> is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ2, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.</li> <li><em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ3.mx12</em> is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ3, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>2. Keywords associated with code smells.pdf</strong></p> <p>This file contains the final set of keywords asociated with code smells that we identified by following the systematic approach proposed by Bosu and his colleagues in their paper: Identifying the Characteristics of Vulnerable Code Changes: An Empirical Study, FSE 2014.</p>
Replication Package for the Paper: "Understanding Code Smell Detection via Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack Community"
<p>This repository contains the data and results from the paper "Understanding Code Smell Detection via Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack Community" submitted to ICPC 2021.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>1. "data.zip" contains the following three folders:</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>1) data folder</strong></p> <p>The data folder contains the retrieved 1,190 reviews that discuss code smells. Each review includes four parts: Code Change URL, Code Smell, Code Smell Discussion, and Source Code URL.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>2) scripts folder</strong></p> <p>The scripts folder contains the Python scripts that were used to search for code smell terms and the list of code smell terms.</p> <ul> <li> <p><em>keyword.txt</em> contains the keywords associated with code smells, such as "smell, duplication, and dead".</p> </li> <li> <p><em>get_changes.py</em> is used for getting code changes from OpenStack.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>get_comments.py</em> is used for getting review comments for each code change.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>keywords_search.py</em> is used for searching review comments that contain at least one keyword.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>random_select.py</em> is used for randomly selecting review comments that do not contain any keyword.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>keywords_improve.py</em> is used for improving the keyword-based mining approach.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>tools.py</em> is used for supporting the process of keywords improving.</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>3) project folder</strong></p> <p>The project folder contains the MAXQDA project files. The files can be opened by MAXQDA 12 or higher versions, which are available at <a href="https://www.maxqda.com/">https://www.maxqda.com/</a> for download. You may also use the free 14-day trial version of MAXQDA 2018, which is available at <a href="https://www.maxqda.com/trial">https://www.maxqda.com/trial</a> for download.</p> <ul> <li> <p><em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ2.mx12</em> is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ2, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ3.mx12</em> is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ3, which were analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>2. Keywords associated with code smells.pdf</strong></p> <p>This file contains the final set of keywords associated with code smells that we identified by following the systematic approach proposed by Bosu and his colleagues in their paper: Identifying the Characteristics of Vulnerable Code Changes: An Empirical Study, FSE 2014.</p>
Data accompanying the paper "Regime-dependent turbulence length scale formulation for NWP models based on turbulence kinetic energy, shear and stratification", submitted to Monthly Weather Review
<p>This repository contains the outputs of MicroHH LES (van Heerwaarden et al., 2017) and ALADIN-CZ single-column model simulations of four idealized cases:</p> <p>1) The continental cumulus case utilizing measurements from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, and Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) site in Oklahoma (Brown et al. 2002; Lenderink et al. 2004)</p> <p>2) The trade wind cumulus case from the Barbados Oceanographic and Meteorological Experiment (BOMEX; Siebesma et al. 2003)</p> <p>3) A drizzling stratocumulus case based on the first research flight data of the second period of the Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus (DYCOMS-II) campaign (Stevens et al., 2005)</p> <p>4) A stable planetary boundary layer case based on the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Atmospheric Boundary Layer Study (GABLS1) data (Beare et al. 2006; Cuxart et al. 2006; Holtslag 2006)</p> <p>The MicroHH LES outputs are taken from Reilley et al. (2022) study and can be also found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6372434. Additionally, we provide case study outputs from the ALADIN-CZ 3D NWP model, wherein the fields roughly match those verified/shown in Fig. 9.</p> <p> </p> <p>The files are organized in the following way:</p> <p>1) MicroHH LES model configuration files (.ini) and output files (NetCDF format) are stored in the file "LES.zip" within "conf" and "data" folders, respectivelly. Additionally, a sample script to plot LES-derived Turbulence Length Scales (TLS) and those based on NWP formulations (using LES data as input) is provided (plot.py).</p> <p>2) The vertical profiles of (i) conserved variables and (ii) turbulent fluxes from the ALADIN-CZ single-column model for four idealized cases are provided in the file "single-column_simulations.zip", consisted of individual ASCII files (per case and TLS formulation). A detailed description of its content can be found in the associated README file.</p> <p>3) Chosen surface and upper-air fields for (i) 23 November 2019 inversion and (ii) 24 June 2022 mesoscale convection system cases are provided in the file "case_studies.zip" and consisted of individual GRIB files per field and prognostic hour. A detailed description of its content can be found in the associated README file.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Dataset for the Paper "Longevity of Artifacts in Leading Parallel and Distributed Systems Conferences: a Review of the State of the Practice in 2023"
<p>Dataset used for the paper "Longevity of Artifacts in Leading Parallel and Distributed Systems Conferences: a Review of the State of the Practice in 2023" submitted at ACM REP'24.</p> <p>The associated analysis scripts are available on Software-Heritage: https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:3904795a49327b1e9b7ef1a8aff995b1f94ae6fb;origin=https://github.com/GuilloteauQ/artefact-lifetime;visit=swh:1:snp:9adc667f9fefcb6783df076520ef357231030ad4;anchor=swh:1:rev:ad4d19abb5da12fd6df708bc13e444d834c85dfa</p>
Dataset for paper: The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviews
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Code repository that supports the research presented in the paper "The gender gap in higher STEM studies: a Systematic Literature Review"
<p>Resources for the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) carries out as part of PhD thesis about the gender gap in STEM studies in higher education by Sonia Verdugo-Castro and supervised by Alicia García-Holgado and Mª Cruz Sánchez Gómez.</p> <p>The SLR covers papers in WoS and Scopus from 2015 to 2021.</p> <p>All the papers retrieved and the different steps in the SLR selection process are contained and documented in:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ldml-Mg-oguX9gXayllojBRtZ1kjdD4WRSqYwf1yZ0o/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ldml-Mg-oguX9gXayllojBRtZ1kjdD4WRSqYwf1yZ0o/edit?usp=sharing</a></li> </ul>
Replication Package for the Paper: "Understanding Code Snippets in Code Reviews: A Preliminary Study of the OpenStack Community"
<p>This is the replication package for the paper: "Understanding Code Snippets in Code Reviews: A Preliminary Study of the OpenStack Community", including dataset and so on (see the description below) : </p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Data of Code Snippets in Code Review.xlsx</strong> is the dataset of our paper, which contains 10,790 review comments collected from the Nova project and Neutron project of OpenStack community. Among all the review comments, 626 review comments contain code snippets. For the rows of review comments with code snippets, we filled them with blue color as an indicator.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Examples for Each Purpose.xlsx</strong> contains six review comment examples for the six detailed purposes mentioned in our paper (see Section 4.2).</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>README.md</strong></p> </li> </ul>
Replication Package for the Paper: "Code Smells Detection via Modern Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communities"
<p>This repository contains the data and results from the paper "Code Smells Detection via Modern Code Review: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communities" submitted to the ICPC 2021 special issue of the Empirical Software Engineering Journal, 2021.</p> <p> </p> <p>The replication package contains the following two folders:</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>1) data folder</strong></p> <p>The data folder contains the following four folders, which is organized by research questions (RQs).</p> <ul> <li>RQ1: The RQ1 folder contains the retrieved 1,539 code reviews that discuss code smells. Each review includes four parts: Code Change URL, Code Smell, Code Smell Discussion, and Source Code URL.</li> <li>RQ2: The RQ2 folder contains the coded data for RQ2, called <em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ2.mx18</em>. It is the results of data labeling and encoding for RQ2, which was analyzed by the MAXQDA tool.</li> <li>RQ3 and RQ5: <ul> <li><em>Extracted data for RQ3.1.xlsx</em>: this file contains the extracted data (i.e., specific refactoring actions suggested by reviewers) for RQ3.1.</li> <li><em>Data Labeling & Encoding for RQ3 and RQ5.mx18</em>: this file contains the extracted data for RQ3 (excluding the specific refactoring actions in RQ3.1) and RQ5.</li> <li><em>Code change status for RQ5.xlsx</em>: this file contains the information of status of code changes where the developers disagreed with the reviewers and chose to ignore the identified code smells.</li> </ul> </li> <li>RQ4: The RQ4 folder contains the extracted data for RQ4, called <em>Extracted data for RQ4.xlsx</em>.</li> </ul> <p>Note: The mx18 files can be opened by MAXQDA 18 or higher versions, which are available at https://www.maxqda.com/ for download. You may also use the free 14-day trial version of MAXQDA 2018, which is available at https://www.maxqda.com/trial for download.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>2) scripts folder</strong></p> <p>The scripts folder contains the Python scripts that were used to search for code smell terms and the list of code smell terms.</p> <ul> <li><em>keyword.txt</em> contains the keywords associated with code smells, such as "smell, duplication, and dead".</li> <li><em>get_changes.py</em> is used for getting code changes from OpenStack and Qt.</li> <li><em>get_comments.py</em> is used for getting review comments for each code change.</li> <li><em>keywords_search.py</em> is used for searching review comments that contain at least one keyword.</li> <li><em>random_select.py</em> is used for randomly selecting review comments that do not contain any keyword.</li> <li><em>keywords_improve.py</em> is used for improving the keyword-based mining approach.</li> <li><em>tools.py</em> is used for supporting the process of keywords improving.</li> </ul>
data for the paper "Role of Vertical Mixing in the Upper Ocean in the Seasonal Variation of Arctic Amplification" in 2nd round peer review
<p>Here are all data for the paper "Role of Vertical Mixing in the Upper Ocean in the Seasonal Variation of Arctic Amplification", which is still during its peer review period. </p>
Supplementary materials for the paper "Computing with liquid crystal fingers: Models of geometric and logical computation." Physical Review E 84.6 (2011): 061702.
<p>When a voltage is applied across a thin layer of cholesteric liquid crystal, fingers of cholesteric alignment can form and propagate in the layer. In computer simulation, based on experimental laboratory results, we demonstrate that these cholesteric fingers can solve selected problems of computational geometry, logic, and arithmetics. We show that branching fingers approximate a planar Voronoi diagram, and nonbranching fingers produce a convex subdivision of concave polygons. We also provide a detailed blueprint and simulation of a one-bit half-adder functioning on the principles of collision-based computing, where the implementation is via collision of liquid crystal fingers with obstacles and other fingers.</p>
Fig. 3 in Ecology of Soil Eumycetozoans Review paper
Fig. 3. Plasmodium of a myxomycete (photo by Randy Darrah). Scale bar: 25 mm.
Supplementary material for the paper "Data-Limited Continuous Experimentation (dlCE): A Literature Review"
<p>This is supplementary material for a paper, "Data-Limited Continuous Experimentation (DLC): A Literature Review", published at the 15th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB 2024). It contains a list of included papers from a literature review, their experimentation cases and extracted data related to contextual and experimentation factors, as well as their relevance to dlCE scenarios.</p>
Replication Package for the Paper: "Code Reviewer Recommendation for Architecture Violations: An Exploratory Study"
<p>This is the replication package for the paper: "Code Reviewer Recommendation for Architecture Violations: An Exploratory Study".</p> <p><strong>1) scripts.zip </strong>includes the Python scripts used to run the experiments in this work. Experimental details (e.g., parameters) are described in the Python files. Choose the relevant experimental settings and run "Experiment.py" to start the experiments.</p> <p><strong>2) dataset.xlsx </strong>is the dataset used in the experiments on code reviewer recommendation, which includes the code review comments (from the four OSS projects) related to architecture violations and the file paths of code changes.</p>
Dataset of papers Effects of Salinity on the Formation of Rainbow Fish Embryos (Melanotaenia Parva): A Systematic Review
<p>This is the dataset of the study. It consist:</p> <p>1. PRISMA checklist</p> <p>2. List of sample papers from Pubmed using for this study </p> <p>3. List of figures </p>
dataset of sample papers used for literature review of effect of moringa extract to reduce stunting probability
<p>This dataset contains two files namely:</p> <p>1. Txt file of abstract of all papers used for samples</p> <p>2. CSV file of details of all papers</p> <p> </p> <p>Those two file were downloaded from PubMed</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.