Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
157
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
157 results for “roosts”
Figure 10 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 10. Tibiotarsi of (A–D) fossil Pomatostomus sp. compared with (E–F) a left tibiotarsus of P. temporalis AM O. 68479. (A–B) QM F36368, distal left tibiotarsus. (C–D) QM F36670, distal right tibiotarsus. (A,C,E) cranial view, (B,D,F) caudal view. Some characteristic features are highlighted: 1, tuberositas retinaculi extensoris lateralis protuberant and at about level with the bony ridges for attachment of retinaculum m. fibularis; 2, lateral bony ridge for retinaculum m. fibularis a moderate flange, whereas medial bony ridge low; 3, trochlea cartilaginis tibialis very wide; 4, cristae near parallel. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 5 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 5. Distal left tibiotarsi of (A) fossil meliphagid gen. et sp. indet. QM F30824 and (B) Ptilotula flavescens AM O.66333 in cranial aspect. Some characteristic features of Meliphagidae shown: 1, pons supratendineus very long; 2, tuberositas retinaculi extensori lateralis low and situated on proximal edge of pons supratendineus; 3, bony ridges for attachment of retinaculum m. fibularis low. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 2. Humeri of (A,C,D,F) fossil Meliphagidae gen. et sp. indet., compared with the humerus of (B,E) Conopophila albogularis AM O.70096. (A,D) QM F30825, distal right humerus. (C,F) AR21604, distal left humerus. (A–C) caudal and (D–F) cranial aspects. Some characteristic features of Meliphagidae shown: 1, sulcus humerotricipitalis deep; 2, distal profile between sulci humerotricipitalis et scapulotricipitalis highly concave; 3, distal end greatly expanded dorsally and 4, ventrally; 5, proc. supracondylaris dorsalis bifurcated and projects well dorsally; 6, fossa m. brachialis moderately deep. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 7 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 7. Distal tarsometatarsi of (A–B,D–E,G–H) fossil Meliphagidae gen. et sp. indet., compared with that of (C,F,I) Nesoptilotis leucotis AM O.59863. (A,D,G) QM F57929, distal left tarsometatarsus. (B,E,H) QM F36648, distal right tarsometatarsus. (A–C) dorsal and (D–F) plantar aspects, and (G–I) lateral aspect of distal end. Some characteristic features of Meliphagidae shown: 1, tr II medio-laterally compressed, pointed distally and rotated planto-medially from shaft long axis; 2, lateral edge of tr IV situated medially of that of shaft; 3, medial rim of tr III greater in distal extent than lateral rim; 4, incisura intertrochlearis medialis narrow; 5, medial flange at about level with fossa metatarsi I; 6, distal end dorso-plantarly compressed and distinctly bent plantarly. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 14 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 14. Wing bones of (A–B,E–G,I–K) fossil Estrildidae gen. et sp. indet. compared with those of (C–D,H,L) Lonchura oryzivora AM O.66319. (A–B) QM F57940, distal right humerus. (E,I) QM F30821, left carpometacarpus.(F,J) QM F57903, left carpometacarpus. (G,K) QM F57933, right carpometacarpus. (A,C) caudal view, (B,D) cranial view, (E–H) ventral view, (I–L) dorsal view. Some distinguishing features of Estrildidae shown: 1, sulcus humerotricipitalis deep and extends proximally beyond base of proc. supracondylaris dorsalis; 2, sulcus scapulotricipitalis strongly marked; 3, distal profile of condylus dorsalis convex; 4, fossa m. brachialis elongate and very deep; 5, tub. supracondylare ventrale protrudes proximo-cranially; 6, trochlea carpalis ventralis circular; 7, ventral fossa on distal end of os metacarpale minus very shallow; 8, distal end of the os metacarpale minus square and broad; 9, proximal end of os metacarpale minus narrow and becomes wider distally; 10, sulcus interosseus moderately deep. Scale = 2 mm.
Figure 11 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 11. Proximal right tarsometatarsi of (A–F) fossil Pomatostomus sp. compared to the corresponding bone of (G–I) P. ruficeps AM O.60045. (A–C) QM F57900. (D–F) QM F30357. (A,D,G) dorsal view, (B,E,H) plantar view, (C,F,I) lateral view. Some characteristic features of Pomatostomus labelled: 1, arcus extensorius longer than wide; 2, tuberositas m. tibialis cranialis low and located close to arcus extensorius; 3, groove for M. fibularis longus marked; 4, ossified tendinal bridge between hypotarsus and crista plantaris lateralis, enclosing a small foramen in crista. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 9 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 9. Comparison of fossil and extant pomatostomid wing bones. (A–B) distal left humerus of Pomatostomus sp. QM F30358 and (C–D) distal right humerus of P. temporalis AM O.65103 (mirrored). Right ulnae of (E–F) Pomatostomus sp. QM F57939 and (G–H) P. ruficeps AM O.60045. (A,C,F,H) caudal aspect; (B,D,E,G) cranial aspect. Some characteristic features of Pomatostomus shown: 1, proc. supracondylaris dorsalis long and bifurcated; 2, sulcus humerotricipitalis very shallow; 3, distal end of humerus well expanded ventrally; 4, distal extent of proc. flexorius much greater than that of condylus ventralis; 5, condylus ventralis long with respect to length of condylus lateralis; 6, olecranon short; 7, distal edge of proc. cotyla dorsalis about level with that of cotyla ventralis; 8, cotyla ventralis shallow; 9, impressio m. brachialis very shallow; 10, shallow depression situated distally of attachment scar for trochlea humeroulnaris. Scale bar = 2mm.
Figure 13 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 13. Proximal left ulnae of (A–C) a fossil petroicid gen. et sp. indet. and (D–F) Petroica phoenicea AM O.60008. (A,D) cranial view, (B,E) caudal view, (C,F) ventral view. Some characteristic features of Petroicidae highlighted: 1, cotyla ventralis shallow; 2, proc. cotyla dorsalis square and its proximal edge is located distally of that of cotyla ventralis by a distance greater than one-third the length of the latter; 3, depression situated ventrally of the impressio m. scapulotricipitis; 4, protuberance for attachment of the trochlea humeroulnaris projects beyond the caudal edge of the olecranon. Scale = 2 mm.
Figure 17 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 17. Carpometacarpi of (A–D) fossil Acrocephalus sp. compared with the corresponding element of (E–F) A. australis AM O.58015. (A–B) QM F57902, left carpometacarpus. (C–D) QM F30356, right carpometacarpus. Some characteristic features of Acrocephalus shown: 1, depression for origin of M. flexor digiti minoris deep, terminates distally of proc. pisiformis; 2, ventral fossa on distal end of os metacarpale minus large and deep; 3, fovea carpalis caudalis small and deep; 4, proc. intermetacarpalis moderately short and does not protrude beyond caudal edge of os metacarpale minus; 5, proc. dentiformis long, low and situated well distally of midpoint of os metacarpale minus. Scale = 2 mm.
Figure 15 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 15. Comparison of (A–B, D–E, G) fossil bones of Megalurus sp. with those of (C,F,H) extant M. mathewsi AM O.59292. (A,D) QM F30820, right carpometacarpus. (B,E) QM F30852, right carpometacarpus. (G) QM F57941 distal left tibiotarsus. Some distinguishing features of Megalurus labelled: 1, cranial extent of proc. extensorius far greater than that of proc. alularis; 2, depression for attachment of M. flexor digiti minoris terminates distally of proximal edge of proc. pisiformis; 3, proc. dentiformis situated distally of midpoint of os metacarpale majus; 4, proc. cranialis long; 5, sulcus interosseus shallow; 6, distal edge of tuberositas retinaculi extensoris medialis at about level with bony ridges for retinaculum m. fibularis; 7, bony ridges for attachment of the retinaculum m. fibularis long and prominent flanges; 8, tuberositas retinaculi extensori lateralis occupies most of lateral half of pons supratendineus and does not protrude beyond its proximal edge; 9, condylus lateralis wider than condylus medialis; 10, incisura intercondylaris wide and its distal profile asymmetrical. Scale = 2 mm.
Figure 1 in The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham's Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia
Figure 1. Distal left tibiotarsi of (A) fossil malurid gen. et sp. indet. QM F30361 and (B) Stipiturus malachurus AM O.68207 in cranial aspect. Some characteristic features of Maluridae shown: 1, sulcus extensorius very shallow and displaced laterally of the medio-lateral midpoint of the shaft; 2, tuberositas retinaculi extensori lateralis situated on proximo-lateral part of pons supratendineus; 3, condylus lateralis greater in width and in proximal extent than condylus medialis. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Fig. 5 in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Peninsular Malaysia: urban winter roost counts after 50 years, and dietary segregation from house-farmed swiftlets Aerodramus sp.
Fig. 5. Diet distribution of swallows and house-farmed swiftlets at Bentong identified by NGS molecular analysis.
Fig. 1 in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Peninsular Malaysia: urban winter roost counts after 50 years, and dietary segregation from house-farmed swiftlets Aerodramus sp.
Fig. 1. (Left) Map of Peninsular Malaysia, with an enlarged plan of Pahang State; the circle indicates the study area, Bentong District. (Right) Google view of Bentong municipality, showing old town centre (red) and suburbs where house-farmed swiftlet colonies (blue) were counted.
Fig. 2 in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Peninsular Malaysia: urban winter roost counts after 50 years, and dietary segregation from house-farmed swiftlets Aerodramus sp.
Fig. 2. Swallows roosting on utility wires along streets of the Bentong town centre. Pacific Swallows, recognisable from below by the grey belly, were present in very low numbers during the passage and wintering period.
Fig. 4 in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Peninsular Malaysia: urban winter roost counts after 50 years, and dietary segregation from house-farmed swiftlets Aerodramus sp.
Fig. 4. Comparative diets of swallows and house-farmed swiftlets in Bentong, identified by morphological analysis.
Fig. 3 in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Peninsular Malaysia: urban winter roost counts after 50 years, and dietary segregation from house-farmed swiftlets Aerodramus sp.
Fig. 3. Number of Barn Swallows in the urban roost in Bentong town, Pahang, in 2015–16 and averaged for 1966–68.
Fig. 2 in Home range, habitat use and roost-site selection by lowland female Siamese fireback Lophura diardi in northeastern Thailand
Fig. 2. The variation in home ranges and core areas of the eight female Siamese fireback in 2011 during different reproductive periods, estimated using 95% MCP and CHP Hot Spot methods. Locations shown were the food supplement sites (1 and 2) and nesting sites during the breeding season.
Fig. 3 in Home range, habitat use and roost-site selection by lowland female Siamese fireback Lophura diardi in northeastern Thailand
Fig. 3. The occurrence probability of Siamese fireback in relation to habitat variables. Shown are predicted values and 95% confidence limits for breeding (black solid lines) and non-breeding (gray dashed lines) periods.
Fig. 1 in Home range, habitat use and roost-site selection by lowland female Siamese fireback Lophura diardi in northeastern Thailand
Fig. 1. Location of Sakaerat Environmental Research Station (SERS), northeastern Thailand, including the locations of 60 available sites, two food supplementary sites, 14 nesting sites, and 52 roosting sites. Polygons shown are the home range boundaries of the eight radiotagged Siamese firebacks (group A–H).
Fig. 3 in Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand
Fig. 3. Roosting sites responded (total number: 34) according to responses from community-based questionnaire, and result of a field survey to validate survey data.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.