Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
31
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
31 results for “science communication”
Science Communication Webinar Series: The Art of Pitching Presentation
<p>Blue-Action are coordinating a series of webinars on climate science communication in 2020. These are aimed at early-career researchers, but anyone who wishes to engage people with their research at any stage will find them valuable.</p> <p>This webinar was delivered on 21st August 2020 by <a href="https://nordic.climate-kic.org/what-we-offer/entrepreneurship/our-offering-for-start-ups/">Thomas Simon Oleson</a>, who is an Entrepreneurship Manager at <a href="https://nordic.climate-kic.org/">EIT Climate-KIC</a>. Thomas has worked with businesses and start-ups for over 8 years. Here he describes how to pitch your work to stakeholders with visual and verbal style.</p> <p> </p>
Stemming the Fake Flow: How Unistem Day Reveals the Importance of Science Communication to Students
<p><strong>Episode Summary</strong></p> <p>In this episode we cover UniStem Day, a pan European outreach event that bring stem cell research and high school students together. We talk to the organisers of UniStem Day at the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Stefanie Mahler and Dr Daniel Besser, as well as teachers and pupils who attended. </p> <p><strong>Episode Links</strong></p> <p><a href="https://gscn.org/en/HOME.aspx">German Stem Cell Network</a></p>
Videnskabsformidlingsaktivitet – Science Communication – Nørre Lyndelse Friskole – Oktober 2023
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Analysis: Systematic literature review PRISMA model results about extended, virtual and augmented reality applied to Science Communication
<div> <p>The results of the analysis made after the PRISMA process of the systematic literature review carried out about results about extended, virtual and augmented reality applied to Science Communication.</p> </div>
A Week's Worth of SciComm: Berlin Science Week and the Value of Science Communication
<p><strong>Episode Summary: </strong></p> <p>Is Science Communication relevant and important to Open Science? Using the events organised by ORION and the MDC as part of the recent Berlin Science Week as a case study of varied science communication events the usual hosts are joined by Dr Christian Popp and Valentin Popescu from the Lifetime Flagship project at the MDC to discuss these topics. </p> <p><strong>Episode Links:</strong></p> <p><a href="https://lifetime-fetflagship.eu/">Lifetime Project</a></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/LifeTimeFET">Lifetime Twitter</a></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://berlinscienceweek.com/">Berlin Science Week</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7vnd9Vq26E&feature=youtu.be">Brain City Berlin Trailer ft. Open Science Workshop event</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCezio0iuIEj9iwYVM43Am3A/videos?view=0&sort=dd&shelf_id=1">The Bear: Storytelling Workshop on the theme of Eureka! moments</a></p> <p>Episode Quotes:</p> <p>"Science is amazing and I don't understand it but I want to know more!"</p>
Figure 1 from: Smith V, Rycroft S, Brake I, Scott B, Baker E, Livermore L, Blagoderov V, Roberts D (2011) Scratchpads 2.0: a Virtual Research Environment supporting scholarly collaboration, communication and data publication in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2193
Figure 1 - Scratchpad usage statistics from February 2007 to September 2011. The black dashed line represents the number of Scratchpad community sites (in hundreds) and the blue solid line represents the number of registered users (in thousands). As of September 2011 we have switched to recording the number of active users (currently 4424) since this figure provides a more accurate guide to usage.
Figure 2 from: Smith V, Rycroft S, Brake I, Scott B, Baker E, Livermore L, Blagoderov V, Roberts D (2011) Scratchpads 2.0: a Virtual Research Environment supporting scholarly collaboration, communication and data publication in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2193
Figure 2 - Screenshots of the Scratchpad 2 publication module showing an example workflow. Top, the section writing tool showing material and methods section; middle, the relationship selector that allows a taxon and additional materials to be associated with a section of the publication; and bottom, supplementary files such as illustrations, photos or graphs can be added to complete the publication.
Citizen science project descriptions as science communication texts - the good, the bad, and the ugly
<p>This study aimed to determine to what extent do CS project descriptions actually contain the kinds of information relevant to prospective participants and whether this information is conveyed in a comprehensible and attractive manner. To this end, we conducted a qualitative content analysis of a random sample of 120 English-language project descriptions stored in the CS Track database. The coding rubric used for this study is based on the ten-step template for writing engaging project descriptions we recently designed and published. The sample was produced as follows: After creating a dataset containing only English-language project descriptions, we excluded all descriptions which consist of less than 100 or more than 500 words. Texts of less than 100 words cannot be expected to contain a significant amount of information. Project descriptions of more than 500 words are less likely to be read in their entirety than shorter texts and thus ill-suited to the task of capturing the readers’ interest and prompting them to join the project in question. Finally, we applied the ‘random’ function of RStudio to randomly select 120 texts from the resulting dataset of 1283 descriptions. The qualitative content analysis was performed in two consecutive steps. First, in order to ensure that the coding rubric is fit for purpose and all categories within it well-defined and demarcated, all three members of the research team independently coded 40 project descriptions. After discussing the results and making slight modifications to the coding rubric, each team member coded roughly one third of the remaining 80 descriptions. </p> <p>Preliminary results suggest that the majority of project descriptions in our sample fail to mention how citizen scientists will benefit from participating, what kind of training they will receive, how their contributions will be acknowledged, and whether they will have access to project results. Furthermore, the project’s goals, its target audience, and the tasks volunteers will be expected to complete are very often not described explicitly and clearly enough. For instance, very few project descriptions contain concrete information on required skills and equipment or on the time commitment associated with participation.</p> <p>This dataset contains the coding rubric used to analyse project descriptions and a visualisation of preliminary results.</p>
Effects of a Peer-mentoring Program on Undergraduate Students' Outcomes and Perspectives Related to a Career in Communication Sciences and Disorders
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07308821. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Communicating Multiple Disease Risks: A Translation of Risk Prediction Science
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03255291. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Systematic literature review PRISMA model results about extended, virtual and augmented reality applied to Science Communication
<p>The results of the PRISMA process of the systematic literature review carried out about results about extended, virtual and augmented reality applied to Science Communication.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.