Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,162
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,162 results for “survey data”
2017 Hurricane Irma Evacuation Survey Data
<p>Following Hurricane Irma in 2017, an online survey was distributed by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley to collect information on the individual choices of those impacted by the storm in Florida. Collected from October to December 2017, the data includes questions regarding risk perceptions, communications, evacuation decisions, potential usage of the sharing economy in disasters, opinions of evacuation management, and demographic information. The survey was distributed with the assistance of local partners (i.e., transportation agencies, emergency management agencies, local city and county governments, CBOs, and news outlets). Partners were allowed to post the survey using electronic communication methods including but not limited to: Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, agency websites, news websites, email listservs, and alert subscription services. The survey received 1,263 valid responses, of which 921 were completed. Subsequent papers using this data retained 645 cleaned survey responses for discrete choice modeling, based on the respondents' completion of key choice and demographic questions. The survey was incentivized with the chance to win one of five $200 gift cards. The survey questions are included in a separate PDF document. Please note that Q173-Q197 in the survey questions were not asked to respondents and no data was collected. </p> <p><strong>We request that those who download the data send a courtesy email to the lead author, Dr. Stephen Wong (swong1392@gmail.com). To ensure that any new research makes unique contributions to knowledge and does not duplicate past analyses, users are requested to read and cite publications using this data including:</strong></p> <p>Wong, S., Pel, A., Shaheen, S., Chorus, C. (2020). Fleeing from Hurricane Irma: Empirical Analysis of Evacuation Behavior Using Discrete Choice Theory. <em>Transportation Research Part D: Disasters and Resilience Section</em>. Retrieved from <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102227">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920919312866</a>. <strong>Note: The data file can also be accessed via this journal article. </strong></p> <p>Wong, S., Walker, J., & Shaheen, S. (2020). Bridging the Gap between Evacuations and the Sharing Economy. <em>Transportation</em>.<em> </em>Retrieved from <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11116-020-10101-3">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11116-020-10101-3</a>.</p> <p>Wong, S.,<strong> </strong>Shaheen, S., & Walker, J. (2018). Understanding Evacuee Behavior: A Case Study of Hurricane Irma. Report. Retrieved from <a href="https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9370z127">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9370z127</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Additional framing work on evacuations can be found here:</p> <p>Wong, S.<strong> </strong>(2020). Compliance, Congestion, and Social Equity: Tackling Critical Evacuation Challenges through the Sharing Economy, Joint Choice Modeling, and Regret Minimization. University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation. Retrieved from <a href="https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9b51w7h6">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9b51w7h6</a>.</p>
Data set supplementing "Benchmarking triage capability of symptom checkers against that of medical laypersons: Survey study"
<p>This is the de-identified data set used to conduct the analyses in the study published as Original Research in the JMIR under the title "Benchmarking triage capability of symptom checkers against that of medical laypersons: Survey study" (https://doi.org/10.2196/24475)</p> <p>The data set contains the assessments of the urgency of symptoms to 45 fictitious clinical case vignettes by 91 US participants, and the participants' age, gender and level of education. Data for the symptom checker apps is needed to fully reproduce our study and can be found in the appendix of the paper "Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study" by Semigran et al. (2015) (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3480).</p>
Survey Data on Apple Farming in China: Agronomic Management, Advisory Channels, and Profitability
<p>The Survey results and original data are stored in a directory structured as the table:</p> <table style="width: 100%; height: 223.938px;"> <tbody> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;"><strong>Type</strong></td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;"><strong>File Name</strong></td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;"><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr style="height: 47.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 47.5938px;"> <p>Raw_Data_Spearate_Source</p> </td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 47.5938px;">raw_data_english_telephone.xlsx</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 47.5938px;">Translated data in English corresponding to the Chinese telephone interview data</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;"> </td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;">raw_data_english_wechat.xlsx</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;">Translated data in English corresponding to the Chinese Wechat Mini Program data</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;">Raw_Data_Total</td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;">raw_data_english_total.xlsx</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;">Combined data from raw_data_english_telephone.xlsx and raw_data_english_wechat.xlsx</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 39.1875px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 39.1875px;">Apple_Statistical_Data</td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 39.1875px;">apple_2022_statistical_data.xlsx</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 39.1875px;">Contains data on apple planting area, production, and yield sourced from the China Statistics Bureau, along with the number of survey questionnaires collected from various provinces</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;"> </td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;">province_eng.xlsx</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;">Contains the English version of the provinces' names</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;">Map_Boundary_line</td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;">national_boundary_line.shp</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;">The country boundaires of China</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19.5938px;"> <td style="width: 18.8269%; height: 19.5938px;"> </td> <td style="width: 21.7597%; height: 19.5938px;">province_boundary.shp</td> <td style="width: 59.4134%; height: 19.5938px;">The province boundaries of China</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>For privacy reasons, personally identifiable information such as respondents’ names, telephone numbers, and specific addresses has been anonymized in the dataset. The file <em>raw_data_english_total.xlsx</em> contains 96 columns, each corresponding to a question in the questionnaire.</p>
Data of Survey on National Contributions to EOSC 2022
<p>This is the data set of the annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC 2022 for the EOSC Steering Board</p><p>The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC was developed by the EOSC Future project and EOSC Steering Board to monitor policies, practices, and impacts related to EOSC and Open Science at national and institutional levels in Europe</p><p>The annual survey for 2022 was published in the EOSC Observatory on 19 January 2023 and ran until 09 June 2023 whereby 32 member states and associated countries in Europe responded to the survey</p><p>The data of the annual survey for 2022 is now available and exploitable in the online dashboard of the EOSC Observatory developed by Technopolis Group and OpenAIRE: [<a href="https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu">https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu</a>]</p><p>Disclaimer: The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC is in an initial stage of implementation and will be improved in future iterations whereby the data should for now be taken as a best-effort attempt by participating countries</p>
Data from DIAMAS follow-up survey about funding practices
<p>The WP5 team of the DIAMAS project designed a follow-up survey to investigate the funding <br>practices of IPSPs more deeply. We examined the proportion of Diamond publishing within the <br>same IPSP by output type, and the capability to plan for the future. We also enquired about <br>spending priorities, reasons for fundraising and the amount of work required, and asked about <br>views on institutional publishing funding.</p> <p><br>The project sent the follow-up survey to respondents of the DIAMAS survey (metadata and <br>aggregated data available <a href="../records/10590503">here</a>) who agreed to be contacted. Emails used unique identifiers, <br>enabling us to merge databases and easily recover information gathered from the first survey <br>for more advanced cross-analysis.</p> <p><br>This follow-up survey was open during the last two months of 2023 and successfully garnered <br>469 answers. After cleaning (mainly deleting blank surveys and duplicates), we retained 383 <br>relevant answers, a response rate of 56%.</p>
Survey Data and Analysis on Open Access Strategies (2022)
<p><strong>Description:</strong><br>This dataset includes the analysis, codebook, and raw survey data from a 2022 survey titled <em>"Which Open Access Strategies Are Relevant?"</em>. The survey targeted professionals in library and information sciences specializing in open access and scholarly publishing.</p> <p>The dataset is based on 100 adjusted responses (<em>N=100</em>) and aims to provide insights into the strategies and challenges associated with open access implementation in academic and professional environments.</p> <p><strong>Contents:</strong></p> <ol> <li><strong>analysis_oa-strategies-2024-01-14.xlsx</strong>: Processed data and key analyses, including summary tables and graphs.</li> <li><strong>codebook_oa-strategies_2024-01-14.xlsx</strong>: Comprehensive documentation of variables, codes, and their definitions for interpretation of the raw data.</li> <li><strong>survey_results_oa-strategies_2024-01-14.xlsx</strong>: Anonymized raw data from the survey, suitable for further analysis.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong><br>The survey employed a structured questionnaire distributed in 2022 to professionals in library and information sciences. It focused on identifying key strategies, institutional policies, and perceived barriers to open access. The collected data were cleaned and anonymized to ensure privacy and compliance with ethical standards.</p> <p><strong>Purpose and Use:</strong><br>This dataset is designed for researchers, policymakers, and information science professionals. It is particularly valuable for studying open access adoption strategies, evaluating institutional policies, and conducting comparative research.</p>
Survey data on people's forest use patterns and perceptions of border security measures in Białowieża Forest region, Poland
<p>A survey was conducted in June-July 2022 to obtain information about people's forest use patterns and opinions and feelings about border security measures (state of emergency, border zone closure, militarization) instituted in northeastern Poland starting in September 2021. Participants were informed that the survey was voluntary and anonymous. Participants were not obliged to respond to all questions and could stop the survey at any time. Survey completion and submission implied consent to participate. Participants had to be at least 18 years of age to take part in the survey. They had to be residents of the Białowieża Forest region. 100 persons participated in the survey. Of these 100 persons, 44 identified as local (born in the region). Data are coded and a key is provided. Some responses are aggregated and only responses to close-ended questions are shared, to prevent disclosure of potentially identifying information. </p>
Data of Survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science 2023
<p>This is the data set of the annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science 2023 for the EOSC Steering Board</p> <p>The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science was developed by the EOSC Future project and EOSC Steering Board to monitor policies, practices, and impacts related to EOSC and Open Science at national and institutional levels in Europe</p> <p>The annual survey for 2023 was published in the EOSC Open Science Observatory on 17 January 2024 and ran until 01 July 2024 whereby 32 European member states, associated countries, and other countries responded to the survey</p> <p>The data of the annual survey for 2023 is available and exploitable in the online dashboard of the EOSC Open Science Observatory developed by Technopolis Group and OpenAIRE in the EOSC Future project and continued in the EOSC Track project: [<a href="https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu">https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu</a>]</p> <p>Disclaimer 1: The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science is in an initial stage of implementation and will be improved in future iterations whereby the data should for now be taken as a best-effort attempt by participating countries</p> <p>Disclaimer 2: V1 of the data set included an error in the data set and has thus been restricted and replaced by an updated V2 of the data set</p>
UK creators' earnings survey 2020 processed data
<p>We have started to retrospectively harmonize the Music Creators Earnigs survey for the the Digital Music Observatory. The survey’s raw data is accessible on the website of the UKIPO <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/music-creators-earnings-in-the-digital-era">here</a>.</p> <p>Ex post harmonization will be limited, because of the following factors:</p> <ul> <li>The MCE survey did not use harmonized questions in many cases</li> <li>The MCE surveys answers do not cover a full range of possible answers</li> <li>The MCE survey does not appear to represent the UK artists and music professionals.</li> </ul> <p>Because of the bias of the survey, we did not include statistical indicators of the survey yet in our observatory, and we will make further processing steps in later versions of the data file.</p> <p>Nevertheless, because of the relatively large sample size (n=708) we believe that imporant comparisons can be made with our CEEMID surveys, and we can shed some light on the earnings distribution of UK artists, and the way they distribute and finance their recordings.</p>
Bicycle Mobility Data: Current Use and Future Potential. An International Survey of Domain Professionals
<p>Active mobility, especially cycling, is an essential building block for sustainable urban mobility. Public and private stakeholders are striving to improve conditions for cycling and subsequently increase its modal share. Data are regarded as key for different measures to become efficient and targeted. There is extensive evidence for an increasing amount of mobility data, availability of new data sources and potential usage scenarios for such data. However, little is known about the current use of these data in policy making, planning and related fields. To the best of our knowledge, it has not been investigated yet to which degree professionals in the broader field of cycling promotion benefit from an increasing amount of cycling-related data. Thus, we conducted a multi-lingual online survey among domain professionals and acquired data on their perspectives on current data availability, use and suitability as well as the potential they see for the use of cycling data in the future. In total, we received 325 complete responses from 32 countries, with the vast majority of 241 valid responses originating from Germany, Austria and Italy. Key findings are: 84% of domain professionals attribute high importance to data, and 89% state that they currently cannot or only partly solve their tasks with the data available to them. Results emphasize the need for making more and better suited data available to professionals in cycling-related positions, in both the private and public sector.</p> <p>Read the full publication: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/data6110121">https://doi.org/10.3390/data6110121 </a></p>
Restart Data Workbench Motivation Survey
<p>The Restart Data Workbench motivation study was conducted within the ongoing H2020 project named <a href="https://actionproject.eu/">ACTION</a> (pArticipatory sCience Toolkit agaInst pollutiON) on citizen science. Volunteers participate to citizen science initiatives for multiple reasons: personal enjoyment, desire for improvement or achievement, establishment of personal relationships, care for the environment, etc.<br> Studying motivation and investigating the factors influencing people participation to citizen science projects is an essential aspect in the analysis of citizen science communities. Understanding the reasons that foster people to engage can support the successful design and implementation of effective participant involvement tasks, as well as pave the way for long-term engagement.<br> The goal of the study is to analyse the motivation to participate of a specific citizen science community focused on fighting soil pollution through waste reduction/management in the Restart Data Workbench pilot supported by the ACTION project. More info on the pilot available at <a href="https://actionproject.eu/citizen-science-pilots/restart-data-workbench/">https://actionproject.eu/citizen-science-pilots/restart-data-workbench/</a>.</p> <p>The Restart Data Workbench motivation study is part of the study about motivation in citizen science projects conducted within the ACTION project (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5753092">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5753092</a>). The survey was designed and administered using the <a href="https://coney.cefriel.com/">Coney</a> toolkit.</p> <p>The research object adopts the <a href="https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/1.0/">RO-Crate</a> specification. Files made available within the research object are:</p> <ul> <li><em>*-procedure.ttl</em> contains the RDF representation of the structure of the conversational survey (questions, answers, etc.) using the <a href="https://w3id.org/survey-ontology">Survey Ontology</a></li> <li><em>*-results.ttl </em>contains the RDF representation of the answers collected using the <a href="https://w3id.org/survey-ontology">Survey Ontology</a></li> <li><em>*-survey.tll </em>contains a comprehensive RDF representation of the survey data using the <a href="https://w3id.org/survey-ontology">Survey Ontology</a></li> <li><em>*-results.csv </em>contains the CSV of the collected answers</li> <li>*-<em>script.R</em> is the R script developed to analyse the collected answers</li> <li>*-<em>mean-var-motivating-questions.csv </em>contains the computed mean and average for each question considered (observable variables)</li> <li>*-<em>mean-var-motivating-factor.csv </em>contains the computed mean and average for each motivation factor considered (latent variables)</li> <li>*-<em>correlation-factors-global-motivation.csv </em>contains the correlation analysis between each motivation factor and the global motivation </li> </ul>
What does it take to generate new growth - Survey data on company perceptions on innovative behavior
<p>This data includes raw survey data, a codebook and the survey form for the survey <em>what does it take to generate new growth? </em>The survey focused on comprehensively mapping the Finnish companies growth outlooks and their underlying management practices and principles. The study creates an overview of top managers’ views on Finnish companies’ growth, innovativeness, and the ability for renewal. It allows us to identify what sets high-growing companies apart from others. The Codebook is associated with an SPSS and CSV file including the data.</p>
Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Data from an online survey experiment with 1,973 consumers from Norway and the UK
<p>Data and replication codes for the article "Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Causal evidence on game- and video-based online interventions". 1,973 participants from the UK and Norway, aged 18- 89 years, were assigned to (i) a control condition, or (ii) exposed to a brief information video, or (iii) in addition played an online game (two different conditions). In all conditions, participants answered a pre-survey and seven days later a post-survey. In the survey, next to collecting some information on sociodemographic background and certain preferences, subjects reported some recent food safety behaviors and we elicited beliefs in the efficacy of certain food safety actions, as well as beliefs in myths related to food and hygiene.</p> <p>We use this data set in our publication <br> Koch, A. K., Mønster, D., Nafziger, J., & Veflen, N. (2022). Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Causal evidence on game-and video-based online interventions. <em>Food Control</em>, 108825.</p>
Data quality assurance at research data repositories: Survey data
<p>This dataset documents findings form a survey on the status quo of data quality assurance practices at research data repositories.</p> <p>The personalized online survey was conducted among repositories indexed in re3data in 2021. It covered the scope of the repository, types of data quality assessment, quality criteria, responsibilities, details of the review process, and data quality information, and yielded 332 complete responses.</p> <p>The dataset comprises a documentation file, the data file, a codebook, and the survey instrument.</p> <p>The <strong>documentation file</strong> (documentation.pdf) outlines details of the survey design and administration, survey response, and data processing. The <strong>data file</strong> (01_survey_data.csv) contains all 332 complete responses to 19 survey questions, fully anonymized. The <strong>codebook</strong> (02_codebook.csv) describes the variables, and the <strong>survey instrument</strong> (03_survey_instrument.pdf) comprises the questionnaire that was distributed to survey participants.</p>
Multi-stakeholder research data management training as a tool to improve the quality, integrity, reliability and reproducibility of research: Quantitative data of the post-course surveys
<p>Data contains doctoral students' and postdoc researchers' (n=168) self-ratings of their RDM competencies before and after the 3 ECTS credits "Basics of Research Data Management" (BRDM) trainings held 2019-2021 in the University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Finland. Moreover, data contains respondents' self-reported further learning needs.</p>
FolkArtiNet: Folk music groups: their artistic practice and infrastructural needs in the COVID-19 era and beyond - survey data
<p> The online survey was one of three methods used for collecting information about the infrastructural needs of the folk music groups. It included a series of questions about different areas of artistic activity, such as working on repertoire, collaboration among group members, storage and sharing of data, and organization of artistic events. The survey data includes all questions and answers in csv format.</p>
Drone-based photogrammetric survey raw data from ESA PANGAEA-X 2017 planetary analogue campaign - Data collected on 2017-11-19
<p>Drone-based photogrammetric survey data from ESA PANGAEA-X 2017 planetary analogue campaign. Data were collected in the framework of the ESA PANGAEA-X testing campaign held in November 2017: We acknowledge ESA for organising the campaign and providing scientific and logistic assistance on site. The authors would like also to thank the Geopark of Lanzarote, the touristic center of Cueva de Los Verdes, the Cabildo of Lanzarote, the National Park of Timanfaya and the IGEO-CSIC-UCM for providing the necessary permits. Data collected on 2017-11-19 during an aerial survey with a DJI Phantom 4 - data from AGPA experiments (AGPA-D) see http://www.agpa-project.eu</p>
OpenAIRE and FAIR Data Expert Group survey about Horizon 2020 template for Data Management Plans
<p>This dataset is published in 2017 by the OpenAIRE project and the FAIR Data Expert Group.</p> <p>It contains two survey data files, two pdf-files summarising the results in a report and an infographic, and a Readme.txt file.</p> <p>The OpenAIRE project supports the open science ambitions of the European Commission. The project and in particular the Research Data Management team provide support, training and information on the Open Research Data Pilot. In this context, a survey was carried out to collect feedback on the Horizon 2020 template for Data Management Plans (DMPs). The team collaborated with the FAIR data expert group, which is providing recommendations to the European Commission on turning FAIR data into reality. One of the specific tasks of the Expert Group is contributing to an evaluation of the Horizon 2020 approach to DMPs, including future revisions of the template and the development of additional sector/ discipline-specific guidance. The aim of the survey was to collect experiences of researchers and DMP reviewers with the DMP template and guidelines on FAIR data management in Horizon 2020. The survey assesses the usefulness of the guidelines and any aspects that are confusing and unclear to determine what improvements can be made.</p> <p>Feedback was sought from both researchers and research support staff. The survey was initially scheduled to run from 22 May to 21 June 2017. Several organisations were asked to help announce the survey, including OpenAIRE’s National Open Access Desks, the FAIR data expert group, FOSTER, LIBER, and the RDA Interest Group on Active DMPs. When the first survey responses showed only a small share of researchers, more stakeholders were contacted to specifically target this community. The European Research Area was approached, whose project officers circulated the survey call among award holders of EC projects. Early-career researchers were also informed through the YEAR network and EURODOC. This resulted in an extension of the survey to 21 July 2017.</p> <p>At the close of the survey on 21 July 2017, a total number of 289 responses were reached. 50% of the respondents indicated that they were researchers, and 60% that they were (also) research support staff. OpenAIRE and the FAIR data expert group are very pleased with this balanced outcome and would like to thank all colleagues and organisations who promoted the survey, as well as everyone who took part in it.</p> <p> </p>
Shipboard Conductivity–Temperature–Depth (CTD) and dissolved oxygen profile data collected during hypoxia surveys along six hydrographic sampling lines within Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary, 2004–2015
<p>This data set includes Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) and dissolved oxygen profile data that were collected along Washington State’s outer coast within Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS). Measurements were made along six cross-shelf hydrographic sampling lines during a series of hypoxia survey cruises from 2004 – 2015. The 398 CTD profiles were acquired using Sea-Bird Scientific 19 SeaCAT or 19plus SeaCAT CTD profilers with associated SBE-43 (Sea-Bird Electronics) or Beckman or YSI-type (Yellow Springs Instruments) dissolved oxygen sensors. The data were processed via Sea-Bird Scientific’s SBE Data Processing application using six of the modules in the following order: Data Conversion, Filter, Align CTD, Loop Edit, Derive, and Bin Average. These processing steps and associated methods are the same as those used to process CTD data collected during OCNMS mooring maintenance cruises (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340924001422">Risien et al., 2024</a>) and along the Newport Hydrographic Line (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340922001342">Risien et al., 2022</a>) located off the central Oregon coast.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Station Name </strong></td> <td><strong>Latitude</strong></td> <td><strong>Longitude</strong></td> <td><strong>Water Depth (m, MLLW)</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Cape Alava (CA)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA010</td> <td>48.1661oN</td> <td>124.7540oW</td> <td>10</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA020</td> <td>48.1661oN</td> <td>124.7598oW</td> <td>20</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA030</td> <td>48.1659oN</td> <td>124.7783oW</td> <td>30</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA040</td> <td>48.1659oN</td> <td>124.7852oW</td> <td>40</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA045</td> <td>48.1659oN</td> <td>124.8335oW</td> <td>45</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA050</td> <td>48.1658oN</td> <td>124.8578oW</td> <td>50</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA060</td> <td>48.1659oN</td> <td>124.8843oW</td> <td>60</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA070</td> <td>48.1655oN</td> <td>124.9011oW</td> <td>70</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA080</td> <td>48.1657oN</td> <td>124.9141oW</td> <td>80</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA090</td> <td>48.1659oN</td> <td>124.9247oW</td> <td>90</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CA100</td> <td>48.1658oN</td> <td>124.9319oW</td> <td>100</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Teahwhit Head (TH)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH030</td> <td>47.8759oN</td> <td>124.6481oW</td> <td>30</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH035</td> <td>47.8761oN</td> <td>124.7024oW</td> <td>35</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH040</td> <td>47.8760oN</td> <td>124.7281oW</td> <td>40</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH050</td> <td>47.8761oN</td> <td>124.7567oW</td> <td>50</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH060</td> <td>47.8765oN</td> <td>124.7822oW</td> <td>60</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH070</td> <td>47.8765oN</td> <td>124.8084oW</td> <td>70</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH080</td> <td>47.8768oN</td> <td>124.8415oW</td> <td>80</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH090</td> <td>47.8769oN</td> <td>124.8868oW</td> <td>90</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TH100</td> <td>47.8769oN</td> <td>124.9182oW</td> <td>100</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Hoh Head (HH)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>HH025</td> <td>47.7688oN</td> <td>124.5605oW</td> <td>25</td> </tr> <tr> <td>HH042</td> <td>47.7688oN</td> <td>124.6428oW</td> <td>42</td> </tr> <tr> <td>HH065</td> <td>47.7688oN</td> <td>124.7401oW</td> <td>65</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Raft River (RR)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>RR015</td> <td>47.4632oN</td> <td>124.3748oW</td> <td>15</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RR020</td> <td>47.4644oN</td> <td>124.4510oW</td> <td>20</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RR042</td> <td>47.4632oN</td> <td>124.5199oW</td> <td>42</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RR065</td> <td>47.4629oN</td> <td>124.6074oW</td> <td>65</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Cape Elizabeth (CE)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE010</td> <td>47.3541oN</td> <td>124.3347oW</td> <td>10</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE020</td> <td>47.354oN</td> <td>124.3608oW</td> <td>20</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE030</td> <td>47.3538oN</td> <td>124.3913oW</td> <td>30</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE040</td> <td>47.3534oN</td> <td>124.4678oW</td> <td>40</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE050</td> <td>47.3532oN</td> <td>124.5064oW</td> <td>50</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE060</td> <td>47.3529oN</td> <td>124.5510oW</td> <td>60</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE070</td> <td>47.3528oN</td> <td>124.5823oW</td> <td>70</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE080</td> <td>47.3527oN</td> <td>124.6158oW</td> <td>80</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE090</td> <td>47.3526oN</td> <td>124.6491oW</td> <td>90</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CE100</td> <td>47.3522oN</td> <td>124.6754oW</td> <td>100</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Moclips (MO)</strong></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>MO010</td> <td>47.2214oN</td> <td>124.2394oW</td> <td>10</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MO015</td> <td>47.2214oN</td> <td>124.2599oW</td> <td>15</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MO020</td> <td>47.2214oN</td> <td>124.2791oW</td> <td>20</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MO030</td> <td>47.2195oN</td> <td>124.3347oW</td> <td>30</td> </tr> <tr> <td>MO042</td> <td>47.2195oN</td> <td>124.3958oW</td> <td>42</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Survey questions and raw data for the study in the paper "Educational Technology for Tutors – What are Useful Tools and Information?"
<p>The data include the questions data set, the answers dataset and the codebook for the questions conducted with soscisurvey (https://www.soscisurvey.de/de/index). The survey itself can be imported in soscisurvey (via the XML data) and reused.</p> <p>The answers are unedited.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.