Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,751
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,751 results for “Future”
Variable influence of photosynthetic thermal acclimation on future carbon uptake in Australian wooded ecosystems under climate change
<p><span>Climate change will impact gross primary productivity (GPP), net primary productivity (NPP), and carbon storage in wooded ecosystems. The extent of change will be influenced by thermal acclimation of photosynthesis – the ability of plants to adjust net photosynthetic rates in response to growth temperatures – yet regional differences in acclimation effects among wooded ecosystems are currently unknown. We examined the effects of changing climate on 17 Australian wooded ecosystems with and without the effects of thermal acclimation of C<sub>3</sub> photosynthesis. Ecosystems were drawn from five ecoregions (tropical savanna, tropical forest, Mediterranean woodlands, temperate woodlands, and temperate forests) that span Australia's climatic range. We used the CABLE-POP land surface model adapted with thermal acclimation functions and forced with HadGEM2-ES climate projections from RCP8.5. For each site and ecoregion, we examined a) effects of climate change on GPP, NPP, and live tree carbon storage; and b) impacts of thermal acclimation of photosynthesis on simulated changes. Between the end of the historical (1976–2005) and projected (2070–2099) periods, simulated annual carbon uptake increased in the majority of ecosystems by 26.1 to 63.3% for GPP and 15 to 61.5% for NPP. Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis further increased GPP and NPP in tropical savannas by 27.2% and 22.4% and by 11% and 10.1% in tropical forests with positive effects concentrated in the wet season (tropical savannas) and the warmer months (tropical forests). We predicted minimal effects of thermal acclimation of photosynthesis on GPP, NPP and carbon storage in Mediterranean woodlands, temperate woodlands and temperate forests. Overall, positive effects were strongly enhanced by increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations under RCP8.5. We conclude that the direct effects of climate change will enhance carbon uptake and storage in Australian wooded ecosystems (likely due to CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment) and that benefits of thermal acclimation of photosynthesis will be restricted to tropical ecoregions.</span></p>
Present status, future trends, and control strategies of invasive alien plants in China affected by human activities and climate change
<p>Invasive alien plants (IAPs) have serious environmental and economic impacts, especially in vulnerable areas of China. However, IAP richness distribution patterns, their driving factors, and the dynamic shifts in potential distribution areas remain elusive. We assessed IAP richness distribution patterns and drivers using 402 IAPs recorded in China at 88,926 occurrence points, and then predicted their potential distribution areas. The results show that IAP hotspots were mainly located in southeastern China, especially coastal areas of the South and East and large inland cities. Population density, gross domestic product (GDP), and four climate variables associated with precipitation and temperature jointly influenced the richness distribution pattern of all IAPs. Specifically, population density and GDP impacted the richness distribution pattern of narrow-range IAPs, and population density, GDP, distance to the nearest national highway, and five climate variables affected the richness distribution pattern of widespread IAPs. Only GDP contributed significantly to the richness distribution pattern of the top 5% hotspot grid cells, whereas population density, GDP, and precipitation in the driest month (BIO14) significantly influenced the richness distribution patterns of hotspots for both the top 10% and top 20%. Prediction analysis demonstrated that southeastern China would have a particularly high invasion risk under both current and future climate scenarios. Regions with increases in predicted species richness are more common (44.83%–64.97%) than those with decreases, except under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 scenario. Climate change will contribute greatly to the expansion of potential IAP distribution areas under both optimistic (RCP 2.5) and pessimistic scenarios (RCP 8.5). The results of this study provide insights into the priority management of IAPs through developing promising strategies for the control and prevention of IAP invasion.</p>
Data from: Evaluation of different bias correction methods for dynamical downscaled future projections of the California Current Upwelling System
<p class="Abstract">Biases in global Earth System Models (ESMs) are an important source of errors when used to obtain boundary conditions for regional models. Here we examine historical and future conditions in the California Current System (CCS) using three different methods to force the regional model: (1) interpolation of ESM output to the regional grid with no bias correction; (2) a "seasonally-varying" delta method that obtains a season-dependent mean climate change signal from the ESM for a 30-year future period; and (3) a "time-varying" delta method that includes the interannual variability of the ESM over the 1980–2100 period. To compare these methods, we use a high-resolution (0.1˚) physical-biogeochemical regional model to dynamically downscale an ESM projection under the RCP8.5 emission scenario. Using different downscaling methods, the sign of future changes agrees for most of the physical and ecosystem variables, but the spatial patterns and magnitudes of these changes differ, with the seasonal- and time-varying delta simulations showing more similar changes. Not correcting the ESM forcing leads to amplification of biases in some ecosystem variables as well as misrepresentation of the California Undercurrent and CCS source waters. In the non-bias corrected and time-varying delta simulations, most of the ecosystem variables inherit trends and decadal variability from the ESM, while in the seasonally-varying delta simulation, the future variability reflects the observed historical variability (1980–2010). Our results demonstrate that bias correcting the forcing prior to downscaling improves historical simulations and that the bias correction method may impact the spatial and temporal variability of future projections. </p>
Killer prey: Temperature reverses future bacterial predation
<p>Script and datasets for the paper "Killer prey: Temperature reverses future bacterial predation"</p> <p>Prey killer.zip contains the files and code necessary to reproduce the analysis and the figures in the manuscript.<br> • All datasets, as csv files, are in the Data folder together with the README file.<br> • The Figures and Tables folders contain all figures and tables from the manuscript and SI.<br> • prey_killing_predator_script.Rmd is the script used to perform the statistical analyses and create the figures and tables.</p>
Music Data, Archiving for Community Use and Future Directions Through the Decade of Indigenous Languages
<p>Music Data, Archiving for Community Use and Future Directions Through the Decade of Indigenous Languages</p> <p>Linda Barwick</p> <p>Presented 5 October 2022 at the international conference "Where Do We Need to Go From Here?" Language Documentation and Archiving in the International Decade of Indigenous Languages</p>
Projected future autumn leaf phenology of deciduous trees
<p><span>Autumn leaf phenology (i.e. leaf colouring or leaf senescence) marks the end of the growing season, during which trees assimilate atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. Since autumn leaf phenology responds to climatic conditions, climate change affects the length of the growing season. Thus, autumn phenology is often modelled to assess possible climate change effects on future CO<sub>2</sub> mitigating capacities and species compositions of forests.</span></p> <p><span>Here, we give access to the entire dataset of projected autumn phenology analyzed in Meier and Bigler (2023). The data was derived from different combinations of 21 process-oriented phenology models, 5 optimization algorithms, ≥7 sampling procedures, and 26 climate model chains from two representative concentration pathways. The dataset contains the average autumn phenology per site and for the years 2080-2099 according to each combination that led to a successful calibration. Calibration and validation were based on >45 000 observations for common beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica L.</em>), pedunculate oak (<em>Quercus robur L.</em>), and European larch (<em>Larix decidua Mill</em>.) from 500 Central European sites each.</span></p> <p><span>Cite as Meier, M., & Bigler, C. (2023). Process-oriented models of autumn leaf phenology: Ways to sound calibration and implications of uncertain projections. <em>Geoscientific Model Development</em>, 16(23), 7171–7201. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7171-2023</span></p>
Future = death
In fact, I have one, just do not know how to add, this site is new to it. A lot of tolerance, there is the material that I will not render the whole, want someone to teach me, https://www.behance.net/2319650760e7c8This is the final effect, Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Data from: Drivers of contemporary and future changes in Arctic seasonal transition dates for a tundra site in coastal Greenland
<p>Climate change has had a significant impact on the seasonal transition dates of Arctic tundra ecosystems, causing diverse variations between distinct land surface classes. However, the combined effect of multiple controls as well as their individual effects on these dates remains unclear at various scales and across diverse land surface classes. Here we quantified spatiotemporal variations of three seasonal transition dates (start of spring, maximum Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI<sub>max</sub>) day, end of fall) for five dominant land surface classes in the ice-free Greenland and analyzed their drivers for current and future climate scenarios, respectively.</p>
Plant invasion in Mediterranean Europe: current hotspots and future scenarios
<p>These are the raw data that can be used to reproduce results of the paper: "<strong>Plant invasion in Mediterranean Europe: current invasion hotspots and future scenarios</strong>". </p> <p>The Mediterranean Basin has historically been subject to alien plant invasions that threaten its unique biodiversity. This seasonally dry and densely populated region is undergoing severe climatic and socioeconomic changes, and it is unclear whether these changes will worsen or mitigate plant invasions. Predictions are often biased, as species may not be in equilibrium in the invaded environment, depending on their invasion stage and ecological characteristics. To address future predictions uncertainty, we identified invasion hotspots across multiple biased modelling scenarios and ecological characteristics of successful invaders.</p> <p>We selected 92 alien plant species widespread in Mediterranean Europe and compiled data on their distribution in the Mediterranean and worldwide. We combined these data with environmental and propagule pressure variables to model global and regional species niches and map their current and future habitat suitability. We identified invasion hotspots, examined their potential future shifts, and compared the results of different modelling strategies. Finally, we generalised our findings by using linear models to determine the traits and biogeographic features of invaders most likely to benefit from global change.</p> <p>Currently, invasion hotspots are found near ports and coastlines throughout Mediterranean Europe. However, many species occupy only a small portion of the environmental conditions to which they are preadapted, suggesting that their invasion is still an ongoing process. Future conditions will lead to declines in many currently widespread aliens, which will tend to move to higher elevations and latitudes. Our trait models indicate that future climates will generally favour species with conservative ecological strategies that can cope with reduced water availability, such as those with short stature and low specific leaf area. Taken together, our results suggest that in future environments, these conservative aliens will move farther from the introduction areas and upslope, threatening mountain ecosystems that have been spared from invasions so far.</p> <p>With these data (environmental variables, species presences and background points, and distance to ports cities and to the coast) and using the R software following the ODMAP protocol attached to the original paper all results meet the criteria of reproducible science.</p>
Current and Future Flood maps for Flood risk assessment under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways in the Greater Accra region, Ghana
<p>The study used 15 flood conditioning factors in simulating current and future flood conditions under the SSP scenarios using the Frequency Ratio (FR) model </p>
Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP3-RCP7.0)
<p>As global emissions and temperatures continue to rise, global climate models offer projections as to how the climate will change in years to come. These model projections can be used for a variety of end-uses to better understand how current systems will be affected by the changing climate. While climate models predict every individual year, using a single year may not be representative as there may be outlier years. It can also be useful to represent a multi-year period with a single year of data. Both items are currently addressed when working with past weather data by a using Typical Meteorological Year (TMY)methodology. This methodology works by statistically selecting representative months from a number of years and appending these months to achieve a single representative year for a given period. In this analysis, the TMY methodology is used to develop Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) using climate model projections. The resulting set of fTMY data is then formatted into EnergyPlus weather (epw) fi les that can be used for building simulation to estimate the impact of climate scenarios on the built environment.</p> <p>This dataset contains the cross-climate-model version fTMY files for 3281 US Counties in the continental United States. The data for each county is derived from six different global climate models (GCMs) from the 6th Phase of Coupled Models Intercomparison Project CMIP6-ACCESSCM2, BCC-CSM2-MR, CNRM-ESM2-1, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2-MM. The six climate models were statistically downscaled for 1980–2014 in the historical period and 2015–2100 in the future period under the SSP585 scenario using the methodology described in Rastogi et al. (2022). Additionally, hourly data was derived from the daily downscaled output using the Mountain Microclimate Simulation Model (MTCLIM; Thornton and Running, 1999). The shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) used for this analysis was SSP 3 and the representative concentration pathway (RCP) used was RCP 7.0. More information about SSP and RCP can be referred to O'Neill et al. (2020).</p> <p>Please be aware that in cases where a location contains multiple .EPW files, it indicates that there are multiple weather data collection points within that location.</p> <p>More information about the six selected CMIP6 GCMs:</p> <p>ACCESS-CM2 -<br>http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ES19040<br>BCC-CSM2-MR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2977-2021<br>CNRM-ESM2-1-<br>https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001791<br>MPI-ESM1-2-HR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019<br>MRI-ESM2-0 -<br>https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051<br>NorESM2-MM -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020</p> <p>Additional references:<br>O'Neill, B. C., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K. et al. (2020). Achievements and Needs for the Climate Change Scenario Framework.<br>Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 1074–1084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0<br>Rastogi, D., Kao, S.-C., and Ashfaq, M. (2022). How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections? Earth's Future, 10, e2022EF002734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734Thornton, P. E. and Running, S. W. (1999). An Improved Algorithm for Estimating Incident Daily Solar Radiation from Measurements of Temperature, Humidity and Precipitation, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93, 211-228.</p> <p><strong>Please cite the following if this data is used in any research or project:</strong></p> <p><em><strong>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New (2023). “Multi-Model Future Typical Meteorological (fTMY) Weather Files for nearly every US County.” The 3rd ACM International Workshop on Big Data and Machine Learning for Smart Buildings and Cities and BuildSys '23: The 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, Istanbul, Turkey, November 15-16, 2023. DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600100.3626637" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1145/3600100.3626637</a></strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Cross-Model Version:</strong></p> <div> <div> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719204, Feb 2024. [<a href="10719204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719178, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10719178" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10698921, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10698921" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (Cross-Model version-SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10420668, Dec 2023. [<a href="../records/10420668" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Model-specific Version:</strong></p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729277, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729277" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729279, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729279" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729223, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729223" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729201, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729201" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729157, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729157" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729199, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729199" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (East and South – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8335814, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8335814" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (West and Midwest – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8338548, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8338548" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> </div> </div> <p> </p> <p><strong>Representative Cities Version:</strong></p> <p>Bass, Brett, New, Joshua R., Rastogi, Deeksha and Kao, Shih-Chieh (2022). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation (1.0) [Data set]." Zenodo, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6939750, Aug. 2022. [<a href="https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzenodo.org%2Frecord%2F6939750%23.YwYzp3bMKUk&data=05%7C01%7Clif2%40ornl.gov%7C26cbed91b56e40d4014708dbc0976975%7Cdb3dbd434c4b45449f8a0553f9f5f25e%7C1%7C0%7C638315528798318118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S8Z0mjWDMqelFJkp2mfNBVqaiDCdM3AXjQ7PDPEBIu4%3D&reserved=0">Data</a>]</p>
Model output from historical and future scenarios related to 'Carbon Dioxide Removal: Tradeoffs and Lags'
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SSP5-RCP8.5)
<p>As global emissions and temperatures continue to rise, global climate models offer projections as to how the climate will change in years to come. These model projections can be used for a variety of end-uses to better understand how current systems will be affected by the changing climate. While climate models predict every individual year, using a single year may not be representative as there may be outlier years. It can also be useful to represent a multi-year period with a single year of data. Both items are currently addressed when working with past weather data by a using Typical Meteorological Year (TMY)methodology. This methodology works by statistically selecting representative months from a number of years and appending these months to achieve a single representative year for a given period. In this analysis, the TMY methodology is used to develop Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) using climate model projections. The resulting set of fTMY data is then formatted into EnergyPlus weather (epw) fi les that can be used for building simulation to estimate the impact of climate scenarios on the built environment.</p> <p>This dataset contains the cross-climate-model version fTMY files for 3281 US Counties in the continental United States. The data for each county is derived from six different global climate models (GCMs) from the 6th Phase of Coupled Models Intercomparison Project CMIP6-ACCESSCM2, BCC-CSM2-MR, CNRM-ESM2-1, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2-MM. The six climate models were statistically downscaled for 1980–2014 in the historical period and 2015–2100 in the future period under the SSP585 scenario using the methodology described in Rastogi et al. (2022). Additionally, hourly data was derived from the daily downscaled output using the Mountain Microclimate Simulation Model (MTCLIM; Thornton and Running, 1999). The shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) used for this analysis was SSP 5 and the representative concentration pathway (RCP) used was RCP 8.5. More information about SSP and RCP can be referred to O'Neill et al. (2020).</p> <p>Please be aware that in cases where a location contains multiple .EPW files, it indicates that there are multiple weather data collection points within that location.</p> <p>More information about the six selected CMIP6 GCMs:</p> <p>ACCESS-CM2 -<br>http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ES19040<br>BCC-CSM2-MR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2977-2021<br>CNRM-ESM2-1-<br>https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001791<br>MPI-ESM1-2-HR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019<br>MRI-ESM2-0 -<br>https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051<br>NorESM2-MM -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020</p> <p>Additional references:<br>O'Neill, B. C., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K. et al. (2020). Achievements and Needs for the Climate Change Scenario Framework.<br>Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 1074–1084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0<br>Rastogi, D., Kao, S.-C., and Ashfaq, M. (2022). How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections? Earth's Future, 10, e2022EF002734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734Thornton, P. E. and Running, S. W. (1999). An Improved Algorithm for Estimating Incident Daily Solar Radiation from Measurements of Temperature, Humidity and Precipitation, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93, 211-228.</p> <p><strong>Please cite the following if this data is used in any research or project:</strong></p> <p><em><strong>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New (2023). “Multi-Model Future Typical Meteorological (fTMY) Weather Files for nearly every US County.” The 3rd ACM International Workshop on Big Data and Machine Learning for Smart Buildings and Cities and BuildSys '23: The 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, Istanbul, Turkey, November 15-16, 2023. DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600100.3626637" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1145/3600100.3626637</a></strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Cross-Model Version:</strong></p> <div> <div> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719204, Feb 2024. [<a href="10719204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719178, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10719178" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10698921, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10698921" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (Cross-Model version-SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10420668, Dec 2023. [<a href="../records/10420668" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Model-specific Version:</strong></p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729277, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729277" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729279, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729279" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729223, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729223" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729201, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729201" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729157, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729157" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729199, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729199" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (East and South – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8335814, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8335814" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (West and Midwest – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8338548, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8338548" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> </div> </div> <p> </p> <p><strong>Representative Cities Version:</strong></p> <p>Bass, Brett, New, Joshua R., Rastogi, Deeksha and Kao, Shih-Chieh (2022). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation (1.0) [Data set]." Zenodo, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6939750, Aug. 2022. [<a href="https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzenodo.org%2Frecord%2F6939750%23.YwYzp3bMKUk&data=05%7C01%7Clif2%40ornl.gov%7C26cbed91b56e40d4014708dbc0976975%7Cdb3dbd434c4b45449f8a0553f9f5f25e%7C1%7C0%7C638315528798318118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S8Z0mjWDMqelFJkp2mfNBVqaiDCdM3AXjQ7PDPEBIu4%3D&reserved=0">Data</a>]</p>
Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP5-RCP8.5)
<p>As global emissions and temperatures continue to rise, global climate models offer projections as to how the climate will change in years to come. These model projections can be used for a variety of end-uses to better understand how current systems will be affected by the changing climate. While climate models predict every individual year, using a single year may not be representative as there may be outlier years. It can also be useful to represent a multi-year period with a single year of data. Both items are currently addressed when working with past weather data by a using Typical Meteorological Year (TMY)methodology. This methodology works by statistically selecting representative months from a number of years and appending these months to achieve a single representative year for a given period. In this analysis, the TMY methodology is used to develop Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) using climate model projections. The resulting set of fTMY data is then formatted into EnergyPlus weather (epw) fi les that can be used for building simulation to estimate the impact of climate scenarios on the built environment.</p> <p>This dataset contains the cross-climate-model version fTMY files for 3281 US Counties in the continental United States. The data for each county is derived from six different global climate models (GCMs) from the 6th Phase of Coupled Models Intercomparison Project CMIP6-ACCESSCM2, BCC-CSM2-MR, CNRM-ESM2-1, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2-MM. The six climate models were statistically downscaled for 1980–2014 in the historical period and 2015–2100 in the future period under the SSP585 scenario using the methodology described in Rastogi et al. (2022). Additionally, hourly data was derived from the daily downscaled output using the Mountain Microclimate Simulation Model (MTCLIM; Thornton and Running, 1999). The shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) used for this analysis was SSP 5 and the representative concentration pathway (RCP) used was RCP 8.5. More information about SSP and RCP can be referred to O'Neill et al. (2020).</p> <p>Please be aware that in cases where a location contains multiple .EPW files, it indicates that there are multiple weather data collection points within that location.</p> <p>More information about the six selected CMIP6 GCMs:</p> <p>ACCESS-CM2 -<br>http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ES19040<br>BCC-CSM2-MR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2977-2021<br>CNRM-ESM2-1-<br>https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001791<br>MPI-ESM1-2-HR -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019<br>MRI-ESM2-0 -<br>https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051<br>NorESM2-MM -<br>https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020</p> <p>Additional references:<br>O'Neill, B. C., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K. et al. (2020). Achievements and Needs for the Climate Change Scenario Framework.<br>Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 1074–1084 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0<br>Rastogi, D., Kao, S.-C., and Ashfaq, M. (2022). How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections? Earth's Future, 10, e2022EF002734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734Thornton, P. E. and Running, S. W. (1999). An Improved Algorithm for Estimating Incident Daily Solar Radiation from Measurements of Temperature, Humidity and Precipitation, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93, 211-228.</p> <p><strong>Please cite the following if this data is used in any research or project:</strong></p> <p><em><strong>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New (2023). “Multi-Model Future Typical Meteorological (fTMY) Weather Files for nearly every US County.” The 3rd ACM International Workshop on Big Data and Machine Learning for Smart Buildings and Cities and BuildSys '23: The 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, Istanbul, Turkey, November 15-16, 2023. DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600100.3626637" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1145/3600100.3626637</a></strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Cross-Model Version:</strong></p> <div> <div> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719204, Feb 2024. [<a href="10719204" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10719178, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10719178" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). " Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (Cross-Model Version-SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10698921, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10698921" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (Cross-Model version-SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10420668, Dec 2023. [<a href="../records/10420668" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Model-specific Version:</strong></p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729277, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729277" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP1-RCP2.6)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729279, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729279" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729223, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729223" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP2-RCP4.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729201, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729201" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (West and Midwest - SP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729157, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729157" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2024). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County in CONUS (East and South - SSP3-RCP7.0)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10729199, Feb 2024. [<a href="../records/10729199" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (East and South – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8335814, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8335814" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>]</p> <p>Shovan Chowdhury, Fengqi Li, Avery Stubbings, Joshua R. New, Deeksha Rastogi, and Shih-Chieh Kao (2023). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation for every US County (West and Midwest – SSP5-RCP8.5)." ORNL internal Scientific and Technical Information (STI) report, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8338548, Sept 2023. [<a href="../records/8338548" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Data</a>] </p> </div> </div> <p> </p> <p><strong>Representative Cities Version:</strong></p> <p>Bass, Brett, New, Joshua R., Rastogi, Deeksha and Kao, Shih-Chieh (2022). "Future Typical Meteorological Year (fTMY) US Weather Files for Building Simulation (1.0) [Data set]." Zenodo, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6939750, Aug. 2022. [<a href="https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzenodo.org%2Frecord%2F6939750%23.YwYzp3bMKUk&data=05%7C01%7Clif2%40ornl.gov%7C26cbed91b56e40d4014708dbc0976975%7Cdb3dbd434c4b45449f8a0553f9f5f25e%7C1%7C0%7C638315528798318118%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S8Z0mjWDMqelFJkp2mfNBVqaiDCdM3AXjQ7PDPEBIu4%3D&reserved=0">Data</a>]</p>
Role of Quantum Computing in Shaping the Future of 6G Technology
<p>The dataset is provided for the data collected to understand the role of quantum cmputing in shaping the future of 6G technology. The dataset consist of all the raw data and analysed results with respect to the research questions.</p>
Incorporating plant phenological responses into species distribution models (SDMs) reduces estimates of future species loss and turnover
<p>Anthropogenetic climate change has caused distribution shifts of many species, and species distribution models (SDMs) are central for documenting this relationship. However, most SDMs rarely consider the evolution of climate-sensitive functional traits, such as phenology, which strongly affect species fitness. Using >120,000 herbarium specimens representing 360 plant species across the eastern United States, we developed a novel "phenology-informed" SDM that integrates dynamic phenological responses to changing climates. Compared to standard SDMs, our phenology-informed SDMs forecast lower species habitat loss and less species turnover under climate change. These results suggest that phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation in phenology may help species adjust their ecological niches and persist in their habitats under rapid environmental change. Our findings reveal how phenology variation mediates species distributions and affects regional biodiversity patterns. Our newly developed model also circumvents the need for mechanistic models, facilitating the deployment of trait-based SDMs across unprecedented spatial and taxonomic scales.</p>
Calibrated and uncalibrated projection data from the paper "Assessing observational constraints on future European climate in an out-of-sample framework"
<p>Individual uncalibrated and calibrated projections for each of the five methods (A-E) in the following folders:</p> <p>MethodA_proj/</p> <p>MethodB_proj/</p> <p>MethodC_proj/</p> <p>MethodD_proj/</p> <p>MethodE_proj/</p> <p> </p> <p>Also included are the out-of-sample data from the "pseudo-observations" (taken from CMIP6 models) used for the verification (see paper for full details):</p> <p>FUTUREverif/</p>
Evolutionary Overview of Surface Wave Method Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Past, Current and Future
<p>The surface wave method has been a cornerstone in seismic imaging and monitoring across diverse scenarios for the past 70 years. We offers an objective snapshot of the current landscape in surface wave method research through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Utilizing both bibliographic and structured network analysis techniques, including Biblioshiny and VOSviewer applications, we meticulously examine the literature spanning from 1952 to 2024, sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection database. This work has been submitted to "SCIENCE CHINA earth science" for peer review ( Guan et al., 2024 ).</p> <p>The package includes the datasets utilized for bibliometric analysis in the submitted manuscript. It includes a text file named "Refined_TabDelimited_Data.txt" for VOSviewer software and a spreadsheet "Refined_Bibliometrix_Data.xlsx" for Biblioshiny application.</p>
The potential range of Agrilus planipennis according to current and future climate conditions
<p>This dataset is associated to the following reference:</p> <p>Jean-Pierre Rossi, Raphaëlle Mouttet, Pascal Rousse and Jean-Claude Streito<sup> </sup>(2024) Modelling the potential range of <em>Agrilus planipennis</em> in Europe according to current and future climate conditions. In press. Trees, Forests and People. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100559</p> <p>The files correspond to rasters saved as geotiff files. They can be used in geographical information systems.</p> <p><strong>Current climate conditions: 2001-2018. The maps correspond to the whole world.</strong></p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Bart.tif</p> <p>Climate suitability for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the BART algorithm and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The climate suitability ranges from 0 (unsuitable) to 1 (suitable).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Brt.tif</p> <p>Climate suitability for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the BRT algorithm and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The climate suitability ranges from 0 (unsuitable) to 1 (suitable).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Rf.tif</p> <p>Climate suitability for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the RF algorithm and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The climate suitability ranges from 0 (unsuitable) to 1 (suitable).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Bart_pres_abs.tif</p> <p>Reclassified climate suitability maps for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the algorithm BART and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The raster contains 2 classes: suitable conditions (raster value = 1) and unsuitable conditions (raster value = 0).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Brt_pres_abs.tif</p> <p>Reclassified climate suitability maps for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the algorithm BRT and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The raster contains 2 classes: suitable conditions (raster value = 1) and unsuitable conditions (raster value = 0).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_Rf_pres_abs.tif</p> <p>Reclassified climate suitability maps for Agrilus planipennis modelled using the algorithm RF and the reference conditions (2001-2018). The raster contains 2 classes: suitable conditions (raster value = 1) and unsuitable conditions (raster value = 0).</p> <p>CS_2001-2018_committee.tif</p> <p>Map showing the percentage of algorithms indicating suitable climate conditions for Agrilus planipennis. The algorithms (BART, BRT and RF) are projected using the current climate conditions (2001-2018).</p> <p><strong>Future climate conditions: 2041-2060. The maps correspond to Europe.</strong></p> <p> CS_2041-2060_SSP1-2.6_committee.tif</p> <p>Map showing the percentage of algorithms indicating suitable climate conditions for Agrilus planipennis. The algorithms (BART, BRT and RF) are projected using the climate data associated with 11 GCMs for the period 2041-2060 and the SSP1-2.6.</p> <p> CS_2041-2060_SSP2-4.5_committee.tif</p> <p>Map showing the percentage of algorithms indicating suitable climate conditions for Agrilus planipennis. The algorithms (BART, BRT and RF) are projected using the climate data associated with 11 GCMs for the period 2041-2060 and the SSP2-4.5.</p> <p> CS_2041-2060_SSP3-7.0_committee.tif</p> <p>Map showing the percentage of algorithms indicating suitable climate conditions for Agrilus planipennis. The algorithms (BART, BRT and RF) are projected using the climate data associated with 11 GCMs for the period 2041-2060 and the SSP3-7.0.</p> <p> CS_2041-2060_SSP5-8.5_committee.tif</p> <p>Map showing the percentage of algorithms indicating suitable climate conditions for Agrilus planipennis. The algorithms (BART, BRT and RF) are projected using the climate data associated with 11 GCMs for the period 2041-2060 and the SSP5-8.5.</p> <p> </p> <p>BART: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees</p> <p>BRT: Boosted Regression Trees</p> <p>RF: Random Forest</p>
Data from the article "Past large earthquakes influence future strong ground motion in subduction zones".
<p>Rupture and Ground motion data (version 2) in the central zone of Chile using kinematic seismic simulation data published in https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06651-9. The rupture process is derived from coupling and geometry data incorporated into the Heterogeneous Energy-Based method (https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0522).</p> <p>A video summarizing the data and results can be found in: <a href="https://youtu.be/VDIgko7ieEY?si=U_hoXBcO3OlM6XY8">https://youtu.be/VDIgko7ieEY?si=U_hoXBcO3OlM6XY8</a> <br><br>Please note that this is a revised version where the data code has been slightly modified compared to its previous version.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.