Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,315
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,315 results for “Comparative analysis”
FIGURE 21 in Morphology of the antennal sensilla of Rhus gall aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea: Pemphiginae): A comparative analysis of five genera
FIGURE 21. Rhus gall aphids, relative lengths of antennal segments (Standard error indicated by bars; n = 20; length of last antennal segment includes processus terminalis).[SC, S. chinensis; SP, S. peitan; NS, N. shiraii; NY, N. yanoniella; FM, F. meitanensis; ME, M. elongallis; MF, M. flavogallis; KR, K. rhusicola rhusicola; KO, K. rhusicola ovatirhusicola; KN, K. rhusicola ensigallis; KV, K. rhusicola ovogallis].
FIGURES 1–20 in Morphology of the antennal sensilla of Rhus gall aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea: Pemphiginae): A comparative analysis of five genera
FIGURES 1–20. Rhus gall aphids, antennae and antennal sensilla. (1–5) Sensilla of alates, (1) S. chinensis, Type I trichoid sensilla (arrow); (2) S. chinensis, Type II trichoid sensilla; (3) M. elongallis, campaniform sensilla (arrow); (4) K. rhusicola rhusicola, coeloconic sensilla; (5) N. shiraii, Johnson's Organ and radial supports at base of flagellum. (6– 12) Secondary sensilla on flagellar segments, (6) S. chinensis, irregular plate sensilla; (7) S. peitan, irregular plate sensilla; (8) N. shiraii, annular sensilla; (9) N. yanoniella, annular sensilla; (10) F. meitanensis, annular sensilla; (11) M. elongallis, large sheet sensilla; (12) M. flavogallis, large sheet sensilla. (13–20) Alate antennae, light microscope photographs, (13) S. chinensis; (14) S. peitan; (15) N. yanoniella; (16) N.shiraii; (17) F. meitanensis; (18) M. elongallis; (19) M. flavogallis; (20) K. rhusicola rhusicola.
Figure 3 in A comparative analysis on cranial ontogeny of South American fur seals (Otariidae: Arctocephalus)
Figure 3. Bivariate standardized major axis (SMA) regressions for Arctocephalus australis (white circles and dashed line), Arctocephalus gazella (black circles and solid line), and Arctocephalus tropicalis (grey circles and dotted line): A, same slope and intercepts for A. australis, A. gazella, and A. tropicalis; B, different slopes between the growth trajectories; and C, same slope and different intercepts between species. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 2 in A comparative analysis on cranial ontogeny of South American fur seals (Otariidae: Arctocephalus)
Figure 2. Cranial measurements of used in this study: BW, braincase width; CBL, condylobasal length; CW, alveolus width of upper canine teeth; LAU, load arm length at upper canine; LO, length of orbit; MW, mastoid width; OCPH, occipital plate height; PL, palatal length; POC, postorbital constriction; PW, palatal width; RH, rostral height; RL, rostral length; RW, rostral width; UPCL, upper postcanine length; ZW, zygomatic width.
Figure 1 in A comparative analysis on cranial ontogeny of South American fur seals (Otariidae: Arctocephalus)
Figure 1. Ventral view of skulls of male Arctocephalus australis (A, B), Arctocephalus gazella (C, D), and Arctocephalus tropicalis (E, F). Ontogenetic series represent non-adult (left) and adult (right) specimens. Scale bar: 30 mm.
Figure 4 in A comparative analysis on cranial ontogeny of South American fur seals (Otariidae: Arctocephalus)
Figure 4. Pairwise comparison of factors 1 and 2 from the principal component analysis of the ontogenetic series of Arctocephalus australis (filled squares), Arctocephalus gazella (crosses), and Arctocephalus tropicalis (triangles).
Figure 2 in An evolutionary comparative analysis of the medusozoan (Cnidaria) exoskeleton
Figure 2. Schematic of the exoskeleton in fossil groups in Medusozoa. A, Conulatae: A1, hypothetical Conulatae, general morphology with main features (modified from Leme et al., 2004); A2, lamellar ornament details of the exoskeleton. B, Corumbella: B1, Corumbella werneri; B2, oral region; B3, cross-section of the exoskeleton with microlamellae; B4, lamellar detail showing pores (brown arrow) and papillae (red arrow); B5, underside view of two of the polygonal plates that comprise the lamellae with papillae (shown as red 'u'); B6, topside view of the same plates as in B5, showing pores (shown as brown oval) (modified from Pacheco et al., 2011). Colour-coded chemical composition and structure of the exoskeleton: yellow, calcium phosphate; orange, calcium carbonate.
Figure 1 in An evolutionary comparative analysis of the medusozoan (Cnidaria) exoskeleton
Figure 1. Model of the chitin-protein (corneous) exoskeleton and cell tissues in Medusozoa. Red line refers to the exoskeleton, yellow circles are carbon atoms, blue circles hydrogen, purple circles oxygen, and cyan circle N-acetyl group.
Figure 3 in An evolutionary comparative analysis of the medusozoan (Cnidaria) exoskeleton
Figure 3. Schematic view of the exoskeleton in extant groups of Medusozoa. A, Staurozoa, Stauromedusae, Haliclystus; B, C, Scyphozoa: B, Coronatae, C, Discomedusae; D, Cubozoa, Carybdeida; E–I, Hydrozoa: E, Leptothecata, F, 'Anthoathecata', G, Hydridae, Hydra vulgaris, H, Millepora sp., I, Bimeria vestita. Chemical composition and structures of the exoskeleton indicated in different colours: red, chitin-protein; cyan, glycosaminoglycans; orange, calcium carbonate; green, glycosaminoglycan, chondroitin sulphate, and putative peroxidase proteins; p, podocyst.
Figure 4 in An evolutionary comparative analysis of the medusozoan (Cnidaria) exoskeleton
Figure 4. Phylogenetic hypothesis of the exoskeleton in Cnidaria, with fossil Medusozoa, with optimization for different skeleton types: calcareous, corneous, coriaceous; bilayered;? unknown, without exoskeleton. Skeleton composition: chitin, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and putative peroxidase proteins, chitin-protein and GAGs. Lineages are by colour: yellow, Anthozoa; orange, Staurozoa; green Cubozoa; purple, Scyphozoa; blue, Trachylina; dark green, Capitata; grey, Siphonophora; brown, Aplanulata; red, 'Anthoathecata'; cyan, Leptothecata. Numbers in parentheses indicate the total number of extant species, based on Daly et al. (2007) and Collins (2009). Solid bars indicate fossils, open squares do not have fossil records. Red circles indicate groups with internal, chitinous skeletons. This hypothesis combines the phylogeny in Collins et al. (2006) with, for the position of the Conulatae, Van Iten et al. (2006, 2014) and Cartwright et al. (2008). Hypothetical relations for Hydroidolina are based on unpublished data (M. M. Maronna & A. C. Marques). Images of fossils: 1, Cubozoa and Narcomedusae (Cartwright et al., 2007); 2, Conulatae (Van Iten et al., 2013a); 3, Pseudodiscophylum windermerensis (Fryer & Stanley, 2004); 4, Lepidopora sp. (modified from Cairns & Grant-Mackie, 1993); 5, Sinobryon elongatum (Balinski et al., 2014).
Figure 4. Comparative metriorhynchid cranial morphology. A in The evolution of Metriorhynchoidea (mesoeucrocodylia, thalattosuchia): an integrated approach using geometric morphometrics, analysis of disparity, and biomechanics
Figure 4. Comparative metriorhynchid cranial morphology. A, Eoneustes gaudryi comb. nov., holotype, NHM R.3353. B, Geosaurus araucanensis, holotype, MLP 72-IV-7-1. C, Cricosaurus suevicus, lectotype, SMNS 9808. D, Enaliosuchus schroederi, holotype, MMGLV#. E, Suchodus durobrivensis, referred specimen, NHM R.2618. F, Metriorhynchus superciliosus, referred specimen, MNHN 1908-6. G, Geosaurus giganteus, referred specimen, NHM 37020. H, Dakosaurus maximus, neotype, SMNS 8203. Scale bars: 20 mm. We thank N. Knötschke for photograph (D), and P. Hurst and P.M. Barrett for photograph (G).
Figure 6 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 6. Articulated maxilla and ectopterygoid of ROM 702 in lateral (A) and medial (B) views. Jugal of ROM 702 in lateral (C) and medial (D) views. See text for list of anatomical abbreviations. Scale bar: 5 cm.
Figure 17 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 17. Holotype skull of Hypacrosaurus stebingeri, MOR 549, in lateral view. See text for list of anatomical abbreviations. Scale bar: 10 cm.
Figure 9 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 9. Incomplete squamosal of Hypacrosaurus altispinus (AMNH 5248) in caudal (A), lateral (B), and medial (C) views. See text for list of anatomical abbreviations. Scale bar: 3 cm.
Figure 12 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 12. Left dentary of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, ROM 702, in medial view (A); detailed view of dentary teeth from inset (B). Scale bars: 5 cm in (A); 1 cm in (B).
Figure 7 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 7. Cranial bones of Hypacrosaurus altispinus. A, incomplete jugal of CMN 8674 in lateral view. B and C, incomplete quadratojugal of ROM 702 in lateral and medial views. D, vomer of CMN 2246 in?labial view. Scale bars: 2 cm.
Figure 8 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 8. Incomplete pterygoid of Hypacrosaurus altispinus (ROM 702), in lateral (A), medial (B), and caudal (C) views. Scale bar: 5 cm.
Figure 14 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 14. Bivariate plots of cranial growth exclusive of the cranial crest in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids. Blue (dotted) lines represent regression for Corythsaurus, red (solid) lines represent regression for Hypacrosaurus, and green (dashed) lines represent regression for Lambeosaurus. The log of skull length is the standard variable (x) in all comparisons. •, Corythosaurus casuarius; O, Corythosaurus intermedius morph; ¥, Hypacrosaurus altispinus; +, Hypacrosaurus stebingeri,
Figure 16 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 16. Results of phylogenetic analyses conducted in this study using a modified version of the data matrix presented in Evans & Reisz (2007). Top: strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees (MPTs) recovered from the phylogenetic analysis of Lambeosaurinae. The data resulted in three MPTs of 112 steps, each with a consistency index of 0.9, a rescaled consistency index of 0.83, and a retention index of 0.92. See Evans & Reisz (2007) for a character list. Bottom: majority rule consensus tree resulting from Bayesian analysis (Mk+gamma model) of the same data matrix. Abbreviations: bd, bremer decay value; bs, bootstrap value; us, unambiguous synamorphies; prob, posterior probability values.
Figure 15 in Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypacrosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)
Figure 15. Bivariate plots of cranial crest variables in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids. The log of skull length is the standard variable (x) in all comparisons. Blue (dotted) lines represent regression for Corythsaurus, red (solid) lines represent regression for Hypacrosaurus, and green (dashed) lines represent regression for Lambeosaurus. •, Corythosaurus casuarius; O, Corythosaurus intermedius morph; ¥, Hypacrosaurus altispinus; +, Hypacrosaurus stebingeri,, Lambeosaurus lambei, Z, Lambeosaurus clavinitialis morph; °, Lambeosaurus magnicristatus; z, Parasaurolophus walkeri.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.