Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61,240
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61,240 results for “two”
Fig. 7 in Stick insects from Vietnam: The new genus Mycovartes gen. nov., with two new species and two new species of Neooxyartes Ho, 2018 (Phasmida: Lonchodidae: Necrosciinae)
Fig. 7. Mycovartes khoii gen. et sp. nov., eggs (RBINS). A. Lateral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Operculum. D. Ventral view. E. Dorsolateral view. F. Anterolateral view. G. Posterodorsal view. H. Polar area. I. Variation.
Fig. 24 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Fig. 24. Neighbour-Joining tree generated from DNA barcode data for four species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000.
Figs 13–17 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Figs 13–17. Dorsal view of the abdomen of species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000. 13. A. comorosensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (RMCA ENT 000056900). 14. A. congensis (Curran, 1938), ♂ (ANHRTUK 00282353).15. A. conopeum sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NMSA-Dip 219971). 16. A. congensis, ♀ (ANHRTUK 00282352). 17. A. longipilus Kassebeer, 2000, ♀ (ANHRTUK 00282356). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figs 7–8 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Figs 7–8. Lateral view of species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000. 7. A. comorosensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (RMCA ENT 000056900). 8. A. congensis (Curran, 1938), ♂ (ANHRTUK 00282353). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figs 2–6 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Figs 2–6. Frontal view of the head of species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000. 2. A. comorosensis sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (RMCA ENT 000056900). 3. A. congensis (Curran, 1938), ♂ (ANHRTUK 00282353). 4. A. conopeum sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NMSA-Dip 219971). 5. A. congensis, ♀ (ANHRTUK 00282352). 6. A. longipilus Kassebeer, 2000, ♀ (ANHRTUK 00282356). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figs 18–23 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Figs 18–23. Male genitalia of species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000. 18–20. Dorsal views. 18. A. comorosensis sp. nov., holotype (RMCA ENT 000056900). 19. A. congensis (Curran, 1938) (RMCA ENT 000028396). 20. A. conopeum sp. nov., paratype (NMSA-Dip 086809). 21–23. Lateral views. 21. A. comorosensis sp. nov., holotype (RMCA ENT 000056900). 22. A. congensis (RMCA ENT 000028396). 23. A. conopeum sp. nov., paratype (NMSA-Dip 086809). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figs 9–10 in A revision of the Afrotropical hover fly genus Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with the description of two new species and one new synonymy
Figs 9–10. Lateral view of species of Afroxanthandrus Kassebeer, 2000. 9. A. conopeum sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (NMSA-Dip 219971). 10. A. congensis (Curran, 1938), ♀ (ANHRTUK 00282352). Scale bars = 1 mm.
TABLE 1 in The Extinct Fauna of Stingless Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in Dominican Amber: Two New Species and Redescription of the Male of Proplebeia dominicana (Wille and Chandler)
<p>TABLE 1 <b>Measurements (mm) of Select Specimens of <i>Proplebeia dominicana</i></b> Holotype measurements are from the original descriptions by Wille and Chandler (1964).</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Male DR­14­1178</th><th>Worker DR­14­1111</th><th>Holotype, worker</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1. Head width</th><td>1.31</td><td>1.30</td><td>1.22 (72)</td></tr><tr><th>2. Head length</th><td>1.00</td><td>1.02</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>3. Mesosoma width</th><td>1.28</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>4. Tergum 2 width</th><td>0.98</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>5. Eye length</th><td>0.84</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.80 (47)</td></tr><tr><th>6. Eye width</th><td>0.40</td><td>0.36</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>7. Upper interorbital distance</th><td>0.75</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.76 (45)</td></tr><tr><th>8. Maximum interorbital distance</th><td>0.78</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.82 (48)</td></tr><tr><th>9. Lower interorbital distance</th><td>0.50</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.65 (38)</td></tr><tr><th>10. Clypeus length</th><td>0.34</td><td>0.23</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>11. Clypeus width</th><td>0.48</td><td>0.54</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>12. Clypeocellar distance</th><td>0.64</td><td>0.70</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>13. Malar area length</th><td>linear</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.05 (3)</td></tr><tr><th>14. Interalveolar distance</th><td>0.13</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.15 (9)</td></tr><tr><th>15. Alveolus diameter</th><td>0.14</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.12 (7)</td></tr><tr><th>16. Alveolorbital distance</th><td>0.10</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.17 (10)</td></tr><tr><th>17. Scape length</th><td>0.38</td><td>0.40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>18. Scape width</th><td>0.08</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>19. Length of pedicel plus flagellum</th><td>1.66</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>20. Alveolus­lateral ocellus distance</th><td>0.55</td><td>0.58</td><td>0.65 (38)</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>(lateral ocellus?)</td></tr><tr><th>21. 1st flagellomere length</th><td>0.16</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>22. 2nd flagellomere length</th><td>0.15</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>23. 3rd flagellomere length</th><td>0.15</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>24. 3rd flagellomere diameter</th><td>0.09</td><td>0.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>25. Distance between lateral ocelli</th><td>0.34</td><td>0.26</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>26. Median ocellus diameter</th><td>0.14</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><th>27. Ocellorbital distance</th><td>0.11</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.17 (10)</td></tr><tr><th>28. Scutellum length: width</th><td>0.28:0.50</td><td>0.26:0.44</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>29. Mesoscutum length</th><td>—</td><td>0.80</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>30. Marginal cell length</th><td>0.91</td><td>0.92</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>31. Marginal cell width</th><td>0.20</td><td>0.21</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>32. Forewing length</th><td>2.75</td><td>2.68</td><td>2.60</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>(+tegula 3,12)</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>33. Forewing width</th><td>0.96</td><td>1.08</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>34. Tibia III length</th><td>0.92</td><td>0.96</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>35. Tibia III width</th><td>0.30</td><td>0.37</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>36. Basitarsus III length</th><td>0.52</td><td>0.42</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>37. Basitarsus III width</th><td>0.12</td><td>0.19</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>38. Hamuli</th><td>5–6</td><td>5</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>39. Pterostigma length: width</th><td>0.44:0.12</td><td>0.50:0.12</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>40. 1st abscissa of M</th><td>0.38</td><td>0.39</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>41. 1st abscissa of Cu</th><td>0.54</td><td>0.56</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>42. Rs + M + 2nd abscissa M</th><td>0.36</td><td>0.40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th>43. Total body length</th><td>3.68</td><td>3.20</td><td>2.95</td></tr></tbody></table>
Fig. 4 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)
Fig. 4. Palmar view of right hand of Colostethus trilineatus, MUSM 15618. Note the swelling of the preaxial side of the Finger II. ×20.
FIG. 2 in Two New Taxa (Caviomorpha, Rodentia) from the Early Oligocene Tinguiririca Fauna (Chile)
FIG. 2. Location map; Tinguiririca River valley, Termas del Flaco, Chile (modified from Wyss et al., 1994).
FIG. 1 in Two New Taxa (Caviomorpha, Rodentia) from the Early Oligocene Tinguiririca Fauna (Chile)
FIG. 1. The transitional Eocene-Oligocene portion of the SALMA sequence (based on Flynn and Swisher, 1995; as modified by Croft et al., 2008).
Research integrity practices and environmental impact of research: Questionnaire of the survey conducted at two French institutions
<p>This dataset is a questionnaire designed to evaluate researchers' understanding, application, and perception of responsible research principles, and to identify strengths and weaknesses in their implementation.<br>It contains about thirty questions and covers various and sometimes complex topics: responsible and inclusive research practices, public trust in science, climate crisis, reduction of GHG emissions caused by research activities, research integrity, researchers' engagement in the public sphere.</p> <p>It is divided into 6 sections:<br>- Relations between science and society <br>- Conducting research in a changing world <br>- Ethics and research integrity <br>- Engaged research <br>- Science communication </p> <p>To enable comparative analysis, it incorporates questions from other surveys which are cited as references.</p>
Photographs presenting two sandy cones in the Stołowe Mountains, together with the geomorphic setting in which they are situated.
<p>The .zip files contain selected photographs of the sandy cones BS1 and SzW1 that were subject to detailed soil study and dating (single grain OSL as well as 14C). Apart from the cones, their close vicinity is presented (the geomorphological context).</p>
Figure 8A-D. Two xiphiplastra. A in A fossil giant tortoise from the Mehrten Formation of Northern California
Figure 8A-D. Two xiphiplastra. A. Dorsal view of UCMP 132086, a left Figure 9A-C. Peripherals. A. Right peripheral 5, lateral view, UCMP xiphiplastra. B. Ventral view of UCMP 132086 showing sulcus between 97986. B. Pygal, left and right peripheral pairs 10-11, and left periphfemoral and anal scales. C. Ventral view of UCMP 132084, right xiphi- eral 9, posterior view showing sulci separating marginal scales, UCMP plastron showing sulci. D. Dorsal view of UCMP 132084. Scale bars=4 95919. C. Lateral view, two articulated partial left peripherals, UCMP cm 95918. Scale bars=4 cm.
Quantitative results of the analysis of two types of bone particles corresponding to the work "A comprehensive analysis of two types of xenogeneic bone particles for use in maxillofacial bone regeneration therapies"
<p>This dataset corresponds to the quantitative data generated in the work entitled "A comprehensive analysis of two types of xenogeneic bone particles for use in maxillofacial bone regeneration therapies".</p> <p>Regeneration of maxillofacial bone structures is challenging. One of the strategies applied to bone damage repair is the use of bone filler particles, and different types of these particles have been tested. In this work, we analyzed the regenerative potential of deproteinized bone particles (DP) and collagen-based bone particles (CP) to determine the potential of each biomaterial in bone repair. Results of the structural analysis using scanning electron microscopy and 3D scanning showed that DP and CP were structurally similar, and consisted of a heterogeneous mixture of bone particles of different sizes and shapes. Then, ex vivo analyses using morphological evaluation, LIVE & DEAD and quantification of DNA released to the medium demonstrated that CP and DP were highly biocompatible when used in direct and in indirect contact with human cells, at 24, 48 and 72h of follow-up. Then, when both particles were grafted for 2 months on Wistar rats in which a critical defect had been generated at the mandible bone. Results of the computed tomography analysis showed a significant reduction of the bone defect in the CP group, but not in the DP group, as compared with negative controls devoid of any bone particles. Histological analysis of the graft area revealed that both particles were biocompatible in vivo, and a regenerative tissue with collagen fibers and mineralized spots was found in CP and DP, with higher number of mineralized spots in DP. Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry analyses confirmed the presence of collagen, proteoglycans and osteocalcin at the regeneration area of CP and DP. In general, these results confirm the biocompatibility of both types of particles and that both were able to induce maxillofacial bone regeneration, especially in the case of CP. Future studies should determine their clinical usefulness in patients with cleft palate, mandibular damage and other maxillofacial applications.</p>
Fig. 3. – Capurodendron namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda. A in Two further new species in the highly-diverse Malagasy endemic genus Capurodendron (Sapotaceae)
Fig. 3. – Capurodendron namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda. A. Apex of branch; B. Branch; C. Old flower lacking corolla, dissected laterally; D. Old flower lacking corolla; E. Leaf, abaxial side; F. Leaf, adaxial side. [Gautier et al. 6276] [Drawing: G. Loza]
Plate 2 in Revision of the Congo River Lamprologus Schilthuis, 1891 (Teleostei: Cichlidae), with Descriptions of Two New Species
Plate 2. (a) Lamprologus symoensi, paratype, MRAC 79001.6284–85, female, 46 mm SL; (b) Lamprologus lethops, holotype, MCZ 50248, male, 26 mm SL; (c) Lamprologus teugelsi, n.sp., holotype, AMNH 233611, female, 60 mm SL; (d) Lamprologus tigripictilis, n.sp., holotype, AMNH 233609, male, 62 mm SL.
Plate 1 in Revision of the Congo River Lamprologus Schilthuis, 1891 (Teleostei: Cichlidae), with Descriptions of Two New Species
Plate 1. (a) Lamprologus congoensis, MRAC 118140–53, male, 104 mm SL; (b) Lamprologus tumbanus, MRAC 100851–53, male, 51 mm SL; (c) Lamprologus mocquardi, AMNH 5897, male, 78 mm SL; (d) Lamprologus werneri, MRAC 98158–92, male, 56 mm SL.
Data from: A tale of two studies: detection and attribution of the impacts of invasive plants in observational surveys
1.Short-term experiments cannot characterize how long-lived, invasive shrubs influence ecological properties that can be slow to change, including native diversity and soil fertility. Observational studies are thus necessary, but often suffer from methodological issues. 2.To highlight ways of improving the design and interpretation of observational studies that assess the impacts of invasive plants, we compare two studies of nutrient cycling and earthworms along two separate gradients of invasive shrub abundance. By considering the divergent sampling strategies and statistical analyses of these two studies, and interpreting their contradictory results in the context of other studies, we also aim to better describe the impacts of the focal invader, Rhamnus cathartica. 3.In a new study of a single site in Minnesota, we observed positive correlations between buckthorn abundance and soil pH, soil nutrient pools, nutrient fluxes through leaf litterfall, earthworm abundance, and root biomass. Multiple regression models showed these relationships persisted after accounting for variability in soil texture and tree species composition. For a separate, more expansive study in Illinois, other authors reported little to no correlation between buckthorn abundance and 10 soil properties, including earthworm abundance, pH, and nutrient concentrations. However, like many other studies, their regression models only assessed predictors related to invader abundance. R2 values for models of ecosystem properties ranged from 0-0.79 (adjusted-R2) for our study in Minnesota and from <0.05-0.16 (unadjusted) for the prior study in Illinois. 4.Differences in sampling error and use of predictor variables between the two studies likely explain the contrasting results. 5.Synthesis and applications. To reduce the uncertainty of conclusions from observational studies of invasive plants, future studies must ensure that heterogeneity of soils and vegetation is adequately accounted for in the sampling strategy and statistical analyses (e.g., analysis of covariance, multiple regression). Particular attention should be given to ecosystem properties with variability that likely predates the invader (e.g., geophysical features and tree community composition). In our study, effects of buckthorn on ecosystem properties were not only robust to the inclusion of potentially confounding predictors, but also consistent with expectations based on ecological stoichiometry and mass balance of element flow.
Image 11 in First record of two Pentatomidae bugs from Chandoli area, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
Image 11. Ventral view of Sabaeus humeralis abdomen showing the spiny tips at the posterior angle of each segment
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.