Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8,038
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8,038 results for “Validity”
Creation and Validation of the First Infinium DNA Methylation Array for the Human Imprintome [blood_imprintome]
GEO Series GSE268073. Homo sapiens. 34 samples. Type: Methylation profiling by array.
Data set from Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, Baroni I, Conte G, Turrini F, Castiello G, Magon A, Pittella F, Caruso R. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3177-3188. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14875. Epub 2019 Apr 21. PMID: 30938908.
<p>Data set from Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, Baroni I, Conte G, Turrini F, Castiello G, Magon A, Pittella F, Caruso R. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3177-3188. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14875. Epub 2019 Apr 21. PMID: 30938908</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a current issue for healthcare delivery. Nurse self-efficacy in managing PUs could predict patients' outcome, being a proxy assessment of their overall competency to managing PUs. However, a valid and reliable scale of this task-specific self-efficacy has not yet been developed.</p> <p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses' self-efficacy in managing PUs, that is, the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses (PUM-SES).</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a multi-method and multi-phase design, where study reporting was supported by the STROBE checklist (File S1). Phase 1 referred to the scale development, consisting in the items' generation, mainly based on themes emerged from the literature and discussed within a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on a three-step validation process: the first step aimed to assess face and content validity of the pool of items previously generated (initial version of the PUM-SES); the second aimed to assess psychometrics properties through exploratory factorial analysis; the third step assessed construct validity through confirmative factorial analysis, while concurrent validity was evaluated describing the relationships between PUM-SES and an established general self-efficacy measurement. Reliability was assessed through the evaluation of stability and internal consistency.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>PUM-SES showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, internal consistency and stability. Specifically, PUM-SES had four domains, labelled as follows: assessment, planning, supervision and decision-making. These domains were predicted by the same second-order factor, labelled as PU management self-efficacy.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PUM-SES is a 10-item scale to measure nurses' self-efficacy in PU management. A standardised 0-100 scoring is suggested for computing each domain and the overall scale. PUM-SES might be used in clinical and educational research.</p> <p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Optimising nurses' self-efficacy in PU management might enhance clinical assessment, determining better outcomes in patients with PUs.</p> <p> </p>
Data set from Caruso R, Grugnetti AM, Pastore U, Dellafiore F, Pittella F, Ausili D, Stievano A, Arrigoni C. Modified Research Utilization Questionnaire: Development and Validation Study among Italian Nurses. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Feb;13(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 18. PMID: 30660835.
<p>Data set from Caruso R, Grugnetti AM, Pastore U, Dellafiore F, Pittella F, Ausili D, Stievano A, Arrigoni C. Modified Research Utilization Questionnaire: Development and Validation Study among Italian Nurses. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Feb;13(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 18. PMID: 30660835.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is the abstract:</p> <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop the modified research utilization questionnaire (M-RUQ) and to establish its content and face validity, construct validity, and reliability.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study has a multiphase (three phases), methodological, and cross-sectional design. First, research utilization questionnaire (RUQ) was translated into Italian, which is the target language to develop the M-RUQ. Second, the RUQ psychometric proprieties were assessed using exploratory factorial analysis to identify ambiguous or problematic items (e.g., cross-loadings) (cross-sectional sampling A). The RUQ modification (i.e., item deleting, wording modification, and scoring procedure) represented the development of the M-RUQ among Italian nurses. The third phase was aimed to confirm the construct validity of the M-RUQ and to test its stability and internal consistency (cross-sectional sampling B).</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>This study's findings show that M-RUQ has a three-dimensional structure and a total of 22 items. The M-RUQ shows evidence of validity and reliability. Precisely, the factorial structure coming from an exploratory factorial analysis on the first sample (n = 504) was confirmed by a final model of confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) on a second sample (n = 362). The final CFA model showed adequate goodness of fit, where all the factor loadings showed values higher than .40. Cronbach's α was satisfactory for each domain and for the overall scale. Furthermore, the M-RUQ showed good stability described by the test-retest.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The M-RUQ should be used to assess research utilization among nurses for educational or research purposes to address the practice. Further research about its validity and reliability is suggested.</p> <p> </p>
Valid_2.2_Survey_data
<p>197 responses </p> <p>Instructions </p> <p>Read each one carefully and for each statement, you are given a 5-point scale of importance from unimportant to important. <br> <br> Select the answer that indicates whether the statement is a purpose you would attribute to design and technology (please use the full range). </p>
Valid_2.1_SurveyData
<p><strong>Valid_2.1_Phase 2 Redux </strong></p> <p>Side-by-side questions for each value statement. </p> <p>163 responses </p> <p><em>Instructions</em> </p> <p>For each statement: </p> <ul> <li> <p>in the first column, select the answer that best matches your view </p> </li> <li> <p>in the second column, select the answer that indicates how certain you feel about your view </p> </li> <li> <p>in the third column, select the answer that indicates whether the statement is a purpose you would attribute to design and technology </p> </li> </ul>
Dataset related to article "Prospective Validation of the ROL System in Substaging pT1 High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Mono-Institutional Confirmatory Analysis in BCG Treated Patients"
<p>This record contains raw data related to article "Prospective Validation of the ROL System in Substaging pT1 High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Mono-Institutional Confirmatory Analysis in BCG Treated Patients"</p><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>Patients with pT1 high-grade (HG) urothelial carcinoma (UC) and a very high risk of progression might benefit from immediate radical cystectomy (RC), but this option remains controversial. Validation of a standardized method to evaluate the extent of lamina propria (LP) invasion (with recognized prognostic value) in transurethral resection (TURBT) specimens is still needed. The Rete Oncologica Lombarda (ROL) system showed a high predictive value for progression after TURBT in recent retrospective studies. The ROL system was supposed to be validated on a large prospective series of primary urothelial carcinomas from a single institution. From 2016 to 2020, we adopted ROL for all patients with pT1 HG UC on TURBT. We employed a 1.0-mm threshold to stratify tumors in ROL1 and ROL2. A total of 222 pT1 HG UC were analyzed. The median age was 74 years, with a predominance of men (73.8%). ROL was feasible in all cases: 91 cases were ROL1 (41%), and 131 were ROL2 (59%). At a median follow-up of 26.9 months (IQR 13.8-40.6), we registered 81 recurrences and 40 progressions. ROL was a significant predictor of tumor progression in both univariable (HR 3.53; CI 95% 1.56-7.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and multivariable (HR 2.88; CI 95% 1.24-6.66; <i>p</i> = 0.01) Cox regression analyses. At Kaplan-Meier estimates, ROL showed a correlation with both PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.0012) and RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.0167). Our results confirmed the strong predictive value of ROL for progression in a large prospective series. We encourage the application of ROL for reporting the extent of LP invasion, substaging T1 HG UC, and improving risk tables for urological decision-making.</p>
Data for Development of a lifetime model for large format nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide-based lithium-ion cell validated using a real-life profile
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data for "Twin- model framework development for a comprehensive battery lifetime prediction validated with a realistic driving profile"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data for "Electro-aging model development of nickel-manganese-cobalt lithium-ion technology validated with light and heavy-duty real-life profiles"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Validation of the Spanish Sexual Risk Behaviour Scale (SRBS): Psychosocial factors influencing sexual health risk-taking among adolescents, youth, and future professionals
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Validation Data for the KaTid-Child-Japan
<h3><strong>Dataset Title</strong></h3> <p>Validation Data for the KaTid-Child-Japan</p> <h3><strong>Description</strong></h3> <p>The dataset comprises data collected for the purpose of validating the Japanese version of the KaTid-Child assessment tool. The dataset comprises information utilized to assess the test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and other psychometric properties of the tool. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using a range of techniques, including Spearman's rank correlation, the kappa statistic, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Furthermore, bootstrap resampling was employed to calculate confidence intervals.</p> <h3><strong>Key Features</strong></h3> <p>The objective of this study is to validate the Japanese version of KaTid-Child for use in pediatric occupational therapy. The data set includes both raw and processed data used for reliability analyses. The variables included in the data set are those that are relevant to test-retest and inter-rater reliability.</p> <h3><strong>File Details</strong></h3> <ul> <li><strong>Filename</strong>: Validation_Data_for_the_KaTid-Child-Japan.xlsx</li> <li><strong>Format</strong>: Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (.xlsx)</li> <li><strong>Size</strong>: 58.78 KB</li> <li><strong>Structure</strong>: The data have been organized into separate sheets for the following purposes: raw data, descriptive statistics, and reliability analysis results.</li> </ul> <h3><strong>Usage Notes</strong></h3> <p>The data set is intended for use in research. In the event of reuse, the original study must be appropriately cited and the authors acknowledged. Prior to utilizing the dataset, it is requisite that the authors be contacted to obtain permission. For a detailed account of the methodology and context, please refer to the associated publication.</p> <h3><strong>Contact Information</strong></h3> <p>Should you require further information or clarification regarding this dataset, please do not hesitate to contact us at tasaka-shota@spu.ac.jp.</p>
Data sets of the article Validation of the Health Protective Sexual Communication Scale (HPSC) in British and Spanish young adults.
<p>Data sets of the article <em>Validation of the Health Protective Sexual Communication Scale (HPSC) in British and Spanish young adults. </em></p> <p>SPSS data sets used to perform Exploratory Factor Anlaysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Spain and the United Kingdom.</p> <p>SPSS AMOS data sets to perform CFA in Spain and the United Kingdom.</p>
Validation of the DYALS (Dysphagia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
<p>Dysphagia is a common symptom during the trajectory of ALS, and it can significantly impact on the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Nowadays, no specific tool for the screening of dysphagia in ALS is validated, and the approach is heterogeneous across the Italian Centres. </p> <p>To validate the DYALS (Dysphagia in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) questionnaire, adapting the DYMUS (Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis) questionnaire, for the assessment of dysphagia in ALS patients, in order to uniform the evaluations across the Italian ALS network.</p> <p>We included 197 patients diagnosed with ALS following the El Escorial criteria, in sixteen Italian ALS Centres between 1st December 2019 and 1st July 2020. For each patient, we collected clinical and demographic data, and obtained ALSFRS-r score, ALSAQ-5 score, DYMUS score, and EAT-10 score. </p> <p>Across the 197 patients, the ratio M/F was 113/84, and the median age was 64 years (IQR 56-72.5). Bulbar patients were 20%, and spinal patients 80%. The median ALSFRSr total score of patients was 35 (IQR 28-39). DYALS score was statistically higher in bulbar ALS than in spinal ALS (median=6, IQR 4.5-9 vs median=1, IQR 0-5, z =6.253, p<0.0001). DYALS questionnaire showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.88). There was a statistically significant correlation between DYALS and EAT-10 (rho=0.90, p<0.0001).</p> <p>DYALS scale is reliable, manageable, and easily usable for the screening of dysphagia in ALS. It can be shared with all the Italian ALS Centres in order to collect uniform data for therapeutic strategies and clinical trials.</p>
Nursing self-efficacy for oral anticoagulant therapy management: Development and initial validation of a theory-grounded scale
<p>Dataset from Magon A, Arrigoni C, Fava A, Pittella F, Villa G, Dellafiore F, Conte G, Caruso R. Nursing self-efficacy for oral anticoagulant therapy management: Development and initial validation of a theory-grounded scale. Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;59:151428. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151428. Epub 2021 Mar 23. PMID: 33947515.</p> <p>Abstract</p> <p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a nursing self-efficacy scale for OAC management (SE-OAM).</p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) requires specific nursing competencies. Given that self-efficacy acts as a proxy assessment of nursing competence, its measurement is pivotal for addressing educational programs to enhance nursing competence in managing OAC. Thus far, the measurement of self-efficacy in OAC is undermined by the unavailability of valid and reliable tools.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-method and multi-phase design was adopted: Phase one was a methodological study encompassing developmental tasks for generating items. Phase two comprised the validation process for determining the content validity, construct and concurrent validity, and internal consistency through two cross-sectional data collections.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 190 nurses were enrolled for determining the psychometric structure of the SE-OAM through an exploratory approach, and 345 nurses were subsequently enrolled to corroborate its most plausible factor structure derived from the exploratory analysis. The SE-OAM showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct, concurrent validity, good internal consistency, and stability. The final version of the scale encompassed 21 items kept by five domains: clinical management, care management, education, clinical monitoring, and care monitoring.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SE-OAM showed evidence of initial validity and reliability, fulfilling a current gap in the availability of tools for measuring nursing self-efficacy in managing OAC. SE-OAM could be strategic for performing research to improve the quality of OAC management by enhancing nursing self-efficacy.</p>
Psychometric Assessment of the GHQ-12 (General Health Questionnaire-12 items): Evaluating the reliability, validity, and comparison of factor structure in Indian undergraduate students
<p>Objectives: This study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the GHQ-12 in the Indian undergraduate student population. Although it is the most widely used scale of psychological distress, the debate around its factor structure is still ongoing. Method: A sample of (n=432) Indian undergraduate students aged 17 to 22 years were taken. The English version of GHQ-12 was used. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Convergent validity was examined by the correlation coefficients with life satisfaction, subjective happiness, and a measure of general worry. A comparison of the different models of GHQ-12 proposed in the literature was made using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with maximum likelihood estimates. Result: Cronbach’s alpha (.784) reliability coefficient indicates adequate reliability. Correlation coefficients with life satisfaction (r= -529, p<.01 ), subjective happiness (r= -460, p<.01), and general worry (r= .424, p<.01) were also along the expected lines.Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed a good fit to the data (Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.0319, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.989, Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.982, Root Mean Square of Error Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.039). Hence, the findings indicated a seven items two-factor model consisting of Social Dysfunction and Anxiety/Depression.</p>
Data set : Validation of the French version of mental toughness measurement among athletes
<p>Data set:</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Validation of the French version of mental toughness measurement among athletes </strong></p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the factorial validity of the translated French version of the questionnaire measuring mental toughness "MTQ48" according to the 4/6Cs (four and six components) theoretical constructs of <a href="#_ENREF_5">Clough et al. (2002)</a>. The 48 items assess the following components: challenge; commitment; emotional and life control; ability and interpersonal confidence; and overall mental toughness (MT) score. The sample consisted of 302 athletes (153 males and 149 females), aged 14-27 years (M 20.25; SD 3.8). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) performed by principal component analysis (PCA) with the PROMAX method did not confirm the four and six component theoretical structure of the MTQ48, but a good statistical fit could be obtained with a reduced version of 37 items and three components MTQ37_3C : Challenge-Commitment CC, Confidence CF and Control CT. Cronbach's alpha suggests that each of the three factors has adequate internal consistency (alpha CC = .991; alpha CF = .989; alpha CT = .813). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index for measuring sampling quality was (.991) and Bartlett's sphericity index was (df = 666; p < .001), indicating that CFA is appropriate. MES structural equation modelling confirmed that the 3 factors represent a good model fit (χ² = 678 564, df = 628, CFI = .997, SRMR = .019, RMSEA = .017). In conclusion, our results allowed us to propose a valid and reliable French measure of three components of mental toughness among athletes.</p> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>mental toughness, French version, validation, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Validation de la version française de la mesure de la force mentale chez les sportifs </strong></p> <p><strong>Résumé</strong></p> <p>L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer la validité factorielle de la version française traduite du questionnaire qui mesure la force mentale "MTQ48" selon les constructions théoriques 4/6Cs (quatre et six composantes) du modèle de <a href="#_ENREF_5">Clough et al. (2002)</a>. Les 48 items évaluent les composantes suivantes : le défi ; l'engagement ; le contrôle des émotions et de la vie ; la confiance en capacités et interpersonnelle, ainsi que le score global de la force mentale (FM). L'échantillon était composé de 302 sportifs (153 hommes et 149 femmes), âgés de 14 à 27 ans (M 20.25 ; ET 3.8). L'analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC) effectuée par l'analyse des composantes principales (ACP) avec la méthode PROMAX n'a pas confirmé la structure théorique à quatre et six composantes du MTQ48, mais un bon ajustement statistique a pu être obtenu avec une version réduite de 37 items et de trois composantes MTQ37_3C : le Défi- Engagement DE, la Confiance CF et le Contrôle CT. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach suggère que chacun des trois composantes possède une cohérence interne adéquate (alpha DE = .991 ; alpha CF = .989 ; alpha CT = .813). L'indice de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin pour mesurer la qualité de l'échantillonnage était de (.991) et l'indice de sphéricité de Bartlett était (df = 666 ; p <.001), indiquant que l'AFC est approprié. La modélisation des équations structurelles MES a confirmé que les 3 composantes représentent un bon ajustement du modèle (χ² = 678 564, df = 628, CFI = .997, SRMR = .019, RMSEA = .017). En conclusion, nos résultats ont permis de proposer une mesure française valide et fiable de trois composantes de la force mentale chez les sportifs.</p> <p><strong>Mots clefs </strong>: force mentale, version française, validation, analyse factorielle confirmatoire modélisation des équations structurelles..</p>
Dataset related to article "Is the Instability Severity Index Score a Valid Tool for Predicting Failure After Primary Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability?"
<p>This record contains raw data related to article “Is the Instability Severity Index Score a Valid Tool for Predicting Failure After Primary Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability?”.</p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the validity of the Instability Severity Index Score in predicting the rate of recurrence of dislocation in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>The inclusion criteria were recurrent anterior traumatic glenohumeral instability and a minimum follow-up of 5 years. According to the preoperative Instability Severity Index Score, patients were divided into the following groups: ≤3 points (A), 4 to 6 points (B), and >6 points (C). The recurrence rate was determined by telephone interviews. The estimated overall rate of success at 5 years was defined as the estimated overall percentage of patients free of recurrence at 5 years.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred seventy patients (572 men and 98 women) were included. The average age was 27 years (range, 18 to 39 years) at the time of surgery. One hundred fourteen of 670 patients had a recurrence of instability, with an overall recurrence rate of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.2%-19.9%). The Instability Severity Index Score had a significant association with recurrence. Compared with patients in group A, those in group B had double the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, 95% CI 1.38-4.28, P = .002), and patients in group C a 9 times greater risk of recurrence (HR = 9.42, 95% CI 5.20-17.7, P < .001). The estimated overall rate of success at 5 years was 84.8% (95% CI 81.8-87.3). The rate of success with an Instability Severity Index Score ≤3 points was 93.7% (95% CI 89.6-96.2), but it dropped to 85.7% (95% CI 81.7-88.9) in those with an Instability Severity Index Score of 4 to 6 points and became 54.6% (95% CI 42.8-64.9) in those with an Instability Severity Index Score >6 points. On multivariable analysis, the Instability Severity Index Score was found to significantly affect the risk of recurrence, corrected by type of sport and glenoid bone loss.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Instability Severity Index Score is a validated tool with which to assess the recurrence rate of dislocation after arthroscopic surgery in patients with shoulder instability. Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an Instability Severity Index Score ≤3 is associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrence of glenohumeral instability compared with that in patients with an Instability Severity Index Score >3 points.</p> <p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, case-control study.</p>
Data set documentation of two surveys to identify and validate the critical success factors (CSFs) in the implementation of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in Colombian manufacturing SMEs
<p>Documentation describing the data sets of two surveys conducted with the aim of identifying and validating critical success factors (CSFs) in the implementation of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in manufacturing SMEs in Colombia is included.</p> <p>The first, at a general level and named <strong><em>E1</em></strong>, had the objective of identifying manufacturing SMEs in Colombia that have implemented Lean, Six Sigma or LSS. The second, of a specific level and named <strong><em>E2</em></strong>, was applied in the SMEs found in <strong><em>E1</em></strong> and had the objective of identifying and prioritizing the CSFs in the implementation of LSS and to assess their importance and practice using Likert-type scales. It also made it possible to identify the best-known and most used LSS tools and investigate the specific results of LSS implementation in SMEs.</p> <p>The questionnaire proposed by J. Antony et al. (2008) and adapted by Timans et al. (2012) for LSS was used. The consent to use is included in the documentation. The technical concept of four LSS experts in Colombia was requested to adapt expressions to the context.</p> <p>In the statistical validation phase of the identified CSFs, the estimation of a set of statistical criteria commonly used in psychometric research was made using statistical software SPSS® Version 26 from IBM®. The validation of the factorial structure of the complete model made up of the identified factors and their observable variables was done through a Confirmatory Factorial Analysis using the graphic software SPSS Amos® Version 26 also from IBM®.</p> <p>To build the graphic model the observable variables (statements in the questionnaire E2 of Section III) were represented by rectangles and identified with the letter P (question in Spanish) and with the number according to the order of appearance from 1 to 51 (Example, P1). The critical success factors (CSFs), which are the variables that are not directly measurable or latent, were represented with ovals and identified with the letter F for factor and with the number according to the order of appearance in the questionnaire E2 Section III from 1 through 13 (Example, F1)</p> <p>The following documentary support files are included:</p> <ul> <li><em>Dataset documentation.pdf</em> file</li> <li><em>Consent for the use of the E2 questionnaire.pdf</em> file</li> <li>Anonymized data from <strong><em>E1</em></strong> survey with 352 complete responses in the <em>E1_survey_dataset.exc</em> file.</li> <li>Anonymized data from <strong><em>E2</em></strong> survey with 44 complete responses in the <em>E2_survey_dataset.exc</em> file.</li> <li><strong><em>E1</em></strong> survey instrument with all survey items in the <em>E1_survey_instrument.p</em>df file.</li> <li><strong><em>E2</em></strong> survey instrument with all survey items in the <em>E2_survey_instrument.pdf</em> file.</li> <li>Factorial structure of the CSFs of the initial model in the <em>CFA_CSF </em>Amos file.</li> <li><em>CSFs</em> SPSS file.</li> </ul>
Dataset for 'Quantitative investigation of the validity conditions for the Beckmann–Kirchhoff scattering model'
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL) in German Patients with Lymphedema of the Upper or Lower Limbs
<p>Raw data collected during interviews 1 and 2.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.