Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Data for: Flexible emulation of the climate warming cooling feedback to globally assess the maladaptation implications of future air conditioning use

<p>This dataset contains the code and the data files needed to create the figures shown in the paper titled "Flexible emulation of the climate warming cooling feedback to globally assess the maladaptation implications of future air conditioning use".</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 3 in Limited gene flow among Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in two isolated regions in China: Implications for utilization of the SIT

Fig. 3. Dendrogram generated by NJ analysis representing the genetic distance among populations of Cydia pomonella. The topology was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The scale bar represents 2.0% genetic distance. The sampling locations include JinTa (JJT), YinDa (JYD), XiDong (JXD) and ZongZai (JZZ) of Jiuquan Region, and Luo Tuocheng (ZLT), NiJiaying (ZNJ), MinYong (ZMY) and XiaoMan (ZXM) of Zhangye Region.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Limited gene flow among Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in two isolated regions in China: Implications for utilization of the SIT

Fig. 1. Sampling regions and locations of Cydia pomonella in Hexi Corridor of China. (I) map of China, the Hexi Corridor is indicated in the dash box; (II) enlarged map of Hexi Corridor, the 2 sampling regions are indicated as (A) Jiuquan region and (B) Zhangye region; (III) enlarged map of the sampling regions and sampling locations. The sampling locations includes JinTa (JJT), YinDa (JYD), XiDong (JXD), and ZongZai (JZZ) of the Jiuquan Region, and Luo Tuocheng (ZLT), NiJiaying (ZNJ), MinYong (ZMY) and XiaoMan (ZXM) of the Zhangye Region.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in Limited gene flow among Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in two isolated regions in China: Implications for utilization of the SIT

Fig. 2. Bayesian clustering analysis by use of STRUCTURE, which indicates the presence of 2 clusters. Proportion of membership coefficient for 8 Cydia pomonella populations falling into the 2 clusters is depicted by 2 different shades of gray, respectively. The sampling locations include JinTa (JJT), YinDa (JYD), XiDong (JXD) and ZongZai (JZZ) of Jiuquan Region, and Luo Tuocheng (ZLT), NiJiaying (ZNJ), MinYong (ZMY) and XiaoMan (ZXM) of Zhangye Region.

Fig. 4 in Myxosporean parasites in Australian frogs: Importance, implications and future directions

Fig. 4. Hypothetical life cycle and transmission routes of Cystodiscus species. Understanding of the life cycle and timing of infection will provide invaluable information to wildlife disease managers to mitigate the impact of myxosporean parasite. The majority of myxosporean parasite life cycles alternate between a vertebrate host and an invertebrate host, in the case of Cystodiscus it is frogs and an unknown invertebrate (green box) (1). The vertebrate host sheds myxospores (grey square, right) that infect an invertebrate host that produces actinospores (grey square, left) (2). Actinospores are the infective stages for vertebrate hosts (frogs). It is unknown at what stage of development amphibians are susceptible to infection (3), Cystodiscus spp. have been found in both tadpoles and adults. It is possible that spawn, tadpole, metamorph or an adult frog can be infected by actinospores (red arrows, green outlined square). It is unknown if infection can be shed during development or if it is passed on during metamorphosis or spawning (blue arrows, green outlined square).

Fig. 2 in Myxosporean parasites in Australian frogs: Importance, implications and future directions

Fig. 2. Emergence of Cystodiscus parasites across eastern Australia from 1960–2011. All locations (red square) represent records for Cystodiscus spp. from one or more frogs. Both published and unpublished data were used to compile the distribution map (Delvinquier, 1986; Hartigan et al., 2010;, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d; Supplementary Table 1). The data are split into 1960–1990 (A) and 1991–2011 (B) to show recent records in western New South Wales and South Australia.

Fig. 1 in Myxosporean parasites in Australian frogs: Importance, implications and future directions

Fig. 1. Summary of myxosporean parasites recorded in Australian frogs. The frog species are sorted according to IUCN Red List conservation status [http:// www.iucnredlist.org/], note, the Cane toad (Rhinella marina) is listed as exotic pest species introduced to Australia in 1935. Myxosporean frog host species belong to three out of five frog families present in Australia; genus Litoria (family Hylidae), Limnodynastes (family Myobatrachidae) and Rhinella (family Bufonidae). Distribution for each species in Australia (black) is shown according to Frogs Australia [www.frogs.org.au]. Myxosporean development and myxospores are shown as column under each frog species. For Cystodiscus species either brain (CNS) or liver development is shown in form of a histological section and line drawing of myxospore. Spore measurements according to Hartigan et al. 2012b for C. australis 15·0–18·0 × 8·0–10·0 µm, for C. axonis 13·0–15·0 × 8·0–10·0 µm. For Myxobolus species gonad development is shown in form of a histological section and line drawing of myxospore. Absence of a record of development or myxospores is shown as – not known. Presence of myxospores, but absence of a record of development is shown as – likely (not seen). Development of M. hylae has been published by (Johnston and Bancroft (1918) and (Berger, 2001. Diseases in Australian frogs. PhD thesis, James Cook University, Townsville), but not recorded by authors during 2007–2011. M. fallax spore measurements according to Browne et al. 2002 12.6–14.6 × 8.3–10.6 µm (no noticeable variation between fresh and formalin fixed material). M. hylae myxospores according to Johnston and Bancroft (1918) measured 8–10 × 7–8 µm. L. lesueuri, L. raniformis and L. castanea photos courtesy of David Hunter.

Fig. 3 in Myxosporean parasites in Australian frogs: Importance, implications and future directions

Fig. 3. Cystodiscus species and Myxobolus species of frogs. Worldwide records of described Cystodiscus species (blue) based on gallbladder myxospores and Myxobolus species (orange) based on myxospores in gonad of amphibians. Note: Only descriptions down to species level are included, i.e., Myxobolus sp. are not included.

Fig. 3 in Mitophylogeny of Pangasiid Catfishes and its Taxonomic Implications for Pangasiidae and the Suborder Siluroidei.

Fig. 3. Detailed PhyML-phylogeny based on the analysis of the partial cox1 sequences (551 bp) showing the detailed relationships of the family Pangasiidae and related families (Austroglanididae, Ictaluridae, and Cranoglanididae). In total, 83 sequences, including 81 from Pangasius and Pangasianodon and 2 outgroup sequences from the order Gymnotiformes, were included (Table S3). The alignment was performed by MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013), curated by BMGE v1.12 (Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010), the tree was reconstructed in PhyML 3.3 (Guindon et al. 2010) using a maximum likelihood method and 1000 bootstrap resamplings, and the output Newick tree was extracted and visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018). The basal nodes of the Pangasiidae and two sister groups (Pangasianodon and (Pangasius + Helicophagus + Pseudolais)) are shown by arrows. The Pangasius mekongensis, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, and Pangasius krempfi sequences in this study are bolded. The taxonmisidentified sequences were added with a question mark at the end. The taxa from Pangasiidae were shortened and those from other related families were presented with their full names. The abbreviations of the isolates are given in brackets, including the geographical origin or voucher records of each sequenced specimen (where available), which were retrieved from the previous studies (Karinthanyakit and Jondeung 2012; Tran and Duong 2019; Schedel et al. 2022). The country of origin or where the sample was reported is given in full or in brackets, if available. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence label. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 2 in Mitophylogeny of Pangasiid Catfishes and its Taxonomic Implications for Pangasiidae and the Suborder Siluroidei.

Fig. 2. PhyML-phylogeny of the order Siluriformes, including 32 catfish families (117 sequences) of three suborders, Siluroidei, Loricarioidei, and Diplomystoidei based on the complete concatenated nucleotide sequences of all 13 mitochondrial protein coding genes (about 11,408 bp in length) (Table S2). Two sequences of Gonorynchiformes were used as an outgroup. The alignment was performed by MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013), curated by BMGE v1.12 (Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010), the tree was reconstructed in PhyML 3.3 (Guindon et al. 2010) using a maximum likelihood method and 1000 bootstrap resamplings, and the output Newick tree was extracted and visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018). The nodal bootstrap support values (shown at each node) were interpreted from the concurrently constructed tree using the above MAFFT-BMGE alignment by MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). The basal nodes of the three suborders (Diplomystoidei, Loricarioidei, and Siluroidei) as well as the two major "Big Asia" and "Big Africa" groups (background highlighted) are shown by arrows. The Pangasius mekongensis, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, and Pangasius krempfi sequences in this study are indicated by stars and with the associated families' background highlighted. The taxa were presented with their full names. The abbreviations of the isolates are given in brackets, including the geographical origin or voucher records of each sequenced specimen (where available), which were retrieved from the previous studies (Saitoh et al. 2003; Nakatani et al. 2011; Kappas et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2021; Schedel et al. 2022). The country of origin or geographical regions where the sample was reported are given in full name, if available. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence label. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 1. A in Mitophylogeny of Pangasiid Catfishes and its Taxonomic Implications for Pangasiidae and the Suborder Siluroidei.

Fig. 1. A schematic circular map of the mitochondrial genome of three Mekong River pangasiid catfishes catfishes in Vietnam, Pangasius mekongensis, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, and Pangasius krempfi, and the OL origin site of the light (L) strand's replication. A, The circular map and gene abbreviations were generated by the MitoAnnotator software in the MitoFish database (http://mitofish.aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/annotation/ input.html). Protein-coding genes (PCGs) are denoted by two capital letters or full names, and transfer RNA genes (tRNAs) are marked with threeletter amino-acid abbreviations. The heavy (H) strand is indicated by the outer line of the circle and the light (L) strand by the inner line. The D-loop (control region) is located between tRNAPro and tRNAPhe. The pangasiid photos were taken by the authors from the naturally caught fish on site. B, A schematic presentation of the stem-loop secondary structure of the OL origin site in mitogenomes of three pangasiid species based on the RNAfold predicted structure with the lowest free energy (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi). On the L-strand, between the two flanking tRNAs (trnN (c) and trnC (c)), there is a conserved stem (hairpin) formed by 9-nucleotide (nt) base-pairing and ending with a loop of 9 nt (in Pmek and Phyp) and 10 nt (in Pkre).

Fig. 4 in Mitophylogeny of Pangasiid Catfishes and its Taxonomic Implications for Pangasiidae and the Suborder Siluroidei.

Fig. 4. Detailed PhyML-phylogeny based on the analysis of the partial cytB sequences (634 bp) showing the detailed relationships of the family Pangasiidae and related families (Austroglanididae, Ictaluridae, and Cranoglanididae). In total, 80 sequences, including 78 from Pangasius and Pangasianodon and 2 outgroup sequences from the order Clupeiformes, were included (Table S3). The alignment was performed by MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013), curated by BMGE v1.12 (Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010), the tree was reconstructed in PhyML 3.3 (Guindon et al. 2010) using a maximum likelihood method and 1000 bootstrap resamplings, and the output Newick tree was extracted and visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018). The basal nodes of the Pangasiidae and two sister groups (Pangasianodon and (Pangasius + Helicophagus + Pseudolais)) are shown by arrows. The Pangasius mekongensis, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, and Pangasius krempfi sequences in this study are bolded. The taxonmisidentified sequences were added with a question mark at the end. The taxa from Pangasiidae were shortened and those from other related families were presented with their full names. The abbreviations of the isolates are given in brackets, including the geographical origin or voucher records of each sequenced specimen (where available), which were retrieved from the previous studies. The country of origin or where the sample was reported is given in full or in brackets, if available. Accession numbers are given at the end of each sequence label. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 6 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 6. Termination-associated sequences (TAS), conserved sequence blocks (CSB-1, CSB-2, and CSB-3) and central conserved sequences (CSB-D) and GTGGG box in control region of two Oxyurichthys species mitogenomes.

Fig. 8 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 8. Phylogenetic trees of goby derived from Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on 13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs. The numbers at nodes are ultrafast bootstrap values. GenBank accession numbers are placed in front of species names.

Fig. 7 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 7. Phylogenetic trees of goby derived from Bayesian Inference (BI) method based on 13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs. The numbers at nodes are posterior probability values. GenBank accession numbers are placed in front of species names.

Fig. 5 in Comparative Analysis of Complete Mitogenomes of Two Gobies and Their Phylogenetic Implication.

Fig. 5. The putative origin of L-strand replication (OL) of Oxyurichthys ophthalmonema (a) and Oxyurichthys microlepis (b).

Fig. 2 in Molecular Identification, Fatty Acid Profile and Trace Elements in a Stranded Fin Whale in Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia): Implications on Migration Routes and Trophic Ecology of Southern Fin Whales.

Fig. 2. (a) The phylogenetic tree showing the stranded baleen whale (Baleen whale KP/Sabah/02082012) clustered together with the fin whale Balaenoptera physalus (U13103, Z18633 and X61145). (b) The phylogenetic analysis of the cytochrome b gene sequence indicating that the stranded fin whale (Baleen whale KP/Sabah/02082012) is closely related to the specimen of fin whales from the southern hemisphere with accession number KC572845, which represents Balaenoptera physalus quoi.

Fig. 1 in Molecular Identification, Fatty Acid Profile and Trace Elements in a Stranded Fin Whale in Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia): Implications on Migration Routes and Trophic Ecology of Southern Fin Whales.

Fig. 1. Stranding site (red-filled triangle) of the fin whale at the Sitompok River (Lat. 05°34'672"N; Long.115°39'710"E) near Kuala Penyu (KP), a coastal town overlooking the South China Sea on the western shores of Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia) (inset map). The approximate location of the sighting of possible fin whales reported by De Boer (2000) is marked with a blue-filled circle. The distribution ranges of rorquals species, including fin whales, in the Philippine waters reported by Slijper et al. (1964) and Acebes (2014) are marked with green-filled circles. The locations of fin whales' migration ranges in Australian waters according to Aulich et al. (2019) are shown using red-filled circles. The stranding site of the unconfirmed fin whale species at Pulau Sugi (Junge 1950) is indicated by a yellow-filled circle.

Fig. 4 in Molecular Identification, Fatty Acid Profile and Trace Elements in a Stranded Fin Whale in Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia): Implications on Migration Routes and Trophic Ecology of Southern Fin Whales.

Fig. 4. (a) Concentrations of trace elements (Mean ± SD) in the skin and blubber of the southern fin whale recorded in the present study compared to (b) the concentrations of trace elements in the skin of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) extracted from the results of Martino et al. (2013).

Fig. 3 in Molecular Identification, Fatty Acid Profile and Trace Elements in a Stranded Fin Whale in Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia): Implications on Migration Routes and Trophic Ecology of Southern Fin Whales.

Fig. 3. Comparison of the percentages of fatty acid profiles for (a) SFA, (b) MUFA and (c) PUFA in the tissues of adult male (M) and female (F) southern humpback whales during the early and late migrations extracted from the results of Waugh et al. (2012), epipelagic and mesopelagic (i.e., average) fish in the South China Sea (SCS) extracted from the supplementary data of Wang et al. (2019) and the southern fin whale in the present study.