Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 7. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 7. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87, detail of the anatomy in the region of the anal tentacle and suprabranchial cavity. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 21. Limatula smithi. Sta. 191 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 21. Limatula smithi. Sta. 191, inner view of left mantle margin to show disposition of the tentacles and papillae. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 22 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 22. Limatula celtica. Sta. Incal DS16, lateral view of shell from the left side. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 3. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 3. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87, (a) internal view of the hinge of a left valve; (b) dorsal veiw of a shell to show external detail of the hinge. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 14 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 14. Limatula margaretae. (a) Sta. 318, dorsal view of shell; (b) Sta. Incal OS05, internal view of hinge of right valve. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 5. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 5. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87, posterior view of the anatomy of a juvenile specimen with the shell removed. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 16 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 16. Limatula margaretae. Sta. Incal OS05, semi-diagrammatic drawing of the right mantle margin. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 9 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 9. Limatula subovata. Population size histograms of four stations from which w 100 specimens were collected.

FIG. 20. Limatula smithi. Sta. 189 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 20. Limatula smithi. Sta. 189, semi-diagrammatic view of the anatomy from the right side. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 15 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 15. Limatula margaretae. Sta. Incal OS05, lateral view of the foot from the right side to show the position and extent of the pedal glands. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 4. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 4. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87, semi-diagrammatic drawing of a partially opened shell to show the arrangement of the tentacles on the mantle margin. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 8. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 8. Limatula subovata. Sta. 87, semi-digrammatic drawing to show the disposition of the major ganglia and their commissures. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 11. Limatula louiseae. Sta. 331 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 11. Limatula louiseae. Sta. 331, (a) internal view of the hinge of a right valve; (b) dorsal view of a shell—note holes (black) in shell at position of the prodissoconchs. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

FIG. 13 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 13. Limatula margaretae. Sta. BGIV DS57, lateral view of a shell from the right side. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIG. 12. Limatula louiseae. Sta. 331 in The Recent species of the genera Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea) present in the Atlantic, with particular reference to those in deep water

FIG. 12. Limatula louiseae. Sta. 331, semi-diagrammatic drawing of the anatomy from the left side. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 6 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Figure 6. Snout–vent length (SVL, expressed in millimetres) amongst individuals of all the species of the Liolaemus archeforus, Liolaemus kingii, Liolaemus lineomaculatus, and Liolaemus magellanicus groups. Female data are shown in white and male in grey.

Figure 4 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Figure 4. Number of midbody scales amongst individuals of the Liolaemus archeforus, Liolaemus kingii, Liolaemus lineomaculatus, and Liolaemus magellanicus groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the L. kingii and L. archeforus groups. Female data are shown in white and male in grey.

Figure 3 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Figure 3. Pictures of dorsal scales of all the species belonging to the Liolaemus archeforus, Liolaemus kingii, Liolaemus lineomaculatus, and Liolaemus magellanicus groups. Squares are 1 cm2. No differences or trends can be observed between scales of the species included in the L. kingii and L. archeforus groups.

Figure 2 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships hypothesized for the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section using nuclear (nu) and/or mitochondrial (mt) genes; A, species tree inferred using mt and nu genes by Breitman et al. (2011a); posterior probability (Pp) values higher than 0.5 are shown, bold branches show clades with Pp> 0.95; B, Bayesian tree, representing concatenated analyses and summarizing information from maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods from Breitman et al. (2011a); nodes with high support from three methods (MP jack-knife and ML bootstrap> 0.70; Pp> 0.95) are identified by bold branches; open squares show nodes with weak MP support, and circles nodes with weak MP and ML support; C, ML tree recovered using mt genes by Schulte & Moreno-Roark (2010).

Figure 5 in Past and present taxonomy of the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Liolaemidae): is the morphological arrangement hypothesis valid?

Figure 5. Snout–vent length (SVL, expressed in millimetres) amongst individuals of the Liolaemus archeforus, Liolaemus kingii, Liolaemus lineomaculatus, and Liolaemus magellanicus groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the L. kingii and L. archeforus groups. Female data are shown in white and males in grey.