Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in Mitochondrial DNA variation and the evolutionary history of the Mediterranean species of Cicada L. (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea)

Figure 4. Minimum spanning network for Cicada in the Mediterranean area, based on 12S rRNA gene haplotypes (HCo, C. orni haplogroup; HCm, C. mordoganensis haplogroup; HCc, C. cretensis haplogroup; HCl, C. lodosi and HCb, C. barbara haplogroup). The size of the circles representing each haplotype is proportional to the number of specimens showing that particular haplotype; colours are representative of the locality.

Figure 3 in Mitochondrial DNA variation and the evolutionary history of the Mediterranean species of Cicada L. (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea)

Figure 3. Frequencies of transitions and transversions over K81 sequence divergences obtained among Cicada specimens for (A) the total length of 12S rRNA sequences, (B) loop regions based on the secondary structure of the 12S rRNA gene sequences and (C) stem regions based on the secondary structure of the 12S rRNA gene.

Figure 1 in Mitochondrial DNA variation and the evolutionary history of the Mediterranean species of Cicada L. (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea)

Figure 1. Collection sites of the Cicada specimens analysed in the Mediterranean region: inserts are given for Portugal and Greece, where most sites were sampled.

Figure 6 in Mitochondrial DNA variation and the evolutionary history of the Mediterranean species of Cicada L. (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea)

Figure 6. Post-glacial colonization routes of Cicada orni (black arrow) and C. barbara (crosshatched arrow) in Europe (top map) and distribution of Cicada haplotypes in the Aegean area (map below). Pie charts represent the proportion of each haplotype in each locality. Hatched circle surrounds C. orni haplotypes, grey circle groups C. mordoganensis and crosshatched circle groups C. cretensis. Smaller black circles highlight populational substructure within C. orni.

Figure 5 in Mitochondrial DNA variation and the evolutionary history of the Mediterranean species of Cicada L. (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea)

Figure 5. Neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree [the maximum likelihood (ML) consensus tree had the same topology and is not shown) obtained for Cicada in the Mediterranean area, based on 12S rRNA gene haplotypes. Two hundred bootstrap replicates for the ML tree and 1000 for the NJ tree were performed to assess the statistical significance of internal nodes (only bootstrap values> 50% are shown, ML bootstrap values followed by the NJ ones). For each clade, an oscillogram (time vs. amplitude) of the calling song of one male of C. orni, C. mordoganensis, C. cretensis, C. lodosi and C. barbara is shown. A locality code follows the haplotype: WE, Western Europe (including most Iberian Peninsula and France specimens but also Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia); IP, Iberian Peninsula; Gc, Greece continental – in all other codes the last letter stands for country: P, Portugal; S, Spain; M, Morocco; F, France; G, Greece; C, Crete; T, Turkey; and the first letter(s) stands for locality: M, Monforte; SH, St. Hippolyte; P, Portel; C, Caparica; L, Lisbon; Le, Lesbos; Sk Skyros; Cr, Crato; Ki, Kithira; N, Naxos; S, Samos; R, Rhodes; K, Kos; H, Heraklion; G, Gordes; Mè, Mèknes; Se, Sevilla; F, Fès; Mo, Moura; T, Toledo; A, Alcalar; FC, Foz Côa.

FIG. 9. — Taphura maculata n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 9. — Taphura maculata n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, paratype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 8. — Taphura egeri n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 8. — Taphura egeri n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 7. — Taphura boulardi n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 7. — Taphura boulardi n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, paratype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, paratype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 5. — Carineta quinimaculata n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 5. — Carineta quinimaculata n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, paratype ♂ operculum; E, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C-F, 1 mm.

FIG. 6. — Selymbria danieleae n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 6. — Selymbria danieleae n. sp.: A, holotype ♀ and paratype ♂ habitus; B, holotype ♀ dorsum; C, paratype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♀ operculum; E, paratype ♂ operculum; F, holotype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype ♀ ventral view of genitalia; H, paratype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♂ posterior view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 4. — Carineta modesta n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 4. — Carineta modesta n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 3. — Carineta guianaensis n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 3. — Carineta guianaensis n. sp.: A, holotype ♂; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, holotype ♂ operculum; E, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C-F, 1 mm.

FIG. 2. — Carineta apicoinfuscata n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 2. — Carineta apicoinfuscata n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal; D, paratype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, holotype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B-E, 2 mm; F-I, 1 mm.

FIG. 1. — Hyantia bahlenhorsti n in Checklist of the cicadas of French Guiana including new records and the description of nine new species (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadoidea, Cicadidae)

FIG. 1. — Hyantia bahlenhorsti n. sp.: A, holotype ♂ and paratype ♀ habitus; B, holotype ♂ dorsum; C, holotype ♂ timbal cover; D, paratype ♂ operculum; E, paratype ♀ operculum; F, paratype ♂ lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype ♂ posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype ♀ lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype ♀ ventral view of genitalia. Scale bars: A, 2 cm; B-E, 2 mm; F-I, 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in La cigale grise Cicada orni Linnaeus, 1758, une espèce récente dans le canton de Genève (Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

Fig. 3. Répartition de la cigale grise Cicada orni dans le canton de Genève (en gris foncé apparaissent les zones urbanisées, chaque point représente un mâle changeur observé).

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in La cigale grise Cicada orni Linnaeus, 1758, une espèce récente dans le canton de Genève (Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

Fig. 2. Distribution de la cigale grise Cicada orni en Suisse (Hertach & Nagel 2013, Revue Suisse de Zoologie).

Fig. 59 in An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna

Fig. 59 (continued on facing page). One of the 634 most parsimonious trees showing names of transformations for basal nodes. These nodes and characters transformations are identical for all 634 trees. Numbered nodes relate to discussion in the text. Proposed families and subfamilies are named at their respective nodes. Black bars = nonhomoplasious forward change; grey bars = homoplasious forward change; white bars = reversal (whether homoplasious or not). Numbered nodes refer to discussion in text.

Fig. 60. Character transformations within clade 4 in An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna

Fig. 60. Character transformations within clade 4 of the same tree shown in Fig. 59. Numbered nodes relate to discussion in the text. Note that resolution within this clade differs little from the strict consensus tree shown in Fig. 56. Tribal groupings are those proposed under this study. Black bars = non-homoplasious forward change; grey bars = homoplasious forward change; white bars = reversal (whether homoplasious or not).

Fig. 58 in An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna

Fig. 58. Strict consensus tree showing current tribal placements for genera, together with their proposed tribal placements under the revised classifications derived from this study. Numbered nodes are those referred to in the text.

Fig. 62. Character transformations within clade 13 in An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna

Fig. 62. Character transformations within clade 13 of the same tree shown in Fig. 59. Note that resolution within this clade differs little from the strict consensus tree shown in Fig. 56. Numbered nodes relate to discussion in the text. The tribal grouping is that proposed under this study. Black bars = nonhomoplasious forward change; grey bars = homoplasious forward change; white bars = reversal (whether homoplasious or not).