Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 11 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 11. Cover of Michener's 1954 treatise on the bee fauna of Panama. Much of the material which formed the basis for this monograph was collected while Mich was deployed to the Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, Panama during the mid-1940s and engaged in work for the U.S. Army. Mich's time in Panama was his first major experience working with a tropical bee fauna and he was greatly aided by advice and identifications from the late Padre Jesus S. Moure (1912–2010), among others.

Figure 31 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 31. Michener in the bee collection at the University of Kansas in 1986 (photograph courtesy of the University Archives, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas).

Figure 22 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 22. Michener in his Snow Hall office in 1982 (photograph courtesy of the University Archives, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas).

Figure 17 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 17. Michener at work photographing bee specimens in Snow Hall, 1962 (photograph courtesy of the University Archives, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas).

Figure 25. Charles D. Michener and Alexandr P in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 25. Charles D. Michener and Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn outside of Snow Hall, 7 November 1989, and during the time in which they worked on the fossil bumble bee, Bombus vetustus Rasnitsyn & Michener (photograph by George W. Byers).

Figure 21 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 21. The cover of Mich's extraordinarily influential, The Social Behavior of the Bees (1974, Harvard University Press). Born of the era in which the foundations of sociobology were set in place (e.g., Wilson, 1975), this book distilled all of what was known regarding the social organization and evolution of societies among bees. It was a particularly powerful text when placed against the backdrop of seminal works that had appeared around the same time on termites (Krishna & Weesner, 1969, 1970) and on social insects in general (Wilson, 1971). It remains unrivaled to this day and immensely relevant. A companion book on the biology and behavior of solitary bees was discussed, according to documents in the University of Kansas Archives, but never undertaken.

Figures 9–10 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figures 9–10. Prominent works marking Michener's entry into the study of behavior. 9. The cover of American Social Insects (1951, van Nostrand), coauthored with his wife, Mary H. Michener (1919–2010). 10. The first page of Mich's 1953 paper discussing the evolution of sociality in insects (courtesy of the Kansas Academy of Science).

Figure 20 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 20. Michener in his office in 1974, depicted with a line drawing of an allodapine bee's wings (photograph courtesy of the University Archives, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas).

Figures 1–2 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figures 1–2. The unchanging face of Mich over four decades (photographs by George W. Byers). 1. On the steps outside of Snow Hall, University of Kansas, 14 July 1956. 2. In the 'new' wing of Snow Hall, 22 September 1998 (Mich's 80th birthday).

Figure 13. Padre Jesus S in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 13. Padre Jesus S. Moure (1912–2010) and Michener outside of Snow Hall, 14 July 1956 (photograph by George W. Byers).

Figure 14. A in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 14. A triumvirate of bee systematists at the 10th International Congress of Entomology, Montreal, Canada, 20 August 1956. Vladimir V. Popov (1902–1960) at left, Michener at center, and Padre Jesus S. Moure (1912–2010) at right (photograph by George W. Byers).

Figure 6 in The bibliography of and taxa proposed by Charles D. Michener

Figure 6. Michener in New Jersey in 1946 and during his time as Assistant Curator in charge of the Lepidoptera in the Department of Insects and Spiders at the American Museum of Natural History. Although his responsibility was for the Lepidoptera, and he would ultimately publish several important papers including a tremendous monograph of the Saturniidae, his work on bees continued unabated (photograph courtesy of the University Archives, Kenneth Spencer Research Library, University of Kansas).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Figure 2 in A proposed best practice approach to overcome unverified and unverifiable "first records" in ichthyology

Figure 2. - Locations of the occurrences of Lobotes surinamensis in the Adriatic Sea. 1: Dulčić & Dragičević, 2011; 2: Valter Kožul, pers. com.; 3: this paper).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Supplementary Data for Publication related to NFFA proposal ID-509

<p>This is supplementary data for the publication "Ordered Transfer from 3D-Oriented MOF Superstructures to Polymeric Films: Microfabrication, Enhanced Chemical Stability, and Anisotropic Fluorescent Patterns", DOI: 10.1002/adma.202404384, related to the NFFA proposal ID-509. </p>

Fig. 4 in Hyaloklossia Labb´e, 1896 (Alveolata: Apicomplexa) in frogs: Description of a new species and proposing a new subfamily to accommodate these enigmatic parasites

Fig. 4. Mature sporocysts of Hyaloklossia in the kidney of Pelophylax porosus porosus. (A) Light microscopy of a mature sporocyst in homogenized kidney tissue. (B) Nomarski interference contrast microscopy of a mature sporocyst in squash preparation of renal tubular tissue showing the presence of four spindle-shaped sporozoites. (C) Composite line drawing. Bar = 10 μm. Asterisk: sporocyst residuum.

Fig. 3 in Hyaloklossia Labb´e, 1896 (Alveolata: Apicomplexa) in frogs: Description of a new species and proposing a new subfamily to accommodate these enigmatic parasites

Fig. 3. Light microscopy of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of renal tissues of Pelophylax porosus porosus. (A) Mature sporocysts in the renal interstitium. Arrows indicate the transverse section of sporocysts showing four sporozoites with nuclei and a granular sporocyst residuum. (B and C) Immature oocysts. Note the very thin oocyst wall (arrows), sporonts with granular cytoplasm, and nuclei distributed at the cell margin (arrowheads). (D) Immature oocysts with two sporoblasts each and containing two polar nuclei (arrowheads). (E) Mature oocysts in renal epithelial cell showing two sporocysts with elongated sporozoites with circular nuclei (arrowhead) and a granular sporocyst residuum. Arrows indicate the sporocyst wall. Bars = 50 μm (A) and 10 μm (B–E).

Fig. 2 in Hyaloklossia Labb´e, 1896 (Alveolata: Apicomplexa) in frogs: Description of a new species and proposing a new subfamily to accommodate these enigmatic parasites

Fig. 2. Light microscopy of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of renal tissue of Pelophylax porosus porosus. Hyaloklossia sporocysts and/or oocysts congregated in a diffused manner in the renal interstitium (circles), and some were found solitarily in renal epithelial cells or in the lumen (arrowheads). Bar = 200 μm. A highresolution version of this slide for use with the Virtual Microscope is available as eSlide: VM06312.

Fig. 5 in Hyaloklossia Labb´e, 1896 (Alveolata: Apicomplexa) in frogs: Description of a new species and proposing a new subfamily to accommodate these enigmatic parasites

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic trees of coccidian parasites belonging to the subfamilies Toxoplasmatinae, Eumonosporinae, and Cystoisosporinae and related taxa using 18S (A), 28S (B), and cox1 (C) sequence data. Sarcocystis rileyi (Sarcocystidae: Sarcocytinae) was used as an outgroup. The nodes are labeled using support from the bootstrap values obtained for neighbor joining (left) and maximum likelihood (right) methods. The unlabeled nodes and hyphens indicate support <50. Scale bars represent the substitutions per site.

Fig. 1 in Hyaloklossia Labb´e, 1896 (Alveolata: Apicomplexa) in frogs: Description of a new species and proposing a new subfamily to accommodate these enigmatic parasites

Fig. 1. Light microscopy of Hyaloklossia sporocysts in the kidney of Pelophylax porosus porosus. (A) Mature sporocysts within a cyst-like structure are visible in the renal interstitium. (B) Squash preparation of kidney showing numerous immature sporocysts. Note the granular cytoplasm of the sporoblasts (sporonts) and the barely visible membrane surrounding them. (C) A sporocyst (arrowhead) in the renal endothelial cell. (D) Mature oocyst (arrowhead) with two sporocysts in the renal endothelial cell. Asterisk indicates renal tubules. Bars = 25 μm.