Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 6 in Gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory endoparasites in the wild felid guigna (Leopardus guigna) in Chile: Richness increases with latitude and first records for the host species

Fig. 6. Distribution of parasite infection intensity (total number of helminths per guigna) in the analyzed guignas from Chile.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Cardiopulmonary nematodes of wild carnivores from Denmark: Do they serve as reservoir hosts for infections in domestic animals?

Fig. 1. Map of Denmark showing Denmark's position in Europe and a map of Denmark showing the regional division and the four major cities.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 4 in Gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory endoparasites in the wild felid guigna (Leopardus guigna) in Chile: Richness increases with latitude and first records for the host species

Fig. 4. Richness of gastrointestinal parasites in guignas from Chile, compared (a) by geographic zone and (b) by sex. p values show the statistical significance in the Mann-Whitney U test between (a) center-south and (b) females-males.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Arthropod parasites of Antarctic and Subantarctic birds and pinnipeds: A review of host-parasite associations

Fig. 1. Sub-areas of the Antarctic region. Legend: AAP = Antarctic Peninsula (including South Shetland Islands and Palmer Archipelago), AWS = Antarctica Weddell Sea sector, AAT = Antarctica Atlantic Ocean sector (including Bouvet Island), AIW = Antarctica Indian Ocean West sector, AIE = Antarctica Indian Ocean East sector, ARS = Antarctica Ross Sea sector (including Scott and Balleny Islands), APW = Antarctica Pacific Ocean West sector, APE = Antarctica Pacific Ocean East sector (including Peter I Island), SOI = South Orkney Island, SGI = South Georgia Island, SSI = South Sandwich Islands, PEI = Prince Edward Islands, CRI = Crozet Islands, KEI = Kerguelen Islands, HMI = Heard and McDonald Islands. The Antarctic Polar Front was drawn from Moore et al. (1999).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Figure 2. Host plant. A in Bioecological aspects of Cynea (Cynea) diluta (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae)

Figure 2. Host plant. A. Tussock of Alpinia purpurata (Vieill.) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae). B-C. Shelters built by the late instar larvae of Cynea (Cynea) diluta (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869). / Figura 2. Planta huésped. A. Mata de Alpinia purpurata (Vieill.) K. Schum. (Zingiberaceae). B-C. Refugios construidos por las larvas de último estadio de Cynea (Cynea) diluta (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Figure 2. Oiketicus kirby.a. Basket-shaped bag. b in Living inside baskets: a new fruit tree host for Oiketicus kirbyi Guilding, 1927 (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) in Brazil

Figure 2. Oiketicus kirby.a. Basket-shaped bag. b. Dorsal view of larva. c. General view of Jabuticabeira tree. d. Immature Jabuticabeira fruit being eaten by O. kirbyi larva. / Figura 2. Oiketicus kirby. a. Capullo. b. Vista dorsal de la larva de Oiketicus kirbyi. c. Vista general del árbol de Jabuticabeira. d. Fruto inmaduro de Jabuticabeira siendo comido por la larva de O. kirbyi.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Impact of host plant resistance on emergence, body parameters, and supercooling point of Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Coleoptera: Brentidae)

Fig. 1. Daily (Mean ± SE) sweetpotato weevil emergence 30 d afer oviposition from individual storage roots of sweetpotato cultivars 'Beauregard,' 'Evangeline,' and 'Murasaki.'

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Oviposition by Copitarsia decolora Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on and near the host plant

Fig. 1. Number of eggs (mean ± SEM) of paired females of C. decolora on and near the host plant. Different letters indicate mean values significantly different at P <0.05 (Tukey), n = 12.

Fig. 5 in Host associations of gall-inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: implications for its use as a biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Fig. 5. Susceptibility of Jatropha gossypiifolia to Prodiplosis longifila. Morphologically similar galls induced on control Jatropha clavuligera (A) and Jatropha gossypiifolia (B) plants under no-choice conditions in quarantine in Pretoria, South Africa. Galling on a transplanted Jatropha gossypiifolia plant under the natural field conditions in Bolivia (C).

Fig. 4 in Host associations of gall-inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: implications for its use as a biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Fig. 4. Relationship between the number of branches per plant and number of shoot tips with Prodiplosis longifila galls (A) and percentage of shoots (± SE) with Prodiplosis longifila galls (B) across 3 sites in Bolivia in Feb 2016. Different letters above SE bars indicate significant differences (Tukey's test, P <0.001).

Fig. 3 in Host associations of gall-inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: implications for its use as a biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Fig. 3. Incidence of Prodiplosis longifila galls on Jatropha clavuligera (percentage of plants with galls) in relation to (A) sites and (B) sampling yr and season (± SE). Different letters above SE bars indicate significant differences (Tukey's test, P <0.001).

Fig. 1 in Host associations of gall-inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: implications for its use as a biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Fig. 1. Rosette galls induced by Prodiplosis longifila in the growing shoot tip of Jatropha clavuligera. (A) Rosette gall in the terminal and axillary buds of Jatropha clavuligera with swollen petiole and rachis and malformed leaves. (B) Young gall in Jatropha clavuligera showing early stage larvae feeding on the nutritive tissue of the gall with no evidence of cell necrosis and fungal growth.

Fig. 2 in Host associations of gall-inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: implications for its use as a biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)

Fig. 2. Morphological and histological changes in the rosette galls induced by Prodiplosis longifila on Jatropha clavuligera. (A) Vertical sectional view of a portion of the galled shoot showing the inflamed axillary position (*) (bar = 1 mm). (B) Cross sectional view of a portion of the galled shoot showing the hyperplasied stems and leaves (bar = 0.33 mm); * indicates the location where the larvae congregate; le = leaf. (C) Cross sectional view of a galled leaf showing the intense hyperplasied upper mesophyll (bar = 0.18 mm); arrows point to the hypertrophied epidermis. (D) Cross sectional view of a leaf axil (bar = 0.33 mm); * indicates the location where the larvae congregate; note the vertically dividing epidermal cells towards the bottom, whereas the laterally occurring epidermal cells are hypertrophied. (E) Cross sectional view of the stem showing variously dividing cortical cells (bar = 30 μm); the arrow indicates cell proliferation. (F) Compactly arranged parenchymatous nutritive cells, each with a prominent nucleus (n) and dense cytoplasm (cyt) (bar = 10 μm). (G) Low magnification image of galled stem showing layers of nutritive cells (nc), where the larvae feed (lfs) (bar = 30 μm). In fact, the cells lying opposite, which appear to be empty, show signs of regeneration (rc). In the far interior of the stem cortex, numerous phenol-included cells (pic) occur. Far interior into the stem cortex numerous phenol including cells (pic) occur. (H) An enlarged view of a phenol-including cell (bar = 18 μm).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Host range expansion and increasing damage potential of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Florida

Fig. 2. Relationships among host tree diameter, height above ground, and site of attack by Euwallacea nr. fornicatus. Density of beetle entrance holes versus the trunk or branch diameter (A) and the trunk or branch height (B) of host Lysiloma latisiliquum from 4 trees. Mean values topped by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's test, P = 0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Host range expansion and increasing damage potential of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Florida

Fig. 1. Ambrosia beetle gallery entrances in the trunk of a Lysiloma latisiliquum. Euwallacea nr. fornicatus and Theoborus ricini were the two most abundant species of ambrosia beetle recovered from L. latisiliquum.

Fig. 3 in Host range of the invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania

Fig. 3. Tuta absoluta-related damage in solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania. Damage values are averaged across all survey locations (see Table 1). Damage was quantified as the number of T. absoluta mines per leaf (A) and percentage of T. absoluta-damaged fruits (B) in 10 locations within each sampled field. Six to 12 fields were sampled per crop, and 1 to 3 fields per weed species (see Table 2). Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum; eggplant or aubergine, Solanum melongena; African (Afr.) eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum; African (Afr.) nightshades, Solanum nigrum and Solanum americanum; pepper, Capsicum annuum; and 3 weed species, Datura stramonium, Nicandra physalodes, and Solanum incanum.

Fig. 1 in Host range of the invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania

Fig. 1. Map of locations surveyed to determine host range and infestation level of Tuta absoluta in solanaceous crops and weeds in 2015. Four districts were targeted, each within the major tomato-producing regions of Tanzania. Within each district, 3 villages (indicated by black circles) were randomly selected for the survey (see Table 1).

Fig. 7 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 7. Comparison of 3 characteristic forms of damage: (a) hole and feces coming from inside the pad, useful to distinguish pads with Cactoblastis cactorum; (b) typical damage observed in plants that were attacked by C. cactorum; (c) circular black spot fungal damage; (d) map black spot fungal damage.

Fig. 6 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 6. Proportion of Cactoblastis cactorum infected cladodes parasitized by Apanteles opuntiarum and proportion per cladode of C. cactorum larvae parasitized by A. opuntiarum throughout the yr for sites from Santiago del Estero, Córdoba, and Tucumán provinces. The average and standard deviation of the number of pupae of A. opuntiarum per C. cactorum larvae also is shown.

Fig. 1 in Oviposition preference of rugose spiraling whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plant species

Fig. 1. Photo showing the cage arrangement. Six cages (1.83 × 1.83 × 1.83 m with 20 × 20 Mesh Lumite) were constructed in a shadehouse in a north-south row. Each cage had 5 potential host plants and a source plant containing adult whiteflies.