Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 3 in Afromelampsalta, a new genus, a new species, and five new combinations of African cicadettine cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadettinae)

FIGURE 3. Distributions of (○) Afromelampsalta luteofasciata n. gen., n. sp. and (●) Afromelampsalta mimica n. comb. Roads and town are marked in grey.

FIGURE 2. Afromelampsalta luteofasciata n. gen., n in Afromelampsalta, a new genus, a new species, and five new combinations of African cicadettine cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadettinae)

FIGURE 2. Afromelampsalta luteofasciata n. gen., n. sp.: A, paratype male; B, paratype male dorsum; C, paratype male fore femur; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype male lateral view of genitalia; F, paratype male posterior view of genitalia; G, paratype male timbal. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 2 mm; E–G, 1 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Afromelampsalta, a new genus, a new species, and five new combinations of African cicadettine cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadettinae)

FIGURE 1. Partial tree redrawn from the world Cicadettini phylogeny of Marshall et al. (2015a) illustrating the positions of several species previously classified in Melampsalta. The African species are produced in a distinct radiation separate from the clade that includes the type species of both Melampsalta and Cicadetta. Similarly, the Pauropsalta clade is derived entirely from Austalian species not included in this representation. The historic concept of Melampsalta, Cicadetta and Pauropsalta is polyphyletic and the African species should not be incorporated in these genera.

opennotspecifiedJan 2020View details →

FIG. 2 in Redescription of the cicada genus Pycna Amyot & Audinet-Serville, 1843 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadinae: Platypleurini) with the formation of two new genera, one new species, one revised species status and twenty-four new combinations

FIG. 2. Comparison of Pycna, Pycnoides n. gen., and Eopycna n. gen. male genitalia and timbal covers. A, male posterolateral view of genitalia of Pycna madagascarensis, note the large lateral uncus lobes; B, posterior view of Pycna madagascarensis male genitalia; C, Pycna madagascarensis timbal cover; D, male posterolateral view of genitalia of Pycnoides semiclara n. comb., note the enlargement near the distal lateral uncus lobes and large basal pygofer lobe; E, posterior view of Pycnoides semiclara n. comb. male genitalia; F, Pycnoides semiclara n. comb. timbal cover; G, male posterolateral view of genitalia of Eopycna repanda n. comb., note the lateral uncus lobes surround the aedeagus near the distal terminus; H, posterior view of Eopycna repanda n. comb. male genitalia; I, Eopycna repanda n. comb. timbal cover. Scale bar: A—I, 2 mm

FIGURE 7 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 7. Lateral view of pygofer (A) and dissected aedeagus (B) of Hovana distanti (MNHN). (bl) basal lobe; (db) dorsal beak; (un) uncus; (upl) upper pygofer lobe.

FIGURE 6 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 6. Effect of incorrect outgroup choice on inferred relationships and character polarity. The top tree is rooted on the true outgroup species A (the most distantly related taxon). The mapped character supports a monophyletic clade sharing state 2. In the bottom tree, taxon D from the first tree is incorrectly used as the outgroup, causing the earliest diverging lineages A, B, and C to form a false clade. The implied direction of character evolution is reversed, with state 2 now ancestral.

FIGURE 5 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 5. Combined-data Bayesian analysis of genetic and morphological characters for 11 genera possessing data for both character types, with posterior probabilities shown for all nodes. The tree is rooted manually at the position observed in the DNA-only analysis. Lacetas and Hemidictya do not form an exclusive monophyletic as predicted by the classification of Hemidictyini sensu Ruschel & Campos (2019).

FIGURE 2. A and B in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 2. A and B. Posterolateral and ventral views of upper pygofer and uncus of Sapantanga nutans holotype (NHM). C and D. Views of the pygofer in Hemidictya frondosa (Moulds coll.). In both taxa, an uncus projects ventrally from an origin at a medial position (1) on the 10th abdominal segment and then turns posteriorly. The dark brown theca (2) is nested between ventral supporting lobes (3) in the Sapantanga specimen and within a shallow channel (4) in the Hemidictya specimen. Spines (5) and/ or a blade-like process (6) are visible on the tip of the theca, which is only just visible just below the uncus in Sapantanga. The uncus is divided apically by only a slight notch (7) in Sapantanga but is deeply divided in Hemidictya (8).

FIGURE 4 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 4. Molecular systematic position of Hemidictya frondosa as a deep lineage belonging to the subfamily Tibicininae and unrelated to Lacetas (Tettigomyiinae), as indicated by maximum-likelihood analysis of the Cicadidae genetic dataset from Marshall et al. (2018) with Hemidictya and Derotettix mendosensis added (the latter from Simon et al., 2019). Current subfamilies and tribes are shown. Bootstrap supports from 200 pseudoreplicates are given for nodes with> 50% support. No supported differences from the 2018 tree were observed for the collapsed clades containing the remaining two subfamilies. Selymbria madredediosensis Sanborn, 2019 was identified as S. stigmatica in Marshall et al. (2018). Taxon authorships and specimen data for species not mentioned in the text here are found in Marshall et al. (2018).

FIGURE 3 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 3. Effect of outgroup choice on cladistic reconstruction of Cicadidae relationships. A. Cladogram from analysis in TNT using the Ruschel & Campos (2019) dataset with implied weighting and with Carineta diardi (Cicadettinae) chosen as outgroup, as described in their study. B. The same Ruschel & Campos dataset with Tibicina haematodes (Tibicininae) included and used as the outgroup. Tibicininae has been identified as the earliest-diverging subfamily in earlier morphological (Moulds 2005) and molecular genetic (Marshall et al. 2018) analyses. In the latter tree, Hemidictyini sensu Ruschel & Campos is no longer monophyletic and contains early diverging genera rather than species that originated from within Cicadettinae as implied by the tree in A. Monophyly of the subfamily Cicadettinae has been recovered as in previous studies.

FIGURE 1 in Redefinition of the cicada tribe Hemidictyini Distant, 1905, status of the tribe Iruanini Boulard, 1993 rev. stat., and the establishment of Hovanini n. tribe and Sapantangini n. tribe (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

FIGURE 1. Coloured drawings of specimens of Hovana distanti (Brancsik, 1893) and Hemidictya frondosa Burmeister, 1835, two examples of "leaf-winged" cicadas, with silhouette profiles for additional scale. Drawing by Virge Kask.

Figs. 1–6 in Dyticodopoea And Pygmaeodopoea, New Genera For The Central American Cicada Species Previously Assigned To Odopoea Stål, 1861 (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea: Cicadidae: Cicadinae: Zammarini)

Figs. 1–6. Comparison of Dyticodopoea Sanborn, n. genus, Pygmaeodopoea Sanborn, n. genus and Odopoea Stål, 1861 morphology. 1, Habitus of Dyticodopoea signoreti (Stål, 1864) new combination (top), Pygmaeodopoea minuta (Sanborn, 2007) new combination (middle) and Odopoea dilatata (Fabricius, 1775) (bottom) the type species of Odopoea. Scale bar = 2 cm. 2, Dyticodopoea signoreti (Stål, 1864) new combination dorsum. Scale bar = 5 mm. 3, Pygmaeodopoea minuta (Sanborn, 2007) new combination dorsum. Scale bar = 5 mm. 4, Odopoea dilatata (Fabricius, 1775) dorsum. Scale bar = 5 mm. 5, Dyticodopoea signoreti (Stål, 1864) new combination ventral view of female genitalia. Scale bar = 2 mm. 6, Odopoea cariboea Uhler, 1892 ventral view of female genitalia. Scale bar = 2 mm.

FIGURE 15. Carineta tricuspis n in The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of Peru including the description of twenty-four new species, three new synonymies, and thirty-seven new records

FIGURE 15. Carineta tricuspis n. sp.: A, Holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, paratype male timbal; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–E, 2 mm; F–G, 1 mm; H–I, 1 mm.

FIGURE 18. Herrera chanchamayoensis n in The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of Peru including the description of twenty-four new species, three new synonymies, and thirty-seven new records

FIGURE 18. Herrera chanchamayoensis n. sp.: A, Holotype male habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal; D, paratype male operculum; E, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype male posterior view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–D, 2 mm; E–F, 1 mm.

FIGURE 13. Carineta rumipataensis n in The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of Peru including the description of twenty-four new species, three new synonymies, and thirty-seven new records

FIGURE 13. Carineta rumipataensis n. sp.: A, Holotype male habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal; D, holotype male operculum; E, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype male posterior view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–D, 2 mm; E–F, 1 mm.

FIGURE 14. Carineta tingomariaensis n in The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of Peru including the description of twenty-four new species, three new synonymies, and thirty-seven new records

FIGURE 14. Carineta tingomariaensis n. sp.: A, Holotype male habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal; D, holotype male operculum; E, paratype male lateral view of genitalia; F, paratype male posterior view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–D, 2 mm; E–F, 1 mm.

FIGURE 22. Herrera polygramma n in The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of Peru including the description of twenty-four new species, three new synonymies, and thirty-seven new records

FIGURE 22. Herrera polygramma n. sp.: A, Holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, paratype male timbal; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–E, 2 mm; F–G, 1 mm; H–I, 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedJun 2019View details →

FIGURE 8. Selymbria loretoensis n in The cicada genus Selymbria Stål, 1861 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Tibicininae: Selymbrini): redescription including ten new species and a key to the genus

FIGURE 8. Selymbria loretoensis n. sp. A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 5 mm; C–E, 2 mm; F–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.