Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8,537
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8,537 results for “Openness”
Data Matrix Theme-Specific Analysis of the Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (RSSR): Open Access, Open Data, and Open Science
<p>This Table sets out findings from the mapping exercise conducted as part of the objectives of subtask 6.1 of the RRING project.</p> <p>Aim: Alignment of RRI to advance the UN SDGs.</p> <p>Objectives:</p> <ul> <li>Mapping the RSSR to the SDGs </li> </ul> <p>Mapping the RSSR to the SDGs is aimed at providing new perspectives, ideas and approaches that can help to improve the operationalization and implementation of each SDG, <em>by facilitating the integration of RRI (or RRI-like) practices in the SDGs, to make them more achievable.</em> The impact of the new perspectives, ideas and approaches in SDG operationalization and implementation will be aimed at the level of <em>national and international policy (making); future research and innovation projects (in industry and academia); as well as education and training of researchers, policy makers and other stakeholders.</em></p> <p>Two documents were used for this task:</p> <ul> <li>2017 Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers ([RSSR], UNESCO), and</li> <li>the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</li> </ul>
Data from: An inexpensive and open-source method to study large terrestrial animal diet and behavior using time-lapse video and GPS
1. The behavior of free-ranging animals is difficult to study, especially on the large spatial and temporal scales relevant to long-lived large species. Animal-borne video and environmental data collection systems (AVEDs) record behavior and other data in real time as animals conduct daily activities. However, few studies have combined systematically collected, long term AVED foraging data with environmental and movement data to test hypotheses on animal foraging. Additionally, AVEDs are often either prohibitively expensive, or require extensive fabrication and programming knowledge. 2. The video and coordinate animal-mounted system (VACAMS) is an animal-mounted data collection system based on a modified GoPro® action camera platform that records short, first "person" perspective videos of animal behavior on an automated time-lapse schedule. As most videos are georeferenced, researchers can return to the locations of specific behaviors and collect accurate, fine-grained data on non-woody vegetation and other habitat characteristics that may influence animal behavior. Moreover, VACAMS are inexpensive and easy to use. 3. This study describes VACAMS preliminary data on cattle foraging and a hypothesis exploring free-ranging cattle browsing habits throughout the rainy season in the tropical dry forest of Sonora, Mexico. I generated a database of vegetation types consumed by cows each month (Annual, Woody, and Leaf litter) and compared actual vegetation type frequencies to a priori assumptions based on seasonal patterns of forage availability. During the monsoons, when palatable vegetation was abundant, frequencies of annual and woody perennial vegetation in cattle diets did not differ from month to month. When the rains ceased and palatable vegetation became scarce, cows switched to leaf litter, dead annual vegetation, twigs, and dried leguminous fruits. 4. Open source software and commercially available hardware make VACAMS financially attainable for many researchers, land managers, students, and other user groups. VACAMS could be used on a range of domestic and semi-domestic free-ranging animals, particularly in dense forests where conventional observations are impossible. With improvements to GPS battery life and durability, the weakest points of the system, VACAMS could also potentially apply to studies of other large terrestrial animals.
Coherent Electric Field Manipulation of Fe3+-spins in PbTiO3. Open data set
<p>Data supporting figures 3 and 4 of the related publication.</p>
Supporting Dataset for "Comparing GGA, GGA+U, and Meta-GGA Functionals for Redox-Dependent Binding at Open Metal Sites in Metal−Organic Frameworks"
<p>Supporting Dataset for "Comparing GGA, GGA+U, and Meta-GGA Functionals for Redox-Dependent Binding at Open Metal Sites in Metal−Organic Frameworks"</p>
Open-Unmix-Pytorch UMX-L
<p>Weights of the UMX-L (umxl) music separation model for PyTorch. For more information, visit https://github.com/sigsep/open-unmix-pytorch</p>
Data from: Open notes sounds great, but will a provider's documentation change?
<p><strong>Background</strong>: The effects of shared clinical notes on patients, care partners, and clinicians ("open notes") were first studied as a demonstration project in 2010. Since then, multiple studies have shown clinicians agree shared progress notes are beneficial to patients, and patients and care partners report benefits from reading notes. To determine if implementing open notes at a hematology/oncology practice changed providers' documentation style, we assessed the length and readability of clinicians' notes before and after open notes implementation at an academic medical center in Boston, MA.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: We analyzed 143,888 notes from 60 hematology/oncology clinicians before and after the open notes debut at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, from January 1, 2012, to September 1, 2016. We measured the providers' (medical doctor/nurse practitioner) documentation styles by analyzing character length, the number of addenda, note entry mode (dictated vs. typed) and note readability. Measurements used five different readability formulas and were assessed on notes written before and after the introduction of open notes on November 25, 2013.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: After the introduction of open notes, the mean length of progress notes increased from 6,174 characters to 6,648 characters (P<0.001), and the mean character length of the "assessment and plan" (A&P) increased from 1,435 characters to 1,597 characters (P<0.001). The Average Grade Level Readability of progress notes decreased from 11.50 to 11.33, and overall readability improved by 0.17 (P=0.01). There were no statistically significant changes in the length or readability of "Initial Notes" or Letters, inter-doctor communication, nor in the modality of the recording of any kind of note.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: After the implementation of open notes, progress notes and A&P sections became both longer and easier to read. This suggests clinician documenters may be responding to the perceived pressures of a transparent medical records environment.</p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Open Access Compliance Monitoring 2020
<p><strong>I. Executive summary</strong></p> <p>The Austrian Science Fund (FWF), which is Austria's main funding organisation for basic research, encourages and helps all project leaders and project staff members to make their peer-reviewed research results freely available on the Internet. Any exceptions must be clearly indicated and justified. For projects that started after 1 January 2015, open access has been compulsory for all peer-reviewed publications. All principal investigators in FWF-funded projects are obliged to submit a final report within four months of completing their projects.</p> <p>In 2020, a total of 483 final reports were submitted to the FWF, 32 of which could not report any publications so far. The publications and other data mentioned in those reports are archived and analysed by the FWF. This report examines the state of compliance with open access requirements for peer-reviewed publications on the basis of final project reports submitted in the year 2020.</p> <p>2020 shows a significant decline in the number of publications compared to 2019. This decline can be explained by the fact that 15% fewer final project reports were received as a result of weaker funding years in the mid-2010s as well as an increased shift of final report submissions from 2020 to later points in time (‘corona effect’). Especially in the programmes with the highest number of publications (Doctoral Programmes, Special Research Programmes) as well as in programmes with many projects (Stand-Alone Projects, International Projects), there were fewer final project reports submitted, which has a massive impact on the total number of publications. It must be taken into account that the method (recording the number of publications via final project reports) is a look into the past, as the final project reports show publications that were produced in previous years during the project term. The publication activity in relation to the year of publication itself is relatively constant according to databases such as Dimensions. Due to the automation of the monitoring processes and the introduction of Plan S of cOAlition S, the category of ‘Other open access’ (self-archiving in a non-maintained repository, homepage, or archiving of preprints), which was previously determined manually, is no longer taken into account, and thus the open access share of peer-reviewed publications has decreased compared to previous years.</p> <p>Main findings:</p> <p>-A total of 6,196 publications were listed in the final project reports submitted in 2020.</p> <p>-Of those publications, 4,809 were conclusively identified as peer-reviewed.</p> <p>-Regarding compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy, the analysis shows that 84% of the peer-reviewed publications listed in the final project reports submitted in 2020 were openly accessible (2015: 83%, 2016: 92%, 2017: 90%, 2018: 92%, 2019: 89%).</p> <p>-The most frequently chosen option was hybrid open access (40%). The share of old open access was 21%, the share of green open access 23%, and no open access 16%.</p> <p>-The majority of peer-reviewed publications submitted were journal articles (89%), 88% of which were openly accessible.</p> <p>-The lowest rate of compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy could be found in editions, contributions to edited volumes, and monographs (38%).</p> <p>-The absolute number of publications listed in final reports in 2020 included 362 publications that were mentioned several times in different projects; however, those repetitions did not ultimately affect the relative share of open access publications (83%).</p> <p><strong>II. Bias</strong></p> <p>Most of the publications were submitted to the FWF via a research documentation system (provided by ©Researchfish), in which FWF-funded researchers are able to enter and update their research data on an ongoing basis. The last check of the open access status was performed in March 2020. In some cases, the embargo period may have already expired, and publications labelled ‘no open access’ in the FWF’s database may now be accessible through green open access.</p> <p>Whenever the status ‘peer-reviewed’ could not be clearly identified according to the FWF’s guidelines, the publications were classified as non-peer reviewed.</p> <p>Openly available non-peer reviewed publications were entered as 'openly available’.</p> <p> </p>
Survey on how do Brazilian Software Engineering Researchers Perceive and Practice Open Science
<p>This document provides our survey questionnaire and the responses of 31 researchers.</p>
24x7 Sessions 2 and 3 - Open Repositories 2021 (OR2021)
<p>This video contains presentations from two 24x7 sessions.</p> <p><strong>Elevating Open Data: Building an Accessible Environment for Data Stewardship in Research Libraries with CADRE</strong><br> <em>Wilkinson, Jaci (1); Wittenberg, Jamie V. (2); Mabry, Patricia L. (3); Pentchev, Valentin (4); Van Rennes, Robert (5); Fridmanski, Ethan (1)</em><br> <em>1: Indiana University Libraries; 2: University Libraries, University of Colorado Boulder; 3: HealthPartners; 4: Indiana University Network Science Institute; 5: Big Ten Academic Alliance</em><br> <br> <strong>Using Research Profiles as a Service (RPaS) to Populate an Institutional Repository</strong><br> <em>Gambill, Agnes</em><br> <em>Appalachian State University, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>Swallow Beyond the Repository: Development of a Custom Metadata Management Software</strong><br> <em>Neugebauer, Tomasz; Berrizbeitia, Francisco</em><br> <em>Concordia University, Canada</em><br> <br> <strong>Repository Migration: How it started, How it’s going</strong><br> <em>Homenda, Nicholas; Hardesty, Juliet L.</em><br> <em>Indiana University Libraries, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>Increasing the A in OA: How accessibility work in repositories should influence publisher agreements</strong><br> <em>Roosa, Sadie</em><br> <em>MIT Libraries, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>We’ve got a Digital Repository: now what do we do with it?</strong><br> <em>Reynolds, Kent Douglas; <em>Parisi,</em> Bianca; <em>Rigg</em>, Cindy</em><br> <em>Niagara College Canada, Canada</em></p> <p><strong>Navigating OA eBook usage data stakeholder interests to facilitate cross-platform data exchange</strong><br> <em>Drummond, Christina</em><br> <em>Educopia Institute, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>DataCite Service Providers program: Bringing the power of DOIs to a system near you</strong><br> <em>Krznarich, Liz</em><br> <em>DataCite, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>Reopening the Repository: Redeveloping ScholarSphere to support Open Access</strong><br> <em>Coughlin, Daniel; Erickson, Seth; Wead, Adam</em><br> <em>Penn State University, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>Sustaining Open Infrastructure Communities: Evaluating Fiscal and Administrative Service Options</strong><br> <em>Greer Klein, Heather (1); Metz, Rosalyn (2)</em><br> <em>1: Samvera, United States of America; 2: Emory University, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>An Engaged Campus Repository in Practice: The University of Minnesota’s Institutional Repository and the Pandemic Response</strong><br> <em>Moore, Erik A.; Collins, Valerie M.; Johnston, Lisa R.</em><br> <em>University of Minnesota, United States of America</em><br> <br> <strong>Taking (small) steps towards accessible repository content</strong><br> <em>Maistrovskaya, Mariya</em><br> <em>University of Toronto Libraries, Canada</em><br> </p>
Quantum coherent spin-electric control in a molecular nanomagnet at clock transitions. Open data set
<p>Data supporting the related publication.</p>
Open Science for Action (OS4A): A working model for libraries
<p>A diagram outlining a conceptual model for how libraries can contribute to and advance open science in principle and practice. </p>
The role of shade in maintaining alternative stable states between open- and closed-canopy vegetation
<p>Fire is commonly identified as strong driver of alternative stable states such as adjacent open- versus closed-canopy vegetation types. The absence of open-canopy species from closed-canopy understoreys, where light availability is low and dynamic, however, suggests shade tolerance is an integral determinant of such vegetation boundaries. While the importance of light dynamics between alternative stable states has been acknowledged, the physiological mechanisms behind sun versus shade-tolerance are unclear. Here we investigated the differences in light interception and carbon assimilation of open- and closed-canopy species, and whether this contributes to the maintenance of alternative stable states.</p> <p>Evergreen forest and fynbos species were grown under three light availability treatments (24%, 54%, 100%) in a glasshouse with their photosynthetic response to continuous and fluctuating light, dark respiration, root respiration, biomass and leaf traits quantified.<br> <br> Fynbos species displayed smaller, thicker, and tightly aggregated leaves compared to forest species. Under low light, fynbos species experienced some mortality, and showed lower light-use efficiency with fluctuating light and lower in situ photosynthetic rates under the 54% light treatment compared to forest species (0.8 versus 4 mmol CO2 m-2 s-1).<br> <br> Synthesis. Contrasting light availability in forest and fynbos selects for dissimilar traits, where fynbos species are unable to efficiently intercept light and maintain a positive carbon balance under low, dynamic light compared to forest species. This shade intolerance is exacerbated by divergent nutrient and fire regimes in forest and fynbos environments, requiring incompatible trait specializations that promote the emergence and maintenance of alternative stable states.</p>
Instance data: open-shop scheduling problems with any regular minsum objective
<p>Open shop scheduling instances used in the working paper</p> <ul> <li>Emde, S. & Lysgaard, J. (2021). Branch-cut-and-price for open-shop scheduling problems with any regular minsum objective.</li> </ul> <p>The instances in file <em>Brucker_instances.csv</em> are based on the test data for the classic [O||Cmax] problem from Brucker, P., Hurink, J., Jurisch, B., & Wöstmann, B. (1997). A branch & bound algorithm for the open-shop problem. <em>Discrete Applied Mathematics</em>, <em>76</em>(1-3), 43-59. They are enriched with release and due dates as well as machine-pair dependent transportation delays. The instances in file <em>random_instances.csv </em>are new.</p> <p>The files contain comma-separated values. Each line (except for the header) stands for one instance. The columns labels are:</p> <p>ID: label (identifier) of the instance</p> <p>n: number of jobs</p> <p>m: number of machines</p> <p>p: processing times; each square bracket stands for one machine, the values inside the brackets for the processing times of the jobs on the respective machine</p> <p>t: transfer times between machines; note that the dummy machine 0 where all jobs originate and end is the last machine, i.e., it has the highest index</p> <p>r: release dates for each job</p> <p>d: due dates for each job.</p> <p>Mj: set of machines on which the jobs must be processed; each square bracket stands for one job, values inside the brackets for machine indices. Note that indices are zero-based.</p> <p>In instance set <em>Brucker_instances.csv</em>, every machine is visited by every job, therefore there is no column Mj. Conversely, due dates are immaterial for the random instances because of their quadratic completion time objective. Hence, they are omitted from the table.</p>
Connectivity and succession of open structures as a key to sustaining light-demanding biodiversity in deciduous forests
<p>1. European forests are facing a rapid decline of light-demanding biota. This has prompted active interventions to re-establish and maintain partial habitat openness in protected areas. Managers of protected areas, however, need substantially more scientific evidence to support their decisions on where, when, and how to intervene.</p> <p>2. We investigated the importance of spatial continuity of open forest habitats in different years of succession, using six pairs of experimental clearings established in the formerly open, oak-dominated forests of the Podyji National Park (Czech Republic). In each pair, one clearing was connected to the forest edge, while the other was isolated in closed forest. We sampled butterflies (74 spp.), moths (435 spp.), saproxylic beetles (465 spp.), and vascular plants (567 spp.) on the 12 clearings during the first five years of succession. We then compared species richness, abundance, and composition of the four taxa between the two clearing types and along the succession.</p> <p>3. All studied insect groups were substantially more species-rich and more abundant in connected than in isolated clearings. Species composition of plants, moths, and butterflies differed between the clearing types.</p> <p>4. The number of species of all studied taxa generally increased from the first to the second or third year after cutting; species composition of all taxa differed among years. This suggests rapid changes in habitat quality and thus limited time for colonisation by light-demanding organisms.</p> <p>5. <i>Synthesis and applications</i>: Our results offer an evidence that spatial connectivity and rapid temporal dynamics are important habitat features for light-demanding insects. Attempts to create or restore habitats for light-demanding forest biota should take into account that: (i) Insects benefit from direct connection of new open patches to open habitats or flight corridors such as forest edges. (ii) Considering plants, the optimal solution is to connect newly created open forest habitats to existing habitats with established biota of high conservation value. (iii) Interventions should be carried out within short time intervals, i.e. within years rather than decades. (iv) A fine mosaic of interconnected<span>, open woodland patches in various successional stages is more beneficial than a single large patch with a single successional stage.</span></p>
DAPSI Open Call1-Subgrantees Dataset
<p>This file contains the main data from the awarded applicants in the first open call of the NGI-DAPSI Programme funded under the GA 871498.</p>
Eurodoc Survey on Publishing in Open Science 2020
<p>The Eurodoc Survey on Publishing in Open Science 2020 was a survey launched to collect data and the state-of-art about Open Science and publishing platform, realised by Eurodoc within the 'Open Research Europe' (ORE) project. ORE is an open access<br> Publishing Platform for Horizon 2020 beneficiaries offering rapid publication of a wide range of article types without editorial bias.</p> <p>All articles benefit from transparent peer review and will be published under an open license. ORE is a significant step towards Open Science in Europe. Eurodoc, as an expert partner in the project, will ensure that the voice of early-career researchers is heard.</p> <p>This survey aims to provide the ORE project team with insights related to awareness, perception and experience with open practices and tools, from the perspective of doctoral candidates and junior researchers. Survey results and the underlying data are published in F1000: https://f1000research.com/articles/10-1306/v1. </p> <p><strong>About Eurodoc</strong></p> <p><a href="http://www.eurodoc.net/">Eurodoc</a>, the European Council of <a href="http://www.eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/attachments/2017/133/defining-doctoral-candidates-and-doctoral-trainingmay2012.pdf">Doctoral Candidates</a> and <a href="http://www.eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/attachments/2017/133/eurodoc2017-juniorresearchersdefinitionandchallenges.pdf">Junior Researchers</a>, is a grassroots federation of national associations of early career researchers (ECRs) from European countries. Eurodoc was founded in 2002 and then established in 2005 as a non-profit, international volunteer organisation based in Brussels. As representatives of ECRs at European level, we engage with all major stakeholders in research and innovation in Europe. Eurodoc primarily focuses and advocates for <a href="http://www.eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/attachments/2017/133/defining-doctoral-candidates-and-doctoral-trainingmay2012.pdf">doctoral candidates</a> and <a href="http://www.eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/attachments/2017/133/eurodoc2017-juniorresearchersdefinitionandchallenges.pdf">junior researchers</a><a href="http://eurodoc.net/eurodoc/mission-and-vision#_ftn1"><sup>[1]</sup></a>, that is, researchers at <a href="https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/europe/career-development/training-researchers/research-profiles-descriptors">R1 and R2 stages.</a></p>
Mini Talks/Videos about Open Science from OLS-3 Cohort
<p><strong>We aim to present important topics in Open Science (e.g. open Licence, open review, open access, open sources, agile, open protocols, ...) within 10-15 minutes videos with subtitles and translations.</strong></p> <p>This is a collection of <strong>Open Life Science (OLS-3) videos and captions</strong> in order to make them accessible, re-useable, and encourage further translation in other languages beyond English and Arabic.</p> <p>All original videos are available on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs12-ZgnDJOWIWN3Vo1XHXA">Open LifeSci YouTube channel</a>. This project was initiated by <a href="https://twitter.com/talarify?lang=en">Talarify</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/OpenSciSaudi">Open Science Community in Saudi Arabia</a> to facilitate learning of Open science practices to novice learners.</p> <p><strong>Individual videos can be downloaded from the GitHub repository:</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcTwm7D1XsQ&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=1">Introduction to Open Life Sciences</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-ozvoNadL4&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=2">Open Canvas for Project Strategy</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnQgdneO3zY&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=3">Roadmapping for Open Projects</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdBwuut6dRY&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=4">A Primer on Open Licenses</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jgv34Kwgga8&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=5">README for Open Projects</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu34Pd2PeYM&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=6">Contributing Guidelines and Codes of Conduct for Open Projects</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obnnT722PDg&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=7">Agile and Iterative Project Management Methods</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OskC2LNtPkU&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=8">Open Source in Research</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjsLA1jhK6c&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=9">Open Data</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KymHGq9SAgM&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=10">Open Source/Science Hardware</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_G6flATV1c&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=11">Preprint adoption in the life sciences by ASAPbio</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wN6RqCmpqM&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=12">Open Protocols</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTT8xsS3s_I&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=13">Participatory Citizen Science</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EdD3JKA6WA&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=14">FAIR Data</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_5Tn50KCQ4&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=15">FAIR Training</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME8_NRGRhSs&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=16">FAIR software</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vj15O_bDFhI&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=17">Open Leadership Career Guidance: Social Entrepreneurship</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2DBOAHWThk&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=18">Open Science Hardware</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnrUmQdzUA8&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=22">Indonesia and the Impact on Open Science</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf4MZZ2j4ak&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=19">Unconscious Bias</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYJvxR3PcdY&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=20">Personas and Pathways</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRik7qB7IuA&list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9&index=21">Explore the Mountain of Engagement in 10 Minutes</a></li> </ul> <p>They are also available on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1CvC6Ez54KDvJbbdLn5rPvf1kInifEh9">a playlist on YouTube</a>.</p> <p><strong>Contributing</strong> 💝</p> <p>We welcome all contributions to improve this project especially first-timers to expand the translation!</p> <p><strong>You don't need to know git to start contributing, we use <a href="https://crowdin.com/project/ols3">Crowdin localisation</a>, which enables you to translate strings of SRT files while watching the video and adding content to your translation. More details are added to our <a href="https://github.com/open-life-science/ols3-cohort-talks-and-transcripts/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md">Contribution Guide</a>.</strong></p>
Open-Source Software Product Line Extraction Processes: the ArgoUML-SPL and Phaser Cases
<p>Collection of datasets and analysis scripts supporting the information provided in the text.</p> <p>There are two compressed files, one for the ArgoUML data and one for the Phaser data. Each compressed file contains a README describing important information.</p>
'Opening the Future' - a new funding model for open-access monographs: introducing an innovative approach to publishing OA books through library membership funding
<p>We showcase a collaborative pilot case study that implements an innovative open access revenue model at the Central European University Press and Liverpool University Press, with assistance from the COPIM Project (Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs). Building on existing library subscription models (e.g. OBP, punctum), this is a sustainable OA publishing model that gives library members access to a highly-regarded backlist, with the membership fees then used to make the frontlist openly accessible.<br> Given the current global library environment and existing budget pressures that have been exacerbated by Covid-19, a consortial model of funding promises a cost-effective solution for OA that means no single institution bears a disproportionate burden. This model, then, appeals to both those who wish to pay for subscription-access content (more traditional university acquisition models) and those who support OA initiatives. It brings many institutions together under one roof for an affordable route to open access books.<br> Library members get access to a selection of the publishers’ backlists, DRM free and with perpetual access after three years. In return, the membership revenue is used to make newly-published books openly accessible to anyone with an internet connection.<br> We believe Opening the Future is a trailblazer in scholarly comms, offering a viable and affordable route to OA change for small/medium university presses and which appeals to libraries of all sizes and budgets. We aim to open up research for the public good. The model that we are piloting reduces inequalities in access to open access publication by eradicating exclusionary book processing charges (BPCs).<br> As we progress with the pilot, we are writing up everything we’ve done to implement the model and will release this and any software as a free toolkit, so that other publishers can use it and also take the leap.</p>
A Systematic Mapping of the Classification of Open Educational Resources for Computer Science Education in Digital Sources (Data)
<p>Data from a Systematic Mapping of the classification of Open Educational Resources for Computer Science Education.</p> <p>Content:</p> <ul> <li>Studies selected</li> <li>Digital sources used to classify Open Educational Resources for Computer Science Education</li> <li>Computer Science domains explored by Open Educational Resources</li> <li>Approaches for the classification of Open Educational Resources for Computer Science Education</li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.