Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,281
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,281 results for “Chilopoda”
Figure 10 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 10. Outline shape models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 9 projected into the space of the extended eigenshapes. Outlines are overlain at the landmark from which digitization started in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change.
Figure 11 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 11. Canonical variates ordination of gonopod shape data for two Allothereua serrulata subspecies as assessed by landmark data and relative warps analysis. As there are only two groups the first canonical variate axes account for all of the observed between-groups shape variation. Nevertheless, higher canonical variates exist (see MacLeod, 2007) and the second canonical variate axis is shown here in order to illustrate aspects of the overall ordination in the discriminant space. Cross-tabulation analysis of these results using only the distribution along the first axis (Table 5) indicated that almost 85% of the sample can be assigned to the correct subspecies.
Figure 9 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 9. Canonical variates ordination of outline semi-landmark data for the gonopod mesarthra of three Allothereua species as assessed by extended eigenshape analysis. Only the first two of the five possible canonical variate axes are shown. As there are only three groups these two canonical variate axes account for 100.00% of the observed betweengroups shape variation. Cross-tabulation analysis (Table 4) indicated that almost 75% of the sample can be assigned to the correct species.
Figure 8 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 8. Thin-plate spline models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 7 projected into the space of the relative warps. Landmark positions are overlain with one another in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change.
Figure 5 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 5. Canonical variates ordination of outline semi-landmark data for the gonopod mesarthra for genera as assessed by extended eigenshape analysis. Only the first two of the five possible canonical variate axes are shown. This analysis was based on seven extended eigenshape variables which together accounted for 93.7% of the observed outline shape variation. Cross-tabulation analyses of these results (Table 2) indicated that over 90% of the sample can be assigned to the correct genus.
Figure 4 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 4. Thin-plate spline models of positions along the canonical variate axes (numbers in parentheses) shown in Figure 3 projected into the space of the relative warps. Landmark positions are overlain with one another in the figure to the right of each sequence in order to illustrate better the magnitudes and directions (arrows) or localized shape change. See text for discussion.
Figure 2 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 2. Map of the distributions of the different species and subspecies of Allothereua in south-eastern Australia (using only geographical data for the specimens in this analysis).
Figure 3 in Geometric approaches to the taxonomic analysis of centipede gonopods (Chilopoda: Scutigeromorpha)
Figure 3. Canonical variates ordination of gonopod shape data for genera as assessed by landmark data and relative warps analysis. Only the first two canonical variate axes are shown. Together these account for 91.41% of the observed between-group shape variation. However, because only three relative warp axes accounted for 95% of the observed shape variation, only three canonical variate axes could be specified. Cross-tabulation analysis of these results (Table 1) indicated that over 80% of the sample can be assigned to the correct genus.
Figure 7 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 7. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sturanyi (Attems, 1903) from Xiropotamos near Drama (Greece: Macedonia) (58-mm long, with 111 leg-bearing segments; 10-IV-1993, Beron lg, collection Natn. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bulgarian Acad. Sci., Sofia): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Figure 6 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 6. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia sorrentina (Attems, 1903) from Palmarola Island (Italy: Tyrrhenian Sea) (23-mm long, with 61 leg-bearing segments; 3-IV-1966 Consiglio lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Figure 4 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 4. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia frenum (Meinert, 1870) from Baie de Tamanart (Algeria) (28-mm long, with 81 leg-bearing segments; 7-XI-1984, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; cl, clypeus; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; la, labrum; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margins; t1, telopodite of first maxillae; t2, telopodite of second maxillae.
Figure 2 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 2. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia species. The previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude. The type localities of all nominal taxa are indicated by circles (full circles for valid species, empty circles for synonyms), with the following abbreviations: ab, abbreviatus; ac, acuneli; al, albanensis; an, antecribellatus; as, asiaeminoris; bo, bosporanus; br, brevicornis; c, caldarium; cr, cribelliger; fi, fimbriatus; ff, forficularius; fv, foveolatus; fr, frenum; gi, giljarovi; gr, graecus; li, linearis; na, naxius; or, ormanyensis; pl, palaestinus; po, polyporus; pp, palpiger; rh, rhodopensis; ro, romanus; sl, silvestrii; sm, simplex; so, sorrentinus; st, sturanyi.
Figure 3 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of Stenotaenia frenum, Stenotaenia romana, and Stenotaenia sturanyi. Both previously published and new records have been plotted upon a grid of 30′ latitude ¥ 30′ longitude.
Figure 1 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 1. Main differential characters between Stenotaenia and related genera to which species of Stenotaenia have been assigned, to date. Drawings represent the type species of each genus (see Table 1): A, forcipular segment, ventral; B, sternum at about one third of the length of the trunk, ventral; C, last leg-bearing segment and terminal segments in the female, ventral. Abbreviations: ch, chitin line; co, condyle of forcipular coxosternum; cs, 'carpophagus' socket; cx, forcipular coxosternum; fb, forcipular basal article; fi, forcipular intermediate articles; ft, forcipular tarsungulum; go, gonopods; lc, claw of last leg; ls, sternum of last leg-bearing segment; op, openings of coxal glands; pc, forcipular pleurocoxal margin; po, sternal pore area.
Figure 5 in Stenotaenia Koch, 1847: a hitherto unrecognized lineage of western Palaearctic centipedes with unusual diversity in body size and segment number (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Figure 5. Microscopic images of a female specimen of Stenotaenia romana (Silvestri, 1895) from Isola del Cantone near Genova (Italy: Liguria) (12-mm long, with 47 leg-bearing segments; 5-XI-1978 Gardini lg, collection A. Minelli): (a) head, ventral; (b) clypeus and maxillary complex, ventral; (c) sternum of leg-bearing segment X; (d) forcipular segment, ventral.
Fig. 6 in Brooding behaviour of the centipede Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) and its morphological variability in Thailand
Fig. 6. Variability in taxonomic characters in Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (examination materials: CUMZ 00224, Wat Tham Wararam, Phanom district, Surat Thani; CUMZ 00229, Tham Wang Thong, Phatthalung; CUMZ 00231, Surin Islands, Phang-nga). A, Ventral view of cephalic plate and antenna; B, Dorsal view of cephalic plate and antenna; C, Coxosternite; D–F, Variation in coxosternal teeth; G, Surface of TT5–7; H, Variability of depressions on surface of sternites 5–7; I, Leg 20 with projection on distal end of tarsus 1; J, Leg 21 with projection on tarsus 1; K, Ultimate leg-bearing segment, ventral view, with arrangement of ventral spines on prefemur of ultimate legs; L, Tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with arrangement of dorsal and corner spines on prefemur of ultimate legs; M, Pore field on coxopleuron (left).
Fig. 5. Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 in Brooding behaviour of the centipede Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae) and its morphological variability in Thailand
Fig. 5. Otostigmus spinosus Porat, 1876. Light photographs of specimens from southern Thailand (Fig. A–E; specimens from Surin Islands, Phang-nga province: CUMZ 00231; Fig. I–N; specimens from Wat Tham Wararam, Surat Thani province: CUMZ 00224). A, Cephalic plate and T1 with first pair of locomotory legs; B, Forcipular segment; C, Antenna with cephalic plate and TT1–5; D, Tergites 9–10; E, Sternites 9–10; F–H. Spiracles on segments 3, 5 and 8, respectively; I, Tergite and sternite of ultimate-leg bearing segment; J, Pore field on left and right coxopleura; K, Dorsal view of ultimate leg prefemur; L, Ventral view of ultimate leg prefemur; M–N, Leg 20 left and right with spine on distal part of prefemora.
Fig. 1 in To the fauna of the family Himantariidae (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha) of Kyrgyzstan
Fig. 1. Distribution of the family Himantariidae Bollman, 1893 in Kyrgyzstan: oval – Bothriogaster signata (Kessler, 1874); triangle – Polyporogaster porosa (Sseliwanoff, 1881);
Figs 7–13 in The maxillary organ gland: Description of a new head gland in Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopoda, Notostigmophora)
Figs 7–13. Maxillary organ gland of Scutigera coleoptrata. 7. Transition between secretory cell (sc) and intermediary cell (ic). 8. General view of intermediary cells (ic) and connecting proximal (pc) and distal canal cells (dc). 9. Transition between intermediary cell (ic) and proximal canal cell (pc) with its apical infoldings. Note the cuticular lining (cu) of the conduction canal in the most distal part of the intermediary cell. 10. Distal part of maxillary organ gland with several cross sections of the proximal (pc) and distal (dc) canal cells and their cuticular ducts (*). 11. Cross sectioned proximal canal cell with apical infoldings and cuticular duct. The asterisk points. 12. Cross section of the distal canal cell (dc) with its cuticular duct (*). (pc) proximal canal cell. 13. Part of distal canal cell with its conducting canal (*) passing through the cuticle (cu) of the
Figs 1–6 in Studies on centipede communities (Chilopoda) from three habitats in Toledo Province, Spain
Figs 1–6. Monthly densities of Chilopoda captured. 1. Through edaphic probes in riverside plot. Mean density standard error for the whole sampling period. 2. Through edaphic probes in rural plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 3. Through edaphic probes in green oak forest plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 4. Through direct capture in riverside plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 5. Through direct capture in rural plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period. 6. Through direct capture in green oak forest plot. Mean density standard error of the whole sampling period.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.