Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
74
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
74 results for “2100”
Data for Marine Ecological Niche Models, for 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species
<p>Data for Ecological Niche Models: Global-scale Environmental parameters at 0.1° and 0.5° resolutions, Presence and Absence Records of 1508 European-seas Species.</p>
Ecological Niche Models, in 2019 and across RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, of 1508 European Marine Species, developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Native ecological niche models of 1508 European species (894 fish and 614 non fish) developed with AquaMaps, Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machines, for 2019 and under RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100, at 0.5° spatial resolution.</p>
Biodiversity Index, in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European Marine Species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution
<p>Biodiversity Index in 2019 and across RCP 4.5, and 8.5 scenarios in 2050 and 2100 of 1508 European marine species based on ensemble Ecological Niche Models developed with Artificial Neural Networks, Maximum Entropy, Support Vector Machines, and AquaMaps at 0.5° Resolution. The Index counts the number of species (among the 1508) potentially present in each 0.5° cell according to the ensemble models. For each ensemble model, a threshold of at least 3 models agreeing on species presence in the cell was used to indicate species presence.</p>
Future hydrologic outputs using the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM) for the Saddle Catchment, 2001 - 2100.
The Saddle Catchment of the Niwot Ridge LTER is subject to warming in a future climate and thus changes in precipitation phase, precipitation redistribution, and timing and distribution of surface water inputs (the summation of rainfall and snowmelt) as well as changes in atmospheric demand (potential evapotranspiration, PET) and the amount of evapotranspiration (ET). The input warming data were developed to first force a future climate across the Saddle Catchment and evaluate resultant hydrologic outputs using the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM). Future forcing data were generated by calculating and implementing delta values between daily average historical data and those generated from end-of-current-century Weather Research Forecasting model data. The variables perturbed in the warming DHSVM simulation were: precipitation, air temperature, relative humidity and longwave radiation. Target outputs included: daily spatially distributed precipitation (historical and future), daily spatially distributed surface water inputs (historical and future), total spatially distributed PET (historical and future), and total spatially distributed ET (historical and future). The precipitation and surface water inputs products are orthorectified (UTM projection) raster products, and the forcing data and PET and ET are CSV files. The forcing data represent catchment averages, which are distributed within DHSVM, and all other files are at the 2 m resolution.
A 1 km global cropland dataset from 10000 BCE to 2100 CE
<p>This dataset is the 1 km global cropland dataset from 10000 BCE to 2100 CE. It contains a total of 131 global cropland maps at 1 km resolution from past to future. The time-step intervals are 1000 years for 10000 BCE-1 CE, 100 years for 1 CE-1700 CE, and 10 years for 1700 CE-2100 CE. After 2010 CE, eight future SSP-RCP scenarios are provided. The map values indicate the proportion of cropland within 1×1 km grid cell.</p> <p>This dataset can also be viewed online at <a href="https://cbw.users.earthengine.app/view/globalcroplanddataset">https://cbw.users.earthengine.app/view/globalcroplanddataset</a></p> <p><strong>Citations:</strong></p> <p>When using this dataset, please cite both the dataset and the following data description article:</p> <p><em>Cao, B., Yu, L., Li, X., Chen, M., Li, X., Hao, P., and Gong, P.: A 1 km global cropland dataset from 10 000 BCE to 2100 CE, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 5403–5421, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5403-2021, 2021. </em></p>
Statistical characterization of Andalusian wave climate for several combinations of Global Climate Models and Regional Climate Models and periods 2026 - 2045 and 2081 - 2100.
<p>The following text is an extract of the extended abstract entitled "<strong>Parametric Characterization of Wave Climate along the Andalusian Coast for Non-Stationary Stochastic Simulation</strong>" whose authors are Manuel Cobos, Pedro Magaña, Pedro Otiñar and Asunción Baquerizo, and that was included in proceedings of <em>39th IAHR World Congress</em> where this dataset is included.</p> <p><em>Processed data comes from PIMA Adapta Costas project (Ramírez et al., 2019), in particular, from projections of maritime climate for 2026-2045 and 2081-2100. Sea climate contains, among other information, time series of the significant wave height (H<sub>s</sub>) obtained for several combinations of GCM-RCM projections of EUR-11 for the RCP 8.5. GCM-RCM combinations ACCE, CMCC, CNRM, GFDL, HADG, IPSL, MIRO with a 0.1 degrees grid were used for the Atlantic facade while CNRM, HADG, IPSL, MIRO, MEDC, MPIE, ESM2, EART models with 1/11 degrees were used for the Mediterranean one. A total of 210 locations were analyzed, 54 at the Atlantic facade and 156 at the Mediterranean one (Figure 1). The data was bias adjusted using the Empirical Quantile Mapping (Déqué et al., 2007; Michelangeli et al., 2009). Information of the significant wave height and the dependence between the values at a given time with previous values with a VAR(q) model is already available. </em></p> <p><em>At each location, the methodology of Lira-Loarca et al. (2021) was applied, using the software described in Cobos et al. (2022a). More precisely, for every GCM-RCM (hereinafter, model n for n = 1, .., N where N = 7 for Atlantic data and N = 8 for the Mediterranean data), a non-stationary marginal distribution of H<sub>s</sub>, , assuming that the year was the largest periodicity of the climate, was fitted to data using a lognormal model for the central part and two generalized Pareto distribution for the lower and upper tails, as in Solari and Losada (2011). The non- stationarity is considered by assuming a decomposition of the parameters of the distribution and of the percentiles of the common end points of the interval into a trigonometric truncated expansion.</em></p> <p><em>In addition, the coefficients of the matrix, C<sub>n</sub>, of a VAR(q) model with q up to 92 hours were estimated. The ensemble multi-model characteristics of the data were obtained from the compound distributions and the weighted averaged matrix coefficients. </em></p> <p><em>Soon, the results of the peak period (T<sub>p</sub>) and mean incoming wave direction (ϑ<sub>m</sub>) and the coefficients of the multivariate VAR model will also be included.</em></p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Trento 1936 - Building 2100
<u>Coordinates</u>: N/A <br><u>Length</u>: 38.87 m<br><u>Width</u>: 10.18 m<br><u>Height</u>: 25.74 m<br><u>Points</u>: 24 <br><u>Vertices</u>: 132 <br><u>Primitives</u>: 44 <br><br><u>Main Files:</u><br><table><tbody><tr><th>Filename</th><th>.glb</th><th>.xml</th><th>.obj</th></tr><tr><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100.glb/content">building_2100.glb</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100.glb/content">Link</a></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100.obj/content">building_2100.obj</a></td><td></td><td></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100.obj/content">Link</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/11578744_edm.xml/content">11578744_edm.xml</a></td><td></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/11578744_edm.xml/content">Link</a></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/11578744_metsmods.xml/content">11578744_metsmods.xml</a></td><td></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/11578744_metsmods.xml/content">Link</a></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><br><br><u>Thumbnails:</u><br><table><tbody><tr><th>Perspective</th><th>1000x1000</th><th>512x512</th><th>256x256</th><th>128x128</th></tr><tr><td>Perspective 1</td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_1.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_1_512x512.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_1_256x256.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_1_128x128.png/content">Link</a></td></tr><tr><td>Perspective 2</td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_2.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_2_512x512.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_2_256x256.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_2_128x128.png/content">Link</a></td></tr><tr><td>Perspective 3</td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_3.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_3_512x512.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_3_256x256.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_3_128x128.png/content">Link</a></td></tr><tr><td>Perspective 4</td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_4.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_4_512x512.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_4_256x256.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_4_128x128.png/content">Link</a></td></tr><tr><td>Perspective Top</td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_top.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_top_512x512.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_top_256x256.png/content">Link</a></td><td><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/12694058/files/building_2100_perspective_top_128x128.png/content">Link</a></td></tr></tbody></table><br><br><br><u>Changelog</u>: <br> - v<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12550129">0.0.2</a>: Thumbnails added, Description updated with Link Tables.<br> - v<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12694058">0.0.3</a>: Added XMLs for Europeana Data Model (EDM) and MetsMods.<br>
Modeling biogeochemical responses of tundra ecosystems to temporal and spatial variations in climate in the Kuparuk River Basin , Alaska, 1921 to 2100.
Output data set of the MBL-GEM III model run for tussock tundra in the Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska, described in detail in Le Dizès, S., B. L. Kwiatkowski, E. B. Rastetter, A. Hope, J. E. Hobbie, D. Stow, and S. Daeschner, Modeling biogeochemical responses of tundra ecosystems to temporal and spatial variations in climate in the Kuparuk River Basin (Alaska), J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 8165, doi:10.1029/2001JD000960, 2003. We ran the model at a 10 km x 10 km resolution for 123 cells at a yearly time step for 180 years, from 1921 to 2100. Two scenarios enabled the investigation of the effects of two opposing climate change scenarios for the 2001-2100 future period: warmer and wetter ("wet scenario" or Scenario 1) and warmer and drier ("dry scenario" or Scenario 2). These 246 files contain all simulation results for each scenario for individual cells in the Kuparuk River basin.
Human Capital-weighted population estimates for 185 countries from 1970 to 2100
<p>We provide a novel dataset of human capital-weighted population size (HCWP) for 185 countries from 1970 to 2100. HCWP summarizes a population's productive capacity and human capital heterogeneity in a single metric, enabling comparisons across countries and over time. The weights are derived from Mincerian earnings functions applied to multi-country census data on educational attainment. The model used to compute the returns to schooling accounts for the diminishing positive relative relationship between education and wages as the overall education of populations rises. The population weights are adjusted by a skills assessment factor representing differences in education quality across countries and years. HCWP is calculated by applying these adjusted human capital weights to population estimates and projections disaggregated by age, sex and education, spanning the period 1970-2020 and 2020-2100 for five Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios. Validation analyses demonstrate the utility of the new HCWP data in explaining national income trends. As a more comprehensive population measure than basic size and age-sex indicators, HCWP enhances the power of statistical models aimed at the assessment of socioeconomic change impacts and forecasting.</p>
Block-level & block group-level income projections for Washington state under different SSPs from 2020 to 2100
<p>The files "bg_binned_income_proj.csv" and "bk_binned_income_proj.csv" contain income projections in 2015 dollars for Washington state (under census geographic boundary 2020) from 2020 to 2100 at the block group and block level, respectively, based on different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2, SSP3, and SSP5). The income projections are represented by the projected number of households for each of the three different income bins.</p><p>In the files, GISJOIN is the unique identifier for each block (or block group) . Each number of households projection is stored in a column, where the first four characters of the column name represent the projection year (e.g., 2020, 2030), the following four characters represent the SSP (e.g., SSP2, SSP3, SSP5), and the remaining characters indicate the income bin (Income1 represents annual household income less than $18,150, Income2 represents annual household income between $18,150 and $48,396, and Income3 represents annual household income greater than $48,396). For example, "2020SSP2Income1" indicates the household number projection for the first income bin in 2020 under SSP2.</p><p>"README.txt" describes the general steps for income data generation.</p>
F I G U R E 6 Projected change between 1960 and 2100 in Global warming is projected to lead to increased freshwater growth potential and changes in pace of life in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar
F I G U R E 6 Projected change between 1960 and 2100 in length-at-smoltification decision (a, b, and c), length-at-smoltification as 1-year-olds (d, e, and f), and length-at-smoltification as 2-year-olds (g, h, and i) under the three shared socioeconomic pathways and representative concentration pathways: SSP1-RCP2.6 (green), SSP3-RCP7.0 (orange), and SSP5-RCP8.5 (red) for juvenile Atlantic salmon in the Burrishoole. The gray-shaded area represents the historical reference (2000 to 2020), and the red vertical line represents the historical average.
Supplementary data for: "Historical glacier change on Svalbard predicts doubling of mass loss by 2100"
<p>Supplementary datasets for:</p> <p>Geyman, E.C., van Pelt, W.J.J., Maloof, A.C., Faste Aas, H., and Kohler, J., 2022. "Historical glacier change on Svalbard predicts doubling of mass loss by 2100." Nature.</p> <p>Abstract:</p> <p>The melting of glaciers and ice caps accounts for about one-third of current sea-level rise, exceeding the mass loss from the more voluminous Greenland or Antarctic Ice Sheets. The Arctic archipelago of Svalbard, which hosts spatial climate gradients that are larger than the expected temporal climate shifts over the next century, is a natural laboratory to constrain the climate sensitivity of glaciers and predict their response to future warming. Here we link historical and modern glacier observations to predict that twenty-first century glacier thinning rates will more than double those from 1936 to 2010. Making use of an archive of historical aerial imagery from 1936 and 1938, we use structure-from-motion photogrammetry to reconstruct the three-dimensional geometry of 1,594 glaciers across Svalbard. We compare these reconstructions to modern ice elevation data to derive the spatial pattern of mass balance over a more than 70-year timespan, enabling us to see through the noise of annual and decadal variability to quantify how variables such as temperature and precipitation control ice loss. We find a robust temperature dependence of melt rates, whereby a 1°C rise in mean summer temperature corresponds to a decrease in area-normalized mass balance of -0.28 m yr<sup>-1</sup> of water equivalent. Finally, we design a space-for-time substitution8 to combine our historical glacier observations with climate projections and make first-order predictions of twenty-first century glacier change across Svalbard.</p> <p> </p> <p>Dataset description: </p> <p><br> This dataset contains the digital elevation models (DEMs), elevation change maps, point clouds, orthophotos, and vector outlines of glacier extents based on the Norwegian Polar Institute's collection of 5,507 high-oblique aerial images captured over Svalbard in 1936/1938. The photographs were analyzed through structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry to generate 3D models. We also provide an .xlsx spreadsheet containing glacier-by-glacier statistics of ice loss and climate fields. Note that all of the raster and point cloud files listed below have been georeferenced in Metashape using the ground control points (GCPs) illustrated in Main Text, Fig. 2e, but have not undergone the co-registration and bias-correction following the methods of Nuth & Kaab (2011), which was done on a glacier-by-glacier basis. However, the glacier change budgets in the .xlsx file [#5 below] do reflect the values from the glacier-by-glacier co-registered and bias-corrected DEMs. See below for descriptions of each dataset (each number below corresponds to a different zipped folder).</p> <p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </p> <p><strong>Svalbard-wide datasets [all georeferenced Svalbard-wide datasets are in the coordinate system UTM 33N]: </strong></p> <p><br> 1. Svalbard-wide 1936 DEM (20 m and 50 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif file] </p> <p>2. Svalbard-wide 1936 orthophotomosaic (20 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif file] </p> <p>3. Svalbard-wide dh (1936-2010) (20 m and 50 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif file] </p> <p>4. Shapefile of 1936 glacier extents [ESRI .shp file] </p> <p>5. Glacier-by-glacier statistics [.xlsx file] </p> <p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- </p> <p><strong>Regional-datasets: </strong></p> <p><em>Due to file size limitations, the high-resolution (5 m) datasets are split into the 8 regions illustrated in Main Text, Fig. 2d: </em></p> <p><em>Zone 1 - South Spitsbergen</em></p> <p><em>Zone 2 - Barentsoya-Edgeoya</em></p> <p><em>Zone 3 - Austfonna</em></p> <p><em>Zone 4 - Vestfonna</em></p> <p><em>Zone 5 - Northeast Spitsbergen</em></p> <p><em>Zone 6 - Central Spitsbergen</em></p> <p><em>Zone 7 - Northwest Spitsbergen</em></p> <p><em>Zone 8 - North Spitsbergen</em></p> <p><br> 6. Regional 1936 DEMs (5 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif files] </p> <p>7. Regional dh (1936-2010) (5 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif files] </p> <p>8. Local 1936 orthomosaics (5 m resolution) [georeferenced .tif files] </p> <p>9. Unprocessed point clouds [.laz files]. These files represent the raw 3D point clouds (x,y,z) generated in Agisoft Metashape for each of the 17 local models described in Extended Data Figure 3.</p> <p>10. Thumbnail-sized copies of the 5,507 historical aerial images (1936 and 1938) analyzed in this study, along with a .csv file labeling the approximate location of each photograph.</p>
Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions (v3.0)
<p><strong>Agricultural land resources – a global suitability evaluation (v3.0)</strong></p> <p>Local climate, soil and topography determine the conditions under which agricultural crops are suitable for growth or not. The methodology uses a fuzzy logic approach that is described in Zabel et al. (2014). The approach is based on Liebig's law of the minimum. Accordingly, plant suitability is determined not by total available resources, but by the scarcest resource. The limiting factor depends on the local environmental conditions and the crop-specific requirements, that are taken from literature. </p> <p><strong>Determining Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>Agricultural suitability is calculated for each of 5 climate models (GFDL, HadGEM2, IPSL, MIROC and NorESM1) from the AR5 ISIMIP fast track protocol. Daily climate model data for temperature, precipitation and solar radiation are statistically downscaled to 30 arc seconds spatial resolution. A monthly bias-correction is applied using WorldClim data. The provided suitability data refers to the model median over the 5 climate simulations. Soil data is taken from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) v1.21. Considered soil properties are texture, proportion of coarse fragments and gypsum, base saturation, pH content, organic carbon content, salinity, sodicity. Soil depth is taken into account according to Pelletier et al. (2015). Topography data is applied from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). Irrigation has strong impact on the suitability of crops and is considered in this approach.</p> <p><strong>Agricultural Suitability</strong></p> <p>The agricultural suitability data is provided at a spatial resolution of 30 arc seconds (approximately 1 km<sup>2</sup> at the equator). The dataset contains four time periods (1980-2009, 2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2099) and two climate change scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP 8.5). Agricultural suitability is provided for rainfed conditions and for irrigated conditions seperately. Additionally, we provide a dataset in which the current irrigation areas according to Maier et al. (2018) are applied. The suitability is provided for 23 food, feed, fibre, and 1st and 2nd generation bio-energy crops. An 'overall suitability' is provided for all crops that considers the most suitable crop on each pixel. Additionally, we provide a dataset excluding 2nd generation bioenergy crops (18-23) from the overall aggregation of crops.</p> <table> <caption><strong>Food, feed, fiber and first-generation bioenergy crops</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td>Barley</td> <td>Potato</td> <td>Sugarbeet</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Cassava</td> <td>Rapeseed</td> <td>Sugarcane</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Groundnut</td> <td>Rice</td> <td>Sunflower</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Maize</td> <td>Rye</td> <td>Summer wheat</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Millet</td> <td>Sorghum</td> <td>Winter wheat</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Oilpalm</td> <td>Soybean</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <caption> <p><strong>Second-generation bioenergy crops</strong></p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td>Jatropha</td> <td>Reed canary grass</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Miscanthus</td> <td>Eucalyptus</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Switchgrass</td> <td>Willow</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Growing Season Adaptation</strong></p> <p>The agricultural suitability considers the adaptation of the growing season. For each pixel and crop, the growing season is optimized throughout the year, taking the annual course of precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation as well as their interplay, into account.</p> <p><strong>Most Suitable Crop</strong></p> <p>The most suitable crop for each pixel is provided in the data. Please note that a value of 126 means that no crop suitable and 127 means that multiple crops have the same suitability.</p> <p><strong>Further information</strong></p> <p>Detailled information are available in the following publications:</p> <p>Zabel F, Putzenlechner B, Mauser W (2014) Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions. PLOS ONE 9(9): e107522. doi: <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107522">10.1371/journal.pone.0107522</a></p> <p>Cronin, J., Zabel, F., Dessens, O., Anandarajah, G. (2020): Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land-use. GCB Bioenergy, 12(8). doi: <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcbb.12697">10.1111/gcbb.12697</a></p> <p>Schneider. J.M., Zabel, F., Mauser, W. (2022): Global inventory of suitable, cultivable and available cropland under different scenarios and policies. Scientific Data 9, 527. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8">10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8</a></p> <p>Meier, J., Zabel, F., Mauser, W. (2018): A global approach to estimate irrigated areas – a comparison between different data and statistics. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1119–1133, 2018. doi: <a href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/1119/2018/">10.5194/hess-22-1119-201</a></p> <p>Pelletier, J. D., Broxton, P. D., Hazenberg, P., Zeng, X., Troch, P. A., Niu, G.-Y., Williams, Z., Brunke, M. A., and Gochis, D. (2016), A gridded global data set of soil, immobile regolith, and sedimentary deposit thicknesses for regional and global land surface modeling, <em>J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.</em>, 8, 41– 65, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000526">10.1002/2015MS000526</a>.</p> <p><strong>Improvements in v3.0</strong></p> <p>Compared to the previous version (<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3748350">v2.0</a>), this version (v3.0) <em>uses updated input data for soil (HWSD v1.21) and high resolution irrigated areas (Maier et al. 2018), and additionally considers soil depth (Pelletier et al. 2016). Moreover, the suitability is calculated for an ensemble of 5 climate models, and is available for more crops, including a number of second generation bioenergy crops.</em></p> <p><strong>Contact</strong></p> <p>Please contact: Dr. Florian Zabel, <a href="mailto:f.zabel@lmu.de">f.zabel@lmu.de</a>, Department of Geography, LMU München (<a href="http://www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de">www.geografie.uni-muenchen.de</a>)</p>
MPAS-Albany Land Ice model simulations of Humboldt Glacier, North Greenland, from 2007–2100
<p>This dataset contains model input and output in netCDF format, model code, and analysis scripts for simulations of Humboldt Glacier, North Greenland, through the 21st century (Hillebrand et al., 2022) using the MPAS-Albany Land Ice model (Hoffman et al., 2018). We calibrate parameters controlling basal traction, iceberg calving, and submarine melt against observations from 2007–2017. We then explore the glacier’s sensitivity to climate forcing, iceberg calving, and basal conditions in an ensemble of 24 simulations from 2007–2100. We further explore its sensitivity to uncertainties in ice-shelf melt, bed topography, and calving rate limits in targeted sensitivity experiments. Input files include surface mass balance, ocean thermal forcing, and subglacial runoff forcings provided by ISMIP6 (Nowicki et al., 2020; Slater et al., 2020). Output includes basal traction optimization solutions for the year 2007; annual 2D ice speed, basal shear and driving stresses, and geometry; annual 3D temperature; and grounded, floating, and global mass budgets at every timestep.</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Hillebrand, T. R., Hoffman, M. J., Perego, M., Price, S. F., and Howat, I. M. (2022): The contribution of Humboldt Glacier, northern Greenland, to sea-level rise through 2100 constrained by recent observations of speedup and retreat, The Cryosphere, 16, 4679–4700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4679-2022">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4679-2022</a>.</p> <p>Hoffman, M. J., Perego, M., Price, S. F., Lipscomb, W. H., Zhang, T., Jacobsen, D., et al. (2018). MPAS-Albany Land Ice (MALI): a variable-resolution ice sheet model for Earth system modeling using Voronoi grids. <em>Geoscientific Model Development</em>, <em>11</em>(9), 3747–3780.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3747-2018"> https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3747-2018</a></p> <p>Nowicki, S., Goelzer, H., Seroussi, H., Payne, A. J., Lipscomb, W. H., Abe-Ouchi, A., et al. (2020). Experimental protocol for sea level projections from ISMIP6 stand-alone ice sheet models. <em>The Cryosphere</em>, <em>14</em>(7), 2331–2368.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2331-2020"> https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2331-2020</a></p> <p>Slater, D. A., Felikson, D., Straneo, F., Goelzer, H., Little, C. M., Morlighem, M., et al. (2020). Twenty-first century ocean forcing of the Greenland ice sheet for modelling of sea level contribution. <em>The Cryosphere</em>, <em>14</em>(3), 985–1008.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-985-2020"> https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-985-2020</a></p>
Fig. 2 Projected future changes for Dermacentor reticulatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585 in Ticks on the move-climate change-induced range shifts of three tick species in Europe: current and future habitat suitability for Ixodes ricinus in comparison with Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus
Fig. 2 Projected future changes for Dermacentor reticulatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585. In dark blue: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions but unsuitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential extinction). In light blue: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable absence). In orange: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable range). In red: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions but suitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential new range). AUC = 0.8333 (average over 10 replicates using cross-validation, standard deviation = 0.001113603). Threshold to transform the logistic model output: 0.3816 (10% omission rate threshold). Maps were built using ESRI ArcGIS (Release 10.7, www.esri.com). Projection: Europe Albers Equal Area Conic
Fig. 2 Projected future changes for Dermacentor reticulatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585 in Ticks on the move-climate change-induced range shifts of three tick species in Europe: current and future habitat suitability for Ixodes ricinus in comparison with Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus
Fig. 2 Projected future changes for Dermacentor reticulatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585. In dark blue: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions but unsuitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential extinction). In light blue: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable absence). In orange: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable
Fig. 1 Projected future changes for Ixodes ricinus until 2081–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585 in Ticks on the move-climate change-induced range shifts of three tick species in Europe: current and future habitat suitability for Ixodes ricinus in comparison with Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus
Fig. 1 Projected future changes for Ixodes ricinus until 2081–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585. In dark blue: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions but unsuitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential extinction). In light blue: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable absence). In orange: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable range). In red:
Fig. 3 Projected future changes for Dermacentor marginatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585 in Ticks on the move-climate change-induced range shifts of three tick species in Europe: current and future habitat suitability for Ixodes ricinus in comparison with Dermacentor reticulatus and Dermacentor marginatus
Fig. 3 Projected future changes for Dermacentor marginatus until 2080–2100. a SSP 126. b SSP 245. c SSP 370. d SSP 585. In dark blue: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions but unsuitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential extinction). In light blue: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable absence). In orange: area projected as suitable under current climatic conditions as well as under future climatic conditions (i.e., stable range). In red: area projected as unsuitable under current climatic conditions but suitable under future climatic conditions (i.e., potential new range). AUC = 0.8229 (average over 10 replicates using cross-validation, standard deviation = 0.001121953). Threshold to transform the logistic model output: 0.4298 (10% omission rate threshold). Maps were built using ESRI ArcGIS (Release 10.7, www.esri.com). Projection: Europe Albers Equal Area Conic
Ultrasound Vevo 2100 data on ascending and abdominal aneurysms in ApoE-deficient mice - baseline and early stage
<p>This dataset contains raw data of ultrasound measurements taken of the ascending and abdominal aorta of Ang II-infused mice. Data were taken at baseline (prior to pump implantation) and at an early stage of disease development. Data can be openend with the Vevo 2100 analysis software provided by Fujifilm.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Data for "ISMIP6-based Antarctic Projections to 2100: simulations with the BISICLES ice sheet model"
<p>Data to accompany:</p> <p>O’Neill, J.F., Edwards, T.L., Martin, D.F., Shafer, C., Cornford, S.L., Seroussi, H.L., Nowicki, S., Adhikari, M., Gregoire, L.J.. (2024). "ISMIP6-based Antarctic Projections to 2100: simulations with the BISICLES ice sheet model in the Cryosphere". <em>The Cryosphere</em>. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2024-441 (preprint)</p> <p>Zipped directories called ismip6_<em>expname</em>_8km containing NetCDFs of output data from each experiment, on an 8 km EPSG3031 polar stereographic common grid for ISMIP6. Variable names are the same as those used for ISMIP6 i.e: land ice mass (lim), land ice mass above floatation (limnsw), floating area (iareaf), grounded area (iareag), thickness (lithk), x component of mean velocity (xvelmean), y component of mean velocity (yvelmean), basal mass flux (libmassbffl), acabf (surface mass balance), sftflf (floating ice mask), sftgrf (grounded ice mask), sftgif (ice mask), dlithkdt (ice thickness imbalance), base (elevation at base of ice sheet) and orog (surface elevation of ice sheet). These latter two are only included for the experiments plotted in Figure 11 in "ISMIP6-based Antarctic Projections to 2100: simulations with the BISICLES ice sheet model in the Cryosphere".</p> <p> </p> <p>Also included are csv data for summary variables, masked regionally, and by sectors detailed in the main paper. Please contact J ONeill with any questions or requests. </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.