Find research datasets worth reusing

Philosophy [IO Bijapur 160A]

<ul> <li><strong>Philosophy.</strong></li> <li><strong>This manuscript is now IO Bijapur 160A&nbsp;</strong><strong>in the India Office collections.</strong></li> <li><strong>[metadata:</strong><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Loth">&nbsp;<strong>Otto Loth,&nbsp;</strong></a><strong><em><a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3923636">A Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office</a></em>, (volume 1), no. 543&nbsp;here with further notations and hyperlinks]</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>543.</p> <p>B 160A. Size 8^3/4 in. by 5^3/4 in.; foll. 71. Twenty-six lines in a page.</p> <p>Glosses on <em>Daww&acirc;n&icirc;&rsquo;s</em> Commentary on the <em>Tahdh&icirc;b</em>.</p> <p>The Author is M&icirc;r ABU&rsquo;L-FATḤ Sa&rsquo;&icirc;d&icirc; (d. about A.H. 950).</p> <p>See Ḥ. Kh. ii. 480, and Cat. St. Petersb., p. 69, xciv.2.</p> <p>Begins: الحمدلله على تهذيب المنطق و الكلام &lsquo; و الصلوة و السلام على اعرف المعرفين بطريق الاسلام&lsquo; وآله الحج(الحجج.r) الموصلين الى كل مرام&lsquo; قوله هو الوصف بالجميل الخ الباء اما صلة للوصف الخ.</p> <p>The epilogue, to which Ḥ. Kh. alludes, begins here:</p> <p>هذا آخر ما يتعلق بقسم المنطق من هذا الكتاب&lsquo; و حل ما فيه من المباحث و الابواب &lsquo; و قد بقى قسم الكلام منه متواريا بالحجاب&lsquo; فلو وجدت نسخة من الخ.¹</p> <p>Written chiefly in a clear Naskh, towards the end of the tenth century,² with marginal notes. Scribe, &lsquo;Abd al-mu&rsquo;min. According to an ill-written note at the end, this copy, text and notes, was taken from a MS. which had been revised by the author.</p> <p>The text of foll. 15-17 is in a state of confusion.</p> <p>There are slight defects after foll. 2 and 44.</p> <p>The title-page has the following inscription :هذا شرح على حواشى للعلامة الدوّانى يدفع الغواشى عن التهذيب و حاشية لما يقصده الشارح الجارح و الحمد على التوفيق.</p> <p>The book is, however, wrongly described as شرح تجلیلات در علم حقایق و سلوک by a more modern hand ; cf. Cat. 232, xxiii.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>¹ The text of the following passage is rather incorrect.</p> <p>² On the title-page we find the date, 5th Rab&icirc;&rsquo; I., 988, which apparently refers to completion of this copy.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>