Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
12
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
12 results for “Leptodactylus fuscus”
FIGURE 2. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 2. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37. Oral disc and buccopharyngeal cavity (A) Oral disc, frontal view, (B) Detail of keratodonts, (C) Buccal roof, (D) Buccal floor.
FIGURE 6 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 6. Deformations implied by the CV1. Transformation of the consensus shape to the shape corresponding to maximum and minimum scores on CV1 (A) Chondrocranium, score = 0.05, (B) Chondrocranium, score = -0.04, (C) Hyobranchial skeleton, score = 0.1, (D) Hyobranchial skeleton, score = -0.05. Points are landmarks in the reference configuration, and vectors point out the landmarks in the selected configuration. Solid lines indicate the places where the shape changes are concentrated (the longest vectors): the ascending process (A,B) and the branchial basket (C,D).
FIGURE 1. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 1. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37. External morphology (A) Lateral view, (B) Dorsal view, (C) Ventral view.
FIGURE 5 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 5. Landmarks selected for the CVA of 22 Leptodactylus species (A) Chondrocranium, dorsal view: 1 most anterior point of the confluence between the trabecular horns, 2 anteromedial angle of the trabecular horn, 3 anterolateral angle of the trabecular horn, 4 base of the trabecular horn, 5 most anterior point of the quadratocranial commissure, 6 tip of the quadratoethmoid process, 7 anteromedial angle of the articular process of the palatoquadrate, 8 anterolateral angle of the articular process of the palatoquadrate, 9 most anterior point of the muscular process, 10 tip of the muscular process, 11 tip of the hyoquadrate process, 12 most posterior point of the muscular process, 13 most lateral point of the subocular bar, 14 most posterior point of the subocular bar, 15 ascending process–neurocranium junction, 16 most medial point of the subocular fenestra, 17 most anterior point of the subocular fenestra, 18 most lateral point of the subocular fenestra, 19 most anterior point of the otic capsule, 20 most lateral point of the otic capsule, 21 most posterior point of the otic capsule, 22 most medial point of the otic capsule, 23 most posterior point of the tectum synoticum, 24 most anterior point of the frontoparietal fenestra (B) Hyobranchial skeleton, ventral view: 1 most anterior point of the pars reuniens, 2 tip of the anterior process, 3 tip of the anterolateral process, 4 lateral edge of the ceratohyal, 5 lateral point at the base of the posterior process, 6 tip of the posterior process, 7 pars reuniens–basibranchial junction, 8 basibranchial–hypobranchial plate junction, 9 tip of the branchial anterior process, 10 most lateral point of the ceratobranchial I, 11 most posterior point of the gill slit II, 12 most posterior point of the gill slit III, 13 most posterior point of the gill slit IV, 14 ceratobranchial IV–hypobranchial plate junction, 15 ceratobranchial III–hypobranchial plate junction, 16 ceratobranchial II–hypobranchial plate junction, 17 ceratobranchial I–hypobranchial plate junction; 18, most posterior point of the hypobranchial plate; 19, most posterior point of the hypobranchial plates junction, 20 tip of the urobranchial process.
FIGURE 8 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 8. Scatterplot from CVA of 22 Leptodactylus species hyobranchial skeleton. Different symbols represent the species groups summarized by Frost (2006). Empty circles are centroids from each species group. Grids show the deformation of L. elenae and the group centroid shapes relative to the consensus shape.
FIGURE 3. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 3. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37. Skeleton (A) Chondrocranium, dorsal view, (B) Chondrocranium, ventral view, (C) Hyobranchial skeleton, ventral view, (D) Detail of the suprarostral (up), and mandibles (bottom), frontal view.
FIGURE 4. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 4. Leptodactylus elenae, Stage 36–37. Musculature (A) Dorsal view, (B) Ventral view, (C) Lateral view. Legends: CB(II–IV) constrictor branchialis (II–IV), DB diaphragmatobranchialis, DL dilatator laryngis, DP diaphragmatopraecordialis, GH geniohyoideus, HAL hyoangularis lateralis, HAM hyoangularis medialis, IH interhyoideus, IHP interhyoideus posterior, IM intermandibularis, LB(I–IV) levator arcuum branchialium (I–IV), LMEP levator mandibulae externus profundus, LMES levator mandibulae externus superficialis, LMI levator mandibulae internus, LML levator mandibulae lateralis, LMLP levator mandibular longus profundus, LMLS levator mandibulae longus superficialis, ML mandibulolabialis, OH orbitohyoideus, RC rectus cervicis, SH suspensoriohyoideus, SO subarcualis obliquus, SRI subarcualis rectus I, SRII–IV subarcualis rectus II–IV, TP tympanopharyngeus.
FIGURE 7 in Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay
FIGURE 7. Scatterplot from CVA on 22 Leptodactylus species chondrocrania. Different symbols represent the species groups summarized by Frost (2006). Empty circles are centroids from each species group. Grids show the deformation of L. elenae and the group centroid shapes relative to the consensus shape. Note the articular process slightly short and the larger otic capsules in L. elenae, when compared to the L. fuscus group centroid shape.
Figure 3 in The reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura, Leptodactylidae): new data from natural temporary ponds in the Brazilian Cerrado and a review throughout its distribution
Figure 3. Intra-specific distance of Leptodactylus fuscus males in the Ponte Pond in the Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, São Paulo, from December 2002 and January 2003. In December: NC, non-calling males (N528) and C, calling males (N59); in January: NC, noncalling males (N536) and C, calling males (N519). Points indicate medians; boxes represent first and third quartiles (between 25% and 75% of the variation); bars indicate minimum and maximum values.
Figure 2 in The reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura, Leptodactylidae): new data from natural temporary ponds in the Brazilian Cerrado and a review throughout its distribution
Figure 2. Corrected number Leptodactylus fuscus males observed in calling activity every hour in the three temporary ponds at the Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, São Paulo, from November 2002 to March 2003. Dotted line represents number expected; continuous line represents number observed.
Figure 1 in The reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura, Leptodactylidae): new data from natural temporary ponds in the Brazilian Cerrado and a review throughout its distribution
Figure 1. Maximum number of individuals of Leptodactylus fuscus (bars), accumulated rainfall (dotted lines; mm) and height of the water column (continuous line; mm) reported in each sampling period, in the three temporary ponds at the Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, São Paulo, from November 2002 to March 2003.
De novo genome assembly of Leptodactylus fuscus
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.