Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
942
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
942 results for “Scenarios”
Land-Cover Change Scenarios for Massachusetts 2010-2060
Working with a panel of practitioners and regional experts, we developed and analyzed four plausible but divergent land-use scenarios that depict the future of Massachusetts from 2010 to 2060. We simulated the land-use scenarios and their interactions with anticipated climate change by coupling statistical models of land use to the LANDIS-II landscape model and then evaluated the outcomes in terms of the magnitude and spatial distribution of (1) direct human uses of the landscape (residential and commercial development, agricultural, timber harvest), (2) ecosystem services (carbon storage, flood regulation, nutrient retention), and (3) habitat quality (forest tree species composition, interior forest habitat). Across all scenarios, conflicts occurred between dispersed residential development and the supply of ecosystem services and habitat quality. In all but the scenario that envisioned a significant agricultural expansion, forest growth resulted in net increases in aboveground carbon storage, despite the concomitant forest clearing and harvesting. One scenario, called Forests as Infrastructure, showed the potential for synergies between increased forest harvest volume through the sustainable practices that encouraged the maintenance of economically and ecologically important tree species, and carbon storage. This scenario also showed trade-offs between development density and water quantity and quality at the watershed scale. The process of integrated scenario analysis led to important insights for land managers and policymakers in a populated forested region where there are tensions among development, forest harvesting, and land conservation. More broadly, the results emphasize the need to consider the consequences of contrasting land-use regimes that result from the interactions between human decisions and spatially heterogeneous landscape dynamics.
Fluxes project at North Temperate Lakes LTER: Hydrology Scenarios Model Output
A spatially-explicit simulation model of hydrologic flow-paths was developed by Matthew C. Van de Bogert and collaborators for his PhD project, " Aquatic ecosystem carbon cycling: From individual lakes to the landscape." The model is coupled with an in-lake carbon model and simulates hydrologic flow paths in groundwater, wetlands, lakes, uplands, and streams. The goal of this modeling effort was to compare aquatic carbon cycling in two climate scenarios for the North Highlands Lake District (NHLD) of northern Wisconsin: one based on the current climate and the other based on a scenario with warmer winters where lakes and uplands do not freeze, hereinafter referred to as the "no freeze" scenario. In modeling this "no freeze" scenario the same precipitation and temperature data as the current climate model was used, however temperature inputs were artificially floored at 0 degrees Celsius. While not discussed in his dissertation, Van de Bogert considered two other climate scenarios each using the same precipitation and temperature data as the current climate scenario. These scenarios involved running the model after artificially raising and lowering the current temperature data by 10 degrees Celsius. Thus, four scenarios were considered in this modeling effort, the current climate scenario, the "no freeze" scenario, the +10 degrees scenario, and the -10 degrees scenario. These data are the outputs of the model under the different scenarios and include average monthly temperature, average monthly rainfall, average monthly snowfall, total monthly precipitation, daily evapotranspiration, daily surface runoff, daily groundwater recharge, and daily total runoff. Note that the results of how temperature inputs influence aquatic carbon cycling under these different scenarios is not included in this data set, refer to Van de Bogert (2011) for this information.Documentation: Van de Bogert, M.C., 2011. Aquatic ecosystem carbon cycling: From individual lakes to the landscape. Pr
Raw data for the submitted manuscript entitled "Prospective Scenarios for Addressing the Agricultural Plastic Waste Issue: Results of a Territorial Analysis"
<p><span>Agricultural activities have been positively affected by the use of plastic products, but this has resulted in the production of plastic waste and led to an increase in environmental pollution. </span><span>This file concerns plastic waste indices to different crop types and plastic products allowed quantifying and georeferencing actual plastic waste production. Two improved scenarios were considered, the first consisted of extending the lifespan of some plastics, and the second entailed the introduction of some biodegradable alternatives. </span></p>
Forest expansion for different warming scenarios simulated for 2010 to 3000 CE with LAVESI for Siberia
<p>Simulations with the spatially explicit and individual-based Siberian forest model LAVESI (Kruse et al., 2016, 2018, 2019) were set-up for transect in four focus regions covering the East Siberian treeline and tundra area (details in Kruse & Herzschuh, submitted). The model was updated to include climate forcing data for 300-800 km long and 20 m wide transects necessary for simulating the forest development between the northern taiga forests and the coast of the Arctic Ocean. Forced with climate forecasts driven by relative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 and one with half the warming of RCP 2.6 named 2.6*. These were extended until 3000 AD either following the cooling of the scenarios after peak-warming, or with an arbitrary cooling back to levels of the 20th century.</p> <p>During the simulations, three key variables were extracted in 10-year steps for 2000-3000 AD: single-tree line, treeline, and, forest line, which are defined as the northernmost position of stands with >1 stem (tree > 1.3 m tall) per ha, the northernmost position of a forest cover not falling below 1 stem per ha, and, the northernmost position of a forest cover not falling below 100 stems ha per ha (see for a graphical representation Fig. 2 in Kruse et al., 2019). The determined treeline at year 2000 was used as baseline expansion and subtracted from each following years’ values.</p> <p>Furthermore, the tundra area was estimated for each of the four regions as the area between the treeline and the Arctic Ocean, based on interpolating the treeline position at the four transects over the complete modern treeline (Walker et al., 2005).</p> <ol> <li>Content of Table 1 "Kruse_and_Herzschuh_2022_Forest_expansion_in_Siberia_2010_to_3000_CE.csv": <ul> <li>Column 1: Scenario: RCP scenario used</li> <li>Column 2: Region: One of the four regions, from east-to-west Taimyr Peninsula, Buor Khaya Peninsula, Kolyma River Basin, Chukotka</li> <li>Column 3: Year: Year in CE of the simulation in 10 year steps</li> <li>Column 4: Forest line in m</li> <li>Column 5: Treeline in m</li> <li>Column 6: Single-tree line in m</li> </ul> </li> <li>Content of Table 2 "Kruse_and_Herzschuh_2022_Tundra_area_in_Siberia_2010_to_3000_CE.csv": <ul> <li>Column 1: Scenario: RCP scenario used</li> <li>Column 2: Year: Year in CE of the simulation in 10 year steps</li> <li>Column 3: Tundra area at region Taimyr Peninsula in km²</li> <li>Column 4: Tundra area at region Buor Khaya Peninsula in km²</li> <li>Column 5: Tundra area at region Kolyma River Basin in km²</li> <li>Column 6: Tundra area at region Chukotka in km²</li> </ul> </li> <li>The zip-file "Kruse_and_Herzschuh_2022_Forest_expansion_maps_in_Siberia_2010_to_3000_CE.zip" contains shape files with the tundra area in 10 year steps starting in 2000 until 3000 CE <ul> <li>projection: Albers azimuthal equidistant projection centered at Longitude of 100 °E (PROJ4 string: "+proj=aea +lat_1=50 +lat_2=70 +lat_0=56 +lon_0=100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs")</li> </ul> </li> </ol> <p>This study was supported by the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association and by the ERC consolidator grant Glacial Legacy of Ulrike Herzschuh (grant no. 772852).</p>
Drone onboard multi-modal sensor dataset for complex outdoor scenarios
<p>The Data acquisition missions were designed and executed using DJI Pilot 2’s flight route planning feature. The missions encompassed five distinct geometric patterns: 1. triangular, 2. circular, 3. rectangular, 4. linear, and 5. multi-dimensional. Each mission was configured as a waypoint flight path, allowing precise customization of parameters such as altitude, speed, and turning angle for each waypoint. The dataset consists of 3D space flight data such as take-off, landing and varying altitude to introduce the z-axis changes. It must be noted that data was logged at a frequency of 10 Hz.</p> <p>To ensure consistency within the data, identical parameters were maintained across all data acquisition missions. The dataset comprises 20 distinct flights, with each flight path repeated multiple times, resulting in approximately 30 minutes of flight time per mission. The dataset is structured as time-series data, with each flight uniquely identified by a flight number and corresponding timestamp. The drone's spatial position is represented by the variables <strong>position_x, position_y, position_z </strong>while its orientation is captured by the variables <strong>orientation_x, orientation_y, orientation_z, orientation_w</strong>. Additionally, the drone's velocity and angular velocity are represented by the variables <strong>velocity_x, velocity_y, velocity_z, angular_x, angular_y, angular_z </strong>respectively. The linear acceleration is described by the variables <strong>linear_acceleration_x, linear_acceleration_y, linear_acceleration_z</strong>. The dataset also includes environmental data such as <strong>wind_speed, wind_angle </strong>using the TriSonica Mini Wind and Weather Sensor as well as information regarding the drone's battery status, including <strong>battery_voltage, battery_current.</strong></p> <p><strong>Data Acquisition Paths: <a href="https://ucy-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/ygrigo01_ucy_ac_cy/EYAgdcLGCWxPloO1NMnsF-8Btf390Kmx854IuDe9R3E1ig?e=3Trbuk">Data acquisition paths</a></strong></p> <p>The dataset includes labels for various operational states of the drone, such as IDLE_HOVER, ASCEND, TURN, HMSL and DESCEND. These labels can be utilized to classify the drone's current activity. Moreover, the annotated dataset can be applied in multi-task learning to predict the drone's trajectory.</p> <p>The DJI Matrice 300 RTK is utilized as the primary platform for data acquisition, leveraging its compatibility with onboard development kits to facilitate the extraction of data from its integrated sensors and flight controller. To execute the developed software the NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX serves as the embedded computing device. Utilizing the Onboard software development kit the Jetson Xavier NX enables real-time access and processing of data from the drone's sensors and flight controller.</p>
A large ensemble of CMIP6-based transient climate scenarios for impact assessment in Great Britain.
<p>Climate change impact assessments often require a large ensemble of local-scale transient climate scenarios. Each ensemble member represents plausible long weather series at a local scale. The climate projections from Global Climate Models (GCMs) are difficult to use at local scale due to their coarse spatial and temporal resolution. Moreover, very few projections are usually available for each GCM due to a high computational cost. An alternative approach involves employing a stochastic weather generator to produce a large number of transient scenarios based on the climate projections from GCMs. In a current dataset, transient climate scenarios were generated using the LARS-WG weather generator, based on climate projections from GCMs from the CMIP6 ensemble across 26 representative sites throughout the UK. Each transient scenario spans the period from 2020 to 2090. At each site, 100 transient scenarios were generated for two emission scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) and five selected GCMs from CMIP6 (ACCESS-ESM1-5, CNRM-CM6-1, HadGEM3-GC31-LL, MPI-ESM1-2-LR, and MRI-ESM2-0). The choice of GCMs were based on their performance over northern Europe and their climate sensitivity. The use of a subset of GCMs substantially reduces computational time required for impact assessment, while allowing to quantify uncertainties in impacts related to uncertain future climate. The dataset can be used with impact models in various fields, including, land and water resources, agriculture and food production, ecology and epidemiology, and human health and welfare, when undertaking impact assessment of climate change and decision support for mitigation and adaptation.</p>
CMIP6-based local-scale climate scenarios for impact assessment in Great Britain.
<p>Climate change impact assessments require local-scale climate scenarios. The climate change projections from <span>Global Climate Models (GCMs) </span>are difficult to use at local scale due to their <span>coarse spatial and temporal resolution. </span><span>It is important to have climate change scenarios based on GCMs climate projections GCMs ensembles, e.g. CMIP6, downscaled to local scale to account for their inherent uncertainty, and to generate a sufficient large number of </span>realisations <span>to account for inter-annual climate variability and low frequency but high impact extreme climatic events. A</span><span> <span>dataset of future climate change scenarios was therefore generated at </span></span><span>26 representative sites across the UK</span><span> based on the latest </span><span>CMIP6 multi-model ensemble </span><span>downscaled to local-scale by using a </span><span>stochastic weather generator LARS-WG 7.0. The data set provides </span><span>1,000 years of daily weather at each selected site for a baseline (1985-2015), and very near- (2030) and near-future (2050) climate change scenarios, based on five GCMs and two emission scenarios (</span><span>Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSPs <em>viz</em>. </span>SSP2-4.5 and <span>SSP5-8.5)</span><span>.</span><span> </span><span>A total of </span>15 GCMs from the CMIP6 ensemble were integrated in LARS-WG 7.0. <span>LARS-WG downscales future climate projections from the GCMs and incorporates changes at local scale in the mean climate, climatic variability, and extreme events by modifying the statistical distributions of the weather variables at each site. </span>Based on the performance of the GCMs over northern Europe and their climate sensitivity, a subset of five GCMs was selected, <em>viz</em>.; ACCESS-ESM1-5, CNRM-CM6-1, HadGEM3-GC31-LL, MPI-ESM1-2-LR and MRI-ESM2-0. The selected GCMs are evenly distributed among the full set of 15 GCMs. The use of a subset of GCMs substantially reduces computational time, while allowing assessment of uncertainties in impact studies related to uncertain future climate projections arising from GCMs.<span> <span>The 1000 years of </span></span>realisations <span>of daily weather for the baseline as well as future climate change scenarios are helpful for estimating </span>seasonality and<span> inter-annual variation, and for detecting short, </span>low frequency but high impact extreme climatic signals, such as heat waves, floods and drought events. The dataset <span>can be used as an input to climate change impact models in various fields, including, </span><span>land and water resources, agriculture and food production, </span>ecology and epidemiology, and <span>human health and welfare. Researchers, breeders, farm and programme managers, social and public sector leaders, and policymakers may benefit from this new dataset when undertaking impact assessment of climate change and decision support for mitigation and adaptation.</span></p>
Uncertainty in Migration Scenarios. QuantMig Project Deliverable D9.2 Data Description
<p>This open data deposit contains the data and code accompanying used in the report: Barker and Bijak (2021), Uncertainty in Migration Scenarios, QuantMig Project Deliverable D9.2. The cover note should be read in conjunction with the report, available via www.quantmig.eu, and with the individual readme files in the data folders that can be found within this Zenodo repository (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7709443).</p>
MAGIC Deliverable D6.5: Shale gas development in the EU 10Km radius well grid scenario
<p>Geo data set of escenario of shale gas implementation in Europe. Developed for WP 6 of the <a href="https://magic-nexus.eu/">MAGIC-Nexus project</a>. It derives from a Geomodel of wells and a database of shale gas played developed by the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/pl1-britze.pdf">EUOGA </a>project. </p> <p><strong>DB Fields------------------------------------------</strong></p> <p>WELLid: Id of the well</p> <p>RBid: Id of the River Basin in which the well is located</p> <p>RBtxtINT: Name of the River Basin - English</p> <p>RBtxt: Name of the River Basin - Country's Name</p> <p>GWid: Groundwater basin ID</p> <p>PADid: ID of the extraction pad</p> <p>Formation: Shale formation</p> <p>Age: of the well </p> <p>Depth_avg: Average depth of the shale (inherited)</p> <p>Mature_avg: Average matureness of the shale (inherited)</p> <p>TOC_avg: Average Organic content of the shale (inherited)</p> <p>ThickGross: Gross Thickness of the shale play in meters (inherited)</p> <p>ThickNet_m: Net Thickness of the shale play in meters (inherited)</p> <p>EUOGA_Basi: Basin of the well according ot the EUOGA project database (inherited)</p> <p>Basin_inde: Id of the shale basin (inherited)</p> <p>NGS_Basin: Id of the BAsin as stated by the national geological service</p> <p>Shale_CP: Shale country </p> <p>RF_Maturit: Reference Maturity</p> <p>RF_Depth: Reference Depth</p> <p>CNTR_CODE, Country code</p> <p>NUTS_NAME: Name of the NUTS region</p> <p>NUTid: ID of the NUTS region</p> <p>x,y Coordinates of the well</p>
Long-term heat demand scenarios under climate change utilising a stochastic dynamic building stock model: Morphed hourly outdoor temperatures for Jyvaskyla for 2030 and 2050
<p>******************* Please view the README.txt or README.md file for detailed documentation of data. ********************</p> <p>Title: Long-term heat demand scenarios under climate change utilising a stochastic dynamic building stock model: Morphed hourly outdoor temperatures for Jyväskylä for 2030 and 2050</p> <p>Date of release: 25/11/2020</p> <p>Identifier: 10.5281/zenodo.4275759</p> <p>Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4275759</p> <p>Associated publication: Hietaharju, P.; Louis, J.-N.; Pulkkinen, J.; Ruusunen, M. Long-term heat demand scenarios under climate change utilising a stochastic dynamic building stock model, <strong><em>Under Review</em></strong>, 2020.</p> <p>Suggested citation: Please reference the associated publication above when using any datasets or materials described in the README.txt and README.md files.</p> <p><br> Contact information: Jari Pulkkinen, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, jari.pulkkinen@oulu.fi; Jean-Nicolas Louis, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, jean-nicolas.louis@oulu.fi<br> </p> <p>Dates of data: 2030, 2050</p> <p>Type of data: Outdoor Temperature</p> <p>Geographic location: Jyväskylä</p> <p>Time resolution: hourly, full year</p> <p>Format: All data is stored in .csv files</p> <p>Number of files: 1 .zip --> 50 files + README.txt + README.md</p> <p>This directory contains the following datasets: A summary of all the files has been compiled and stored in the "README.txt" and "README.md" files</p> <p> </p> <p>Notifications:</p> <p>Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) information [2018] and modified Finnish Meteorological Institute [2017,2019] information from etsin.fairdata.fi and from Open data repository (https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/open-data).</p> <p><br> Contains modified Climate One Building information [2019] (reference Lawrie L.K. and Crawley D.B. 2019) and Test Reference Year 2012 (TRY2012) information from Jylhä et al. [2011] and Jylhä et al. [2015] (Energy demand for the heating and cooling of residential houses in Finland in a changing climate).</p> <p>Contains modified Ruosteenoja et al. [2016] information.</p> <p>Other data and information sources are described in README.txt, README.md, references and on the associated publication.</p>
Surface alkalinity, pH (total scale) and CO2 air-sea flux of the Mediterranean Sea under different alkalinisation scenarios.
<p>Surface maps and basin mean/total of annual mean surface alkalinity, pH (total scale) and CO2 air-sea flux of the Mediterranean Sea under different alkalinisation scenarios and for underlying the baseline projection (RCP4.5).</p> <p>Details on simulations and alkalinisation strategies are given in the reference article below.</p> <p> </p> <p>Reference:</p> <p>Butenschön, M., Lovato, T., Masina, S., Caserini, S., Grosso, M., 2021. Alkalinization Scenarios in the Mediterranean Sea for Efficient Removal of Atmospheric CO2 and the Mitigation of Ocean Acidification. Front. Clim. 3. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.614537">https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.614537</a></p>
Detailed abundances based on different nuclear physics for theoretical r-process scenarios
<p>This data set contains detailed abundances (at a time t=10^6 years after the event) for individual trajectories for seven different simulations of potential r-process sites, and based on nine different combinations of nuclear mass models and fission fragment distribution models. The data have been used and are discussed in Cote, Eichler, Yagüe, et al. (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200604833C/abstract) to determine the isotopic ratios of I129/Cm247 and compare them to meteoritic data.</p> <p>Furthermore, a code is included which samples a subset of trajectories reproducing the measured meteoritic I129/Cm247 abundance ratio of 438 +- 92. See the README file and the publication (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200604833C/abstract) for more details.</p>
The European Energy Vision 2060 (EU EnVis-2060): Scenario Parametrization
<h3>Description</h3> <p>This repository contains the scenario parametrization for the European Energy Vision 2060 (EU EnVis-2060) scenarios, which have been created by the European research projects Man0EUvRE (funded by the CETPartnership) and iDesignRES (funded by the European Commission). The data is formatted in the IAMC data format (see <a href="https://pyam-iamc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/data.html">https://pyam-iamc.readthedocs.io/en/stable/data.html</a>). </p> <p>The underlying raw data, including all sources and assumptions used for each data point can be found at the Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD) data repository (see <a href="https://github.com/GENeSYS-MOD/GENeSYS_MOD.data">https://github.com/GENeSYS-MOD/GENeSYS_MOD.data</a>). </p> <p> </p> <p>Alongside the scenario parametrization, there is also included a short report about the qualitative storylines, the workflow, and some key assumptions as part of Deliverable 1.2 of the Man0EUvRE project, as well as the Q2Q (qualitative to quantitative) matrix used in the process of the parametrization.</p> <p> </p> <h3>Changelog</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Version</td> <td>Date</td> <td>Changes</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3.1</td> <td>08.09.2025</td> <td> <p>Improvements in district heating, technology costs for wind, PV, and electrolyzers. Updated fossil fuel import prices.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>3.0</td> <td>31.07.2025</td> <td> <p>Further refinement of data set, used for <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16640689">quantification</a> of the scenarios with GENeSYS-MOD (v1.1.0)</p> <p>Data changes are based on partner feedback and further calibration for the European scenarios.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>2.0.1</td> <td>11.03.2025</td> <td> <p>Added newest version of Q2Q matrix</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>2.0</td> <td>28.02.2025</td> <td> <p>Significantly overhauled data set, used for <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14959447">quantification</a> of the scenarios with GENeSYS-MOD (v1.0.1)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>1.0.2</td> <td>11.09.2024</td> <td>Fixed missing hydropower data in capacities due to an error in the conversion script</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1.0.1</td> <td>07.09.2024</td> <td>Fixed missing data in residual capacities</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1.0</td> <td>06.09.2024</td> <td>Initial Upload</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <h3>Funding</h3> <p>This research was funded by CETPartnership, the European Partnership under Joint Call 2022 for research proposals, co-funded by the European Commission (GA N°101069750) and with the funding organisations listed on the CETPartnership website.</p>
Global ammonia emissions from CAMEO throughout the century for 3 scenarios (2000-2100)
<p><strong>Global ammonia emissions from the CAMEO process-based model </strong>(general model description and evaluation can be found in Beaudor et al., 2023, GMD; https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023).</p><p>Monthly files containing global NH3 emissions and Manure application rates in gN.m2.yr-1 (2.5° lon x 1.27° lat; IPSL-CM6A-LR Earth System Model resolution):</p><p>1) total agricultural emissions (TOT_AGRI; the sum of manure management and agricultural soil emissions)</p><p>2) manure management emissions (MANURE_MANAG.)</p><p>3) agricultural soil emissions (SOIL_AGRI)</p><p>4) natural soil emissions (SOIL_NAT) corrected for baresoil (excluding Sahara in this new version)</p><p>5) Fraction of continent (CONT_FRAC) from the model to use for CTM prescription or global budget calculation</p><p>6) TAN and non TAN applied to grassland from ruminants during grazing (tan_input_graz, nontan_input_graz)</p><p>7) TAN and non TAN applied to grassland from ruminants and considered as fertilizers (tan_input_manureApp_grass, nontan_input_manureApp_grass)</p><p>8) TAN and non TAN applied to cropland from all types of animal and considered as fertilizers (tan_input_manureApp_crop, nontan_input_manureApp_crop)</p><p>9) Grazing intensity (grazing_intensity, unitless)</p><p>10) Net Primary Production of grassland and grass biomass dedicated to livestock feed (NPP_grass, Cgrass_ingested in gC.m2.yr-1)</p><p>The four files correspond to a specific simulation using input4MIPs forcing files :</p><p>- Present-day simulation from 2000 to 2014 </p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-2.45</p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-4.34</p><p>- Future simulation from 2015 to 2100 under scenario SSP-5.85</p><p>Note that these datasets have been prepared in the scope of a publication to be submitted.</p><p><i><strong>Beaudor, M., N. Vuichard, J. Lathière, D. Hauglustaine., Historical and future ammonia emissions database (2000-2100) from the CAMEO process-based model, in preparation.</strong></i></p>
Carbon Price Scenarios: Projecting prices for emission certificates
<p>This dataset consists of three different carbon price development scenarios. Each is represented by two growth rates which results in a total of 6 time series. The time frame is from 2020 to 2050. The units of the values are given in € / t CO₂. All values are nominal.</p> <p>Overall, it should be noted that an estimate of the development of CO2 prices in the german nEHS and EU-ETS is subject to great uncertainty due to the major influence of regulatory intervention, a less liquid market towards 2030 and a lack of markets after 2030.</p> <p>The data provided is delivered in frictionless data format (see 2024-03-25_metadata_carbon-price-scenarios.package.json) and can be accessed using the frictionless software (https://frictionlessdata.io/).</p>
COMPAIR carbon footprint calculations and greenhouse gas emissions reduction scenarios
<p>Citizens' carbon footprint calculation results and citizen-created scenarios on how Greenhouse Gas emissions can be reduced by 55% by 2030 are available that were gathered as part of the <a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101036563">EU Horizon2020 COMPAIR project</a> in Europe. The pilot cities/regions are Berlin, Athens, Sofia, Plovdiv, and Flanders.</p>
Agrisolar Food, Energy, and Water and economic Lifecycle Scenario (FEWLS) Tool Data
<p>Input data and baseline outputs for the Agrisolar Food, Energy, Water, and economic Lifecycle Scenario (FEWLS) Tool. Note that corresponding code is linked in the attached Github doi (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10023281). </p> <p>The FEWLS tool was developed and used in the recently submitted research article, <em>Food-energy-water and economic outcomes of agrisolar co-location in irrigated regions</em>. In general, this code takes in a ground-mounted solar PV shape file (with some auxiliary information) and generates user set lifespan predictions for food (Calorie), energy (GWh), water (m3), and economic (USD) effects due to offsetting agricultural land with solar PV energy generation. </p>
Graph Data: Hydrological impact of widespread afforestation in Great Britain using a large ensemble of modelled scenarios
<p>Data used for creating the figures in the paper: Hydrological impact of widespread afforestation in Great Britain using a large ensemble of modelled scenarios.</p> <p>It contains the flow exceedances (as mm day<sup>-1</sup>), flow duration slope, median elasticity and runoff ratio for the different afforestation scenarios. Also included is the information on the changes of broadleaf afforestation. </p> <p>If you have any questions, please email marcus.buechel@ouce.ox.ac.uk.</p>
OpenLABEL-enriched KITTI Tracking scenarios
<p>In HEADSTART T3.4 task, a conversion from the KITTI format into the ASAM OpenLABEL standard was performed.</p> <p>Additionally, several objects, actions, events, contexts and relations were added to the original annotations, creating richer descriptions of the scenes.</p> <p>The OpenLABEL JSON files were created and used in HEADSTART T3.4 to validate the concept of scenario mining from real data.</p>
Scenarios of technical and useful ground-source heat pump potential for building heating and cooling in Western Switzerland
<p>This dataset contains an estimation of the useful and technical potential of shallow ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs) for Western Switzerland, at a spatial resolution of 400 x 400 m<sup>2</sup>. The <strong>technical potential</strong> is hereby defined as the maximum energy that could be extracted from GSHP systems in case of their dense deployment, such as to <em>avoid the over-exploitation</em> of the heat capacity of the ground. We consider GSHPs with <em>vertical closed-loop borehole heat exchangers</em> (BHE) installed at depths of 50 - 200 m. The <strong>useful potential</strong> is defined as the potential that could be delivered to building heating and cooling systems via a water-to-water heat pump.</p> <p>The datasets contains future scenarios of heating and cooling demand, space cooling equipment deployment (service sector only) and climate change models and considers the potential use of DHC. The dataset covers around 80,000 property units (parcels) in the Swiss Cantons of Vaud and Geneva, excluding only the areas of the Alps and the Jura mountains.</p> <p>The data package contains information on the available area for GSHP systems, the heating and cooling demand as well as the resulting technical and useful potentials for all simulated scenarios of future cooling demand (200 Monte Carlo runs), for the case of <strong>direct heat supply</strong> (per pixel of 400 x 400 m<sup>2</sup>) as well as for <strong>district heating and cooling</strong> (DHC). In scenarios without DHC (direct heat supply), the results are summarized by pixel of 400 x 400 m<sup>2</sup>. In scenarios with DHC, the results of potentials <em>within</em> DHCs are summarized by DHC (see <em>*_in_dhc.csv</em>) while potentials <em>outside</em> of DHCs are summarized by pixel (see <em>*_outside_dhc.csv</em>).</p> <p>For details on the methodology applied to obtain the results provided in the data package, please refer to the above-mentioned research articles. A description of all files is provided in<em> Dataset documentation.pdf</em> and metadata is provided in <em>Datapackage.json.</em></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.