Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
18
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
18 results for “computational thinking”
Dataset for the comparison of two Computational Thinking (CT) test for upper primary school (grades 3-4) : the Beginners' CT test (BCTt) and the competent CT test (cCTt)
<p>This dataset contains quantitative student data acquired during the administration of two validated Computational Thinking (CT) assessments for upper primary school (grades 3 and 4): the Beginners' CT test (BCTt) [1] and the comptent CT test (cCTt) [2]</p> <p>To compare the psychometric properties of both instruments a comparative analysis was conducted with data acquired in schools in Portugal from the same school districts. More specifically, we analyse the results of: </p> <p>- the BCTt test administered in March 2020 to 374 students in grades 3-4,</p> <p>- the cCTt test administered in April 2021 to 201 different students in grades 3-4.</p> <p>These students had no prior experience in Computational Thinking, as this was not part of the national curriculum at the times of administration. </p> <p> </p> <p>The detailed psychometric comparison is published in Frontiers in Psychology - Educational Psychology [3] and provides indications regarding the use of both instruments for grades 3-4. </p> <p> </p> <p>A README is included and provides additional information regarding :</p> <p>- the requirements for re-use. </p> <p>- the specific content of the 2 csv files</p> <p> </p> <p>The BCTt is available upon request to maria.zapata@urjc.es and the cCTt items are available in [2] with an editable version being available upon request to laila.elhamamsy@epfl.ch. </p> <p>In case of other inquiries, please contact: laila.elhamamsy@epfl.ch, maria.zapata@urjc.es or pedro.marcelino@treetree2.org</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>[1] M. Zapata-Cáceres, E. Martín-Barroso and M. Román-González, "Computational Thinking Test for Beginners: Design and Content Validation," <em>2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)</em>, 2020, pp. 1905-1914, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125368.</p> <p>[2] El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Barroso, E. M., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D., & Bruno, B. (2022). The Competent Computational Thinking Test: Development and Validation of an Unplugged Computational Thinking Test for Upper Primary School. <em>Journal of Educational Computing Research</em>, <em>60</em>(7), 1818–1866. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081753">https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081753</a></p> <p>[3] <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/WhosWhoActivity.aspx?sname=LailaEl-Hamamsy&UID=781667">Laila El-Hamamsy</a>* , <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/WhosWhoActivity.aspx?sname=Mar%C3%ADaZapata-C%C3%A1ceres&UID=2073859">María Zapata-Cáceres</a>, Pedro Marcelino, Jessica Dehler Zufferey, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/WhosWhoActivity.aspx?sname=BarbaraBruno&UID=893934">Barbara Bruno</a>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/WhosWhoActivity.aspx?sname=EstefaniaMart%C3%ADn&UID=2086979">Estefanía Martín-Barroso</a> and <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Community/WhosWhoActivity.aspx?sname=MarcosRom%C3%A1n-Gonz%C3%A1lez&UID=760761">Marcos Román-González</a> (2022). <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?d=0&name=Educational_Psychology&ART_DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082659">Comparing the psychometric properties of two primary school Computational Thinking (CT) assessments for grades 3 and 4: the Beginners' CT test (BCTt) and the competent CT test (cCTt)</a>. <em>Front. Psychol.</em> doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082659</p>
Dataset for the validation of a Computational Thinking test for upper primary school (grades 3-4)
<p>This dataset contains quantitative student data acquired during the administration of a new computational thinking assessment for upper primary school (grades 3 and 4). Over 1500 students (approximately half in grade 3 and half in grade 4) participated in the data collection which took place in January 2021 in the Canon Vaud in Switzerland. The data was used to validate the psychometric properties of the instrument in the referenced article. </p> <p> </p> <p>If you use any of the resources provided in this repository, please cite the following</p> <p>• The Zenodo repository, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5865573</p> <p>• The corresponding journal article</p> <p>• Licence : CC-BY-NC</p> <p> </p> <p>In case of inquiries, please contact laila.elhamamsy@epfl.ch</p>
Extended dataset for the validation the competent Computational Thinking test in grades 3-6
<p>Extended dataset for the validation the competent Computational Thinking test in grades 3-6<br>=======================================================</p> <p>• If you publish material based on this dataset, please cite the following :</p> <p> • The Zenodo repository : Laila El-Hamamsy, Barbara Bruno, Jessica Dehler Zufferey, & Francesco Mondada (2023). Extended dataset for the validation of the competent Computational Thinking test in grades 3-6 [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7983525 </p> <p> • The article on the validation of the computational thinking test for grades 3-6 : El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Martín-Barroso, E., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D., Bruno, B., & Román-González, M. (2025). The competent Computational Thinking test (cCTt): A valid, reliable and gender-fair test for longitudinal CT studies in grades 3–6. <em>Technology, Knowledge and Learning</em>, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09777-8 </p> <p>• License : This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY-4.0)</p> <p>• Creators : El-Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Dehler Zufferey, J., and Mondada, F.</p> <p>• Date May 30th 2023</p> <p>• Subject : Computational Thinking (CT), Assessment, Primary education, Psychometric validation</p> <p>• Dataset format : CSV. The dataset contains four files (one per grade, see detailed description below). Please note that the spreadsheets may contain missing values due to students not being present for a part of the data collection. To have access to the specific cCTt questions please refer to the original publication [1] and Zenodo repository [2] which provide the full set of questions and correct responses.</p> <p>• Dataset size < 500 kB</p> <p>• Data collection period : January and November 2021</p> <p>• Abbreviations :<br> - CT : Computational Thinking<br> - cCTt: competent CT test</p> <p>• Funding : This work was funded by the the NCCR Robotics, a National Centre of Competence in Research, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 51NF40_185543)</p> <p># References</p> <p>[1] El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Barroso, E. M., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D., & Bruno, B. (2022). The Competent Computational Thinking Test: Development and Validation of an Unplugged Computational Thinking Test for Upper Primary School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1818–1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081753 </p> <p>[2] El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Marcelino, P., Dehler Zufferey, J., Bruno, B., Martín Barroso, E., & Román-González, M. (2022). Dataset for the comparison of two Computational Thinking (CT) test for upper primary school (grades 3-4) : the Beginners' CT test (BCTt) and the competent CT test (cCTt) (Version 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5885034 </p> <p>[3] El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Martín-Barroso, E. <em>et al.</em> The Competent Computational Thinking Test (cCTt): A Valid, Reliable and Gender-Fair Test for Longitudinal CT Studies in Grades 3–6. <em>Tech Know Learn</em> (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09777-8</p> <p>[4] Brennan, K. and Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. page 25</p> <p>[5] El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Marcelino, P., Bruno, B., Dehler Zufferey, J., Martín-Barroso, E., & Román-González, M. (2022). Comparing the psychometric properties of two primary school Computational Thinking (CT) assessments for grades 3 and 4: The Beginners’ CT test (BCTt) and the competent CT test (cCTt). Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082659</p>
Datasets for testing the computational thinking of children with mental disabilities by cCT-test
<p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of web technologies on the development of computational thinking of students with mental disabilities. The experiment involved 14 students aged 8-12. For 8 weeks children were trained in computational thinking and computer science. Assessment of computational thinking was performed with cCT-test by El-Hamamsi et al. before and after the experiment (El-Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Barroso, E. M., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D., & Bruno, B. (2022). The competent Computational Thinking Test: Development and Validation of an Unplugged Computational Thinking Test for Upper Primary School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331221081753 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081753">https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081753</a>).</p> <p>After conducting computer science lessons using web technologies the respondents showed a higher level of computational thinking (M=15,7, SD=3,69), compared to the results of preliminary testing (M=5,93, SD=2,3). Web technologies can significantly increase the effectiveness of inclusive pedagogy, which establishes the importance of integrating web technologies into the teaching system in inclusive classes of general education schools.</p> <p>Examples of tasks are located at the link <a href="https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVPz8p6LE=/?share_link_id=864046044746">https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVPz8p6LE=/?share_link_id=864046044746</a> </p> <p>https://wordwall.net/resource/48631685</p> <p>https://wordwall.net/resource/48650842</p> <p>https://wordwall.net/resource/48655774</p> <p>https://wordwall.net/resource/48661305</p> <p> </p>
Data SRL Computational Thinking
<p>Scoping Review of the Literature data (2018-2021) o Computational Thinking. WoS and Scopus databases.</p>
Student answers to computational thinking tasks based on Riau Malay culture
<p>The data is the result from the test of computational thinking tasks based on Riau Malay culture to elementary school students in a public school in Pekanbaru</p>
98 selected publications analysed in-depth in the context of a systematic literature review on Computational Thinking in compulsory education
<p>This is the list of the <strong>98 publications from between 2016 and 2021 </strong>analysed in-depth through a review matrix in the context of the <strong>"</strong><a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347">Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: State of Play and</a> <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347"> Practices from the Field</a><strong>"</strong> <strong>research study.</strong> The <a href="https://computhink2study.eu/">study</a> was designed, funded, and followed by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) to investigate <strong>how Computational Thinking (CT) is currently positioned within compulsory school education in Europe’s various Member States, as well as outside the EU</strong>. The study was carried out from April to December 2021 by the Institute for Educational Technology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR-ITD), together with European Schoolnet (EUN) and Vilnius University (VU).</p> <p>Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M.A., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). <em>Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education</em>. Publications Office of the European Union. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/126955">https://doi.org/10.2760/126955</a></p> <p> </p>
Structure of the complete review matrix developed in the context of the "Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: State of Play and Practices from the Field" research study
<p>This is the structure of the complete review matrix used to analyse in-depth <strong>98 selected publications from between 2016 and 2021 </strong>in the context of the "<a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347">Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: State of Play and</a> <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347"> Practices from the Field</a>" research study. The <a href="https://computhink2study.eu/">study </a>was designed, funded, and followed by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) to investigate <strong>how Computational Thinking (CT) is currently positioned within compulsory school education in Europe’s various Member States, as well as outside the EU</strong>. The study was carried out from April to December 2021 by the Institute for Educational Technology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR-ITD), together with European Schoolnet (EUN) and Vilnius University (VU).</p>
Additional Data: Mapping the Evolution of Computational Thinking in Education: A Bibliometrics Analysis of Scopus Database from 1987 to 2023
<p>The following is a selection of figures and tables from a bibliometric study that will be released later. The title of this study is Mapping the Evolution of Computational Thinking in Education: A Bibliometrics Analysis of Scopus Database from 1987 to 2023.</p> <p>In the online listing of the appendix, we will find three figures (Figure 5, Figure 6, and Figure 12) and three tables (Table 3, Table 4, and Table 4), also several references related to this research. It was important to us that the core of the study that is now being carried out not be diminished in any way, which is why we chose the photos and tables we did. This study was conceived and supported by the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), which the Ministry of Finance administers in the Republic of Indonesia, to evaluate current trends and research problems in computational thinking for education. The Scopus database was used, and its range of coverage was from 1987 to 2023.</p> <p> </p>
98 selected publications analysed in-depth in the context of a systematic literature review on Computational Thinking in compulsory education
<p>This is the list of the <strong>98 publications from between 2016 and 2021 </strong>analysed in-depth through a review matrix in the context of the <strong>"</strong><a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347">Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: State of Play and</a> <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347"> Practices from the Field</a><strong>"</strong> <strong>research study.</strong> The <a href="https://computhink2study.eu/">study</a> was designed, funded, and followed by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) to investigate <strong>how Computational Thinking (CT) is currently positioned within compulsory school education in Europe’s various Member States, as well as outside the EU</strong>. The study was carried out from April to December 2021 by the Institute for Educational Technology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR-ITD), together with European Schoolnet (EUN) and Vilnius University (VU).</p> <p>Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M.A., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). <em>Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education</em>. Publications Office of the European Union. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/126955">https://doi.org/10.2760/126955</a></p> <p> </p>
Dataset for the paper "How to Work on Equality and Inclusion when Introducing Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review"
<p>Resources for the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) about Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics in Early Childhood Education for fostering equality and inclusion. The SLR is related to the project "COEDUIN-Alfabetización digital y STEAM en edades tempranas: propuesta co-educativa inclusiva" funded by Fundación Caja Canarias and Fundación La Caixa (ref. 2020EDU08).</p> <p>The SLR covers papers in WoS and Scopus from 2011 to 2022.</p>
Umfrage sowie zugehörige erfasste Daten im Rahmen einer Masterarbeit über das Computational und Mathematical Thinking
<p>Die Dateien umfassen einerseits die Items des online Fragebogens und andererseits die bei der durchgeführten Umfrage ermittelten Daten. </p><p>Die Umfrage diente der Evaluation eines von mir im Rahmen meiner Masterarbeit entwickelten Frameworks, einer Definition des Computational Thinking sowie einer selbsterstellten Intervention.</p><p>An der Umfrage nahmen Expert:innen aus der Hochschullehre sowie der Lehre teil, deren Namen nur auf Nachfrage preisgegeben werden. </p>
Programming and computational thinking concepts and contextual factors in integrated computing activities in U.S. Schools
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fostering Inclusivity and Equality in Early Childhood Education via Computational Thinking and Robotics: A Systematic Review
<p>Resources for the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) about Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics in Early Childhood Education for fostering equality and inclusion. The SLR is related to the project "COEDUIN-Alfabetización digital y STEAM en edades tempranas: propuesta co-educativa inclusiva" funded by Fundación Caja Canarias and Fundación La Caixa (ref. 2020EDU08).</p> <p>The SLR covers papers in WoS and Scopus from 2011 to 2023.</p>
STEM CO-EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS COMBINING EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTATIONAL THINKING
<h1><span>AMBIENTES COEDUCATIVOS STEM QUE COMBINAN ROBÓTICA EDUCATIVA Y PENSAMIENTO COMPUTACIONAL </span></h1> <p><span> </span></p> <p><strong><span>STEM CO-EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS COMBINING EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTATIONAL THINKING</span></strong></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p><span>Resumen en español </span></p> <p><span>El presente artículo de investigación se enfoca en abordar las desigualdades de género en el ámbito educativo, especialmente en las disciplinas STEM, mediante el uso de la robótica educativa y el pensamiento computacional. Para ello se realiza una revisión sistemática de literatura, con el objetivo de analizar tendencias, desafíos y oportunidades en la implementación de estas estrategias en Colombia y su impacto en el cierre de brechas de género. Aunque no se encontró una revisión que sintetice la evidencia de estos temas de manera conjunta, el estudio actual busca llenar ese vacío y contribuir a intervenciones educativas futuras más equitativas.</span></p> <p><span>Palabras clave (en español): </span><span>Educación STEM, Robótica educativa, Pensamiento computacional, Brechas de género, Vocaciones científicas</span><span>.</span><span> </span></p> <p>Resumen en inglés</p> <p><span>This research article focuses on addressing gender inequalities in education, especially in STEM disciplines, through the use of educational robotics and computational thinking. To this end, a systematic literature review is conducted, with the aim of analyzing trends, challenges and opportunities in the implementation of these strategies in Colombia and their impact on closing gender gaps. Although no review was found that synthesizes the evidence on these topics together, the current study seeks to fill this gap and contribute to more equitable future educational interventions.</span></p> <p><span>Palabras clave (en inglés): STEM education, educational robotics, Computational thinking, Gender gaps, Scientific vocations. </span></p>
Effect of promoting computational thinking on 21st century skills: a systematic review of the literature
<p>Data extracted from primary studies of a systematic literature review investigating the effect of promoting computational thinking on 21st century skills.</p>
METHODS OF TEACHING STUDENTS TO THINK INDEPENDENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Does attitude toward programming predict computational thinking? Analysis of gender and programming experience effect among engineering students
<p>This data was generated during the development of the FDPD project. Data were anonymized.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.