Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
71
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
71 results for “evaluation questionnaire”
MEDIATOR Driving Simulator Study Germany: Questionnaire Data User Evaluation HMI
<p>The dataset provided resulted from a driving simulator study conducted by Chemnitz University of Technology (TUC) within work package 3 of the MEDIATOR project. The study focused on the user evaluation of the Mediator system and its functionalities, including the innovative Human Machine interface (HMI). The user evaluation centred on acceptance, trust, usability, comfort and the experience of Transitions of Control (TOCs). The core idea of the Mediator system is to mediate between the human driver and the automated system. Thereby, the Mediator system aims at establishing both as a team that is aware of each other’s strengths, limitations as well as current states in order to achieve safe TOCs, which are actively proposed by the HMI. The main focus of the driving simulator study was on comfort TOCs from manual to automated driving, simulated automation degradation and related TOCs by the human driver, comfort critical situations (i.e., close approach to the rear-end of a traffic jam) as well as the influence of driver characteristics. The provided dataset contains the questionnaire data of 74 German-speaking participants.</p> <p> </p> <p>This document contains information about the study methodology and coding of the variables. For a detailed description, please consult Mediator deliverable D3.3 ‘Results of the MEDIATOR driving simulator evaluation studies’ (Part II – Driving simulator study Germany). Please note that selected passages of this deliverable were adopted (partly in a slightly modified manner) in this document.</p> <p> </p> <p>This dataset is licensed under a <a href="https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-4.0.html">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</a> License.</p> <p> </p> <p>The research leading to this dataset received funding from the European Commission Horizon 2020 programme under the project MEDIATOR (<a href="https://mediatorproject.eu/">https://mediatorproject.eu/</a>), grant agreement number 814735.</p> <p> </p> <p>If you use the dataset, please cite it as: MEDIATOR (2023). MEDIATOR Driving Simulator Study Germany: Questionnaire Data User Evaluation HMI. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7638299">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7638299</a></p> <p> </p> <p>For further information, please contact: <a href="mailto:cornelia.hollander@psychologie.tu-chemnitz.de">cornelia.hollander@psychologie.tu-chemnitz.de</a>.</p>
Software product quality evaluation questionnaire for IoT LCDP&MDE
<p>This dataset contains the questionnaire used to assess the quality of LCDP and MDE tools in line with the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 product quality standard.</p>
EFAICTS final evaluations VanderLaan questionnaires synthesis
<p>This excel file summarizes the Van-der-Laan questionnaires of the pilots who participated to the final evaluations of the EFAICTS project.</p>
Questionnaire for evaluating data narratives
<p>File containing the evaluation questionnaire for the data narratives. The questionnaire describes 6 different scenarios, where the respondents have to choose which narrative is more appropriate, or define the one they would choose.</p>
User evaluation results for a Wikidata-centric tool for temporal data in Humanities and Cultural Heritage (June 2024): raw tabular result data and web forms for two questionnaires from five online focus group workshops
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>This resource is created for the article: "Wikidata Visualization for Event and Temporal Data Exploration in Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage" in Semantic Web Journal Special issue on the Semantic Web and Ontology Design for Cultural Heritage. It contains materials use for the user evaluation (June 2024) of a Wikidata visualization tool (<a title="ReKisstory" href="https://rekisstory.labs.vu.nl/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ReKisstory</a>) described in the article. </p> <p><strong>Summary of the user evaluation</strong></p> <p>The structrue of the user evalution is summarized in the table below:</p> <table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 99.9708%;"><colgroup><col style="width: 28.0622%;"><col style="width: 26.893%;"><col style="width: 27.0309%;"><col style="width: 17.9856%;"></colgroup> <tbody> <tr> <td> </td> <td>Objectives</td> <td>Setup </td> <td># of people participating</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Pre-workshop survey</td> <td>Understanding potential user profiles before workshop</td> <td>Online questionnaire (Q1)</td> <td>51</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Workshop (Focus Group)</td> <td>Introducing and testing the tool. Obtaining feedback about it</td> <td>Online demo, testing, discussion</td> <td>16</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Post-workshop survey</td> <td>Understanding user needs after testing</td> <td>Online questionnaire (Q2)</td> <td>11</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>The structure of the data is as follows:</strong></p> <p>1. The PDF and PPTX files, containing materials prepared for the pre-workshop survey, workshop, and post-workshop survey:</p> <ul> <li>Pre-workshop survey: Questionnaire (Q1) screenshot from GoogleForms <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/1stQuestionnaire.pdf?download=1&preview=1">1stQuestionnaire.pdf</a></li> <li>Post-workshop survey: Questionnaire (Q2) screenshot from GoogleForms <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/2ndQuestionnaire.pdf?download=1&preview=1">2ndQuestionnaire.pdf</a></li> <li>Documents distributed to the participants of the Focus Group Workshop: <ul> <li>ReKisstory Compare section manual <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/rekisstory_compare_manual.pdf?download=1&preview=1">rekisstory_compare_manual.pdf</a></li> <li>ReKisstory Find section manual <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/rekisstory_find_manual.pdf?download=1&preview=1">rekisstory_find_manual.pdf</a></li> <li>ReKisstory Find example search patterns <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/rekisstory_group_search_example_search_patterns.pdf?download=1&preview=1">rekisstory_group_search_example_search_patterns.pdf</a></li> <li>Workshop slides <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/Focus_Group_Workshop_slides.pptx?download=1&preview=1">Focus_Group_Workshop_slides.pptx</a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>2. The Excel spreadsheets consists of the results of two questionnaires (Q1 and Q2) (<a href="https://zenodo.org/records/14960584/files/Two_questionnaires_online_workshops.xlsx?download=1&preview=1">Two_questionnaires_online_workshops.xlsx</a>): </p> <ul> <li>Pre-workshop survey: Questionnaire (Q1), containing information about potential users: <ul> <li>Demographics</li> <li>Experience of <ul> <li>Time-related data</li> <li>Wikidata</li> <li>SPARQL</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Post-workshop survey: Questionnaire (Q2), containing information about feedback from the Workshop participants : <ul> <li>Comparison with Q1</li> <li>Questions about time-related functionalities</li> <li>Questions about Compare and Find searches</li> <li>Overall comment</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><em>Please see "Wikidata Visualization for Event and Temporal Data Exploration in Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage" for more details</em></p>
The visualization of the collected data corresponding to the following paper: "The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: multinational experts' and patients' perspectives"
<p>These two PDF files include the data collected for a study conducted by Afghah et.al, 2022. They include the responses of the participant in this study to a newly developed self-rated ICF-based questionnaire. One file includes the responses to 30 demographic questions and the other one 88 ICF-based questions. The presented data were collected in Germany, the USA, and Egypt as well as overall data.</p> <p>The design of the questionnaire is described here:<br> Afghah, T., Alfakir, R., Meis, M., van Leeuwen, L. M., Kramer, S. E., Hammady, M., Youssif, M., & Wagener, K. C. (2021). The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate hearing, communication, and conversation disability: multinational experts' and patients' perspectives. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5534360.</p> <p>This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Project ID: 352015383 – SFB 1330, C4.</p>
Questionnaire used in FAIR Workbench user evaluation
<p>A pdf copy of the Questionnaire filled out by users at the end of the FAIR Workbench user evaluation study. The questions regarded the evaluation notebook, published here: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5045448</p>
Experimental results and the user questionnaires for KG profiling tool (ABSTAT vs Protégé) evaluation
<p>Experimental results and the user questionnaires for KG profiling tool (ABSTAT vs Protégé) evaluation</p>
Dataset for Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire
<p>These are the datasets that we used for evaluating the construct validity of the Charité Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire (CAFQa) in a forthcoming publication. All items were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and were scored by us as follows: -2/“I do not agree at all”, -1/“I do not agree”, 0/“I agree in part”, 1/“I agree”, 2/"I very much agree".</p> <p>A previous version of this upload included only the data of Study 1. A new version provides the data of Study 2. Please refer to the methods section of the forthcoming publication for more details.</p> Variable names and their corresponding item. Items marked with <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable Name</th> <th>CAFQa Item</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>procedural_instruction</td> <td>In my ward, procedural instruction on how to deal with alarms is regularly updated and shared with all staff.<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr> <td>respond_quickly</td> <td>Responsible personnel respond quickly and appropriately to alarms.<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr> <td>motivation_decrease</td> <td>With too many alarms on my ward, my work performance, and motivation decrease.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>physical_symptoms</td> <td>Too many alarms trigger physical symptoms for me, e.g., nervousness, headaches, and sleep disturbances.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ward_floor</td> <td>The acoustic and visual monitor alarms used on my ward floor and in my nurse station allow me to assign the patient, the device, and the situation clearly.<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr> <td>reduce_concentration</td> <td>Alarms reduce my concentration and attention.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>alarm_limits</td> <td>Alarm limits are regularly adjusted based on patients' clinical pictures (e.g., blood pressure limits for conditions after bypass surgery).<sup>a</sup></td> </tr> <tr> <td>interrupt_workflow</td> <td>My or neighboring patients' alarms or crisis alarms frequently interrupt my workflow.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>alarms_confuse</td> <td>There are situations when alarms confuse me.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> Other variables in the data set. <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable Name</th> <th>Explanation</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>self_reported_AF</td> <td>self-estimated alarm fatigue in percent</td> </tr> <tr> <td>estimated_false_alarms</td> <td>perceived rate of false alarms in the participant's ICU</td> </tr> <tr> <td>monthly_time_on_ICU</td> <td>the average number of workdays per month in an intensive care or monitoring area</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ICU_experience</td> <td>number of years/months of ICU experience</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profession</td> <td>physician, nurse, or supporting nurse</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Members of the Study Group</strong> <strong>in alphabetical order</strong>: <em>Dr. med. Mirza Aghamov</em><sup><em>1</em></sup><em>, Prof. Dr. med. Manfred Blobner<sup>2</sup>, Prof. Dr. med. Ulrich Frey<sup>3</sup></em><em>, Prof. Dr. Christian von Heymann<sup>4</sup></em><em>, Prof. Dr. med. Bettina Jungwirth</em><sup><em>1</em></sup><em>, Dr. med. Dragutin Popovic<sup>4</sup></em><em>, Prof. Dr. med. Michael Sander<sup>5</sup></em><em>. </em></p> <p>1: <em>Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany</em></p> <p>2: <em>Technical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany</em></p> <p>3: <em>Department for Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne – Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany</em></p> <p>4: <em>Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany</em></p> <p>5: <em>Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany</em></p> <p> </p>
Evaluation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) in Patients With Bronchiectasis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00805025. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Study questionnaire and material for evaluation of usefulness of digital ecosystem representation
<p>Contains study material (original German, translated to English) and study questionnaire (original in German, translated to English).</p>
Functional Evaluation With Questionnaire in Patients Investigated for Suspected Peripheral Artery Disease
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01632033. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Validation of a Questionnaire to Evaluate the Home Cooking Skills of Nutrition Professionals and the General Population
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06687798. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
RAPP-children, Rhinitis & Asthma in Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire for Quality of Life Evaluation in Children With Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03276416. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Field-test and Psychometric Validation of the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire in the Dutch Pectus Excavatum Population
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06918392. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 9.
Evaluation of the BRADA and ABILHAND Questionnaires
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00938444. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Validation of the Evaluation of the Perception of Physical Activity Questionnaire Adapted to Chronic Low Back Pain
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05942196. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Activity-specific Balance Confidence (A-ABC) and the Arabic Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04898959. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
An Evaluation of Remote Care (questionnaire+hybrid) in Patients Who Are Post-lung Transplant
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05916495. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Consistency of Questionnaires to Evaluating Sexual Functions in Young Healthy Women
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03241524. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.