Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10 results for “facial attractiveness”
Data and script for: "Chronic and immediate refined carbohydrate consumption measured by glycemic load, and facial attractiveness"
<p>Data and script for statistical analyses.</p> <p>Script: script.Rmd</p> <p>Data: - <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/5769d185-6fe1-44c1-a9b4-c36823efb4fc/data_attractiveness_juge_results.csv">data_attractiveness_juge_results.csv</a> (for GLMM)</p> <p> - <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/5769d185-6fe1-44c1-a9b4-c36823efb4fc/data_subjects.csv">data_subjects.csv</a> (for path analysis)</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
More than just a pretty face? The relationship between immune function and perceived facial attractiveness
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The boundary of holistic processing in the appraisal of facial attractiveness
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Data-driven mathematical model of East-Asian facial attractiveness: the relative contributions of shape and reflectance to attractiveness judgements
Facial attractiveness is judged through a combination of multiple cues including morphology (facial shape) and skin properties (facial reflectance). While several studies have examined the way in which people in Western cultures judge facial attractiveness, there have been fewer investigations into non-Western attitudes. This is because stimuli that quantitatively vary the attractiveness of non-Western faces are rare. In the present study, we built a model of the attractiveness of East-Asian faces, judged by East-Asian observers. Therefore, 400 computer-generated East-Asian faces were created and attractiveness rating scores were collected from Japanese observers. Data-driven mathematical calculations were used to identify quantitative links between facial attractiveness and shape and reflectance properties, with no prior hypothesis. Results indicate that faces with larger eyes, smaller noses, and brighter skin are judged as more attractive, regardless of the sex of the faces, possibly reflecting a general preference for femininity. Shape is shown to be a strong determinant of attractiveness for both male and female faces, while reflectance properties are less important in judging male facial attractiveness. Our model provides a tool to effectively produce East-Asian face stimuli that quantitatively varies attractiveness and can be used to elucidate visual processes related to attractiveness judgment.
Data from: Facial attractiveness is related to women’s cortisol and body fat, but not with immune responsiveness
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The carotenoid beta-carotene enhances facial color, attractiveness and perceived health, but not actual health, in humans
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Data-driven mathematical model of East-Asian facial attractiveness: the relative contributions of shape and reflectance to attractiveness judgements
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Facial attractiveness data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
The effect of various orthodontic treatments on facial attractiveness. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial and smile attractiveness are significant motivating factor for patients to seek orthodontic treatment. Although there is a general belief that orthodontic treatment improves facial appearance, this has yet not been systematically evaluated.</p> <p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To assess the current evidence on the effect of orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness.</p> <p><strong>Search Methods:</strong> Systematic and unrestricted search of nine databases were performed up to January 2022.</p> <p><strong>Selection Criteria: </strong>Studies evaluating facial attractiveness before and after orthodontic treatment.</p> <p><strong>Data Collection and Analysis: </strong>Extracted data included study design and setting, sample size and demographics, malocclusion type, treatment modality and method for outcome assessment. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies and with RoB-2 for randomized controlled trials. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies were included in data synthesis; three randomized controlled clinical trials and 17 non-randomized clinical studies of retrospective or prospective design. One of the randomized controlled trials was found to have low risk of bias, one presented some concerns and the third showed a high risk of bias. All non-randomized studies showed either unclear or high risk of bias. </p> <p>Data syntheses showed that orthodontic treatment improved facial attractiveness ratings by 9% when compared to untreated controls (MD: 9.05 / 95% CI: 4.71; 13.39). A combination of orthodontics and orthognathic surgery also showed a positive effect of 5.5% (MD: 5.51 / 95% CI: 1.55; 9.47) when compared to orthodontic treatment alone. There was no difference in effect between extraction and non-extraction treatments (MD: -0.89 / 95% CI: -8.72; 6.94) or between different types of Class II correctors (MD:2.21 / 95% CI: -16.51; 20.93).</p> <p><strong>Limitations: </strong>With the exception of 2 RCTs, included studies were of unclear or low quality.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Orthodontic treatment has a clinically weak effect on facial attractiveness when compared to no treatment. The same is true when a combined orthodontic/surgical treatment is compared to orthodontics alone.</p> <p><strong>Registration:</strong> PROSPERO #: CRD42020169904</p> <p><strong>Conflict of Interest: </strong>None</p> <p><strong>Funding:</strong> None</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.