Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10 results for “graphical display”
Two graphical displays from SpectrumLab of WWV-10 carrier frequency on 18 Aug 2017
<p>NAME : Martin Potter, VE3OAT<br> GEOPOSIT : 45 15' 9.023" N 75 35' 27.60" W (Maidenhead FN25eg)<br> START TIME : 1400 UT<br> STATION CONFIG :<br> Multi-band vertical antenna with 18 radials.<br> Receiver Yaesu FTdx1200 in AM mode with audio bands limited to<br> 800-1200 Hz (18 dB/octave roll-off).<br> Trimble Thunderbolt 10 MHz output to HP 3325B sig generator set<br> to 9999 kHz and injected to station antenna.<br> Measured nominal 1 kHz beat note between WWV-10 and sig generator<br> using SpectrumLab software.<br> <br> Note : On 20 Aug, receiver AGC was ON. On 21 Aug, receiver AGC was<br> OFF and audio output level was set using RF Gain control. </p> <p> </p>
FIGURE 9 in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 9. Confidence in a relation is represented as a symbol imposed on the box indicating the name considered valid. A) illustrates a questionable synonymy for Cerianthus vermicularis (E. Forbes), and B) illustrates a questionable synonymy for Cerianthus lloydii Gosse, 1859. Both relations should be read: Gosse (1860) indicated the possible synonymy of Cerianthus vermicularis (Forbes in Johnston, 1847) with Cerianthus lloydii Gosse, 1859. In B, the name Cerianthus vermicularis (E. Forbes) Gosse, 1860, is imposed on white; this name is not part of the synonymy of C. lloydii, but is listed in Syngraph because the name C. lloydii has questionably been applied to C. vermicularis. Note that the line for Cerianthus vermicularis (E. Forbes) Gosse, 1860, contains two question marks that should not be confounded: that after the name vermicularis was introduced by the authority in the cited publication to signify the authority's uncertainty about the name, whereas that on the box of the lead line is the convention in Syngraph for such uncertainty (which is not as obvious in some citations as it is in this one).
FIGURE 8 in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 8. Pro parte is represented as a three-branch relation using a dashed red line to the right of the names. The middle name is the one the authority considered was erroneously applied to some specimens. It is linked above to the name considered by the authority to be the senior synonym, and below (indicated by a red box) to the name considered valid, followed, at the end of the line, by the name of the authority and the bibliographic citation to the source of the information. The relation shown here should be read: Carlgren (1928) found that some of the specimens described by Pax (1922) as Rhytidactis antarctica are, in fact, Halianthella kerguelensis (Stud).
FIGURE 5. A in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 5. A homonymy is represented as a two-branch relation using a dashed black line to the left of the names. The name the authority considered homonymous (on black) is linked to the name the authority considered valid; the original description of that species is indicated by a rectangle of same color outlined in black. The status of the homonymous name is indicated on the green line to its right. The relation shown here should be read: The status of Actinia aurora of Gosse, 1854, as a junior homonym of Actinia aurora of Quoy and Gaimard, 1833, was recognized by Dunn (1981), who used the name Heteractis aurora (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833) for the latter.
FIGURE 7. Misidentification and non relations. A in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 7. Misidentification and non relations. A misidentification is represented as a three-branch solid gray line to the right of the names. The name that was misapplied (imposed on light grey) is linked to the first mention of the name the authority considered valid and to the name used by the authority, which is indicated by a gray box, and which is followed, at the end of the line, by the name of the authority and the bibliographic citation to the source of the information. The relation shown here should be read: Carlgren (1938) found that Bolocera longicornis Carlgren, of Stephenson (1918) is Bolocera capensis Carlgren, 1928. The two-branch relation in red to the right of the names illustrates the use of non. The name the authority considered non (imposed on black) is linked to the name considered valid by the authority, indicated by a red box, and which is followed, at the end of the line, by the name of the authority and the bibliographic citation to the source of the information. The relation shown here should be read: Dunn (1983) considered Bolocera longicornis Carlgren, 1891, not to be a synonym of Bolocera kerguelensis Studer, 1879.
FIGURE 6. A in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 6. A determination is represented as a three-branch relation using a solid gray line to the left of the names. The name initially used for the specimen(s) is linked to the first mention of the name and the name the authority considered valid, indicated by a gray box, which is followed, at the end of the line, by the name of the authority and the bibliographic citation to the source of the information. The relation shown here should be read: Dunn (1981) determined that Condylactis sp. of Saville-Kent (1897) is Heteractis aurora (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833).
FIGURE 4. A in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 4. A synonymy is represented as a three-branch relation using a solid black line to the left of the names. The two names the authority considered related are linked to the name the authority considered valid, indicated by a black box, which is followed, at the end of the line, by the name of the authority and the bibliographic citation to the source of the information. The relation shown here should be read: Carlgren (1928) considered Dimyactis duplicata Pax, 1922, to be a junior synonym of Edwardsia kerguelensis Studer, 1879, under the new combination Halianthella kerguelensis (Stud.).
FIGURE 2 in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 2. The Syngraph display is composed of five blocks: A synonym relations; B list of names; C problems; D adjectives; E authorship and reference information. Each name in B is rendered precisely as given in the reference at the right end of the line in E; the verbatim author (the left-hand portion of E) is stored as part of the reference.
FIGURE 10 in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 10. Geographical distribution of the sea anemone Heteractis aurora, its documented occurrences coded by the color used for the synonym unit applied to it in the Syngraph synonym list for the species (this image was captured when there were 73 records for the species; currently there are 84: http://hercules.kgs.ku.edu/Hexacoral/anemone2/ distribution.cfm?xmlsource=http%3A%2F%2Fhercules.kgs.ku.edu%2Fhexacoral%2Fdev%2Fxml%2Fhexmlscript.cfm %3Fseniorid%3D15%26type%3D&callingpage=species&speciessearched=Heteractis%20aurora).
FIGURE 3 in Syngraph: An application for graphic display and interactive use of synonym lists
FIGURE 3. Three entries of a synonym unit. The rectangle on which the first use of a name is imposed (the original description) is outlined in black. The genus name is annotated as having been misspelled – it was correctly rendered in the second citation. This example also illustrates an adjective, which is rendered as a two-branch relation using a solid green line to the right of the names. The name to which the adjective applies is linked to the name considered valid by the authority, indicated by a green box. Thus, the name listed third is a new combination, and the relation should be read: Carlgren (1949) placed the species described by Carlgren (1900) as Actinoides africana in the genus Anthopleura.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.